Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Kommer både med S Pen och kraftfulla funktioner (Sammanfattning)

Varde ljus! Note20 Ultra höjer ribban, i synnerhet när det kommer till skärmen, men den upprepar också gamla misstag som Galaxy S20 Ultra led av. Med ett större batteri, en ny design, en bättre kamera samt en S Pen försöker den allra kraftigaste Note-modellen vinna köparnas hjärtan. Vår recension kommer att avslöja huruvida något hindrar den från att göra detta.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Minne
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.9 tum 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixlar 494 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.3 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Positionering, Accelerometer, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Närhetssensor, Barometer, MST
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900)), LTE (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B3 (1,800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2,600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 164.8 x 77.2
Batteri
4500 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1.33", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MP (ultra-vidvinkel, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 12 MP (5x optisk zoom, f/3.0, 1/3.0", OIS), 8K-video, Camera2 API-nivå: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, DPAF)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Nätadapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Headset, Dokumentation, One UI, Microsoft apps, Spotify, 24 Månader Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, SAR (Huvud): 0.338 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 1.470 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
208 g, Strömförsörjning: 69 g
Pris
1,266 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
09/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.9"3088x1440
87 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.8"3040x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242

Storleksjämförelse

164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
670 (326min - 802max) MBit/s ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (310min - 384max) MBit/s ∼35% -60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=590)
277 MBit/s ∼27% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼84% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (496min - 582max) MBit/s ∼58% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
534 (468min - 587max) MBit/s ∼55% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=590)
263 MBit/s ∼27% -66%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø870 (841-882)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (691-832)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Bro
Garmin Edge 500 - Bro
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Vändpunkt
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Vändpunkt
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bro
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow-LightZoomUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
30 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 26.47 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 38.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 5.98 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 13.62 ∆E
870
cd/m²
878
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
867
cd/m²
860
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
883
cd/m²
869
cd/m²
898
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 898 cd/m² Medel: 878.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.91 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 860 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.9
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Screen
9%
4%
30%
23%
Brightness middle
860
683
-21%
592
-31%
753
-12%
790
-8%
Brightness
878
694
-21%
605
-31%
762
-13%
790
-10%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
96
0%
96
0%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.9
36%
2.5
44%
0.9
80%
1.4
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
4.8
54%
5.5
47%
1.6
85%
3.4
67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
2.6
-8%
1.5
37%
1.9
21%
Gamma
2 110%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6466 101%
6247 104%
6173 105%
6415 101%
6466 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17602 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

HDR - Blandade färger (Målfärgrymd: DCI P3)
HDR - Blandade färger (Målfärgrymd: DCI P3)
HDR - Gråskalespårning (Målfärgrymd: BT.2020)
HDR - Gråskalespårning (Målfärgrymd: BT.2020)
HDR - Mättnad (Målfärgrymd: DCI P3)
HDR - Mättnad (Målfärgrymd: DCI P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=27)
1938 Points ∼35% -65%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=29)
1693 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2331 Points ∼70% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼92% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=113)
1930 Points ∼58% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
834 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=113)
549 Points ∼58% -42%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼79% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=418)
5006 Points ∼38% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=418)
1531 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=516)
5927 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=674)
6499 Points ∼45% -55%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼66% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=168)
2656 Points ∼69% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼89% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=168)
2957 Points ∼36% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼72% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼85% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=168)
2668 Points ∼41% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼61% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼95% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=519)
2205 Points ∼40% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼65% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=519)
2112 Points ∼23% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼64% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=520)
1974 Points ∼25% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼68% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼83% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=550)
2116 Points ∼41% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼40% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼81% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=550)
2833 Points ∼22% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼52% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼80% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=550)
2382 Points ∼27% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼68% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼100% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=600)
2088 Points ∼43% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=600)
1779 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼69% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=601)
1699 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼67% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼97% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=642)
1954 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼41% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼73% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=641)
2347 Points ∼19% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼49% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=644)
2019 Points ∼22% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼75% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=787)
15436 Points ∼36% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼32% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=785)
26683 Points ∼13% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼56% -20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=785)
20833 Points ∼22% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼33% -34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=789)
45.1 fps ∼16% -69%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=798)
31.1 fps ∼28% -72%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=694)
26.6 fps ∼17% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼62% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=702)
22.4 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼65% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=557)
21.4 fps ∼21% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼47% -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=559)
19.4 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼37% -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=312)
11.2 fps ∼24% -67%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼62% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% -9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=310)
8.02 fps ∼28% -64%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=316)
16.8 fps ∼29% -66%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼64% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=315)
19.3 fps ∼26% -55%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼44% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=482)
14.4 fps ∼23% -62%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼38% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=486)
12.7 fps ∼26% -63%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼79% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=111)
317377 Points ∼53% -40%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (8.52min - 83.34max) fps ∼39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (12.07min - 47.94max) fps ∼52%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (10.62min - 99.35max) fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼70%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=87)
2558 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=728)
820 Points ∼47% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=728)
2499 Points ∼15% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼58% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +108%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=728)
1862 Points ∼23% -51%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼56% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=728)
3458 Points ∼24% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=728)
1763 Points ∼29% -63%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +127%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼44%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=188)
40.6 Points ∼31% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +214%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=619)
47.1 Points ∼16% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=171)
42.7 runs/min ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=255)
69.7 Points ∼39% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +151%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=786)
7859 Points ∼16% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=812)
9766 ms * ∼100% -325%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼26% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼24% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy Note10+Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
7%
13%
7%
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
24%
62.5 (55.6 - 69.3, n=2)
12%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=530)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
26%
75.7 (65.6 - 85.8, n=2)
15%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=530)
5%
Random Write 4KB
217.74
183.59
-16%
259.21
19%
258.54
19%
231 (205 - 269, n=4)
6%
35.8 (0.14 - 319, n=883)
-84%
Random Read 4KB
186.67
196.22
5%
226.38
21%
264.9
42%
223 (187 - 267, n=4)
19%
59.1 (1.59 - 324, n=883)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
802.09
588.06
-27%
401.79
-50%
750.44
-6%
771 (732 - 802, n=4)
-4%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=883)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1782.3
1503.7
-16%
1780.5
0%
1738.65
-2%
1709 (1675 - 1782, n=4)
-4%
341 (12.1 - 1802, n=883)
-81%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.9: Ø88 (57-118)
Hög belastning
 32.9 °C33.1 °C30.8 °C 
 33.8 °C33.3 °C31.3 °C 
 32.5 °C33 °C30.7 °C 
Max: 33.8 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C
29.1 °C30.7 °C30 °C
29.1 °C31.1 °C30.3 °C
28.8 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C
Max: 31.1 °C
Medel: 30.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.923.3252923.73121.927.44022225029.935.36322288019.330.710016.331.31251440.316016.956.120014.954.625014.158.63151066.74001165.750011.766.763010.969.480011.972.310001176.4125010.276.8160011.477.8200012.879250012.979315012.578.440001378.5500013.175.8630013.475.3800015.776.11000013.573.5125001470.31600013.763.9SPL24.888.8N0.677.4median 13median 72.3Delta1.18.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.06 / 1.49 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.91 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-31%
-13%
9%
-49%
-22%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.7
-8%
0.87
-34%
0.61
6%
0.92
-42%
0.846 (0.65 - 1, n=5)
-30%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=885)
-37%
Idle Average *
1.06
1.81
-71%
1.75
-65%
1.19
-12%
2.9
-174%
1.534 (1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-45%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=884)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.92
-29%
1.83
-23%
1.23
17%
2.94
-97%
1.858 (1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-25%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=885)
-37%
Load Average *
4.91
7.57
-54%
3.85
22%
4.18
15%
3.65
26%
5.14 (4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
-5%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=879)
16%
Load Maximum *
10.29
9.34
9%
6.64
35%
8.53
17%
6.18
40%
10.7 (9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-4%
6.08 (1.2 - 14.2, n=879)
41%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 84)
10tim 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 33min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 38min
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
21%
16%
53%
Reader / Idle
1223
1585
30%
2174
78%
2133
74%
2618
114%
H.264
993
934
-6%
1098
11%
973
-2%
1346
36%
WiFi v1.3
644
532
-17%
823
28%
865
34%
909
41%
Load
338
305
-10%
219
-35%
198
-41%
408
21%

För

+ Väldigt ljusstark OLED-skärm med HDR10
+ Bra högtalare
+ S Pen
+ Kraftfull trippelkamera
+ Utökningsbar lagring
+ WiFi 6, 5G och eSIM
+ IP68-certifiering

Emot

- Långsam microSD-plats
- 120 Hz endast vid Full HD
- Har varken aptX HD eller aptX Adaptive
- SoC-policyn

Omdöme - Ett svårt val

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vid skrivande stund är Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra en av de bästa smarta telefonerna som går att få tag på. Den utmärker sig i vårt test med en riktigt ljusstark AMOLED-skärm, ett snabbt system, en bra och mångsidig kamera, behagliga högtalare samt en tjusig design. Dessutom har vi S Pen, en väldigt mogen produkt med många utmärkta funktioner.

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra är ett riktigt komplett paket och tre års utlovade uppdateringar garanterar ett långt liv.

Det är bara om man tittar närmare på detaljerna som några mindre irritationsmoment uppenbarar sig. Dessa inkluderar först och främst dilemmat med de olika chippen, vilket lämnar en dålig smak i munnen. Inte nog med att prestandan är sämre med en Exynos SoC; den är dessutom mindre energieffektiv och 5G-funktionaliteten får brottas med att den saknar stöd för mmWave. Skärmen kunde också varit bättre kalibrerad; även om detta knappt går att märka med blotta ögat hindrar det skärmen från att få ett bättre betyg. Vidare hade vi väntat oss att skärmens 120 Hz-läge skulle fungera även i QHD+ upplösning på en såpass lyxig produkt.

Gillar man Note finns det egentligen ingen väg runt Galaxy Note20 Ultra, men det finns inte mycket anledning att byta från förra årets modell för en del saker har Samsung inte förbättrat överhuvudtaget. Har man inget problem med det höga priset får man dock en utmärkt smartphone.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - 09/03/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
96%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 90%
Mus
98%
Anslutningar
70 / 70 → 100%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
57 / 64 → 88%
Programprestanda
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
80%
Medel
84%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Kommer både med S Pen och kraftfulla funktioner (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-09- 9 (Update: 2020-09- 9)