Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy M51 – Stor i mittenskiktet (Sammanfattning)

Är ett väldigt batteri väldigt kul? Samsung Galaxy M51 är en stor mittenskiktstelefon med ett rejält batteri på 7.000 mAh. Intressant nog känns den inte allt för klumpig. Är detta ett hett tips för alla som gillar lång batteritid?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Galaxy M Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.70 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 385 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 128 GB, 106 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1,B2,B3,B4, B5,B7,B8,B12,B17,B20,B26,B28,B38,B40,B41,B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.5 x 163.9 x 76.3
Batteri
7000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, fasjämförande-AF, LED-blixt, video @2160p/​30fps (kamera 1); 12.0 MP, f/​2.2, vidvinkellins (kamera 2); 5.0 MP, f/​2.2, skärpedjup (kamera 3); 5.0 MP, f/​2.4, makrolins (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, Headset, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.609 W/​kg (huvud), 1.446 W/​kg (kropp); LTE-hastigheter: 800 Mb/s (nerladdning), 150 Mb/s (uppladdning), fanless
Vikt
213 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g
Pris
369 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy M51
SD 730, Adreno 618
213 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
78 %
05/2020
Sony Xperia 10 II
SD 665, Adreno 610
151 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.00"2520x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51

Storleksjämförelse

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g163.9 mm 76.3 mm 9.5 mm 213 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g157 mm 69 mm 8.2 mm 151 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +98%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼98% +93%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (270min - 351max) MBit/s ∼51%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 (263min - 342max) MBit/s ∼49% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼45% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=618)
286 MBit/s ∼43% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼100% +99%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼87% +73%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (325min - 339max) MBit/s ∼52% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (318min - 330max) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼46% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=618)
273 MBit/s ∼42% -16%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (270-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (318-330)
Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 – Rondell
Garmin Edge 520 – Rondell
Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Rondell
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Rondell
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Bro
Samsung Galaxy M51 – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main lens flowerMain lens environmentMain lens low lightUltra wide-angle
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
37 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
33 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
48 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M51: 40.08 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 63.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
21 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M51: 12.76 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 20.97 ∆E
617
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 655 cd/m² Medel: 632.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 626 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.88 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 3.441
Samsung Galaxy M51
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Sony Xperia 10 II
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Screen
24%
21%
0%
10%
Brightness middle
626
461
-26%
591
-6%
589
-6%
529
-15%
Brightness
632
458
-28%
590
-7%
589
-7%
531
-16%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
97
3%
94
0%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.52
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.88
1.01
65%
1.42
51%
2.22
23%
2.53
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.97
2.1
58%
3.83
23%
8.24
-66%
4.52
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
1.5
75%
2.4
59%
2.6
56%
1.7
71%
Gamma
3.441 64%
2.25 98%
2.215 99%
2.111 104%
2.249 98%
CCT
6415 101%
6701 97%
9014 72%
6508 100%
6462 101%
Contrast
887

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9604 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1149 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼18% -68%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼62% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
1149 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (259 - 5532, n=47)
2003 Points ∼100% +74%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1007 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼60% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
457 Points ∼27% -55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼68% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
1007 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=52)
1715 Points ∼100% +70%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1780 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼99% +10%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1405 Points ∼71% -21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1647 - 1780, n=2)
1714 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=144)
1963 Points ∼100% +10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
548 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼98% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points ∼51% -43%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (542 - 548, n=2)
545 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=144)
566 Points ∼93% +3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7913 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼93% +11%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6189 Points ∼66% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼60% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (7177 - 7913, n=4)
7599 Points ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=544)
6033 Points ∼64% -24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9075 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼91% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7583 Points ∼70% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼59% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (8626 - 9075, n=4)
8909 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=700)
6633 Points ∼61% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2862 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2444 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼75% -24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2445 - 2862, n=4)
2700 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=196)
2663 Points ∼93% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2180 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼89% +30%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼31% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼45% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1731 - 2180, n=4)
1997 Points ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=196)
3075 Points ∼97% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2302 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼91% +22%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1132 Points ∼36% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼50% -32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1851 - 2302, n=4)
2119 Points ∼68% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=196)
2724 Points ∼88% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3349 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼98% +3%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2541 Points ∼72% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼65% -31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2827 - 3349, n=4)
3144 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=550)
2262 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2465 Points ∼69%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼89% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
985 Points ∼28% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼43% -38%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2085 - 2465, n=4)
2291 Points ∼64% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=550)
2242 Points ∼63% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2619 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼91% +24%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼32% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼47% -37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2214 - 2619, n=4)
2437 Points ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=551)
2078 Points ∼58% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3339 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼99% +5%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2503 Points ∼70% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼66% -30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2702 - 3339, n=4)
3091 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=582)
2177 Points ∼61% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3741 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼91% +30%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1667 Points ∼31% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼37% -47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3101 - 3741, n=4)
3448 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=582)
3047 Points ∼57% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3644 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼93% +23%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1801 Points ∼37% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼43% -43%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3002 - 3644, n=4)
3359 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=582)
2523 Points ∼52% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3331 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼98% +3%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2580 Points ∼74% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼63% -33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3210 - 3331, n=4)
3246 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=631)
2138 Points ∼61% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2299 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼90% +29%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼30% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼45% -36%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2008 - 2299, n=4)
2212 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=631)
1883 Points ∼57% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2469 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼91% +22%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1141 Points ∼34% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼48% -36%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2192 - 2469, n=4)
2379 Points ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=632)
1784 Points ∼54% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3362 Points ∼96%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼100% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2596 Points ∼74% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼64% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼99% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2792 - 3362, n=4)
3151 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=673)
2008 Points ∼57% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3604 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼90% +29%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1642 Points ∼32% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼39% -44%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2999 - 3604, n=4)
3316 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=672)
2494 Points ∼48% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3547 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼94% +24%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1788 Points ∼38% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼44% -42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2950 - 3547, n=4)
3277 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=675)
2130 Points ∼46% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21603 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20024 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (19389 - 21898, n=4)
20581 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=817)
15777 Points ∼73% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52736 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼91% +19%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25351 Points ∼37% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼36% -52%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (46605 - 52736, n=4)
50758 Points ∼73% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=815)
28199 Points ∼41% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
39944 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼93% +7%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23936 Points ∼52% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼52% -40%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (35557 - 40105, n=4)
38270 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=815)
21747 Points ∼47% -46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
67 fps ∼69%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼89% +28%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼37% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼47% -31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (67 - 84, n=4)
78 fps ∼80% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=814)
47.3 fps ∼49% -29%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
55 fps ∼73%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +36%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
30 fps ∼40% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼53% -27%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (55 - 59, n=4)
57.8 fps ∼77% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=823)
31.9 fps ∼43% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼62%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼91% +47%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼35% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼44% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (34 - 42, n=4)
38.8 fps ∼71% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=719)
28.1 fps ∼51% -17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼62%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼88% +42%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼30% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼46% -26%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (31 - 37, n=4)
34.5 fps ∼69% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=727)
23.2 fps ∼46% -25%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼87% +38%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼34% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼39% -37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (24 - 30, n=4)
27.8 fps ∼73% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=582)
22.5 fps ∼59% -6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
22 fps ∼65%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼85% +32%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps ∼29% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼41% -36%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (22 - 27, n=4)
24.8 fps ∼73% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=584)
20.1 fps ∼59% -9%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8.3 fps ∼64%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼85% +33%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3.9 (2.7min) fps ∼30% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼42% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (8.3 - 10, n=4)
9.4 fps ∼72% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=342)
11.6 fps ∼89% +40%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
5.4 fps ∼64%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼88% +39%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps ∼32% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼41% -35%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (5.4 - 6.8, n=4)
6.25 fps ∼74% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=340)
8.2 fps ∼96% +52%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼62%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼86% +38%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.7 fps ∼32% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% -30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (13 - 16, n=4)
15 fps ∼71% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=346)
17.4 fps ∼83% +34%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼88% +40%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼34% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼42% -33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (15 - 18, n=4)
16.8 fps ∼70% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=345)
20 fps ∼83% +33%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
14 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼90% +36%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼34% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (14 - 17, n=4)
16 fps ∼76% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=507)
15 fps ∼71% +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
12 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼84% +33%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.7 fps ∼30% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼45% -28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (12 - 15, n=4)
13.8 fps ∼73% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=511)
13.3 fps ∼70% +11%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247877 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84% +13%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
170126 Points ∼51% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼55% -27%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (247507 - 247877, n=2)
247692 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=136)
325471 Points ∼98% +31%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1366 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼100% +7%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
947 Points ∼65% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1099 - 1366, n=4)
1171 Points ∼80% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=751)
834 Points ∼57% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3875 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼90% +21%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1911 Points ∼37% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼42% -44%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3175 - 3875, n=4)
3616 Points ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=751)
2591 Points ∼50% -33%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4482 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼90% +7%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1804 Points ∼34% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼30% -64%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3435 - 4646, n=4)
4007 Points ∼76% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=751)
1940 Points ∼37% -57%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6606 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼99% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4911 Points ∼72% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼70% -28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6426 - 6760, n=4)
6569 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=751)
3545 Points ∼52% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3539 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼95% +9%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2001 Points ∼49% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼16% -82%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2972 - 3539, n=4)
3242 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=751)
1819 Points ∼45% -49%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
50.111 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (36.6 - 50.1, n=4)
43.5 Points ∼74% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=210)
42.2 Points ∼72% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼47% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +42%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (65.3 - 87.5, n=4)
74.1 Points ∼78% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
66.339 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼54% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
49.315 Points ∼52% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 343, n=643)
49.2 Points ∼52% -26%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +30%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼84% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=191)
44.4 runs/min ∼83% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)
41.3 runs/min ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (32.8 - 46.5, n=4)
39.9 runs/min ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼54% -30%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +46%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼77% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (60 - 86, n=4)
73 Points ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=280)
70.9 Points ∼70% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
69 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼56% -17%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
47 Points ∼47% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
16399 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12771 - 17501, n=4)
15757 Points ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼53% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
9671 Points ∼51% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58488, n=812)
8212 Points ∼43% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=838)
9590 ms * ∼100% -246%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
4629.3 ms * ∼48% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼46% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3436, n=4)
2950 ms * ∼31% -6%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼30% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
2773.8 ms * ∼29%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼29% -0%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M51Motorola Moto G 5G PlusSony Xperia 10 IISamsung Galaxy A51OnePlus NordAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
-41%
-4%
59%
-6%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
26.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-56%
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54.4 (28.6 - 70.2, n=17)
-8%
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=549)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
29.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-61%
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
70.3 (30.2 - 86, n=17)
-6%
69.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=549)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
114.5
119.3
4%
56.74
-50%
104.4
-9%
104.5
-9%
84.8 (13.5 - 187, n=23)
-26%
38.5 (0.14 - 319, n=912)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
123.6
138.14
12%
76.83
-38%
110.8
-10%
126.7
3%
125 (88.4 - 173, n=23)
1%
61.6 (1.59 - 325, n=912)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
189.8
180.21
-5%
188.21
-1%
184.9
-3%
473.1
149%
196 (143 - 257, n=23)
3%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=912)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB
491.7
885.34
80%
293.49
-40%
496.1
1%
955.5
94%
495 (409 - 733, n=23)
1%
355 (12.1 - 2037, n=912)
-28%
01020304050Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø39.4 (36-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø29.7 (28-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.4.7a: Ø29.4 (21-36)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.4.7a: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Hög belastning
 46.1 °C39.7 °C36.6 °C 
 46.9 °C39.5 °C37.1 °C 
 46.6 °C39.4 °C36.9 °C 
Max: 46.9 °C
Medel: 41 °C
34.6 °C37.8 °C41.1 °C
34.5 °C38 °C44.1 °C
35.1 °C38.7 °C44.3 °C
Max: 44.3 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.445.22541.945.93138.5364042.242.65043.741.46337.437.18029.627.810026.628.312532.429.416027.539.320019.348.425019.355.731519.360.140019.463.950020.267.263022.969.680022.172.7100022.377.6125023.177.3160020.980.9200020.880.6250021.878.3315022.976.1400023.775.350002578.9630025.281.8800026.276.9100002869.61250027.861.41600028.359.1SPL75.735.989.9N36.42.481.3median 22.9median 69.6Delta3.110.947.242.43942.134.336.539.339.942.144.431.734.426.32626.427.125.631.622.143.919.353.218.958.716.562.71668.614.372.915.773.915.273.713.777.111.776.51274.512.470.311.171.911.269.711.86712.963.513.771.814.173.41475.81366.211.452.26863.425.984.922.415.80.864.6median 14median 69.72.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M51OnePlus Nord
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M51 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus Nord audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.3 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.8 / 7 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 II
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-56%
-41%
-9%
-32%
12%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.5
-88%
1.5
-88%
0.9
-13%
1.8
-125%
0.643 (0.54 - 0.8, n=4)
20%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=907)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.1
-62%
2.1
-62%
1.7
-31%
2.1
-62%
1.235 (0.95 - 1.49, n=4)
5%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=906)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.9
-61%
2.8
-56%
1.8
-0%
2.3
-28%
1.448 (1.08 - 1.8, n=4)
20%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=907)
-13%
Load Average *
4.8
6.7
-40%
4.5
6%
5.2
-8%
3.4
29%
4.28 (2.7 - 5, n=4)
11%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=901)
14%
Load Maximum *
7
9.2
-31%
7.2
-3%
6.6
6%
5.2
26%
6.65 (5.4 - 7.11, n=4)
5%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=901)
13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
44tim 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
25tim 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
28tim 05min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 05min
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 II
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Battery Runtime
-44%
-51%
-40%
-33%
Reader / Idle
2642
1549
-41%
1689
-36%
2003
-24%
H.264
1685
581
-66%
846
-50%
1064
-37%
WiFi v1.3
1508
914
-39%
743
-51%
698
-54%
869
-42%
Load
365
252
-31%
289
-21%
261
-28%

För

+ Riktigt lång batteritid
+ Ljusstark skärm
+ Bra positionering
+ Skapliga kamerabilder

Emot

- Hög värmeutveckling
- Medioker högtalare
- Stryps vid längre perioder av belastning

Omdöme – En stor fördel, en brist

Recension av Samsung Galaxy M51.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy M51.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

"Batteritid, batteritid, batteritid" var troligen mottot när man designade Samsung Galaxy M51, och med över 25 timmar i vårt WLAN-test är det definitivt ett mål som uppnåtts. Trots detta är Galaxy-telefonen varken klumpig eller svårhanterad. Här märks det att batteritekniken har gjort stora framsteg de senaste åren. 

Designen är väldigt praktisk men borde heller inte skrämma iväg någon. Även om lagringen inte är exemplarisk är den skaplig, precis som WLAN-hastigheterna. Även i fråga om prestanda hamnar telefonen i mitten av sin klass. Vi gillar att den har exakt positionering och en ljusstark skärm. Monohögtalaren är kraftfull men låter inte särskilt bra.

Den höga värmeutvecklingen vid belastning är oroande. I synnerhet under varma sommardagar blir telefonen obekvämt varm och behöver strypa sin prestanda med över 20%. Vill man ha 5G får man leta någon annanstans och detsamma gäller för de som önskar sig en smidig 90 Hz-skärm. 

Galaxy M51 är en uthållighetsmästare med genomsnittlig hårdvara som knappt visar upp några svagheter bortsett från kraftig värmeutveckling.

Totalt sett har Samsung skapat en mittenskiktstelefon som borde kunna övertyga många kunder med sin enastående batteritid.

Samsung Galaxy M51 - 09/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
77%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
47 / 70 → 67%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
27 / 64 → 42%
Programprestanda
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
63%
Medel
74%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy M51 – Stor i mittenskiktet (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-10-11 (Update: 2020-10-11)