Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Samsung Galaxy A50 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 644 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
141.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.024
| Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00 | Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.20 | Nokia 7.1 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 23% | -62% | -96% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 644 | 570 -11% | 537 -17% | 577 -10% | 593 -8% |
| Brightness | 628 | 565 -10% | 525 -16% | 550 -12% | 587 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 85 -7% | 91 0% | 94 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.36 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.64 | 1.5 43% | 6.41 -143% | 7.4 -180% | 0.9 66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.23 | 3.6 61% | 10.86 -18% | 15 -63% | 2 78% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.2 52% | 6.7 -168% | 10.2 -308% | 1.5 40% |
| Gamma | 2.024 109% | 2.07 106% | 2.099 105% | 2.29 96% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6649 98% | 6504 100% | 8310 78% | 9657 67% | 6548 99% |
| Contrast | 926 | 1603 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9610 () | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Motorola Moto G7 Plus | Nokia 7.1 | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | 43% | -27% | 248% | 131% | 556% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 507 | 295.8 -42% | 283.6 -44% | 250.9 -51% | 666 31% | 760 ? 50% | 1508 ? 197% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 192.1 | 104.9 -45% | 208.7 9% | 126 -34% | 388.3 102% | 297 ? 55% | 1118 ? 482% |
| Random Read 4KB | 98.9 | 84 -15% | 76.6 -23% | 44.9 -55% | 149.4 51% | 152.9 ? 55% | 247 ? 150% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.2 | 15.45 -15% | 73.1 302% | 11.93 -34% | 165.3 808% | 131.6 ? 623% | 272 ? 1395% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.9 ? | 78.2 ? 6% | 82.8 ? 12% | 83.5 ? 13% | 76 ? 3% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 64.4 ? 6% | 62.1 ? 2% | 61.2 ? 1% | 59.6 ? -2% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.9 / 8.3 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 9610 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -11% | -7% | 16% | 0% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.71 11% | 1.1 -38% | 1.01 -26% | 0.67 16% | 0.8 ? -0% | 0.897 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.36 9% | 1.7 -13% | 2.2 -47% | 1.26 16% | 1.5 ? -0% | 1.452 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.7 | 1.47 14% | 2.1 -24% | 2.25 -32% | 1.29 24% | 1.7 ? -0% | 1.629 ? 4% |
| Load Average * | 5.9 | 5.13 13% | 5.1 14% | 3.76 36% | 3.71 37% | 5.9 ? -0% | 5.55 ? 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.3 | 7.89 5% | 7.9 5% | 5.56 33% | 9.3 -12% | 8.3 ? -0% | 8.31 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -11% | -44% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1587 | 1467 -8% | 983 -38% | 1650 4% | |
| H.264 | 869 | 836 -4% | 809 -7% | 507 -42% | 1008 16% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 701 | 605 -14% | 715 2% | 346 -51% | 546 -22% |
| Load | 275 | 273 -1% | 196 -29% | 156 -43% | 194 -29% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy A50 är en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon. Den rider på sin föregångares framgångar, såsom trippelkameran, men kombinerar detta med en modernare design och en bättre SoC.
A50 har få brister. Men det tar en aning längre tid för fingeravtrycksläsaren att känna igen ett finger och den är dessutom lite sämre på att registrera avtrycket än de flesta sensorer. Vidare än GPS-modulen märkligt oprecis och WiFi-prestandan var ibland sämre än på föregångaren.
Utmärkt skärm, lång batteritid och skapliga kameror. Samsung Galaxy A50 levererar på alla viktiga områden och är i egenskap av mittenskiktstelefon en triumf.
Samsung har också kompromissat på en del områden. LTE-prestandan ligger under vad telefonens SoC skulle kunna uppnå, vilket känns märkligt. Den framåtriktade kameran med fixfokus känns inte heller särskilt genomtänkt.
Men med det sagt tar A50 rejäla steg framåt på andra områden jämfört med Galaxy A7 (2018). Exynos 9610 är ett stort steg upp från Exynos 7885 och knuffar sig till och med före jämförbara Snapdragon-chips. Samsung har också använt ett ca 20% större batteri, vilket hjälper A50 att leverera bättre batteritid än sin föregångare.
För att sammanfatta så är Galaxy A50 ett utmärkt val för den som letar efter en smartphone för ca 3.500 kronor. Men förra årets Galaxy A7 (2018) ger nästan samma upplevelse fast i en äldre design till en bråkdel av det priset.
Samsung Galaxy A50
-
08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
