Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: LG G8S ThinQ - Innovativ eller utdaterad? (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 539 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
146.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274
| LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.20 | Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.10 | Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50 | LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.10 | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.80 | Huawei P30 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 29% | 35% | -16% | 29% | 13% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 539 | 672 25% | 541 0% | 974 81% | 586 9% | 426 -21% | 561 4% |
| Brightness | 556 | 641 15% | 543 -2% | 975 75% | 584 5% | 427 -23% | 560 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 99 13% | 96 9% | 97 10% | 96 9% | 95 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.49 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.78 | 1.3 66% | 0.8 79% | 5.4 -43% | 1.39 63% | 2.14 43% | 1.5 60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.95 | 2.7 61% | 1.7 76% | 13.1 -88% | 2.7 61% | 3.29 53% | 2.5 64% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.2 -0% | 1.2 45% | 5 -127% | 1.6 27% | 1.8 18% | 1.8 18% |
| Gamma | 2.274 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.243 98% | 2.111 104% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6013 108% | 6868 95% | 6601 98% | 7480 87% | 6672 97% | 6329 103% | 6512 100% |
| Contrast | 1920 | 1988 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
| Huawei P30 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
| Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| LG G8s ThinQ | Sony Xperia 1 | LG G7 ThinQ | OnePlus 7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10e | Huawei P30 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | 1% | 52% | 4% | 109% | 76% | 376% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 791 | 750 -5% | 695 -12% | 1468 86% | 792 0% | 909 15% | 760 ? -4% | 1508 ? 91% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 182.4 | 206.9 13% | 176.4 -3% | 387 112% | 194.1 6% | 186 2% | 297 ? 63% | 1118 ? 513% |
| Random Read 4KB | 138 | 147.3 7% | 110.5 -20% | 174.1 26% | 136.9 -1% | 138.8 1% | 152.9 ? 11% | 247 ? 79% |
| Random Write 4KB | 29.6 | 24.16 -18% | 23.26 -21% | 24.8 -16% | 24.1 -19% | 195.3 560% | 131.6 ? 345% | 272 ? 819% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 67.5 ? | 31.34 ? -54% | 84.7 ? 25% | 73.2 ? 8% | 82.8 ? 23% | 76 ? 13% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 46.7 ? | 27.84 ? -40% | 62.7 ? 34% | 60.7 ? 30% | 71.3 ? 53% | 59.6 ? 28% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
LG G8s ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.2 / 1.6 / 2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5 / 10 Watt |
    
| |
| LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 17% | 0% | -5% | 19% | 4% | 11% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 0.61 49% | 1 17% | 1.16 3% | 0.9 25% | 0.6 50% | 0.69 42% | 0.939 ? 22% | 0.897 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.67 -67% | 1.48 7% | 1.98 -24% | 1.8 -13% | 1.2 25% | 2.41 -51% | 1.506 ? 6% | 1.452 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 2.69 -35% | 1.56 22% | 2.07 -4% | 2.9 -45% | 1.5 25% | 2.51 -26% | 1.799 ? 10% | 1.629 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 5 | 4.34 13% | 3.76 25% | 4.51 10% | 5.5 -10% | 5.2 -4% | 3.86 23% | 4.61 ? 8% | 5.55 ? -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 10 | 5.66 43% | 8.48 15% | 8.3 17% | 8.2 18% | 10.2 -2% | 6.96 30% | 9.04 ? 10% | 8.31 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 44% | -14% | 8% | 9% | -21% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1689 | 2969 76% | 1067 -37% | 1662 -2% | 1745 3% | 1185 -30% | 1914 13% |
| H.264 | 753 | 1011 34% | 712 -5% | 908 21% | 802 7% | 795 6% | 1050 39% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 693 | 910 31% | 441 -36% | 591 -15% | 768 11% | 416 -40% | 715 3% |
| Load | 203 | 270 33% | 246 21% | 260 28% | 236 16% | 164 -19% | 208 2% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
LG G8 ThinQ är en fascinerande smartphone. Dess luftrörelse-gester ger en blick in i framtiden och skulle kunna innebära innovativa sätt att styra enheten när mjukvaran har mognat mer. På samma sätt kan luftgesterna göra det enklare att ta foton. Men för tillfället är det mer av en trevlig gimmick som du kan visa vänner och familj. Men med det sagt, en magiker måste studera sina magitrick väl, för luftgesterna är ofta svåra att få till rätt.
Det är dock inte det enda tricket LG G8S ThinQ kan. Den har utmärkt och exakt navigering och använder dessutom sin Snapdragon 855 SoC väl. Vi uppskattade att enheten höll sig sval vid ihållande belastning, även om energiförbrukningen var högre än vi hade önskat. Vidare har G8S ThinQ skapliga kameror, en imponerande skärm och rejäl batteritid. Stereohögtalarna levererade bra ljud och den har både snabbt WiFi och en snabb fingeravtrycksläsare. Hörlursanslutning och utökningsbar lagring är dessutom ganska sällsynt på ett flaggskepp från 2019.
Nackdelarna? Tja, den bakåtriktade kameran var en besvikelse i situationer med låg ljusnivå, telefonens SoC stryps vid ihållande belastning och vi har redan nämnt att den har hög energiförbrukning vid belastning. Men det är de enda större problemen vi har med G8S ThinQ. Det går att köpa telefoner med snabbare WiFi och snabbare lagring, men skillnaderna är i praktiken minimala.
De innovativa ToF-funktionerna är för tillfälllet ganska mycket av en gimmick, men LG G8S ThinQ lyckas med grunderna och är en utmärkt flaggskeppstelefon.
Det stora jacket kan också tänkas skrämma bort en del köpare, men det är en epidemi som drabbat många moderna flaggskepp. Sammanfattningsvis är LG G8S ThinQ ett skapligt alternativ till den etablerade ordningen, särskilt eftersom priset redan börjat sjunka.
LG G8s ThinQ
-
08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
