Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Topptelefon med ett visst handikapp (Sammanfattning)

Kraftfull. Mate-serien är Huaweis mest avancerade produktserie. Den har alltid kommit med de senaste specifikationerna och brukar kombinera en stor skärm med lång batteritid. Detta gäller även i år, men man har snubblat när det kommer till en nyckelkomponent.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Mate Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 8 x 2.1 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77/-A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G78 MP24
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.76 tum 18.56:9, 2772 x 1344 pixlar 456 PPI, Kapacitiv, native pen support, OLED, 240 Hz Touchavkänningsfrekvens, glansig: ja, HDR, 90 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237.89 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, Kortläsare: Nano-minneskort (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, upp till 256 GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Sensor för gester, 3D-ansiktsigenkänning, Gravitationssensor, Infraröd sensor, Barometer, Gyroskop, Kompass, Närhetssensor, Lasersensor, Sensor för färgtemperatur
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40), 5G (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.1 x 162.96 x 75.5
Batteri
4400 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Ultra Vision, vidvinkel, f/1.9), 20 MP (ultra-vidvinkel, f/1.8), 12 MP (5x teleobjektiv, f/3.4, OIS), 4K video i 60 FPS, Camera2 API level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.4) med 3D ToF-sensor
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 66 watt, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Headset (USB-C), Dokumentation, EMUI 11, 24 Månader Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, IP68, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
212 g, Strömförsörjning: 136 g
Pris
1,199 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
11/2020
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24
212 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.76"2772x1344
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
89 %
09/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
90 %
11/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
189 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
86 %
03/2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3168x1440

Storleksjämförelse

165.2 mm 74.4 mm 9.5 mm 202 g164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.96 mm 75.5 mm 9.1 mm 212 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.4 mm 189 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Mali-G78 MP24, Kirin 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1348 (1217min - 1413max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
527 (457min - 562max) MBit/s ∼39% -61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼22% -78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Mali-G78 MP24, Kirin 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1395 (689min - 1434max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
736 (667min - 787max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼20% -80%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1347 (1217-1413)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1395 (1344-1434)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Ett varv runt sjön
Garmin Edge 500 - Ett varv runt sjön
Garmin Edge 500 - Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500 - Vändplats
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Översikt
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Översikt
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Ett varv runt sjön
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Ett varv runt sjön
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Vändplats
Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Vändplats

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleUltra wide angleZoom (5x)Low light
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
18 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
20 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 40 Pro: 19.83 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 25.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 40 Pro: 4.47 ∆E min: 0.88 - max: 10.81 ∆E
781
cd/m²
760
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
779
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
783
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 798 cd/m² Medel: 782.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.27 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 778 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
OLED, 2772x1344, 6.76
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.70
Screen
-31%
-65%
10%
21%
-81%
Brightness middle
778
592
-24%
860
11%
822
6%
753
-3%
778
0%
Brightness
782
605
-23%
878
12%
820
5%
762
-3%
775
-1%
Brightness Distribution
95
96
1%
96
1%
99
4%
96
1%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
2.5
-79%
4.5
-221%
1.2
14%
0.9
36%
4.4
-214%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
5.5
-57%
10.4
-197%
3.5
-0%
1.6
54%
8.7
-149%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.6
-4%
2.4
4%
1.8
28%
1.5
40%
5.6
-124%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2 110%
2.18 101%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
CCT
6530 100%
6173 105%
6466 101%
6337 103%
6415 101%
7250 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
2642 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼81% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +45%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
2642 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼68% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11259 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼73% -27%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼72% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
11259 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6528 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼98% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
6528 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼40% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5602 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3187 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
5602 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
12146 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼68% -32%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
10348 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼77% -23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼77% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
12146 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
9643 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6903 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼83% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
9643 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5568 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3084 Points ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼77% -23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼94% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
5568 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
17612 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼39% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼46% -46%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
20511 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼62% -28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼61% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
17612 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼15% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11895 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
9094 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼74% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼81% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
11895 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5262 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
2975 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼93% -7%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼87% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
5262 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11573 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6917 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼72% -28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼70% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
11573 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼16% -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
9138 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
5344 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼78% -22%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼77% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
9138 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5268 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼90% -10%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼96% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
5268 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
16670 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼57% -43%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼74% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼69% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
16670 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼15% -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
11256 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼81% -19%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼79% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
11256 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
59268 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
39175 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼55% -45%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼47% -53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
59268 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼27% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
123332 Points ∼56%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼34% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼38% -31%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
221179 Points ∼100% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼68% +22%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼66% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
123332 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼13% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
99445 Points ∼91%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼59% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼62% -32%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
108825 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼76% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼69% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
99445 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼20% -78%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
3349 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3468 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1585 Points ∼46% -53%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1583 Points ∼46% -53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
3349 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 3575, n=148)
909 Points ∼26% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼46%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
318 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼64%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼30%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼53%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
180 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼68%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼16%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼26%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼59%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
109.9 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.3 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼27%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
47.5 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼63%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=366)
11.8 fps ∼25%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼71%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
31.2 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼64%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=364)
8.23 fps ∼26%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
58.6 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=370)
17.6 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
84.1 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼64%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=370)
20.1 fps ∼24%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼21%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼66%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
51.8 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼26%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
569468 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼54%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=100)
2561 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼56%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼23%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼25%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼36%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼30%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
161.437 Points ∼100% +103%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
79.612 Points ∼49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
79.6 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼41% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼40% -18%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼40% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼35% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼27% -46%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
342.7 Points ∼100% +164%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
130 Points ∼38% 0%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
129.59 Points ∼38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼34% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼34% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼33% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼28% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼15% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
196 runs/min ∼100% +132%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
84.6 runs/min ∼43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
84.6 runs/min ∼43% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼38% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼36% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼35% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼23% -47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
193 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
147 Points ∼76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
147 Points ∼76% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼62% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼53% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼52% -31%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼52% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼37% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
58488 Points ∼100% +120%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
26597 Points ∼45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
26597 Points ∼45% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼40% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼39% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼39% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼34% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼14% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -468%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼24% -37%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼22% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼21% -17%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Huawei Browser 11)
1671.2 ms * ∼18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
1671 ms * ∼18% -0%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
460.4 ms * ∼5% +72%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 40 ProHuawei Mate 30 ProSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraXiaomi Mi 10 ProOppo Find X2 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-22%
-21%
-33%
-14%
-59%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.87 (NM Card)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
14%
55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
61.8 (55.6 - 69.3, n=4)
2%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
70.2 (NM Card)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
18%
65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
75.8 (65.6 - 85.8, n=4)
8%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-1%
Random Write 4KB
277.65
259.21
-7%
217.74
-22%
258.54
-7%
204.98
-26%
242 (205 - 285, n=8)
-13%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
324.97
226.38
-30%
186.67
-43%
264.9
-18%
202.63
-38%
242 (187 - 325, n=8)
-26%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-81%
Sequential Write 256KB
1321.01
401.79
-70%
802.09
-39%
750.44
-43%
728.72
-45%
825 (671 - 1321, n=8)
-38%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-89%
Sequential Read 256KB
2037.44
1780.5
-13%
1782.3
-13%
1738.65
-15%
1605.6
-21%
1702 (1348 - 2037, n=8)
-16%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-82%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø39.8 (36-41)
; Armajet; 1.55.3: Ø59.9 (58-60)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei P40 Pro
99.8 % ∼100% +102%
Google Pixel 5
94.7 % ∼95% +92%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
72.6 % ∼73% +47%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
49.3 % ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
26.6 % ∼27% -46%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 9000, ARM Mali-G78 MP24, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Qualcomm Adreno 620, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Hög belastning
 30.8 °C30.6 °C28.5 °C 
 31 °C29.9 °C29.2 °C 
 31.3 °C31.6 °C28.4 °C 
Max: 31.6 °C
Medel: 30.1 °C
28.2 °C28.1 °C29.4 °C
28.3 °C27.8 °C29.4 °C
28.3 °C28.5 °C29.5 °C
Max: 29.5 °C
Medel: 28.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.4342523.328.4312629.44022.623.85034.538.16319.926.18014.729.510014.437.212514.944.816017.858.620018.953.525011.756.931513.960.64001364.150010.367.563010.466.780012.469.5100011.170.7125011.272160012.775.8200012.379250012.678.2315012.771.3400012.776.4500012.776.4630013.57980001476.51000013.571.51250014.969.6160001661.6SPL24.887.5N0.671.2median 12.7median 69.6Delta18.436.923.32923.721.927.4222229.935.3222819.330.716.331.31440.316.956.114.954.614.158.61066.71165.711.766.710.969.411.972.31176.410.276.811.477.812.87912.97912.578.41378.513.175.813.475.315.776.113.573.51470.313.763.924.888.80.677.4median 13median 72.31.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 40 ProSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate 40 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.01 / 2.12 / 2.15 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.94 / 6.53 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
4400 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
7%
37%
18%
-58%
0%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
0.87
14%
0.65
36%
0.64
37%
0.61
40%
1.47
-46%
1.01
-0%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
12%
Idle Average *
2.12
1.75
17%
1.06
50%
1.22
42%
1.19
44%
3.43
-62%
2.12
-0%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
1.83
15%
1.49
31%
1.24
42%
1.23
43%
3.52
-64%
2.15
-0%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
5%
Load Average *
3.94
3.85
2%
4.91
-25%
3.04
23%
4.18
-6%
6.2
-57%
3.94
-0%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
-5%
Load Maximum *
6.53
6.64
-2%
10.29
-58%
3.86
41%
8.53
-31%
10.63
-63%
6.53
-0%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Huawei Browser 11)
10tim 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 39min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 30min
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
4400 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Battery Runtime
25%
7%
31%
21%
7%
Reader / Idle
1255
2174
73%
1223
-3%
2091
67%
2133
70%
H.264
999
1098
10%
993
-1%
1117
12%
973
-3%
WiFi v1.3
609
823
35%
644
6%
781
28%
865
42%
654
7%
Load
270
219
-19%
338
25%
311
15%
198
-27%

För

+ Snabb SoC
+ Snabb och utökningsbar lagring
+ Bra dubbelhögtalare
+ Ljusstark 90 Hz-skärm med god färgprecision
+ IP68
+ 3D-ansiktsigenkänning
+ Snabb laddning (trådlös och med kabel)
+ Utmärkt positioneringsförmåga
+ Riktigt bra samtalskvalitet
+ Väldigt bra kommunikationsmoduler

Emot

- Nano-minneskort istället för microSD
- Kortare batteritid
- Saknar Googles tjänster
- Saknar stöd för aptX/aptX HD/aptX Adaptive
- SoC som stryps kraftigt vid belastning

Omdöme - Högpresterande smartphone från Huawei

Recension av Huawei Mate 40 Pro. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.
Recension av Huawei Mate 40 Pro. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Från ett tekniskt perspektiv är Huawei Mate 40 Pro en utmärkt utrustad smartphone. Skärmen är inte riktigt lika ljusstark som på konkurrenternas mest avancerade enheter, men den behöver verkligen inte skämmas för den. Huawei visar i synnerhet upp musklerna när det kommer till telefonens SoC, även om vi inte lyckades köra alla testerna då  vår testenhet inte tillät detta.

Huaweis smartphone klarar sig också bra när det kommer till positionering och samtalskvalitet. Trippelkameran övertygade i vårt test. Kommunikationsmodulerna är toppmoderna, men de sänker också batteritiden och berövar därmed Mate 40 Pro på en av sina nyckelkompetenser. Framtida uppdateringar får visa huruvida detta är på grund av chippets arkitektur eller ifall det rör sig om ett drivrutinsproblem.  

Tekniskt sett är Huawei Mate 40 Pro en av de bästa telefonerna som går att få tag på just nu, men den behöver hantera några mjukvarubegränsningar.

Högtalarna har blivit bättre och låter nu riktigt bra. Men på grund av den rådande handelsblockaden saknas tyvärr inte bara Googles tjänster utan också ljudkodekar från Qualcomm. Mate 40 Pro har åtminstone fått en DRM-certifiering trots de svåra omständigheterna.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Huawei Mate 40 Pro - 11/23/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
96%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
73 / 70 → 100%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
67 / 64 → 100%
Programprestanda
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
85%
Medel
85%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Mate 40 Pro - Topptelefon med ett visst handikapp (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-11-30 (Update: 2020-11-30)