Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Samsung Galaxy M20 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 452 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1102:1 (Svärta: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Samsung Galaxy M20 PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.30 | Motorola Moto G7 Power IPS, 1570x720, 6.20 | Huawei P Smart Plus IPS/LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.30 | Elephone A5 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 2280x1080, 6.26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 20% | 10% | 28% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 452 | 608 35% | 479 6% | 422.4 -7% | 511 13% |
| Brightness | 445 | 585 31% | 471 6% | 414 -7% | 494 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 92 0% | 94 2% | 87 -5% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.36 12% | 0.27 34% | 0.17 59% | 0.49 -20% |
| Contrast | 1102 | 1689 53% | 1774 61% | 2485 125% | 1043 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 5.08 4% | 6.24 -18% | 4.06 23% | 8.3 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 8.74 8% | 10.05 -6% | 8.57 10% | 12.6 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 5.9 13% | 7.4 -9% | 4.8 29% | 8.1 -19% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.219 99% | 2.39 92% | 2.3 96% | 3.31 66% |
| CCT | 8355 78% | 7772 84% | 8942 73% | 7003 93% | 7648 85% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Power | |
| Huawei P Smart Plus | |
| Elephone A5 | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (101367 - 109906, n=4) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
| Elephone A5 (Chrome 71) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Power | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4) | |
| Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL (Chrome 71) | |
| Elephone A5 (Chrome 71) | |
| Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=171, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy M20 | Motorola Moto G7 Power | Huawei P Smart Plus | Elephone A5 | Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 22% | 25% | -1% | 27% | -5% | 481% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 300 | 292.4 -3% | 303.2 1% | 291.9 -3% | 285.5 -5% | 273 ? -9% | 1509 ? 403% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 137 | 215.2 57% | 200.5 46% | 213.9 56% | 198.9 45% | 176.8 ? 29% | 1116 ? 715% |
| Random Read 4KB | 64 | 67.5 5% | 102.5 60% | 60.4 -6% | 74.9 17% | 59.1 ? -8% | 247 ? 286% |
| Random Write 4KB | 44 | 72 64% | 74 68% | 24.35 -45% | 88.2 100% | 31.7 ? -28% | 272 ? 518% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.5 ? | 86.7 ? 6% | 76.9 ? -6% | 80.8 ? -1% | 86.3 ? 6% | 77.4 ? -5% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.3 ? | 65.4 ? 0% | 51.9 ? -21% | 59.6 ? -9% | 66.2 ? 1% | 58.3 ? -11% |
PUBG
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy M20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.94 / 2.37 / 2.42 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.83 / 5.07 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Power 5000 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 3340 mAh | Elephone A5 4000 mAh | Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 5000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7904 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -32% | -21% | 0% | -20% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.94 | 1.1 -17% | 1.3 -38% | 1.08 -15% | 0.76 19% | 1.048 ? -11% | 0.897 ? 5% |
| Idle Average * | 2.37 | 1.9 20% | 2.5 -5% | 3.3 -39% | 2.18 8% | 2.51 ? -6% | 1.452 ? 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.42 | 2.8 -16% | 3.6 -49% | 3.3 -36% | 2.22 8% | 2.8 ? -16% | 1.629 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 3.83 | 4.1 -7% | 5 -31% | 4.4 -15% | 3.47 9% | 5.28 ? -38% | 5.55 ? -45% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.07 | 6.9 -36% | 7 -38% | 5 1% | 7.22 -42% | 6.61 ? -30% | 8.31 ? -64% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Power 5000 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 3340 mAh | Elephone A5 4000 mAh | Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 105% | -45% | -55% | 0% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1904 | ||||
| H.264 | 1121 | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 928 | 2143 131% | 512 -45% | 420 -55% | 928 0% |
| Load | 288 | 513 78% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Det borde funnits mer i Galaxy M20
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Ett lågt pris, i det här fallet 2.290 kronor, är inte allt och prestandan måste vara rätt. Men så är i huvudsak fallet med Samsung Galaxy M20, åtminstone när det kommer till vardagsbruk. Den utmärkta skärmen är stor och skarp och med tunn infattning och ett cirkeljack känns hela enheten ganska modern. Dessutom är 64 GB internt minne generöst för ett pris på under 2.500 kronor. Processorn, tillsammans med 4 GB RAM, presterar bra i de flesta situationer, dock inte i prestandatester. Batteriet är en höjdpunkt. Även om M20 inte kommer i närheten av maratonlöpare som Moto G7 Power så visar den prov på större uthållighet än en majoritet av smartphonemarknaden.
Å andra sidan gillade vi inte kameran alls. Även om ultravidvinkelslinsen från mittenskiktet fortfarande låter lovande på papperet så gav vårt test en anledning att bryta den illusionen. Även om huvudkameran levererar skapliga bilder i bra ljusförhållanden så gäller det inte ultravidvinkelslinsen. När ljuset försvinner blir bildkvaliteten från de båda linserna snabbt oanvändbar.
Samsung Galaxy M20 kombinerar tillverkarens vanliga styrkor med oväntade svagheter. Oavsett det låga priset borde det funnits mer här.
Andra negativa aspekter inkluderar en inte helt modern version av Android och att höljet består av ett enkelt plastmaterial. Med tjusiga aluminiumhöljen och de senaste Android-versionerna ligger konkurrenterna i samma prisskikt definitivt före. Den som kan se bortom dessa brister får en skaplig smartphone från en marknadsledare till ett jämförelsevis lågt pris.
Samsung Galaxy M20
-
04/12/2019 v6(old)
Stefan Schomberg