Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/27/2019

Fotograferingsmästerverk från mittenskiktet? Den vid skrivande stund bäst säljande smartphone-modellen får ytterligare en utgåva. Huawei kallar P30 Lite för ett fotograferingsmästerverk med en "revolutionerande" trippelkamera. Få reda på huruvida kameran på 48 MP kan omdefiniera smartphone-fotografering från mittenskiktet i vår utförliga recension av Huawei P30 Lite.

Huawei P30 Lite (P Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.15 tum 19.27:9, 2312 x 1080 pixlar 415 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS LCD, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljud, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Kompass, Gyroskop, Hall-sensor, OTG, Miracast, Status-LED
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE TDD: B38, 4G LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B4 / B7 / B7 / B8 / B20, 3G WCDMA: B1 / B2 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8, 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 152.9 x 72.7
Batteri
3340 mAh Litiumpolymer, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 21 tim
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (vidvinkelslins, f/1.8 bländare) + 8 MP (ultravidvinkelslins) + 2 MP (bokeh-lins), Camera2 API: Begränsat
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix 24 MP, f/2.0 bländare
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Headset, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Skyddsöverdrag för skärmen, Garantikort, EMUI 9.0, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 1.23 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 1.19 W/kg, LTE Cat. 12 (600/100 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
Vikt
159 g, Strömförsörjning: 54 g
Pris
369 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension

Storleksjämförelse

158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +259%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼73% +161%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +78%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +77%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼46% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼44% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=397)
220 MBit/s ∼33% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +197%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼66% +97%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼45% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼43% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼42% +25%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39% +16%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=397)
210 MBit/s ∼32% -4%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø188 (45-237)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (95-239)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
GPS-test: Huawei P30 Lite
Fotoläge
Fotoläge
Vidvinkelsläge
Vidvinkelsläge
2x zoom
2x zoom
Bländarläge
Bländarläge
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone - Recension
412
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 456 cd/m² Medel: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.05 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 451 cd/m²
Kontrast: 820:1 (Svärta: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Screen
10%
-79%
-21%
-63%
-18%
-40%
-37%
Brightness middle
451
583
29%
537
19%
489
8%
430
-5%
644
43%
567
26%
547
21%
Brightness
430
577
34%
525
22%
486
13%
434
1%
628
46%
547
27%
525
22%
Brightness Distribution
90
97
8%
85
-6%
93
3%
94
4%
91
1%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.55
0.58
-5%
0.34
38%
0.61
-11%
0.36
35%
Contrast
820
926
13%
1438
75%
930
13%
1519
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
6.41
-358%
3.8
-171%
5.09
-264%
2.64
-89%
4.39
-214%
4.6
-229%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
3.9
11%
10.86
-147%
7.1
-61%
8.05
-83%
9.23
-110%
7.28
-65%
12.1
-175%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.7
-8%
6.7
-168%
4.4
-76%
3.3
-32%
2.5
-0%
4.9
-96%
3.9
-56%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.099 105%
2.22 99%
2.257 97%
2.024 109%
2.248 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
6422 101%
6267 104%
8310 78%
7213 90%
7026 93%
6649 98%
7642 85%
7158 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼51% +105%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼30% +21%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +305%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼93% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼34% +38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (3133 - 4083, n=8)
3609 Points ∼25% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=299)
4513 Points ∼31% +27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼65% +10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼54% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼97% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼43% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=8)
5473 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=353)
4479 Points ∼49% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼76% +21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼98% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼70% +11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼34% -46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=8)
1564 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (758 - 4824, n=355)
1325 Points ∼54% -14%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼84% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼99% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼72% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85% +6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼74% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=8)
5649 Points ∼70% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=349)
4937 Points ∼61% -24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼79% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼73% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼86% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼51% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=8)
8159 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=517)
5401 Points ∼56% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼96%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼89%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
2272 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1849 - 15735, n=37)
2434 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
1121 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=37)
2303 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (0 - 1263, n=3)
421 Points ∼21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=40)
1997 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼89% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼65% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=9)
2362 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=363)
1813 Points ∼71% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼48% +155%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +430%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼100% +430%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼27% +41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% +119%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼18% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=9)
822 Points ∼18% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=363)
1548 Points ∼35% +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼60% +126%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +274%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼99% +272%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼36% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼54% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼24% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=9)
957 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=366)
1445 Points ∼39% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼88% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼77% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼79% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼89% -2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼61% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=9)
2377 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=377)
1782 Points ∼63% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼31% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼100% +416%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼77% +299%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼23% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼41% +114%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼19% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=9)
1215 Points ∼18% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=377)
2118 Points ∼31% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼42% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼100% +250%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼77% +170%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼32% +12%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼53% +86%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼26% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=9)
1361 Points ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=378)
1805 Points ∼35% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼65% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=9)
2452 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=439)
1740 Points ∼69% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼42% +142%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +479%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼84% +390%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼24% +40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% +108%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼15% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=9)
735 Points ∼15% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=441)
1280 Points ∼27% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼52% +115%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +312%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼84% +248%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼33% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼20% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=9)
868 Points ∼22% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=449)
1225 Points ∼31% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼78% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% -2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼91% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼62% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=9)
2436 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=471)
1645 Points ∼60% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼24% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +558%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼76% +397%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼15% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +120%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼15% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=9)
1061 Points ∼13% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=471)
1735 Points ∼21% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼36% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼100% +302%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼77% +209%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼25% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼47% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼23% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=9)
1208 Points ∼21% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=479)
1491 Points ∼26% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼39% +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼45% +31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +191%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼80% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼41% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42% +23%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼43% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=631)
13525 Points ∼39% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼53% +101%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼100% +279%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼94% +257%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼20% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼48% +83%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼22% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼24% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=631)
19546 Points ∼24% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼46% +60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +244%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼88% +201%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼25% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=632)
16333 Points ∼26% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼49% +124%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼24% +9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +355%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼80% +264%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼26% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +97%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼19% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=8)
37.6 fps ∼25% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=659)
34.1 fps ∼23% +3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +87%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% +13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +84%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=8)
34.8 fps ∼58% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=662)
26.5 fps ∼44% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼51% +112%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼23% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +318%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼94% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼32% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼45% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼18% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=8)
20.3 fps ∼29% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=578)
18.7 fps ∼26% +10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼57% +106%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼26% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +263%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼97% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼36% +31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +94%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼19% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼32% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=583)
17.4 fps ∼30% +9%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼55% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼21% -17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +192%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +292%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼30% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼49% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼20% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=8)
13.6 fps ∼29% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=440)
15.5 fps ∼33% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼44% +118%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼18% -11%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼83% +309%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼24% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼14% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=8)
12.5 fps ∼23% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=443)
14.8 fps ∼27% +35%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼41% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼9% -52%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼22% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +95%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=8)
4.23 fps ∼19% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=143)
8.76 fps ∼40% +109%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼41% +123%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼22% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼12% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=8)
2.78 fps ∼20% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=143)
5.99 fps ∼43% +130%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼40% +119%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼89% +384%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +447%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼23% +28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +103%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼13% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=8)
5.88 fps ∼17% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=145)
13 fps ∼37% +103%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼47% +129%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼16% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼94% +357%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +386%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼26% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼14% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=8)
6.23 fps ∼18% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=144)
14.4 fps ∼42% +106%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼43% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼18% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +407%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼25% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=8)
7.55 fps ∼22% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=369)
10.4 fps ∼30% +51%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼39% +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼18% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +408%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼85% +331%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼25% +25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +85%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼13% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=8)
6.74 fps ∼20% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=373)
9.41 fps ∼29% +45%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼68% +35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼45% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼55% +9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼64% +27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼34% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=8)
134634 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 380913, n=260)
127050 Points ∼48% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼90% +14%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼72% -9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼83% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼63% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=8)
1110 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=590)
734 Points ∼57% -28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼43% +134%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99% +434%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼25% +32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +109%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=8)
1467 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=590)
1889 Points ∼24% +28%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼90% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼99% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼76% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼90% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=8)
3289 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6661, n=590)
1413 Points ∼43% -53%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼90% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼98% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼77% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼86% +10%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼48% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=8)
5249 Points ∼79% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=590)
2799 Points ∼42% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼75% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼57% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼71% +24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼36% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=8)
2280 Points ∼59% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=594)
1389 Points ∼36% -37%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.2 - 32.1, n=3)
31.4 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (14.7 - 108, n=70)
29 Points ∼78% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼44% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=64)
33 runs/min ∼88% +4%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31.2 - 31.7, n=2)
31.4 runs/min ∼84% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=125)
62.4 Points ∼75% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=7)
62.3 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼75% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼65% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼47% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼90% +39%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼84% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼68% +6%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=8)
9542 Points ∼63% -2%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=652)
6115 Points ∼41% -37%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼32% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=672)
10898 ms * ∼100% -163%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼94% -148%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4310, n=8)
4172 ms * ∼38% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼26% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +34%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SEMotorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi 8Samsung Galaxy A50Nokia 8.1Sony Xperia 10Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
3%
18%
45%
6%
-13%
-11%
-10%
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
65.8 (58.8 - 73.5, n=12)
-3%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=393)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
77.7 (72.3 - 85.9, n=12)
1%
66.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=393)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
87.29
21.86
-75%
73.1
-16%
17.81
-80%
21
-76%
18.2
-79%
7.3
-92%
14.39
-84%
32.7 (8.48 - 127, n=14)
-63%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=701)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
71.57
115.83
62%
76.6
7%
101.01
41%
136.3
90%
98.9
38%
69.9
-2%
53.12
-26%
70.6 (20.7 - 108, n=14)
-1%
43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=701)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
158.63
190.1
20%
208.7
32%
155.57
-2%
207.8
31%
192.1
21%
203.8
28%
232.87
47%
170 (90 - 192, n=14)
7%
90.4 (2.99 - 392, n=701)
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.23
492.48
68%
283.6
-3%
705.38
141%
693.2
136%
507.3
73%
279.3
-5%
273.8
-7%
286 (144 - 499, n=14)
-2%
255 (12.1 - 1468, n=701)
-13%
Aspahlt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.3 (20-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (26-31)
PUBG Compare
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.8 (23-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (21-26)
; HD: Ø23.1 (16-26)
Hög belastning
 41.5 °C41.5 °C38 °C 
 42.3 °C40 °C37.9 °C 
 40.7 °C40.8 °C38.3 °C 
Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 40.1 °C
36.9 °C39.1 °C41.2 °C
35.3 °C38.5 °C42.9 °C
36 °C39.3 °C41.9 °C
Max: 42.9 °C
Medel: 39 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.137.72527.425.93125.522.74024.529.15036.135.96326.125.38024.32410022.124.412519.122.116020.243.820019.449.225016.554.531515.158.840015.3615001461.163014.564.98001465.9100014.570.1125014.574.2160014.376.4200014.678.425001479.8315014.779.7400014.378500014.878.9630014.677.5800014.477.41000014.676.31250014.766.4160001559.5SPL26.788.9N0.873.3median 14.6median 66.4Delta1.512.432.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.91 / 2.41 / 2.43 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.57 / 7.57 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
43%
1%
10%
-28%
8%
27%
20%
2%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.91
0.53
42%
1.1
-21%
0.65
29%
1.5
-65%
0.8
12%
0.8
12%
0.72
21%
0.954 (0.8 - 1.3, n=8)
-5%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=728)
3%
Idle Average *
2.41
1.18
51%
1.7
29%
1.97
18%
2.2
9%
1.5
38%
1.5
38%
2.16
10%
2.18 (1.2 - 2.5, n=8)
10%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=727)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.2
51%
2.1
14%
2.01
17%
2.6
-7%
1.7
30%
1.8
26%
2.17
11%
2.47 (2.2 - 3.6, n=8)
-2%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=728)
17%
Load Average *
4.57
3.04
33%
5.1
-12%
4.29
6%
6.1
-33%
5.9
-29%
3.2
30%
3.32
27%
4.5 (4.06 - 5, n=8)
2%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=722)
11%
Load Maximum *
7.57
4.83
36%
7.9
-4%
9.05
-20%
10.9
-44%
8.3
-10%
5.4
29%
5.34
29%
7.17 (6.13 - 7.86, n=8)
5%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=722)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8tim 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 25min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 18min
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
19%
43%
29%
32%
32%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1248
1374
10%
2088
67%
1634
31%
1587
27%
1682
35%
1006
-19%
H.264
685
853
25%
809
18%
936
37%
897
31%
869
27%
857
25%
620
-9%
WiFi v1.3
515
510
-1%
715
39%
808
57%
736
43%
701
36%
738
43%
541
5%
Load
198
218
10%
196
-1%
220
11%
215
9%
275
39%
246
24%
233
18%

För

+ designen
+ konstruktionskvaliteten
+ skapliga kameramoduler
+ exakt GPS
+ välkalibrerad IPS-skärm
+ 128 GB inbyggt minne

Emot

- eMMC-lagring istället för UFS
- långsamt WiFi-modem
- begränsad mängd LTE-band
- Bluetooth 4.2
- kontrastförhållandet och skärmens ljusstyrka
- spelar bara in video i 1080p
- strypning
- SoC-prestandan i spel
Recenseras: Huawei P30 Lite. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.
Recenseras: Huawei P30 Lite. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Precis som sin föregångare visar sig P30 Lite vara en skaplig och gedigen mittenskiktstelefon som inte lyckas stå ut från sina konkurrenter när det kommer till prestanda eller anslutbarhet. "Lite"-suffixet märks tydligt, till skillnad från andra enheter som Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Om du letar efter en kraftfull och kapabel vardagstelefon föreslår vi istället en titt på det breda utbudet av Snapdragon-alternativ.

Även om det finns många bättre mittenskiktstelefoner tillgängliga så tror vi att P30 Lite kommer att bli en av de mest framgångsrika modellerna i sitt prisskikt.

P30 Lite har en modern design, utmärkt konstruktionskvalitet och en IPS-skärm med breda betraktningsvinklar och god färgprecision. Kamerorna är mer än tillräckliga för den här klassen, i synnerhet den framåtriktade kameran på 24 MP. Men det finns många mindre tillkortakommanden som ofta fördärvar helhetsintrycket, särskilt när man tar Huaweis rekommenderade pris i beaktande. Som tur är har det Kinesiska företaget noterat att den kontextbaserade ljusstyrkejusteringen var en aning för mycket och har därför reducerat effekten till minimum.

Huawei P30 Lite - 05/20/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Design
86%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
90%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 76%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
46 / 63 → 73%
Programprestanda
64 / 70 → 92%
Temperatur
86%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
70%
Medel
76%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05-27 (Update: 2019-05-27)