Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy M31s – Galaxy-mobil med kraftfullt batteri (Sammanfattning)

Uppdatering i mittenskiktet. Större, modernare och med mer lagring - så presenterar sig Galaxy M31. Men eftersom telefonen har samma komponenter rörande kamera, batteri och prestanda borde skillnaderna väl vara små?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Galaxy M Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 405 PPI, Kapacitiv, tryckkänslig, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Kompass, USB-C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/26/28/38/40/41/66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.3 x 159.3 x 74.4
Batteri
6000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase detection AF, LED-blixt, video @2160p/​30fps (kamera 1); 12.0 MP, f/​2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 5.0 MP, f/​2.4, makrolins (kamera 3); 5.0 MP, f/​2.2, skärpedjup (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens nedre kant, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, Headset, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR: 0.756 W/​kg (huvud), 1.365 W/​kg (kropp); FM-radio, fanless
Vikt
203 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g
Pris
319 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79 %
11/2020
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
203 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy M31
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2340x1080
81 %
09/2020
realme 7 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
182 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Galaxy M31s

Storleksjämförelse

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g160.9 mm 74.3 mm 8.7 mm 182 g159.3 mm 74.4 mm 9.3 mm 203 g159.2 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 191 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼94% +85%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (294min - 351max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
336 (282min - 350max) MBit/s ∼50% -1%
realme 7 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 (286min - 339max) MBit/s ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼44% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +123%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼97% +115%
realme 7 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (299min - 338max) MBit/s ∼50% +11%
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (259min - 320max) MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (258min - 312max) MBit/s ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼41% -8%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (294-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (259-320)
Garmin Edge 520 location – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 location – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 location – Vändplats
Garmin Edge 520 location – Vändplats
Garmin Edge 520 location – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 location – Bro
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Vändplats
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Vändplats
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Bro
Samsung Galaxy M31s location – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main lens - FlowersMain lens - SurroundingsMain lens - Low lightUltra wide angle
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
42 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
59.6 ∆E
63 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31s: 39.63 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 63.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
22 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31s: 14.1 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 26.85 ∆E
571
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 601 cd/m² Medel: 585.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 584 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.09 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.084
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M31
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
realme 7 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Screen
1%
8%
19%
22%
Brightness middle
584
622
7%
507
-13%
461
-21%
584
0%
Brightness
586
615
5%
508
-13%
458
-22%
583
-1%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
97
2%
93
-2%
97
2%
Black Level *
0.52
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.09
2.25
-8%
1.88
10%
1.01
52%
1.17
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.96
6.22
22%
3.63
54%
2.1
74%
2.95
63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
2.7
-23%
2
9%
1.5
32%
1.7
23%
Gamma
2.084 106%
2.019 109%
2.338 94%
2.25 98%
2.231 99%
CCT
6512 100%
6810 95%
6665 98%
6701 97%
6341 103%
Contrast
887

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 125 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼88% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1249 Points ∼68% -22%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼60% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼71% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1565 - 1605, n=3)
1592 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 5532, n=65)
1834 Points ∼100% +14%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1343 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1345 Points ∼83% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1138 Points ∼71% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼63% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼73% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1208 - 1345, n=3)
1299 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=68)
1611 Points ∼100% +20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1387 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1325 Points ∼68% -4%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1798 Points ∼92% +30%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼98% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1207 - 1387, n=4)
1310 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=169)
1927 Points ∼99% +39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
347 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
348 Points ∼52% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points ∼85% +64%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼89% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +94%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 349, n=4)
347 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=169)
556 Points ∼83% +60%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5080 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5587 Points ∼55% +10%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10181 Points ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼86% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼76% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5080 - 5925, n=7)
5572 Points ∼55% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=567)
6083 Points ∼60% +20%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5777 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6202 Points ∼45% +7%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13821 Points ∼100% +139%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼72% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼63% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5777 - 6697, n=7)
6166 Points ∼45% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=716)
6702 Points ∼48% +16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1972 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2163 Points ∼75% +10%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2701 Points ∼93% +37%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼97% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1972 - 2163, n=7)
2099 Points ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼91% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1389 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1442 Points ∼45% +4%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2267 Points ∼71% +63%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼89% +105%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% +130%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1442, n=7)
1414 Points ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼94% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1557 Points ∼50% +5%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2351 Points ∼75% +58%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼90% +89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1557, n=7)
1525 Points ∼49% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼85% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1463 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2332 Points ∼67% +59%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3321 Points ∼95% +127%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼99% +136%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼100% +139%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1463 - 2332, n=7)
2115 Points ∼61% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=575)
2292 Points ∼66% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1499 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1533 Points ∼43% +2%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2550 Points ∼71% +70%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼88% +111%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +139%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1533, n=7)
1488 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=575)
2292 Points ∼64% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1491 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1659 Points ∼46% +11%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2689 Points ∼75% +80%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼90% +117%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +142%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1659, n=7)
1588 Points ∼44% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=576)
2116 Points ∼59% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1402 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2308 Points ∼66% +65%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3263 Points ∼93% +133%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼100% +150%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼99% +149%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1402 - 2336, n=6)
2087 Points ∼59% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=606)
2210 Points ∼63% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1995 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1993 Points ∼37% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3810 Points ∼71% +91%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼91% +144%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼100% +167%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1601 - 2021, n=6)
1873 Points ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=606)
3144 Points ∼59% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1824 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2055 Points ∼42% +13%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3673 Points ∼75% +101%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼92% +146%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +168%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1662 - 2074, n=6)
1903 Points ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=606)
2581 Points ∼53% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1415 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2258 Points ∼66% +60%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3241 Points ∼94% +129%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼100% +143%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼99% +142%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1415 - 2258, n=7)
2084 Points ∼60% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼63% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1436 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1478 Points ∼45% +3%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2384 Points ∼72% +66%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼89% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +131%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1478, n=7)
1422 Points ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼57% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1431 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1601 Points ∼48% +12%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2533 Points ∼76% +77%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼90% +111%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +134%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1601, n=7)
1524 Points ∼46% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼54% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1390 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2195 Points ∼63% +58%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3247 Points ∼93% +134%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼100% +152%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% +148%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 2286, n=6)
2079 Points ∼59% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=697)
2039 Points ∼58% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2011 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2020 Points ∼35% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3655 Points ∼63% +82%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼80% +131%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +190%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2092, n=6)
1944 Points ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=696)
2548 Points ∼44% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1829 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2056 Points ∼44% +12%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3556 Points ∼76% +94%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼94% +141%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +157%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2110, n=6)
1958 Points ∼42% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=699)
2175 Points ∼46% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
13103 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20128 Points ∼99% +54%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
20000 Points ∼98% +53%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼99% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (13103 - 20393, n=6)
18907 Points ∼93% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=841)
15961 Points ∼78% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21688 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25160 Points ∼36% +16%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53689 Points ∼77% +148%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼90% +189%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +220%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25625, n=6)
23092 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=839)
29172 Points ∼42% +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18932 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23836 Points ∼53% +26%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39066 Points ∼86% +106%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼94% +126%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼100% +139%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 24052, n=6)
21849 Points ∼48% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=839)
22285 Points ∼49% +18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
28 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
36 fps ∼38% +29%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼91% +207%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼100% +239%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (28 - 48, n=7)
39.1 fps ∼41% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼51% +74%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼43% +28%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +200%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼80% +140%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (25 - 44, n=7)
35.1 fps ∼47% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼43% +30%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼36% +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼100% +194%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼98% +188%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 26, n=7)
20.4 fps ∼41% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼58% +70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
15 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼35% +27%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼80% +193%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +267%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15 - 24, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼36% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼43% +59%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
16 fps ∼42% +60%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼87% +230%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +280%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 16, n=7)
14.7 fps ∼39% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼61% +131%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.9 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼42% +57%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼88% +226%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +271%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.9 - 14, n=7)
13.3 fps ∼40% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼62% +131%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.6 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.7 fps ∼44% +2%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼85% +96%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼85% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +132%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)
6.01 fps ∼46% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=365)
11.8 fps ∼91% +111%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps ∼42% 0%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.9 fps ∼81% +92%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼88% +108%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼100% +136%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)
3.56 fps ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=363)
8.25 fps ∼97% +129%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.2 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.4 fps ∼45% +2%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼81% +85%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼86% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)
9.26 fps ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=369)
17.6 fps ∼84% +91%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.8 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼42% +28%
realme 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼75% +131%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼88% +169%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +208%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (7.8 - 10, n=7)
9.66 fps ∼40% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=369)
20.2 fps ∼84% +159%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼48% +56%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼90% +197%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +228%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (6.4 - 10, n=7)
9.43 fps ∼45% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼73% +141%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.5 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.1 fps ∼51% +65%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼89% +191%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +227%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)
8.53 fps ∼47% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼76% +147%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
152185 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
187087 Points ∼58% +23%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼86% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼98% +109%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (152185 - 187087, n=7)
175473 Points ∼54% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼100% +114%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
884 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=7)
620 Points ∼42% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼58% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2141 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2168 Points ∼42% +1%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼90% +119%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼100% +143%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=7)
2149 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼50% +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1291 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1775 Points ∼31% +37%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼84% +270%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +340%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1291 - 2122, n=7)
1706 Points ∼30% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼35% +53%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2839 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4699 Points ∼70% +66%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼90% +114%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2839 - 4978, n=7)
4361 Points ∼65% +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼53% +26%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1623 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
649 Points ∼16% -60%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼94% +137%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +152%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=7)
1418 Points ∼35% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼45% +14%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼100% +82%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼97% +76%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼85% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)
28.2 Points ∼56% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
27.807 Points ∼55% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
27.632 Points ∼55%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼100% +81%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94% +71%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
51.681 Points ∼55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)
50.4 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
47.5 Points ∼51% -8%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% +55%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% +55%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)
29.4 runs/min ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chome 86)
29.2 runs/min ∼58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)
29 runs/min ∼57% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼97% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼91% +27%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
56 Points ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
56 Points ∼72%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)
53.4 Points ∼68% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼100% +74%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼88% +53%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
10687 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
10434 Points ∼56% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)
9667 Points ∼52% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼45% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -98%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)
4863 ms * ∼51% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86)
4800 ms * ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
4786.2 ms * ∼50% -0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼29% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% +46%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M31sSamsung Galaxy M31realme 7 ProMotorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
9%
17%
54%
13%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42)
1%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
86.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42)
4%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
117.1
152.4
30%
129.1
10%
119.3
2%
138.47
18%
115 (18.2 - 290, n=74)
-2%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
105
128.9
23%
159.8
52%
138.14
32%
156.45
49%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=74)
37%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
318.4
221.7
-30%
198.1
-38%
180.21
-43%
476.87
50%
250 (182 - 511, n=74)
-21%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
490.3
489.5
0%
520.6
6%
885.34
81%
979.54
100%
779 (427 - 999, n=74)
59%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-26%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.1.0: Ø47.2 (34-55)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.1.0: Ø30.8 (7-38)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.5.3a: Ø28.9 (22-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.5.3a: Ø29 (21-31)
Hög belastning
 38.7 °C35 °C32.6 °C 
 39.4 °C34.8 °C32.5 °C 
 38.5 °C35 °C32.6 °C 
Max: 39.4 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C
31.6 °C34.4 °C38.4 °C
31.3 °C34.5 °C40.9 °C
31.1 °C33.7 °C38.7 °C
Max: 40.9 °C
Medel: 35 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.843.52537.538.33129.3294031.934.45037.836.16329.128.68019.522.110019.92112516.527.616014.839.420013.142.425012.547.331510.854.640010.560.250014.862.56301466.280013.466.7100013.570.6125012.172.4160011.774.220001271.5250013.170315013.574.9400014.568.1500015.468.1630016.368.6800016.968.31000017.867.41250018.461.41600019.264.5SPL66.569.771.626.682.7N20.725.524.90.853.1median 14median 66.7Delta1.98.636.836.139.940.831.935.138.934.143.736.629.835.325.925.926.326.324.925.521.627.41934.918.942.618.149.416.654.916.256.714.960.81565.715.671.814.973.714.97215.673.814.670.414.268.314.166.414.460.814.662.714.966.915.272.415.464.415.749.26470.627.581.715.825.3147.9median 15.4median 62.72.111.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M31sSamsung Galaxy M31
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M31s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.4 / 2.2 / 3.4 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.3 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M31s
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
1%
11%
9%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
1.6
-14%
1.5
-7%
1.5
-7%
1.173 (0.9 - 1.6, n=7)
16%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
36%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.1
5%
2.2
-0%
2.28 (1.7 - 4.24, n=7)
-4%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
20%
Idle Maximum *
3.4
3.7
-9%
2.9
15%
2.9
15%
2.86 (1.8 - 4.34, n=7)
16%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
40%
Load Average *
6.3
6.7
-6%
6.7
-6%
4.4
30%
5.97 (5 - 6.99, n=7)
5%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
35%
Load Maximum *
8.9
9.4
-6%
9.2
-3%
7.2
19%
7.83 (6.3 - 9.4, n=7)
12%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
40tim 39min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
21tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23tim 36min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 19min
Samsung Galaxy M31s
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
realme 7 Pro
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-29%
-37%
-6%
Reader / Idle
2439
2456
1%
1549
-36%
1683
-31%
H.264
1416
1432
1%
581
-59%
1403
-1%
WiFi v1.3
1309
1324
1%
931
-29%
914
-30%
884
-32%
Load
319
326
2%
252
-21%
448
40%

För

+ Många LTE-frekvenser
+ AMOLED-skärm med skaplig färgprecision
+ Blir knappt varm
+ Skapligt högtalarljud
+ Fasta priser för reparationer
+ Väldigt lång batteritid

Emot

- Till viss del inexakt positionering
- Jämförelsevis låg prestanda
- PWM-flimmer
- Mycket bloatware
- Utdaterade säkerhetspatchar
- Suddiga kamerabilder
- Stryps vid ihållande belastning
- Laddar långsamt

Omdöme – Vissa höjdpunkter, låg styrka

Recension av Samsung Galaxy M31s. Recensionsex från:
Recension av Samsung Galaxy M31s. Recensionsex från:
notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I likhet med sin syskonmodell är Samsung Galaxy M31s inte perfekt; den har lite för lite prestanda för sitt prisskikt och kameran behöver förbättras på en del områden.

Det väldigt stora batteriet och den resulterande långa batteritiden vid låg eller mediumbelastning är ett starkt argument för Samsungs mittenskikts-telefon. AMOLED-skärmen med skaplig färgprecision är förstås också bra och vi gillade att telefonen hade en dedikerad microSD-plats samt stöd för ett ganska brett utbud av LTE-frekvenser. Monohögtalaren är inte ett HiFi-system, men den är inte dålig för en mittenskiktstelefon.

Samsung Galaxy M31s har en del höjdpunkter i form av lång batteritid och en stark AMOLED-skärm. Men systemet hade behövt vara mer kraftfullt.

Däremot var positioneringen inte särskilt exakt. Samsung har också installerat en relativt stor mängd bloatware och har vid skrivande stund inte riktigt hållt sin telefon uppdaterad med nya säkerhetspatchar.

Telefonen lämnade ett blandat intryck. Galaxy M31s diskvalificerar sig inte från ett köp och kan dessutom stå ut när det kommer till områden som batteritid. Men det finns också stark konkurrens i det här prisskiktet som har mer prestanda och till viss del också modern 5G-anslutbarhet.

Samsung Galaxy M31s - 11/17/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
81%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
46 / 70 → 66%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
14 / 64 → 21%
Programprestanda
54 / 86 → 63%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
58%
Medel
73%
79%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy M31s – Galaxy-mobil med kraftfullt batteri (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-11-23 (Update: 2020-11-30)