Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Bättre på många sätt, men inte på alla (Sammanfattning)

Ultrastark! Galaxy S21 Ultra är kung av Samsungs nya toppskikts-serie. Den har den största, mest högupplösta och mest ljusstarka skärmen, det största batteriet och den mest mångsidiga kameran. Men i Europa får vi återigen en modell med Samsungs egna Exynos SoC, om än en förbättrad sådan. Låt oss ta reda på hur väl den här kombinationen står sig!
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Galaxy S Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G 8 x 2.2 - 2.9 GHz, Exynos X1 / Cortex-A78 / A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G78 MP14
Minne
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.80 tum 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixlar 516 PPI, Kapacitiv, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, HDR10, HDR10+, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 101.67 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Magnetometer, Barometer, Närhetssensor, Rotationssensor, Orienteringssensor, OTG
Nätverk
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.9 x 165.1 x 75.6
Batteri
19.4 Wh, 5000 mAh Litiumjon, 3.88 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung HM3, 24 mm, 83°, 0.8 µm, f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MPix (ultra-vidvinkel, 120°, 1.4 µm, f/2.2, DPAF) + 10 MPix (3x opt. Zoom, 72 mm, 1.22 µm, f/2.4, OIS, DPAF) + 10 MPix (10x opt. zoom, 240 mm, 1.22 µm, f/4.9, OIS, DPAF) + Laser AF sensor; 8k-Video
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (1/2.8", f/2.2, AF)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dual, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, USB-kabel, Snabbstartsguide, One UI 3.1, 24 Månader Garanti, IP68-certifiering, DRM Widevine L1, SAR Kropp: 1.580 W/kg, SAR Huvud: 0.714 W/kg; Camera2 API-Level: Full; GNSS: GPS (Dual-Band), Glonass (Single-Band), BeiDou (Single-Band), Galileo (Dual-Band), fanless, waterproof
Vikt
227 g
Pris
1249 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
89 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.90"3200x1440
89 %
10/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
228 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
90 %
11/2020
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24
212 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.76"2772x1344
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87 %
09/2020
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
235 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

166.9 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 219 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g165 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 235 g162.96 mm 75.5 mm 9.1 mm 212 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.4 mm 228 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Mali-G78 MP24, Kirin 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1348 (1217min - 1413max) MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s ∼13% -82%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼66% -4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
856 (776min - 899max) MBit/s ∼64% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (763min - 855max) MBit/s ∼61% -11%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
575 (364min - 613max) MBit/s ∼43% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=657)
295 MBit/s ∼22% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Mali-G78 MP24, Kirin 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1395 (689min - 1434max) MBit/s ∼100% +74%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
848 (822min - 881max) MBit/s ∼61% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (425min - 890max) MBit/s ∼59% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼58% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s ∼45% -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
693 (354min - 711max) MBit/s ∼50% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=657)
281 MBit/s ∼20% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3 - VHT80: Ø921 (904-928)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3 - VHT160: Ø168 (156-180)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3 - VHT80: Ø789 (437-889)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3 - VHT160: Ø633 (523-703)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Vägskäl
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

wide anglewide angleZoom (5-x)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

ultra wide angleLow-Light (without night mode)Low-Light (with night mode)
Single Take 2.0
Single Take 2.0
Single Take 2.0
Kamerainställningar
Videoalternativ
Zoom med sökaren aktiverad
Kameralägen
Proffsfotoläget
Proffsvideoläget
Proffsvideoläget - Mikrofoninställningar
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: 47.06 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: 5.7 ∆E min: 2.32 - max: 12.23 ∆E
OLED-flimmer vid lägsta ljusstyrka (119 - 122 Hz)
OLED-flimmer vid lägsta ljusstyrka (119 - 122 Hz)
OLED-flimmer vid maximal manuell ljusstyrka (227 -250 Hz)
OLED-flimmer vid maximal manuell ljusstyrka (227 -250 Hz)
OLED-flimmer vid maximal ljusstyrka (240.4 Hz)
OLED-flimmer vid maximal ljusstyrka (240.4 Hz)
908
cd/m²
916
cd/m²
922
cd/m²
908
cd/m²
910
cd/m²
915
cd/m²
909
cd/m²
911
cd/m²
921
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 922 cd/m² Medel: 913.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 910 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.90
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
OLED, 2772x1344, 6.76
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-40%
15%
-5%
17%
3%
Brightness middle
910
734
-19%
855
-6%
778
-15%
753
-17%
684
-25%
Brightness
913
748
-18%
857
-6%
782
-14%
762
-17%
690
-24%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
98
0%
95
-3%
96
-2%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
3.2
-60%
1.1
45%
1.4
30%
0.9
55%
1.3
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.1
6.8
-119%
2.51
19%
3.5
-13%
1.6
48%
2.5
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
2.7
-23%
1.4
36%
2.5
-14%
1.5
32%
1.9
14%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.11 104%
2.187 101%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
CCT
6512 100%
6299 103%
6337 103%
6530 100%
6415 101%
6475 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼74% -21%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3476 Points ∼91% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼88% -7%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
3300 Points ∼87% -8%
Qualcomm SD 888 Test Device
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3810 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (3228 - 3583, n=3)
3392 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=182)
1939 Points ∼51% -46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼71% -15%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1326 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼68% -18%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
1006 Points ∼76% -9%
Qualcomm SD 888 Test Device
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1139 Points ∼86% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (1003 - 1106, n=3)
1070 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=182)
560 Points ∼42% -49%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14476 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
14476 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14895, n=434)
5074 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4970 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
4970 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 5099, n=434)
1551 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
13999 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (12255 - 14362, n=3)
13368 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=580)
6148 Points ∼43% -57%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
16741 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼72% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼66% -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
19824 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (15718 - 16777, n=3)
16412 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=728)
6781 Points ∼34% -59%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4281 Points ∼62% -27%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6923 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (5873 - 6010, n=3)
5950 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=42)
3320 Points ∼48% -43%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4305 Points ∼64% -25%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6779 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (5668 - 5815, n=3)
5746 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=42)
3036 Points ∼45% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
2807 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼83% +14%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
2642 Points ∼68% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +36%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
3875 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
2807 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=224)
2632 Points ∼68% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9900 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼77% -13%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11259 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼73% -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9047 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
9900 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=224)
3010 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6340 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼90% -1%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6528 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼94% +4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
6977 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
6340 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=224)
2650 Points ∼38% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼79% -4%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3115 Points ∼56% -33%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5602 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼94% +13%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
5406 Points ∼97% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (4137 - 4668, n=3)
4485 Points ∼80% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=587)
2308 Points ∼41% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼75% -15%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
11824 Points ∼97% +10%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
12146 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼77% -13%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9953 Points ∼82% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (7680 - 10913, n=3)
9796 Points ∼81% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=587)
2344 Points ∼19% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼77% -11%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
7294 Points ∼76% -13%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
9643 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼83% -4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
8386 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (6717 - 8345, n=3)
7688 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=588)
2154 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4162 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼81% +3%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5262 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼93% +18%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
5035 Points ∼96% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
4162 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=663)
2166 Points ∼41% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9978 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼71% -17%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11573 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼72% -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9032 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
9978 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=663)
1909 Points ∼16% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
7614 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼75% -10%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
9138 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼78% -6%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
7678 Points ∼84% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
7614 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=664)
1810 Points ∼20% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼64% +30%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
313.8 fps ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼65% +32%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
222 fps ∼71% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (137 - 242, n=3)
178 fps ∼57% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=842)
49.5 fps ∼16% -68%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼50% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼76% -13%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -42%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (104 - 119, n=3)
111 fps ∼93% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=851)
32.9 fps ∼28% -68%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼59% -15%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
170.4 fps ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼72% +4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
132 fps ∼77% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (117 - 161, n=3)
140 fps ∼82% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=747)
29.6 fps ∼17% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼58% -14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59.8 fps ∼59% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼86% +28%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼59% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (69 - 119, n=3)
102 fps ∼100% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 119, n=755)
24.2 fps ∼24% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼68% -3%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
106 fps ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼81% +16%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
93 fps ∼88% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (74 - 107, n=3)
88 fps ∼83% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=610)
23.6 fps ∼22% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼67% +14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59 fps ∼68% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼89% +51%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼69% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (51 - 106, n=3)
86.7 fps ∼100% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=612)
21 fps ∼24% -59%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼83% +27%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼75% +15%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
35 fps ∼88% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (26 - 45, n=3)
38.3 fps ∼96% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=379)
12 fps ∼30% -54%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼73% -21%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼67% -29%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼73% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (25 - 28, n=3)
26.7 fps ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=377)
8.36 fps ∼28% -70%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼94% +38%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.5 fps ∼99% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼87% +27%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
54 fps ∼100% +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (37 - 64, n=3)
49 fps ∼91% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 64, n=383)
17.9 fps ∼33% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼64% -19%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
85 fps ∼98% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼62% -22%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
58 fps ∼67% -16%
Qualcomm SD 888 Test Device
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
87 fps ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (49 - 69, n=3)
60.7 fps ∼70% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=383)
20.5 fps ∼24% -70%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼67% -14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼67% -14%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼73% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (42 - 62, n=3)
54 fps ∼72% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=535)
15.7 fps ∼21% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼85% +47%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
42.9 fps ∼83% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼87% +50%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps ∼100% +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (30 - 58, n=3)
48 fps ∼92% +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=539)
13.8 fps ∼27% -54%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
633158 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼67% -21%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
510245 Points ∼69% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼80% -6%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
622888 Points ∼84% -2%
Qualcomm SD 888 Test Device
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
740847 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (600164 - 633158, n=3)
617042 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 700592, n=159)
330483 Points ∼45% -48%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5003 Score ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
5003 Score ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=102)
2592 Score ∼36% -48%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
52.07 (22.24min - 74.36max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42.64 (18.1min - 74.99max) fps ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
52.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 61.5, n=30)
27.1 fps ∼52% -48%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
84.44 (17.95min - 272.19max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
71.55 (21.96min - 153.62max) fps ∼85% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
84.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.71 - 84.4, n=32)
31.7 fps ∼38% -62%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
448.69 (185.08min - 2895.32max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
364.91 (102.63min - 1528.33max) fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
449 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22.7 - 452, n=28)
190 fps ∼42% -58%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
59.77 (16.66min - 145.51max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49.21 (16.35min - 130.08max) fps ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 67.2, n=31)
28.7 fps ∼48% -52%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
98.75 (21.37min - 228.87max) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
85.44 (20.45min - 139.09max) fps ∼86% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
98.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 98.8, n=34)
32.1 fps ∼32% -67%
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
297.33 (37.15min - 1346.87max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (27.2 - 537, n=15)
179 fps ∼60%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼78% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼93% +3%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
1621 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (1448 - 1486, n=3)
1468 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=772)
847 Points ∼52% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼74% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼80% -19%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
11782 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (14362 - 14636, n=3)
14545 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=772)
2674 Points ∼18% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼56% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼99% +21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
8056 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (5924 - 6588, n=3)
6253 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=772)
2009 Points ∼25% -70%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9901 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (10492 - 10936, n=3)
10653 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=772)
3631 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
6247 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
  (6030 - 6247, n=3)
6140 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=772)
1870 Points ∼30% -70%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5725 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4796 Points ∼15% -16%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
15682 Points ∼49% +174%
Qualcomm SD 888 Test Device
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
32288 Points ∼100% +464%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
5725 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2670 - 16688, n=10)
6684 Points ∼21% +17%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
158.281 Points ∼100% +107%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
79.612 Points ∼50% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.623 Points ∼48%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
69.825 Points ∼44% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (65.1 - 76.6, n=3)
69.3 Points ∼44% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼41% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼33% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=234)
43.3 Points ∼27% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
375.22 Points ∼100% +195%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
129.59 Points ∼35% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.31 Points ∼34%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
121.69 Points ∼32% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼31% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (98.8 - 127, n=3)
115 Points ∼31% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼24% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=666)
50.8 Points ∼14% -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
188 runs/min ∼100% +124%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
84.6 runs/min ∼45% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min ∼45%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (74.1 - 85.8, n=3)
81.3 runs/min ∼43% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼36% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼34% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212)
45.5 runs/min ∼24% -46%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
41.2 runs/min ∼22% -51%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
191 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
147 Points ∼77% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points ∼69%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
123 Points ∼64% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (102 - 132, n=3)
116 Points ∼61% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼53% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼45% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=304)
71.4 Points ∼37% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
58632 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (25656 - 28247, n=3)
27059 Points ∼46% -1%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
26597 Points ∼45% -2%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
25953 Points ∼44% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼39% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼33% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=837)
8521 Points ∼15% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=863)
9434 ms * ∼100% -428%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼25% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% -13%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
1853.7 ms * ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1785.6 ms * ∼19%
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (1744 - 1810, n=3)
1780 ms * ∼19% -0%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
1671.2 ms * ∼18% +6%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
467 ms * ∼5% +74%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraHuawei Mate 40 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProAsus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KSAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
11%
-13%
-10%
-18%
-83%
Random Write 4KB
279.54
221.37
-21%
277.65
-1%
258.54
-8%
284.92
2%
235 (121 - 289, n=11)
-16%
41.8 (0.14 - 319, n=947)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
316.7
202.43
-36%
324.97
3%
264.9
-16%
272.69
-14%
243 (133 - 317, n=11)
-23%
64.5 (1.59 - 325, n=947)
-80%
Sequential Write 256KB
1077.13
697.08
-35%
1321.01
23%
750.44
-30%
765.9
-29%
810 (674 - 1095, n=11)
-25%
144 (2.99 - 1321, n=947)
-87%
Sequential Read 256KB
1710.18
1632.02
-5%
2037.44
19%
1738.65
2%
1712.75
0%
1599 (1348 - 1710, n=11)
-7%
371 (12.1 - 2037, n=947)
-78%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Genshin Impact; highest 60 fps; 1.2.0_1565149_1627898: Ø57.9 (42-61)
; Genshin Impact; medium 60 fps; 1.2.0_1565149_1627898: Ø59.6 (54-61)
; Genshin Impact; lowest 60 fps; 1.2.0_1565149_1627898: Ø59.6 (52-61)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max; 2.0.0.3727: Ø60 (56-61)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition; 2.0.0.3727: Ø60 (59-61)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; lowest; 2.0.0.3727: Ø60 (59-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.2.0: Ø59.7 (56-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.2.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.2.0: Ø40 (38-41)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.4 (3633min - 5645max) % ∼100%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Mali-G78 MP24, Kirin 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.3 % ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
40.4 (1752min - 4338max) % ∼63% -37%
Hög belastning
 35.8 °C34.4 °C32.9 °C 
 37.9 °C36.5 °C33 °C 
 35.9 °C37.1 °C33.8 °C 
Max: 37.9 °C
Medel: 35.3 °C
31.8 °C32.7 °C33.1 °C
31.6 °C32.4 °C35 °C
29.8 °C34.9 °C36.6 °C
Max: 36.6 °C
Medel: 33.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.825.82522.6263119.223.74021.424.15032.8366318.624.28018.123.710015.427.712510.739.41601756.120014.954.325013.25831512.562.340011.565.750010.566.86309.968.380011.971.1100010.676.2125013.676.816001471.2200012.972.5250011.773.5315012.978.9400013.180.1500013.377.1630013.873.280001479.51000013.574.41250014.272.5160001763.4SPL2588N0.675median 13.2median 71.2Delta1.27.430.43423.328.42629.422.623.834.538.119.926.114.729.514.437.214.944.817.858.618.953.511.756.913.960.61364.110.367.510.466.712.469.511.170.711.27212.775.812.37912.678.212.771.312.776.412.776.413.5791476.513.571.514.969.61661.624.887.50.671.2median 12.7median 69.618.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S21 UltraHuawei Mate 40 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei Mate 40 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.06 / 1.19 / 1.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.46 / 10.76 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
9%
-15%
19%
-16%
-4%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.06
0.76
28%
0.8
25%
1.01
5%
0.61
42%
0.63
41%
0.967 (0.74 - 1.1, n=3)
9%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=936)
16%
Idle Average *
1.19
1.91
-61%
1.5
-26%
2.12
-78%
1.19
-0%
2.06
-73%
1.357 (1.19 - 1.61, n=3)
-14%
1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=935)
-48%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.96
-63%
1.9
-58%
2.15
-79%
1.23
-3%
2.08
-73%
1.437 (1.2 - 1.78, n=3)
-20%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=936)
-70%
Load Average *
6.46
4.72
27%
3.4
47%
3.94
39%
4.18
35%
5.55
14%
6.42 (6.32 - 6.47, n=3)
1%
4.14 (0.8 - 10.8, n=930)
36%
Load Maximum *
10.76
10.15
6%
4.7
56%
6.53
39%
8.53
21%
9.71
10%
10.2 (9.61 - 10.8, n=3)
5%
6.15 (1.2 - 14.2, n=930)
43%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
23tim 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 88)
11tim 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 04min
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
41%
-15%
3%
-20%
Reader / Idle
1408
1858
32%
2611
85%
1255
-11%
2133
51%
1211
-14%
H.264
1310
1131
-14%
1356
4%
999
-24%
973
-26%
997
-24%
WiFi v1.3
702
720
3%
961
37%
609
-13%
865
23%
677
-4%
Load
304
221
-27%
423
39%
270
-11%
198
-35%
184
-39%

För

+ Extremt ljusstark OLED-skärm
+ 120 Hz och WQHD+
+ Hög systemprestanda
+ Bra kamerauppsättning
+ Wi-Fi 6E, dual SIM med 5G och eSIM
+ Bra samtalskvalitet
+ Stöd för S Pen

Emot

- Lagringen går inte att utöka
- VHT160 WiFi är inte särskilt snabbt eller stabilt
- Spel är FPS-begränsade
- Saknar Bluetooth-ljudkodeks
- 5G utan mmWave

Omdöme – Kraftfullt flaggskepp

Recension av Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra är en välgjord utveckling av föregångaren med en trevlig uppfräschad design. Den nya OLED-skärmen har stöd för hög upplösning samtidigt som den har snabb bilduppdatering i 120 Hz som automatiskt anpassar sig efter innehållet. Den har också den mest ljusstarka skärmen vi någonsin sett i en smartphone.

Då vi saknar Snapdragon 888-utrustade Galaxy S21 Ultra-enheter kan vi just nu inte göra några slutgiltiga jämförelser mellan den europeiska Exynos 2100-utrustade varianten och den amerikanska Snapdragon-utrustade motsvarigheten. Men vi ser redan nu att Samsung har kommit ifatt betydligt i fråga om CPU-prestanda samtidigt som man hamnar efter i fråga om ihållande belastning och grafikprestanda. Med andra ord: en Exynos SoC kanske inte är det bästa valet, men det är heller inte ett dåligt val.

Den uppgraderade zoom-funktionen är definitivt en stor förbättring och bidrog till att säkra ett totalt sett positivt intryck för kamerauppsättningen. Men S21 Ultra misslyckas med att slå sina konkurrenter trots den nya HM3-sensorn på grund av problem med varierande bildkvalitet. Detta rör särskilt att bilderna saknar detalj och blir för skarpa. Trots detta har Samsung lyckats skapa en av de bästa och onekligen en av de mest mångsidiga smartphone-kamerorna som finns.

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra är inte utan brister, men den är utan tvekan en av de bästa telefonerna som finns just nu.

Men frågan alla undrar över kvarstår: vad är haken? En sak är att den nya S21-serien inte längre har stöd för att utöka lagringen med ett microSD-kort. Modellerna med mindre lagring kan bli ett problem för den som gillar att spela in mycket film och det löser heller inte problemet med att backup-lösningen saknas.

Skärmen är heller inte utan brister, men dessa är i ärlighetens namn närmast pretentiösa. Färgprecisionen är skaplig men inte perfekt. Andra som Xiaomi och Apple är bättre på den punkten. Dessutom skulle det verkligen behövas en uppdatering av de ljudkodekar som stöds.

Totalt sett är Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra en av de bästa telefonerna som finns just nu.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - 01/28/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
92%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
98%
Anslutningar
69 / 70 → 99%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
63 / 64 → 98%
Programprestanda
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
81%
Medel
84%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Bättre på många sätt, men inte på alla (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-02- 1 (Update: 2021-02- 1)