Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Mate 8 smartphone (sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 03/18/2016

Snabb och uthållig. Huawei vill vara med och tävla i toppsegmentet med en 6-tumsmobil med en helt ny krets. Vi har testat Mate 8 för att se om den levererar.

Huawei Mate 8 (Mate Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 950
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS-NEO, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.7 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Ljussensor, fingeravtryck, G-sensor, kompass, HALL-sensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, barometer, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (FDD: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26, TDD: B38/B39/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 157.1 x 80.6
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 42 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 28 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 636 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 614 tim
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, OIS, autofokus, Dual-Tone-blixt, 1080p-video (60 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.4
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Hörlurar, EMUI 4.0, Phone Manager, HiCare, FM-radio, Google-Appar, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
185 g, Strömförsörjning: 70 g
Pris
599 Kr

 

Huawei Mate 8: complete
Huawei Mate 8: complete
Huawei Mate 8: crossing
Huawei Mate 8: crossing
Huawei Mate 8: shore
Huawei Mate 8: shore
Garmin Edge 500: complete
Garmin Edge 500: complete
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: shore
Garmin Edge 500: shore

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
509
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 527 cd/m² Medel: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.43 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 514 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1469:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.8-23.34 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.7
99.84% sRGB (Argyll) 79.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.08
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
8%
15%
0%
-1%
-27%
-6%
Brightness middle
514
335.7
-35%
363
-29%
583
13%
297
-42%
425
-17%
538
5%
Brightness
513
332
-35%
365
-29%
560
9%
297
-42%
395
-23%
528
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
90
-4%
91
-3%
93
-1%
88
-6%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.35
0.46
-31%
0.5
-43%
0.66
-89%
Contrast
1469
1267
-14%
850
-42%
815
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.08
2.33
54%
2.34
54%
3.55
30%
2.67
47%
7.05
-39%
2.63
48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.49
2.15
61%
1.03
81%
3.88
29%
2.81
49%
6.38
-16%
3.24
41%
Gamma
2.08 115%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
2.2 109%
2.08 115%
1.63 147%
2.17 111%
CCT
7254 90%
6184 105%
6429 101%
7280 89%
6379 102%
6776 96%
6906 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
79.95
59.05
-26%
66.31
-17%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.84
92.8
-7%
99.79
0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9024 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
2898 Points ∼9%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
915 Points ∼20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4207 Points ∼11% -33%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼12% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼12% -29%
Motorola Moto X Style
3567 Points ∼9% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1317 Points ∼27% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼27% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼52% +47%
Motorola Moto X Style
1276 Points ∼26% -26%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
5220 Points ∼51%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
5130 Points ∼60% -30%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼55% -36%
Motorola Moto X Style
5859 Points ∼69% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1627 Points ∼53% -36%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points ∼43% -48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points ∼54% -34%
Motorola Moto X Style
1345 Points ∼44% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1176 Points ∼22% +47%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points ∼30% +98%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points ∼48% +225%
Motorola Moto X Style
440 Points ∼8% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1253 Points ∼32% +33%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points ∼39% +61%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points ∼60% +145%
Motorola Moto X Style
517 Points ∼13% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1652 Points ∼54% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼37% -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼55% -30%
Motorola Moto X Style
1339 Points ∼43% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1606 Points ∼21% +47%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼30% +111%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼59% +317%
Motorola Moto X Style
1419 Points ∼18% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1616 Points ∼32% +30%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼38% +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼67% +167%
Motorola Moto X Style
1400 Points ∼28% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16117 Points ∼22% +3%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼21% -4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points ∼18% -17%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
21115 Points ∼29% +36%
Motorola Moto X Style
12767 Points ∼18% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
27549 Points ∼6% +34%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼7% +69%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points ∼9% +103%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
20006 Points ∼4% -3%
Motorola Moto X Style
23321 Points ∼5% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
23798 Points ∼12% +24%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼13% +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points ∼14% +45%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
20242 Points ∼10% +6%
Motorola Moto X Style
19702 Points ∼10% +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps ∼3%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼3% +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼6% +92%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2% -34%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
30 fps ∼2% -27%
Motorola Moto X Style
34 fps ∼2% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps ∼10%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼7% -25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼13% +34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4% -57%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
30 fps ∼7% -32%
Motorola Moto X Style
24 fps ∼5% -45%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
18 fps ∼3% 0%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼5% +39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼7% +113%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3% -3%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
13 fps ∼2% -28%
Motorola Moto X Style
15 fps ∼3% -17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
14 fps ∼4% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼5% -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼11% +102%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3% -38%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
12 fps ∼3% -37%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.3 fps ∼3% -51%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼2%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼4% +60%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼7% +180%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.9 fps ∼2% -1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼6%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼5% -14%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼16% +155%
Motorola Moto X Style
5.6 fps ∼3% -49%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
4599 points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4566 points ∼99% -1%
Google Nexus 6P
4332 points ∼94% -6%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
4378 points ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto X Style
3873 points ∼84% -16%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
18831 points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16793 points ∼89% -11%
Google Nexus 6P
10823 points ∼57% -43%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
3856 points ∼20% -80%
Motorola Moto X Style
8815 points ∼47% -53%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
993 Points ∼59% -12%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼47% -30%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points ∼71% +6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼49% -26%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
896 Points ∼53% -20%
Motorola Moto X Style
974 Points ∼57% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
2457 Points ∼27% +50%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼26% +48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼46% +163%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼22% +25%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1411 Points ∼15% -14%
Motorola Moto X Style
1918 Points ∼21% +17%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1298 Points ∼29% -45%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼26% -51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼25% -52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼44% -17%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1035 Points ∼23% -56%
Motorola Moto X Style
1776 Points ∼40% -24%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
3321 Points ∼32% -18%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼17% -56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼38% -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼13% -66%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1968 Points ∼19% -52%
Motorola Moto X Style
2783 Points ∼27% -32%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1801 Points ∼48% -12%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼37% -31%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼58% +8%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼39% -28%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1267 Points ∼33% -38%
Motorola Moto X Style
1743 Points ∼46% -15%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
523.8 MFLOPS ∼18%
Google Nexus 6P
262.042 MFLOPS ∼9% -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1295 MFLOPS ∼44% +147%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2956.69 MFLOPS ∼100% +464%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
415.435 MFLOPS ∼14% -21%
Motorola Moto X Style
589.744 MFLOPS ∼20% +13%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
328.8 MFLOPS ∼32%
Google Nexus 6P
87.088 MFLOPS ∼9% -74%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
669 MFLOPS ∼66% +103%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
369.586 MFLOPS ∼36% +12%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
171.438 MFLOPS ∼17% -48%
Motorola Moto X Style
415.017 MFLOPS ∼41% +26%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼19%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points ∼46% +147%
Motorola Moto X Style
291 Points ∼16% -16%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
16688 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
9252 Points ∼21% -45%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
29659 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
31743 Points ∼71% +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74% +12%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
11.18 fps ∼29% +42%
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
59 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
42.7 fps ∼69% -28%
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
57.8 fps ∼95%
High Performance (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
60.1 fps ∼99%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML Intel Atom Z3580, PowerVR G6430, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sunspider
1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
460.6 ms * ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
688.5 ms * ∼17% -49%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
529.7 ms * ∼13% -15%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
223 ms * ∼6% +52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
409.7 ms * ∼10% +11%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
930.6 ms * ∼23% -102%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
773.6 ms * ∼19% -68%
0.9.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
700.6 ms * ∼7%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95 Points ∼12% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼14% -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points ∼24% +37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points ∼14% -19%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points ∼14% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.136 Points ∼0% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼0% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points ∼0% +83%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points ∼0% -29%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36.274 Points ∼0% -44%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points ∼0% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5066.7 ms * ∼9% -39%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * ∼7% -15%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * ∼3% +52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -52%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6002.2 ms * ∼10% -65%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7325 ms * ∼12% -101%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7724 Points ∼16% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points ∼18% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points ∼32% +41%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points ∼16% -29%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6379 Points ∼13% -44%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8065 Points ∼16% -29%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11458 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8801 Points ∼45% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8622 Points ∼44% -25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15529 Points ∼79% +36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7362 Points ∼38% -36%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7829 Points ∼40% -32%
Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2478 points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1884 points ∼6% -24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
0 points ∼0% -100%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
988 points ∼3% -60%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20.95 MB/s ∼13% +33%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s ∼7% -25%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.48 MB/s ∼5% -46%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.1 MB/s ∼19% +98%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
89.91 MB/s ∼52% +260%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s ∼12% -20%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20.68 MB/s ∼12% -17%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.97 MB/s ∼16% +8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.78 MB/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151.11 MB/s ∼70% +21%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.51 MB/s ∼57% -2%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
89.99 MB/s ∼42% -28%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.15 MB/s ∼21% -63%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.28 MB/s ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
382.97 MB/s ∼47% +61%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.33 MB/s ∼29% -1%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
144.47 MB/s ∼18% -39%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
246.89 MB/s ∼30% +4%
Hög belastning
 42 °C40 °C38.8 °C 
 41.9 °C39 °C38.7 °C 
 39.8 °C38.5 °C36.1 °C 
Max: 42 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
34.9 °C36.3 °C37.5 °C
34.9 °C37 °C37.5 °C
34.7 °C36.1 °C35.9 °C
Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.85 / 2.07 / 2.28 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.91 / 4.69 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-19%
7%
-110%
-20%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.83
2%
0.5
41%
2.85
-235%
1.1
-29%
0.7
18%
Idle Average *
2.07
1.09
47%
1.9
8%
2.95
-43%
2.2
-6%
2.2
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2.28
1.17
49%
2.2
4%
3.26
-43%
2.4
-5%
2.3
-1%
Load Average *
3.91
7.49
-92%
3.2
18%
8.92
-128%
4.2
-7%
3.9
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.69
9.51
-103%
6.4
-36%
9.39
-100%
7.2
-54%
6.8
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
31tim 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 03min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 16min
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-26%
-29%
-26%
-42%
-51%
-42%
Reader / Idle
1872
1459
-22%
1447
-23%
1655
-12%
1078
-42%
1141
-39%
H.264
963
533
-45%
714
-26%
611
-37%
383
-60%
WiFi v1.3
865
501
-42%
375
-57%
513
-41%
369
-57%
420
-51%
400
-54%
Load
256
223
-13%
280
9%
197
-23%
179
-30%
219
-14%

För

+ Utmärkt hölje
+ Ljusstark skärm
+ Bra prestanda
+ Mycket bra batteritid
+ Plats för två SIM-kort
+ Minneskortplats
+ Fingeravtrycksläsare
+ Ingen bloatware

Emot

- Färgavvikelser på skärmen
- Dålig frontkamera
- Högt pris
- Medioker GPS
- Viss strypning under kontinuerlig belastning
- Högtalaren
In review: Huawei Mate 8. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Mate 8. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Huawei Mate 8 gjorde ett mycket positivt intryck under vårt test med sitt stilrena hölje och sin höga prestanda. Det är en ganska stor enhet med 6-tumsskärm, men den är ändå bekväm att använda tack vare den tunna ramen. 

Förutom hög prestanda är vi också övertygade av den nya effektiva Kirin 950-kretsen –batteritiden är utmärkt i kombination med 4000-mAh batteriet. Du bör vanligtvis klara två dagar på en laddning. Android 6.0 med Huaweis EMUI 4.0-gränssnitt är också smidigt att använda.

Så kan Mate 8 konkurrera med andra flaggskepp på marknaden? Inte riktigt, eftersom det finns mer potential i vissa avseenden. FHD-panelen har ganska höga färgavvikelser, du kan inte spela in 4K-video, GPS-modulen kunde varit mer exakt och stödet för dubbla SIM-kort bättre (bara en av platserna tillåter dataanslutningar). 

Några av dessa funktioner kommer troligen att stödjas i det kommande flaggskeppet Huawei P9, som är tänkt att släppas i mars. Mate 8 är ändå en utmärkt enhet och det finns ingen anledning att avstå köp om du letar efter en snygg smartphone med en stor skärm och lång batteritid.

Huawei Mate 8 - 04/13/2016 v5
Andreas Osthoff

Design
91%
Tangentbord
75 / 75 → 100%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
57 / 60 → 95%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
47 / 63 → 74%
Programprestanda
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
79%
Medel
79%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Mate 8 smartphone (sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-03-18 (Update: 2016-03-18)