Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Vass konkurrens. Du behöver inte nödvändigtvis spendera 8.000 kronor för att få en telefon som kan ta bra bilder. Det är åtminstone vad Motorola påstår med Moto G7 Plus, som kostar runt 3.000 kronor. G7 Plus har en optiskt stabiliserad kamera med en upplösning på 16 MP och intelligenta mjukvarufunktioner.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus (Moto G7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 509
Minne
4 GB 
Skärm
6.20 tum 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 47.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, USB 3.0 Typ C-port, OTG och Power Delivery (PD)
Nätverk
Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 157 x 75.3
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon
Camera
Webbkamera: 12 MP, 1.25 μm, LED-blixt
Primary Camera: 16 MPix , f/1.7, Fasdetekterande Autofokus, OIS, Dubbel LED-blixt, video i up till 2160p/30 FPS. (Huvudkamera); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Skärpedjup (Sekundär kamera)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , 12.0 MPix, video i upp till 1080p/30 FPS
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo – ovanför skärmen (dubblar som telefonhögtalare) och på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat 13/5 – 400 Mbps/75 Mbps. SAR: Huvud - 0.788 W/kg. Stöd för ExFAT. DRM Widevine L1-certifiering, fanless
Vikt
176 g, Strömförsörjning: 88 g
Pris
299.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Storleksjämförelse

160.4 mm 76.6 mm 7.8 mm 175 g160 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 167 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 75.4 mm 8.3 mm 175 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (138min - 294max) MBit/s
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (252min - 263max) MBit/s -10%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (136min - 231max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +13%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (314min - 341max) MBit/s
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
330 (63min - 342max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s -16%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (162min - 243max) MBit/s -38%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (314-341)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (314-342)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø207 (162-243)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø288 (268-294)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø259 (252-263)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø182 (136-231)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Översikt
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Översikt
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Slinga
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Slinga
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus – Bro
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Passport: Den nedre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
ColorChecker Passport: Den nedre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Testkartan i detalj
536
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 573 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 525 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 537 cd/m²
Kontrast: 926:1 (Svärta: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.099
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.20
HTC U12 Life
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90
Screen
-5%
42%
-5%
34%
Brightness middle
537
468
-13%
570
6%
484
-10%
761
42%
Brightness
525
452
-14%
565
8%
469
-11%
723
38%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
93
9%
93
9%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.58
0.62
-7%
0.55
5%
0.69
-19%
Contrast
926
755
-18%
880
-5%
1103
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.41
6.09
5%
1.5
77%
7.3
-14%
2.4
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.86
10.23
6%
3.6
67%
11.1
-2%
5.2
52%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.7
6.8
-1%
1.2
82%
7.4
-10%
1.8
73%
Gamma
2.099 105%
2.708 81%
2.07 106%
2.16 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
8310 78%
6972 93%
6504 100%
8534 76%
6312 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1338 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points +14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1614 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
822 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1323 - 1506, n=11)
1351 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (800 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5109 Points +282%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4914 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points -11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5557 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4011 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4781 - 5426, n=11)
4960 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
13696 Points +174%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4465 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points -6%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4083 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3763 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4278 - 5041, n=11)
4505 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2053 - 18432, n=71, last 2 years)
10674 Points +149%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6412 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8939 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5712 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6040 - 7618, n=11)
6624 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +98%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5730 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points -14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7141 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4875 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5611 - 6277, n=11)
5833 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +73%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19777 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points -22%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
20468 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
16818 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (19525 - 20404, n=11)
19846 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20778 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21533 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18449 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (20610 - 21067, n=11)
20839 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16924 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points -12%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17450 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
12845 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (15766 - 19365, n=11)
17020 Points +8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
28 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (30 - 40, n=12)
34.3 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps +137%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
30 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (35 - 36, n=12)
35.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps +575%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (13 - 18, n=12)
15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +372%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps +31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (16 - 16, n=12)
16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +761%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.4 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.7 - 12, n=12)
9.47 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps +509%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 10, n=12)
9.68 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +871%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.3 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.1 - 7.4, n=12)
5.96 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +612%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.6 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 6.3, n=12)
6.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +830%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps +2%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.2 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4.9 - 6.9, n=9)
5.59 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +670%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps +11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.6 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.4 - 6.1, n=9)
5.93 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +1069%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.6 fps +80%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.1 fps +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2 - 4.4, n=9)
3.27 fps +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +1505%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps -4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2.2 - 3.5, n=9)
2.36 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +991%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
116595 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points +4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140188 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
90347 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (115565 - 138661, n=11)
118863 Points +1%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
92015 Points
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
95287 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points -5%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112870 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
71635 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (92015 - 125213, n=10)
98051 Points +7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.99 Points +5%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.01 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
45.78 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11)
45.3 Points -1%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
44.31 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +298%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points +10%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
9121 Points +9%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12)
8665 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms *
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
4758 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12)
4688 ms * +2%
Honor 8X
4248 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4123 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +65%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points +143%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (46 - 61, n=9)
54.4 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8)
158 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
156 Points
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points -6%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G7 PlusHTC U12 LifeSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Honor 8XMotorola Moto G6 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-20%
-12%
-5%
-19%
330%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.6
272.8
-4%
295.8
4%
283.9
0%
286.6
1%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201)
-4%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
419%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.7
209.4
0%
104.9
-50%
170
-19%
216.1
4%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
-15%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
419%
Random Read 4KB
76.6
56.7
-26%
84
10%
49.54
-35%
58.4
-24%
59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201)
-23%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
217%
Random Write 4KB
73.1
16.2
-78%
15.45
-79%
59.9
-18%
62.8
-14%
31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201)
-57%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
265%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
68.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144)
-6%
Game Compare - Asphalt 9: Legends
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Game Compare - Shadow Fight 3
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 1.16.1: Ø47.1 (1-60)
Hög belastning
 32 °C33 °C34 °C 
 32 °C32.6 °C34.6 °C 
 32.2 °C32.5 °C34.1 °C 
Max: 34.6 °C
Medel: 33 °C
31.6 °C33.3 °C33 °C
31.6 °C33 °C33.4 °C
32.2 °C32.6 °C32.2 °C
Max: 33.4 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.434.72530.432.3312732.34033.1295034.631.56329.126.9802423.910023.621.712521.231.416021.140.620018.841.125018.747.231517.650.140016.657.150015.861.763015.864.580015.369.6100016.370.8125014.771.316001668.620001570.7250014.768.7315014.769.4400014.372.9500014.868.9630015.162800015.257.91000014.456.81250014.462.71600014.462.8SPL6063.75527.580.9N12.915.59.30.947median 15.3median 62.7median 32.2median 14.2median 63.9Delta3.111.722.913.31730.740.32531.926.828.326.333.629.840.927.425.12125.419.527.518.825.519.237.617.642.116.94415.852.81555.91559.614.764.114.86714.670.314.36913.469.614.469.914.471.814.876.2158014.869.814.766.5157014.968.115.25315.741.126.884.80.956.5median 15median 66.50.69.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G7 PlusHonor 8X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.1 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
17%
1%
27%
-4%
9%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.7
36%
0.71
35%
0.92
16%
0.5
55%
0.944 ?(0.6 - 1.75, n=12)
14%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.5
12%
1.36
20%
2.3
-35%
1.78
-5%
2.22 ?(1.4 - 4.48, n=12)
-31%
1.447 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=161, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.5
-19%
1.47
30%
2.32
-10%
1.81
14%
2.54 ?(2 - 4.5, n=12)
-21%
1.628 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=161, last 2 years)
22%
Load Average *
5.1
4.7
8%
5.13
-1%
4.37
14%
3.3
35%
4.51 ?(3.65 - 7.92, n=12)
12%
5.48 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=161, last 2 years)
-7%
Load Maximum *
7.9
7.4
6%
7.89
-0%
6.13
22%
5.14
35%
7.37 ?(5.1 - 13.6, n=12)
7%
8.14 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=161, last 2 years)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
11tim 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 29min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 16min
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-16%
9%
19%
24%
H.264
809
836
3%
542
-33%
WiFi v1.3
715
603
-16%
605
-15%
852
19%
702
-2%
Load
196
273
39%
404
106%
Reader / Idle
1467
1846

För

+ utmärkta kameror
+ klarar av 4K-video
+ videoströmning i HD
+ skapliga WiFi-hastigheter
+ SoC som inte stryps
+ lyxig design
+ mycket prisvärd

Emot

- den tryckkänsliga skärmen låter ihålig
- skärmen har en blå ton
- kunde haft en mer kraftfull GPU
Recension av Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.
Recension av Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Motorola Moto G7 Plus är en fantastisk enhet som omdefinierar vad man kan förvänta sig av en mittenskiktsenhet. För bara straxt under 3.000 kronor levererar Motorola en smartphone med en utmärkt kamera, en skaplig skärm och nästan alla funktioner som moderna flaggskepp har. G7 Plus ser också tjusig ut tack vare en modern design. Den är dessutom välgjord.

Motorola Moto G7 Plus är en utmärkt smartphone som kan få en att tänka till en gång extra innan man köper en dyr flaggskeppstelefon. Den är helt enkelt så bra.

Tyvärr har G7 Plus sina brister. Den tryckkänsliga skärmen låter en aning ihålig, men det kan förstås vara ett problem specifikt för vår recensionsenhet. Den har också en svag GPU och Motorola verkar ha utrustat telefonen med en skärm av lägre kvalitet än den som satt i föregångaren. Vi hade också gärna sett ett större batteri, men laddaren som ingår laddar batteriet helt och hållet på under en timma. För att sammanfatta så är Motorola Moto G7 Plus en exceptionell smartphone för sitt pris och är ett utmärkt alternativ till moderna, och betydligt dyrare, flaggskepp.

Obs: Vi kommer att publicera det slutgiltiga omdömet så fort vi färdigställt Batteritids-sektionen.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-02-28 (Update: 2019-04- 1)