Notebookcheck

Test: Google Pixel 5 - Kraftfull mittenskiktare med Android 11 (Sammanfattning)

Mindre är mer. Pixel 5 är ett nytt smartphone-flaggskepp från Google och den visade sig vara extremt kompakt trots sina 6 tum. Den har ingen toppskikts-SoC utan processorn är från mittenskiktet. Men det blev bra ändå i slutändan, vilket våra tester kommer visa.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Google Pixel 5
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.00 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 432 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, OLED, FHD+, 16 miljoner färger, alltid på-skärm, Gorilla Glass 6, glansig: ja, HDR, 90 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Ljussensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Magnetometer, Barometer, Spektrum- och flimmersensor, 2x2 MIMO, aptX, aptX HD, Google Cast, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API full
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 3G (band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66/71), 5G (Sub-6 band n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/28/41/66/71/77/78), Huvud SAR 0.96 W/kg, Kropp SAR 1.39 W/kg, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8 x 144.7 x 70.4
Batteri
4080 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP Ultravid (1.0 μm pixelbredd, ƒ/2.2, 107° synfält) + 12.2 MP dual-pixel (1.4 μm pixelbredd, autofokus med dual pixel phase detection, optisk + elektronisk bildstabilisering, ƒ/1.7, 77° synfält), videoinspelning i upp till [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP (1.12 μm pixelbredd, ƒ/2.0, 83° synfält), videoinspelning i upp till [email protected]
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, 18W adapter med USB-PD 2.0, USB-C kabel, USB-C till USB-A adapter, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Minst 3 års uppdateringar för OS och säkerhet, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
151 g, Strömförsörjning: 50 g
Pris
630 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 5
SD 765G, Adreno 620
151 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2340x1080
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
86 %
12/2019
Google Pixel 4
SD 855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.70"2280x1080
86 %
11/2019
Google Pixel 4 XL
SD 855, Adreno 640
193 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.30"3040x1440
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
84 %
08/2020
Vivo X50 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
181.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"2376x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
84 %
05/2020
ZTE Axon 11 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g160.4 mm 75.1 mm 8.2 mm 193 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 168 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g158.46 mm 72.8 mm 8.04 mm 181.5 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
676 (631min - 695max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (632min - 679max) MBit/s ∼98% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼96% +4%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
631 (579min - 653max) MBit/s ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼93% 0%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼83% -10%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼78% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=620)
286 MBit/s ∼42% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
642 (627min - 656max) MBit/s ∼96% +33%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼88% +22%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% +17%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼79% +10%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼72%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
475 (437min - 523max) MBit/s ∼71% -2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (159min - 363max) MBit/s ∼47% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=620)
273 MBit/s ∼41% -43%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø625 (521-652)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø483 (479-493)
Google Pixel 5: Total rutt
Google Pixel 5: Total rutt
Google Pixel 5: Sjö
Google Pixel 5: Sjö
Google Pixel 5: Vändplats
Google Pixel 5: Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500: Total rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Total rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500: Vändplats

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2Weitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Umgebung
click to load images
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
30 ∆E
69.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
67.5 ∆E
51 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 5: 43.92 ∆E min: 13.98 - max: 76.49 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 5: 6.88 ∆E min: 1.54 - max: 17.79 ∆E
629
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 647 cd/m² Medel: 635.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 635 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.10
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.70
Google Pixel 4 XL
P-OLED, 3040x1440, 6.30
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Vivo X50 Pro
AMOLED, 2376x1080, 6.56
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
ZTE Axon 11 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
6%
5%
-116%
-60%
-93%
-16%
-99%
Brightness middle
635
679
7%
554
-13%
557
-12%
529
-17%
784
23%
584
-8%
603
-5%
Brightness
636
671
6%
550
-14%
555
-13%
531
-17%
780
23%
583
-8%
608
-4%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
94
-3%
95
-2%
94
-3%
97
0%
97
0%
92
-5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.8
0.8
-0%
0.8
-0%
3.9
-388%
2.53
-216%
3.5
-338%
1.17
-46%
3
-275%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
2.4
-9%
1.4
36%
6.1
-177%
4.52
-105%
6.4
-191%
2.95
-34%
6.2
-182%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.1
35%
1.3
24%
3.5
-106%
1.7
-0%
3
-76%
1.7
-0%
3.8
-124%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.249 98%
1.99 111%
2.231 99%
2.21 100%
CCT
6492 100%
6610 98%
6213 105%
6127 106%
6462 101%
6666 98%
6341 103%
7242 90%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2573 Points ∼100% +57%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2164 Points ∼84% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼76% +20%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1876 Points ∼73% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼74% +17%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1816 Points ∼71% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=14)
1757 Points ∼68% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=148)
1968 Points ∼76% +20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼100% +25%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
552 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼82% +2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
634 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼90% +13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
588 Points ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=14)
599 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=148)
570 Points ∼76% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8954 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10254 Points ∼99% +15%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10335 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼91% +5%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8065 Points ∼78% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼75% -13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7737 Points ∼75% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=14)
8274 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=547)
6048 Points ∼59% -32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10007 Points ∼78%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12190 Points ∼96% +22%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12760 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼85% +9%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9675 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼68% -13%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9168 Points ∼72% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 10876, n=14)
9640 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=703)
6654 Points ∼52% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2979 Points ∼86%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3044 Points ∼88% +2%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3452 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼83% -4%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2893 Points ∼84% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼84% -3%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2609 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=14)
2718 Points ∼79% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=199)
2664 Points ∼77% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2364 Points ∼42%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5228 Points ∼92% +121%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼100% +140%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼56% +35%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3149 Points ∼55% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼56% +35%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3192 Points ∼56% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=14)
3033 Points ∼53% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=199)
3059 Points ∼54% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2478 Points ∼50%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4509 Points ∼91% +82%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4970 Points ∼100% +101%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼63% +25%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3087 Points ∼62% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼63% +26%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3041 Points ∼61% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=14)
2941 Points ∼59% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=199)
2715 Points ∼55% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼64% -9%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼82% +16%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5024 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼71% 0%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3765 Points ∼75% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼70% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3225 Points ∼64% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=14)
3248 Points ∼65% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=554)
2268 Points ∼45% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼35%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +186%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼79% +125%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6950 Points ∼86% +145%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼44% +25%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3556 Points ∼44% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼44% +27%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3579 Points ∼44% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=14)
3448 Points ∼42% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=554)
2259 Points ∼28% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼95% +105%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼89% +92%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6404 Points ∼100% +116%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼55% +20%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3597 Points ∼56% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼56% +22%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3494 Points ∼55% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=14)
3381 Points ∼53% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=555)
2088 Points ∼33% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3544 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼73% -4%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼88% +15%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4652 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼76% 0%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3651 Points ∼78% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼75% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3238 Points ∼70% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=14)
3232 Points ∼69% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=586)
2184 Points ∼47% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4036 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +342%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼52% +128%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9995 Points ∼56% +148%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼30% +33%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5265 Points ∼29% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼30% +32%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5416 Points ∼30% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=14)
5144 Points ∼29% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=586)
3080 Points ∼17% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3915 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +135%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼78% +84%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7963 Points ∼87% +103%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼52% +23%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4819 Points ∼52% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼53% +25%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4712 Points ∼51% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=14)
4512 Points ∼49% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=586)
2536 Points ∼28% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3547 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼53% -32%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼91% +18%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4612 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼76% -1%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3462 Points ∼75% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼74% -3%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3133 Points ∼68% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=14)
3324 Points ∼72% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=634)
2142 Points ∼46% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2106 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼92% +172%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼100% +195%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6163 Points ∼99% +193%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼53% +56%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3342 Points ∼54% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼53% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3302 Points ∼53% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=14)
3109 Points ∼50% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=634)
1883 Points ∼30% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2315 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼77% +90%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼98% +143%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5734 Points ∼100% +148%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼58% +44%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3329 Points ∼58% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼58% +45%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3263 Points ∼57% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=14)
3133 Points ∼55% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=635)
1786 Points ∼31% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3529 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼98% +29%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4618 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼75% -2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼74% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼75% -2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3223 Points ∼70% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=14)
3200 Points ∼69% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=676)
2013 Points ∼44% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2844 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼96% +208%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9141 Points ∼100% +221%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼57% +82%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5176 Points ∼57% +82%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼64% +105%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5167 Points ∼57% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=14)
4825 Points ∼53% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=675)
2497 Points ∼27% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2972 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼97% +144%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7507 Points ∼100% +153%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼62% +57%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4652 Points ∼62% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼63% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼61% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=14)
4256 Points ∼57% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=678)
2134 Points ∼28% -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
28331 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼77% +20%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼86% +33%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
43773 Points ∼100% +55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼48% -26%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20631 Points ∼47% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼47% -28%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14891 Points ∼34% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=14)
20608 Points ∼47% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=820)
15818 Points ∼36% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60281 Points ∼29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +247%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% +69%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105430 Points ∼50% +75%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼33% +15%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68808 Points ∼33% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼33% +15%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68840 Points ∼33% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 69645, n=14)
67110 Points ∼32% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=818)
28467 Points ∼14% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48201 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +102%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% +53%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
80296 Points ∼83% +67%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼47% -5%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
44918 Points ∼46% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼47% -6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38137 Points ∼39% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=14)
44131 Points ∼45% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=818)
21881 Points ∼22% -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +571%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼43% +190%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
136 fps ∼42% +183%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼30% +102%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
93 fps ∼29% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼30% +98%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
93 fps ∼29% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=12)
86.8 fps ∼27% +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=818)
47.7 fps ∼15% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% +33%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +96%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼68% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +33%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
81 fps ∼92% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼68% +33%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
59 fps ∼67% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=12)
61.3 fps ∼70% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=827)
32 fps ∼36% -29%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +465%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼43% +142%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
82 fps ∼47% +165%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼31% +77%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼29% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼28% +58%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56 fps ∼32% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=12)
50.3 fps ∼29% +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=723)
28.3 fps ∼16% -9%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼45%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼90% +100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼100% +123%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼69% +53%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼75% +67%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
46 fps ∼69% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼82% +83%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
48 fps ∼72% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=12)
45.9 fps ∼69% +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=731)
23.3 fps ∼35% -22%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +432%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼49% +159%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
53 fps ∼45% +141%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼32% +73%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
35 fps ∼30% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼32% +73%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼32% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=12)
34.8 fps ∼30% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=586)
22.7 fps ∼19% +3%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% +143%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
27 fps ∼45% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼52% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +57%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼53% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 34, n=12)
31 fps ∼52% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=588)
20.2 fps ∼34% -4%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +582%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% +173%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11 fps ∼18% +25%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼22% +48%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼22% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 13, n=14)
12 fps ∼20% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=346)
11.7 fps ∼20% +33%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +523%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼39% +145%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12 fps ∼36% +126%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼26% +60%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.3 fps ∼25% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼26% +60%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.6 fps ∼26% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=14)
8.37 fps ∼25% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=344)
8.24 fps ∼25% +55%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +154%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼28% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35% +62%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 21, n=14)
19.8 fps ∼33% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=350)
17.4 fps ∼29% +34%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +569%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼37% +146%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼38% +154%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼28% +85%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼26% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼28% +85%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼28% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 24, n=14)
22.1 fps ∼25% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=349)
20.1 fps ∼23% +55%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +508%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼47% +183%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼44% +167%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼29% +75%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps ∼27% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼29% +75%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼29% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=12)
19.4 fps ∼27% +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=511)
15.1 fps ∼21% +26%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% +131%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼27% +23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼32% +46%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼30% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼30% +38%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼30% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 19, n=12)
17.4 fps ∼29% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=515)
13.4 fps ∼22% +3%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼88% +30%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
426757 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼78% +15%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
327208 Points ∼77% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼75% +10%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
316938 Points ∼74% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332074, n=12)
310972 Points ∼73% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=139)
326530 Points ∼77% +13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1502 Points ∼94% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼90% +1%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1442 Points ∼90% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼91% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1362 Points ∼85% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=12)
1360 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=753)
835 Points ∼52% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼99% +264%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9356 Points ∼100% +265%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼56% +103%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4639 Points ∼50% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼56% +103%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5247 Points ∼56% +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=12)
4698 Points ∼50% +84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=753)
2592 Points ∼28% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100% +20%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6387 Points ∼99% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼82% -2%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4637 Points ∼72% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼88% +6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5464 Points ∼85% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=12)
5112 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=753)
1947 Points ∼30% -64%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼96% +35%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8417 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼81% +14%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6936 Points ∼82% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼72% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6691 Points ∼79% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=12)
6459 Points ∼77% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=753)
3552 Points ∼42% -40%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 4 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5243 Points ∼99% +59%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼77% +23%
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3857 Points ∼73% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼78% +24%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4020 Points ∼76% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=12)
3792 Points ∼72% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=753)
1823 Points ∼35% -45%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +162%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼44% +15%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼43% +12%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.811 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼38% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
47.673 Points ∼36% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=11)
46.9 Points ∼35% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=213)
42.5 Points ∼32% -16%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15.841 Points ∼12% -69%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +230%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% +21%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼32% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼32% +5%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
89.305 Points ∼30% 0%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.938 Points ∼30%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
84.388 Points ∼29% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.7, n=9)
79.4 Points ∼27% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=647)
49.6 Points ∼17% -44%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
10.765 Points ∼4% -88%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +219%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% +26%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼34% +9%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼32% +3%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼29% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=194)
44.9 runs/min ∼29% -9%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
9 runs/min ∼6% -82%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +139%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼55% +31%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼54% +30%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% +22%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼41% -1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
71 Points ∼39% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=284)
71 Points ∼39% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=11)
70.2 Points ∼38% -9%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
20 Points ∼11% -74%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +162%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
24044 Points ∼49% +29%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% +21%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼39% +3%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼38% 0%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
18219 Points ∼37% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=12)
16587 Points ∼34% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=816)
8273 Points ∼17% -56%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
3592 Points ∼7% -81%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15230.1 ms * ∼100% -517%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=842)
9571 ms * ∼63% -288%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=12)
3874 ms * ∼25% -57%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
2973.3 ms * ∼20% -20%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼19% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼17% -5%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2469.8 ms * ∼16%
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80)
2398.3 ms * ∼16% +3%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼14% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼4% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 5Google Pixel 4Google Pixel 4 XLOnePlus NordVivo X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GZTE Axon 11 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
3%
30%
10%
42%
34%
-2%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.7 (8.4 - 72.4, n=39)
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=550)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
88.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.6 (13.4 - 88.3, n=39)
69.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=550)
Random Write 4KB
155.87
146.64
-6%
164.18
5%
104.5
-33%
156.8
1%
138.47
-11%
128.35
-18%
114 (18.2 - 290, n=69)
-27%
38.6 (0.14 - 319, n=914)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
138.93
122.38
-12%
142.24
2%
126.7
-9%
165.23
19%
156.45
13%
166.27
20%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=69)
4%
61.8 (1.59 - 325, n=914)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
189.99
247.73
30%
197.41
4%
473.1
149%
209.11
10%
476.87
151%
417.09
120%
241 (182 - 511, n=69)
27%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=914)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB
851.37
655.4
-23%
870.91
2%
955.5
12%
924.65
9%
979.54
15%
955.97
12%
768 (427 - 999, n=69)
-10%
356 (12.1 - 2037, n=914)
-58%
0102030405060708090Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø89.1 (79-90)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Hög belastning
 31.3 °C31.7 °C31.7 °C 
 31.3 °C33.2 °C31.3 °C 
 32.9 °C33.6 °C32.5 °C 
Max: 33.6 °C
Medel: 32.2 °C
31.9 °C32.3 °C33.3 °C
31.8 °C33.5 °C34.7 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C35.5 °C
Max: 35.5 °C
Medel: 33.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.435.12523.336.7312641.54022.6405034.540.76319.942.18014.740.810014.439.712514.944.516017.853.920018.952.825011.754.931513.958.94001359.650010.363.463010.466.880012.471.4100011.177.9125011.284.4160012.782.7200012.375.1250012.675.3315012.778.2400012.780500012.783.2630013.582.980001478.81000013.5711250014.964160001658.5SPL24.891.9N0.688.5median 12.7median 71Delta110.234.935.129.128.925.425.629.426.239.435.527.324.621.624.42426.820.736.819.956.31858.816.855.816.259.615.961.313.56413.965.512.971.31473.414.77414.175.814.277.114.575.315.472.914.975.214.871.91572.115.373.315.368.815.661.215.562.32785.60.964.3median 15.3median 68.81.37.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.69 / 0.82 / 0.85 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.73 / 4.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-116%
-83%
-61%
-106%
-104%
-130%
-65%
-79%
-75%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.56
19%
1.01
-46%
0.83
-20%
1.8
-161%
1.18
-71%
1.5
-117%
0.78
-13%
0.958 (0.66 - 1.8, n=13)
-39%
0.892 (0.2 - 3.4, n=911)
-29%
Idle Average *
0.82
2.99
-265%
1.63
-99%
1.24
-51%
2.1
-156%
2.45
-199%
2.2
-168%
1.43
-74%
1.924 (0.82 - 2.55, n=13)
-135%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=910)
-114%
Idle Maximum *
0.85
3.02
-255%
1.69
-99%
1.25
-47%
2.3
-171%
2.51
-195%
2.9
-241%
1.54
-81%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=13)
-144%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=911)
-140%
Load Average *
2.73
4.17
-53%
4.67
-71%
4.98
-82%
3.4
-25%
3.61
-32%
4.4
-61%
5.04
-85%
3.85 (2.73 - 6.8, n=13)
-41%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=905)
-51%
Load Maximum *
4.4
5.44
-24%
8.78
-100%
9.09
-107%
5.2
-18%
5.36
-22%
7.2
-64%
7.49
-70%
5.91 (4.4 - 7.5, n=13)
-34%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=905)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
37tim 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24tim 26min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 33min
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Google Pixel 4 XL
3700 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-50%
-23%
-13%
-20%
4%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2245
2765
23%
1007
-55%
2003
-11%
1529
-32%
1683
-25%
1700
-24%
H.264
1466
1147
-22%
617
-58%
1064
-27%
1352
-8%
1403
-4%
1070
-27%
WiFi v1.3
808
866
7%
460
-43%
623
-23%
869
8%
763
-6%
884
9%
679
-16%
Load
333
267
-20%
185
-44%
261
-22%
216
-35%
448
35%
240
-28%

För

+ Kompakt och lätt hölje
+ IP68-certifiering
+ 5G & NFC
+ Android 11 med garanterade uppdateringar
+ Riktigt bra kamera
+ Ljusstark OLED-skärm med 90 Hz
+ Riktigt bra batteritid
+ Trådlös laddning

Emot

- Lagringen går inte att utöka
- Ej stöd för WiFi 6
- Endast en mittenskikts-SoC
- Tunt stereoljud

Omdöme - Pixel 5 går mot trenden

Test av Google Pixel 5. Recensionsex från Google Germany.
Test av Google Pixel 5. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Google har gjort något vågat med Pixel 5. Istället för att göra som sina konkurrenter och hela tiden satsa på större och större telefoner känns Googles senaste försök pyttig med sina 6 tum. Google har därmed minskat ett glapp som inte borde bortses från, då många användare vill ha kompakta och kraftfulla telefoner.

Kraftfull är definitivt ett karaktärsdrag som passar OLED-skärmen, det dubbla kamerasystemet och batteritiden. Skärmen övertygade med riktigt hög ljusstyrka och utmärkt färgprecision, dubbelkameran tog riktigt bra bilder och Googles telefon visade sig också ha riktigt uthållig batteritid.          

Även om Google Pixel 5 har många förbättringar över Pixel 4 ligger den efter tekniskt jämfört med andra toppmodeller. Den som däremot letar efter en kompakt Android 11-smartphone med garanterade uppdateringar bör verkligen ta en titt på Pixel 5.

Detta för oss till det andra vågade beslutet: vanligen förväntar man sig en toppskikts-SoC i en flaggskeppstelefon. Pixel 5 använder istället en Snapdragon 765G från mittenskiktet. Men vid vardagsbruk kommer du knappt märka av skillnaden i prestanda ändå. Det hade däremot inte skadat om Google också tagit fram en version med en mer kraftfull SoC. Med tanke på att Pixel 5 gör reklam för att hålla länge hade lite mer prestandareserver inför framtiden definitivt varit till nytta.

Pixel 5 kostar ca 6.300 kronor. Det är betydligt lägre än vad många av konkurrenternas toppmodeller kostar, även om de sistnämnda också kommer med snabbare hårdvara. Pixel 5 kan kompensera för detta med ett löfte från Google, som kan avgöra saken för många: Pixel 5 kommer med Android 11 och kommer få minst 3 års operativsystems- och säkerhetsuppdateringar.

Google Pixel 5 - 10/29/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
86%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
51 / 70 → 72%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
28 / 64 → 44%
Programprestanda
73 / 86 → 84%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
71%
Medel
78%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 5 - Kraftfull mittenskiktare med Android 11 (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-11- 2 (Update: 2020-11- 2)