Notebookcheck

Test: Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Kraftfull smartphone med retro-look (Sammanfattning)

Lockande. iPhone 12 Pro har fått en ny design som påminner om gamla iPhone 5s. Den har Apples senaste teknik, inklusive 5G och den nya magnetiska MagSafe-funktionen. Få reda på huruvida det är värt att byta i vår recension.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Jesper Berg), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (iPhone Serie)
Processor
Apple A14 Bionic 6 x
Grafikkort
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Skärm
6.10 tum 19.5:9, 2532 x 1170 pixlar 457 PPI, Kapacitiv, OLED, Super Retina XDR display, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
, 242 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Digital kompass, Face ID, Barometer, Gyroskop med tre axlar, Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Lightning
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1,700/2,100, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66), 5G (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 146.7 x 71.5
Batteri
10.78 Wh, 2815 mAh Litiumjon, 3.83 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Apple iOS 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Vidvinkel, f/1.6, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultravid, f/2.4) + 12 MPix (2x Teleobjektiv, f/2.2, OIS) + LiDAR Scanner, HDR-videoinspelning med Dolby Vision i upp till 4k/60 fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2), HDR-videoinspelning med Dolby Vision i upp till 4k/30 fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, USB-C till Lightning-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Dokumentation, Klistermärke, 12 Månader Garanti, Huvud/Kropp SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
189 g
Pris
1237 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
11/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
189 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
88 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
188 g256 GB NVMe5.80"2436x1125
89 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
88 %
10/2020
OnePlus 8T
SD 865, Adreno 650
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
89 %
09/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.7 mm 74.1 mm 8.4 mm 188 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.4 mm 189 g144 mm 71.4 mm 8.1 mm 188 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼99% +65%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼93% +56%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
767 (611min - 837max) MBit/s ∼87% +46%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
582 (414min - 625max) MBit/s ∼66% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
522 (272min - 554max) MBit/s ∼59% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
527 (457min - 562max) MBit/s ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=296, last 2 years)
402 MBit/s ∼46% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼53% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼50% +5%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
736 (667min - 787max) MBit/s ∼48%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (679min - 724max) MBit/s ∼46% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
557 (439min - 614max) MBit/s ∼36% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
489 (254min - 634max) MBit/s ∼32% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=296, last 2 years)
390 MBit/s ∼25% -47%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760552470489548545521505522541562525457558547528555562560511529535527514522526534547469497530552470489548545521505522541562525457558547528555562560511529535527514522526534547469497530730759739729783765759694677699747667738705770715730743741765694776745741707715769719787762Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø526 (457-562)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø736 (667-787)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Översikt
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Översikt
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Runt en sjö
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Runt en sjö
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Vändplats
Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500 - Vändplats

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleUltra wide angleZoom (5x)Low light
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
73 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
83.9 ∆E
69 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 12 Pro: 45.46 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 83.9 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 12 Pro: 6.11 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 15.25 ∆E
Testkarta (ultra-vidvinkelslins)
Testkarta (ultra-vidvinkelslins)
Testkarta (teleobjektiv)
Testkarta (teleobjektiv)
Skärmflimmer - Lägsta ljusstyrka (117.9 - 245.1 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - Lägsta ljusstyrka (117.9 - 245.1 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - 21% ljusstyrka (223 - 250 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - 21% ljusstyrka (223 - 250 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - Över 21% ljusstyrka (60 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - Över 21% ljusstyrka (60 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - Över 50% ljusstyrka (80 - 277.8 Hz)
Skärmflimmer - Över 50% ljusstyrka (80 - 277.8 Hz)
820
cd/m²
822
cd/m²
820
cd/m²
825
cd/m²
822
cd/m²
819
cd/m²
822
cd/m²
815
cd/m²
817
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 825 cd/m² Medel: 820.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.04 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 99 %
Mitt på batteriet: 822 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.80
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
OnePlus 8T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Screen
6%
-4%
12%
-83%
13%
Brightness middle
822
787
-4%
584
-29%
743
-10%
860
5%
753
-8%
Brightness
820
793
-3%
576
-30%
734
-10%
878
7%
762
-7%
Brightness Distribution
99
98
-1%
95
-4%
91
-8%
96
-3%
96
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.2
-0%
1.1
8%
0.89
26%
4.5
-275%
0.9
25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
2.6
26%
2.3
34%
1.69
52%
10.4
-197%
1.6
54%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.5
17%
1.8
-0%
1.4
22%
2.4
-33%
1.5
17%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.2 100%
2.16 102%
2.199 100%
2 110%
2.24 98%
CCT
6337 103%
6339 103%
6355 102%
6423 101%
6466 101%
6415 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 277.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 277.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 277.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9665 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
4160 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3531 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3164 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (3476 - 4334, n=5)
4017 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=198, last 2 years)
1912 Points ∼46% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1604 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1342 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
889 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (1326 - 1604, n=5)
1542 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=198, last 2 years)
554 Points ∼35% -65%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
8672 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7800 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3310 Points ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4162 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (7100 - 8955, n=4)
8133 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=59, last 2 years)
3077 Points ∼35% -65%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6627 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3297 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4248 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6068 - 6652, n=4)
6495 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=62, last 2 years)
2777 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3187 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3018 Points ∼53% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +80%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5485 Points ∼96% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼75% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼92% +66%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2631 - 3187, n=5)
2892 Points ∼50% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=267, last 2 years)
2883 Points ∼50% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
10348 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8374 Points ∼77% -19%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼63% -35%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9420 Points ∼87% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼76% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼86% -10%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (9833 - 12112, n=5)
10821 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=267, last 2 years)
3412 Points ∼32% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6903 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6006 Points ∼74% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼80% -6%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8125 Points ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼84% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼98% +16%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6119 - 7294, n=5)
6701 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=267, last 2 years)
3071 Points ∼38% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3084 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3877 Points ∼68% +26%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +85%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5468 Points ∼96% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼72% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼75% +39%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2622 - 3084, n=5)
2953 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=265, last 2 years)
2840 Points ∼50% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
20511 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
20154 Points ∼93% -2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼37% -61%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12878 Points ∼60% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼44% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼59% -38%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (20511 - 23094, n=5)
21609 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=267, last 2 years)
4754 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
9094 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
10427 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼70% -20%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9897 Points ∼95% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼71% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼85% -3%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (8333 - 9173, n=5)
8974 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=267, last 2 years)
3783 Points ∼36% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
2975 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3218 Points ∼65% +8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4900 Points ∼99% +65%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼82% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼98% +65%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2975 - 3161, n=4)
3058 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2769 Points ∼56% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6917 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5761 Points ∼69% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼78% -7%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8222 Points ∼99% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼98% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6281 - 9612, n=4)
7523 Points ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2804 Points ∼34% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
5344 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4901 Points ∼68% -8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼85% +13%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7145 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼93% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (5079 - 6614, n=4)
5652 Points ∼79% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2627 Points ∼37% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4882 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼95%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2915 - 3153, n=3)
3025 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2728 Points ∼55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼61%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11586 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (10686 - 13334, n=3)
11661 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3949 Points ∼32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼74%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8877 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6711 - 7564, n=3)
7116 Points ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3345 Points ∼37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
318 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
309 fps ∼97% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼48% -52%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
207 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (264 - 325, n=5)
308 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
98 fps ∼31% -69%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82% +50%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40 - 60, n=5)
55.9 fps ∼51% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
53.2 fps ∼48% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
180 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
168 fps ∼93% -7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
127 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (148 - 180, n=5)
170 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
57.2 fps ∼32% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼66% -2%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98% +47%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (52 - 60, n=5)
58.3 fps ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
41.7 fps ∼46% -30%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
109.9 fps ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
112 fps ∼97% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼65% -32%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼76% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼56% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼74% -22%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (106 - 137, n=5)
116 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=215, last 2 years)
39.1 fps ∼34% -64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.3 fps ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% +13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼68% -2%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼78% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +44%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (45.4 - 60, n=5)
55.5 fps ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼42% -39%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
47.5 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
45 fps ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼48% -52%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼63% -37%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (35.6 - 53, n=5)
44.6 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
13.8 fps ∼29% -71%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
31.2 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼93% -7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼61% -39%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (29 - 32.9, n=5)
30.6 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
9.54 fps ∼31% -69%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
58.6 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
57 fps ∼97% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼61% -39%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40.5 - 60, n=5)
54.1 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=268, last 2 years)
20.9 fps ∼36% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
84.1 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
74 fps ∼84% -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼57% -41%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼63% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼62% -36%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (79 - 106, n=5)
87.7 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼27% -71%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼84% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼59% -41%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (66 - 87.2, n=5)
74.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
23.5 fps ∼31% -69%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
51.8 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
49 fps ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼87% -13%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40 - 52, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=214, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼40% -60%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
569468 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
534558 Points ∼90% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼83% -13%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
576457 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼89% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (510245 - 647374, n=5)
580942 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=169, last 2 years)
331865 Points ∼56% -42%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1466 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1224 Points ∼75%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11790 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=203, last 2 years)
5195 Points ∼44%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7899 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
3983 Points ∼50%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10029 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=203, last 2 years)
6304 Points ∼63%
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6083 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=203, last 2 years)
3411 Points ∼56%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
92916 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59150 Points ∼64% -36%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73666 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (91892 - 92916, n=4)
92512 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 228879, n=41, last 2 years)
49907 Points ∼54% -46%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
161.437 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158 - 167, n=5)
161 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
128.525 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
69.401 Points ∼43% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
47.7 Points ∼30% -70%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (305 - 376, n=5)
353 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
342.7 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
299.99 Points ∼85% -12%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
118.7 Points ∼34% -65%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼33% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼27% -72%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=190, last 2 years)
85.4 Points ∼24% -75%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
196 runs/min ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 198, n=5)
194 runs/min ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
153 runs/min ∼78% -22%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼37% -63%
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86)
71.3 runs/min ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
49.1 runs/min ∼25% -75%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
193 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 195, n=5)
193 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
183 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
108 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
75.9 Points ∼39% -61%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
58488 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 58632, n=5)
57766 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
49151 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼39% -61%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
19915 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼34% -66%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
16273 Points ∼28% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4424 ms * ∼100% -861%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼52% -399%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼46% -339%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼43% -316%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
1860.1 ms * ∼42% -304%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
571.7 ms * ∼13% -24%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 467, n=5)
463 ms * ∼10% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
460.4 ms * ∼10%

* ... smaller is better

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
99.8 % ∼100% +37%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94.7 % ∼95% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.2 % ∼91% +26%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
52 % ∼52% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26.6 % ∼27% -63%
Hög belastning
 33.2 °C33.4 °C33.3 °C 
 33.4 °C34.2 °C33.5 °C 
 33.2 °C34 °C33.4 °C 
Max: 34.2 °C
Medel: 33.5 °C
31.5 °C32.1 °C32.5 °C
31.8 °C33.5 °C33.4 °C
31.1 °C33.5 °C33 °C
Max: 33.5 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  24.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.545.12534.938.13124.641.14024.739.95030.942.46323.640.58017.744.810016.543.512514.146.716012.654.520012.752.225012.156.231512.459.340013.558.250012.162.863012.264.680011.666.1100010.968.9125012.171.916001277.3200012.382250012.683.8315012.584.2400012.882.2500013.180.7630013.780.7800013.781.61000013.577.31250014.371.81600014.762.8SPL24.892.3N0.685.3median 12.6median 68.9Delta0.811.836.923.32923.721.927.4222229.935.3222819.330.716.331.31440.316.956.114.954.614.158.61066.71165.711.766.710.969.411.972.31176.410.276.811.477.812.87912.97912.578.41378.513.175.813.475.315.776.113.573.51470.313.763.924.888.80.677.4median 13median 72.31.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 12 ProSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.22 / 1.24 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.04 / 3.86 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3046 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Apple A14 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-32%
-31%
-65%
-48%
-30%
-83%
-60%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.58
9%
0.92
-44%
1.1
-72%
0.65
-2%
0.61
5%
0.852 (0.62 - 1.3, n=5)
-33%
0.924 (0.37 - 2.3, n=235, last 2 years)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.22
1.99
-63%
1.41
-16%
1.5
-23%
1.06
13%
1.19
2%
2.66 (1.18 - 7.89, n=5)
-118%
1.848 (0.82 - 3.94, n=235, last 2 years)
-51%
Idle Maximum *
1.24
2.03
-64%
1.47
-19%
1.7
-37%
1.49
-20%
1.23
1%
2.81 (1.21 - 7.91, n=5)
-127%
2.13 (0.85 - 4.2, n=235, last 2 years)
-72%
Load Average *
3.04
3.13
-3%
3.35
-10%
4.6
-51%
4.91
-62%
4.18
-38%
4.66 (2.1 - 9.28, n=5)
-53%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=235, last 2 years)
-46%
Load Maximum *
3.86
5.43
-41%
6.37
-65%
9.4
-144%
10.29
-167%
8.53
-121%
7.09 (3.86 - 10.8, n=5)
-84%
7.21 (3.16 - 12.3, n=235, last 2 years)
-87%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
34tim 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari Mobile 14)
13tim 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 37min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 11min
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3046 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-17%
-8%
-16%
-9%
Reader / Idle
2091
2084
0%
1474
-30%
1539
-26%
1223
-42%
2133
2%
H.264
1117
1046
-6%
1137
2%
1103
-1%
993
-11%
973
-13%
WiFi v1.3
781
791
1%
743
-5%
1023
31%
644
-18%
865
11%
Load
311
336
8%
198
-36%
203
-35%
338
9%
198
-36%

För

+ Blixtsnabb SoC
+ Ljusstark OLED-skärm med HDR10 och DolbyVision
+ Lång batteritid
+ Bra trippelkamerasystem
+ Lyxig konstruktion och IP68
+ Exakt positionering
+ Brett stöd för olika frekvensband

Emot

- Medioker högtalare
- Bluetooth utan High Res Audio
- Ganska långsamt WiFi 6
- Begränsad NFC
- Minnet går inte att utöka
- Saknar stöd för mmWave
- Långsam dataöverföring med kabel

Omdöme – Retro-diva som blickar mot framtiden

Recension av Apple iPhone 12 Pro.
Recension av Apple iPhone 12 Pro.

Apple iPhone 12 Pro har ett nytt designspråk som påminner om gårddagens iPhone 4 och iPhone 5-serier, vilket troligen kommer göra en del fans nöjda. Det är trots allt en tjusig smartphone. Tack vare mer skärm i förhållande till kroppen har den bara växt en aning trots att den inrymmer en skärm på 6.1 tum, vilket gör den jämförelsevis kompakt.

Tack vare sin arkitektur är Apples nya SoC ett stort steg framåt. Den är inte bara mer effektiv än innan utan har också högre prestanda, särskilt för maskin-inlärning. Kameran har förbättrats ytterligare även om den mer ljuskänsliga sensorn bara finns på Pro Max-modellen.

iPhone 12 Pro presterade för det mesta väldigt bra och är en sann lyxprodukt med ett väletablerat och moget ekosystem.

Apples sätt att hantera tillbehör känns logiskt och är ett bra steg mot en mer hållbar framtid. Däremot har Apple misslyckats med att kommunicera detta ordentligt och faktum att du kan behöva köpa extra tillbehör är svårsmält.

Den nya MagSafe-tekniken kan användas till många olika saker och vi ser redan att tredjepartstillverkare utnyttjar detta och skapar sina egna roliga tillbehör. 5G-stöd har behövts länge; men det är för en del marknader helt absurt att den saknar stöd för mmWave.

Apple behöver också förbättra ljudet, i synnerhet är det ovärdigt att en toppskikts-smartphone saknar stöd för högupplöst ljud över Bluetooth.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPhone 12 Pro - 11/17/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
92%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
57 / 70 → 81%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
64 / 64 → 100%
Programprestanda
93 / 86 → 100%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
80%
Medel
84%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone 12 Pro - Kraftfull smartphone med retro-look (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-11-23 (Update: 2020-11-23)