Test: OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Skarpsinnig lyx. OnePlus 7 Pro är OnePlus senaste flaggskepp. Enheten har en gigantisk skärm utan något jack, en tredubbel bakåtriktad kamera och mycket annat. Läs vidare för att få reda på huruvida denna så kallade flaggskeppsbesegrare kan leva upp till förväntningarna.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/26/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 7 Pro (7 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Minne

12 GB

Skärm

6.67 tum 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixlar 515 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, 90 Hz, glansig: ja, HDR

Hårddisk

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 239 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutgång genom USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, kompass, gyroskop, lasersensor, närhetssensor, sensor-hubb

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: Band: 2, 3, 5, 8. UMTS: Band: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 19. LTE: Band: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9

Batteri

4000 mAh Litiumpolymer, Warp Charge med 30 W snabbladdning

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX586, 1.6 μm, f/1.6, OIS (Kamera 1), 8 MP teleobjektiv, 1 μm, OIS, f/2.4 (Kamera 2), 16 MP ultravidvinkel, f/2.2 (Kamera 3), tredubbelt autofokus: PDAF, laser, kontrast; Video i 4K/60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sony IMX471, 1 μm, f/2.0, fixfokus, EIS, infällbar

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo med Dolby Atmos, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Silikonfodral, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE-hastighet: Cat. 18 nerladdning (1.2 Gbps), Cat. 13 uppladdning (150 Mbps), fanless

Vikt

206 g, Strömförsörjning: 126 g

Pris

829 Kr

Länkar

OnePlus hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

OnePlus 7 Pro Huawei P30 Pro OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Apple iPhone Xs Max Xiaomi Mi 9 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (542^min - 717^max) MBit/s +42%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	541 (129^min - 633^max) MBit/s +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	489 (439^min - 508^max) MBit/s +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1014 (944^min - 1115^max) MBit/s +117%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (624^min - 683^max) MBit/s +42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +45%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (619^min - 639^max) MBit/s +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s +34%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -19%

OnePlus 7 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø467 (375-519)

OnePlus 7 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø471 (438-506)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


584 cd/m²	583 cd/m²	589 cd/m²
581 cd/m²	586 cd/m²	597 cd/m²
578 cd/m²	579 cd/m²	580 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 597 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 584.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 586 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243

	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.40	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen		-66%	-3%	11%	-189%	-16%
Brightness middle	586	710 21%	656 12%	593 1%	435 -26%	597 2%
Brightness	584	721 23%	659 13%	587 1%	442 -24%	608 4%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	88 -9%	94 -3%	95 -2%	89 -8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.39	3.7 -166%	1.7 -22%	0.9 35%	6.79 -388%	2.2 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	10.3 -281%	2.8 -4%	2 26%	14.93 -453%	3.6 -33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.5 6%	1.7 -6%	1.5 6%	5.4 -238%	1.6 -0%
Gamma	2.243 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	1.998 ^110%	2.27 ^97%	2.252 ^98%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6672 ^97%	6611 ^98%	6487 ^100%	6548 ^99%	7588 ^86%	6268 ^104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

122 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	2420 Points -30%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8906 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +30%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	13260 Points +78%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +46%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points -7%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	10984 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +28%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points -9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8689 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	64437 Points 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	84459 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	35217 Points +31%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points -40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points -4%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6374 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points -46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8248 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points -12%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3551 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points -49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6368 Points -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8415 Points -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points -13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3439 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4721 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=20)	5489 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)	2738 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5246 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5429 - 6362, n=20)	6201 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)	2733 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3496 Points -14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=20)	3954 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)	3156 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5200 Points -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=20)	5819 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)	6705 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5869 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=20)	6793 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)	9675 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points -15%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3717 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=20)	3942 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)	4216 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4348 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=20)	4719 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)	2654 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5530 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=20)	5618 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)	2829 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2488 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3452, n=20)	3045 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)	2672 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	60 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps -42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	151 fps -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153.1 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +49%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	59 fps +7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +31%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	79 fps -22%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +39%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	50 fps +39%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +69%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	56 fps -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +39%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +81%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	31 fps +48%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps +51%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +107%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	34 fps -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +43%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +104%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	34 fps +48%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=20)	32.5 fps +41%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)	43.9 fps +91%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	37 fps -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=21)	39.9 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)	64 fps +52%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +60%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	21 fps +40%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=20)	20.9 fps +39%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)	32.7 fps +118%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	14 fps -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=21)	16.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)	25.5 fps +59%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36.29 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps -2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	30.67 (5.93^min - 132.19^max) fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)	32.2 fps -11%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	22.73 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +42%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28.46 (9.24^min - 54.37^max) fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)	27.5 fps +21%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	37.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27.02 (2.8^min - 80.83^max) fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)	35.9 fps -4%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	293768 Points -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points -4%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5020 Score +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3)	4806 Score -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +20%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4330 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +16%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8138 Points -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +6%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -23%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3907 Points -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +20%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	7926 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +51%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	1395 Points +2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +10%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1425 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1627 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4)	1334 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)	2240 Points +57%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +70%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.5 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)	58.8 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)	44.13 Points -29%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +74%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)	62 runs/min +1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	56 runs/min -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +20%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105.2 Points -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +35%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21)	23749 Points -4%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points -16%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)	16902 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)	2348 ms * -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * -9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009 ms * -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 7 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Xiaomi Mi 9	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition	Huawei P30 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-28%	125%	-28%	116%	184%	308%
Sequential Read 256KB	1468	811 -45%	666 -55%	733 -50%	849 -42%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) 5%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB	387	249.1 -36%	388.3 0%	253.3 -35%	250.8 -35%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) 49%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 189%
Random Read 4KB	174.1	135.2 -22%	149.4 -14%	145.1 -17%	174.4 0%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) 21%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 42%
Random Write 4KB	24.8	22.7 -8%	165.3 567%	22.3 -10%	159.2 542%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) 660%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 997%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			82.6 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	70.6 ?(34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			68.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	59.8 ?(30.7 - 71.7, n=5)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (58-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (59-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (52-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (57-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.6 (27-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


47 °C	45.2 °C	40.6 °C
46 °C	44.7 °C	41.4 °C
45.2 °C	43.8 °C	40 °C

Max: 47 °C
Medel: 43.8 °C


35.4 °C	38.9 °C	42.9 °C
36.6 °C	39.5 °C	42.1 °C
37.4 °C	40 °C	40.9 °C

Max: 42.9 °C
Medel: 39.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 43 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning	5.5 / 8.2 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	17%	26%	20%	7%	11%	12%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.73 19%	1 -11%	0.67 26%	0.6 33%	0.68 24%	0.939 ?(0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -4%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.53 15%	1.4 22%	1.26 30%	1.3 28%	2.6 -44%	1.506 ?(0.85 - 2.8, n=19) 16%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	2.07 29%	1.7 41%	1.29 56%	2.1 28%	2.77 4%	1.799 ?(1 - 2.9, n=19) 38%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	5.5	6.03 -10%	4.6 16%	3.71 33%	4.5 18%	3.74 32%	4.61 ?(3.64 - 5.8, n=19) 16%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -1%
Load Maximum *	8.2	9.18 -12%	6.7 18%	9.3 -13%	8.6 -5%	6.82 17%	9.04 ?(7.49 - 11.9, n=19) -10%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -1%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		29tim 05min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13tim 22min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 56min

	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	-9%	-7%	18%	29%
Reader / Idle	1745	1560 -11%	1305 -25%	1650 -5%		1966 13%
H.264	802	921 15%	801 0%	1008 26%		1193 49%
WiFi v1.3	768	483 -37%	742 -3%	546 -29%	905 18%	838 9%
Load	236	187 -21%	223 -6%	194 -18%		344 46%

För

+ jackfri skärm

+ lyxig design

+ riklig LTE-täckning

+ 3x optisk zoom

+ snabb intern lagring

+ bra batteritid

+ ultrasnabb laddning

Emot

- böjd skärm som är lätt att råka komma åt

- ingen hörlursanslutning

- tung

- ingen IP-certifiering

- ingen trådlös laddning

- jämförelsevis långsamt WiFi

Recension av OnePlus 7 Pro. Recensionsex från OnePlus Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

OnePlus 7 Pro är ett imponerande första försök av OnePlus att skapa en sann flaggskeppstelefon. Den har snabb lagring, skaplig batteritid, löjligt snabb laddning, lyxig design, en förbättrad fingeravtrycksläsare och en jackfri skärm. Åh, den har en 90 Hz-skärm med. Då har vi dessutom glömt den motordrivna framfällbara kameran som definitivt kommer få folk att reagera. Vi imponerades också av stereohögtalarna, som hade ett fylligt och varmt ljud.

7 Pro må vara den dyraste OnePlus-enheten hittills, men den undergräver flaggskeppskonkurrenterna oavsett vilken version du köper. På en del områden presterar den till och med bättre än andra flaggskepp med korta laddningstider, stor skärm i förhållande till kropp och en skärm med 90 Hz bilduppdatering.

Vi har dock en del kritik. Den böjda skärmen känns som stil framför substans samtidigt som det är en kraftig och jämförelsevis lång telefon. Vidare blir 7 Pro så varm att det kan bli svårt att hålla telefonen i handen under längre spelsessioner. Vi hade också önskat att OnePlus IP-certifierade sina enheter och la till trådlös laddning, för detta saknar 7 Pro för jämfört med andra flaggskepp. Andra enheter erbjuder dessutom snabbare WiFi och OnePlus motivering till att telefonen saknar en hörlursanslutning känns tveksam som bäst.

OnePlus 7 Pro är ett imponerande flaggskepp med ett flertal funktioner som får den att stå ut från sina gelikar.

Ett värmerör hindrar telefonens SoC från att strypas, men den låter inte dess Snapdragon 855 prestera bättre än den gör i Xiaomi Mi 9. Den tredubbla bakåtriktade kameran tar dessutom utmärkta foton, även om det inte finns mycket gott att säga om kamera-appens nattläge. Det automatiska läget tar dock fortfarande bra bilder vid låg ljusnivå, så det är inte bara dåliga nyheter.

Sammanfattningsvis lider 7 Pro av en del svagheter, men inga som borde avråda från köp. Tidigare OnePlus-telefoner har haft samma pris även flera månader efter släpp, till skillnad från modeller från Huawei och Samsung som blir billigare efterhand. På grund av det kan det sluta med att 7 Pro är mindre prisvärd i slutet av året än den är nu jämfört med Galaxy S10+ eller P30 Pro. Det är en sak att ha i åtanke, men det bör inte avråda dig från att köpa 7 Pro eftersom det är en utmärkt smartphone.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9942 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2019-05-26 (Update: 2019-05-26)

Test: OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare