Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - En kraftfull smartphone även utan Google (Sammanfattning)

Med Mate 30 Pro fokuserar Huawei för första gången på videoinspelning och har inte bara gett sin toppskiktstelefon en ny Kirin SoC utan också en andra sensor på 40 MP för fotografering eller videoinspelning i ultravidvinkel. Dessutom har man stoppat in all möjlig toppmodern teknik i telefonen, eller åtminstone all toppmodern teknik man lyckades få tag på.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Mate 30 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 990
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.53 tum 18.37:9, 2400 x 1176 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, Knog-gester, native pen support, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237.75 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ C, Kortläsare: Nano-minneskort på upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Kompass, Gyroskop, Hall-sensor, Närhetssensor, USB Typ C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.8 x 158.1 x 73.1
Batteri
17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Litiumpolymer, 3.85 volt
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix (Vidvinkel, f/1.6, 27 mm, 1/1.7") + 8 MPix (3x optisk zoom, f/2.4, 80 mm, 1/4") + 40 MPix (SuperSensing-videokamera, f/1.8, 18 mm, 1/1.54") + 3D ToF, 7,680 FPS slow-motion; Camera2 API Nivå: Begränsad
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 3D ToF)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Två, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Nätadapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Hörlurar, Dokumentation, EMUI 10.0, 24 Månader Garanti, Dual-band GNSS: Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
198 g, Strömförsörjning: 125 g
Pris
1099 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Enhetsjämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
10/2018
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.3"3120x1440
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
87 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.8"3040x1440
84 %
10/2019
LG G8X ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
87 %
11/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440

Storleksjämförelse

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g159.3 mm 75.8 mm 8.4 mm 192 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1001 (min: 209, max: 1106) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
670 (min: 326, max: 802) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (min: 310, max: 384) MBit/s ∼35% -65%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (min: 539, max: 678) MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -75%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (min: 6, max: 792) MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (min: 496, max: 582) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
534 (min: 468, max: 587) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 290, max: 411) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -75%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø1009 (912-1092)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø533 (468-602)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø966 (923-995)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (584-715)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Tur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Tur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Översikt
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Översikt
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Tur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Tur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Loop
GPS-test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Loop
Mate 30 Pro @ 60 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 60 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 30 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 30 FPS
Galaxy S10+ @ 30 FPS
Galaxy S10+ @ 60 FPS
iPhone 11 Pro @ 30 FPS
iPhone 11 Pro @ 60 FPS
Xiaomi Mi 9 @ 30 FPS
Xiaomi Mi 9 @ 60 FPS
P30 Pro @ 30 FPS

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 6.66 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 10.85 ∆E
ColorChecker
24 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
18 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 11.22 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 24.04 ∆E
Testkarta @ 2,500 lux (40 MP)
Testkarta @ 2,500 lux (Inzoomad sektion)
Testkarta @ 1 lux
603
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 616 cd/m² Medel: 605.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 592 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
LG G8X ThinQ
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Screen
18%
29%
7%
-60%
-3%
Brightness middle
592
576
-3%
790
33%
683
15%
570
-4%
606
2%
Brightness
605
582
-4%
790
31%
694
15%
581
-4%
611
1%
Brightness Distribution
96
90
-6%
97
1%
96
0%
90
-6%
95
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
1.4
44%
2.9
-16%
6.27
-151%
3.46
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
3.5
36%
3.4
38%
4.8
13%
9.75
-77%
5.64
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.6
38%
1.9
27%
2.2
15%
5.7
-119%
2
23%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.37 93%
2.258 97%
CCT
6173 105%
6561 99%
6466 101%
6247 104%
7309 89%
6779 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18284 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5
Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6448 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3294 - 6448, n=5)
5360 Points ∼83%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3222 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2245 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2837 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼75% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3222 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼43% -57%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4442 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3460 Points ∼76% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4567 Points ∼100% +3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2305 Points ∼50% -48%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼59% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4442 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼38% -60%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3059 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼72% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3242 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2177 Points ∼67% -29%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2571 Points ∼79% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼91% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3059 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼56% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
783 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
685 Points ∼51% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1344 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
805 Points ∼60% +3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼56% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
783 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼39% -33%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11300 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
12228 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=347)
4800 Points ∼39% -61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
12280 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13356, n=409)
4894 Points ∼40% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼74% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼100% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3898 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=409)
1489 Points ∼33% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼88% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼86% -13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9259 Points ∼89% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
10322 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 12879, n=464)
5688 Points ∼54% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11795 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼91% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
13947 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=625)
6205 Points ∼44% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼66% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3128 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3870 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=126)
2614 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼95% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5733 Points ∼88% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6369 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=126)
2843 Points ∼44% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4838 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5570 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=126)
2558 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼61% -39%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3866 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5576 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=470)
2117 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼53% -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼75% -9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6857 Points ∼86% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6657 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9467, n=470)
1987 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼92%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼62% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼74% -19%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5851 Points ∼85% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6382 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8154, n=471)
1844 Points ∼27% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼68% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5133 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=500)
2028 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼51% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼44% -36%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9724 Points ∼85% +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7970 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=500)
2636 Points ∼23% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼63% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼54% -35%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6795 Points ∼79% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7098 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=500)
2215 Points ∼26% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼68% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4429 Points ∼90% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4909 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=550)
2009 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼92%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼60% -35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼81% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6275 Points ∼89% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼100% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6478 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=550)
1658 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼67% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼79% -18%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5743 Points ∼92% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼100% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6048 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=551)
1585 Points ∼25% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼67% -33%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3260 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4900 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=592)
1875 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼47% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼45% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9806 Points ∼87% +28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94% +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7671 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=591)
2163 Points ∼19% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼61% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼97% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼55% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6780 Points ∼83% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6815 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=594)
1867 Points ∼23% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼77% -23%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
31384 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
43459 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=740)
14957 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼33% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +175%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼32% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
103509 Points ∼50% +38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
75073 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=738)
24584 Points ∼12% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼59% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼56% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
68517 Points ∼71% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
64626 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=738)
19553 Points ∼20% -70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼42% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼33% -37%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
151 fps ∼53% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
152 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=752)
42.3 fps ∼15% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼95% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=761)
29.9 fps ∼49% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼46% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼57% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼54% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
106 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=657)
24.8 fps ∼16% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼93% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=665)
21.2 fps ∼35% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼29% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼65% +16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼51% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
56 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=520)
20 fps ∼20% -64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼36% -64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼49% -51%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
73 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=522)
18.4 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼41% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼37% -35%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
26 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=262)
10.8 fps ∼23% -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼45% -32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼62% -5%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼55% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=260)
7.67 fps ∼26% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
40 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=266)
16.1 fps ∼28% -60%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼44% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼64% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
49 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=265)
18.1 fps ∼24% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼49% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼44% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼57% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=445)
13.6 fps ∼22% -67%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼33% -53%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼38% -47%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=449)
12.1 fps ∼25% -64%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (min: 8.52, max: 83.34) fps ∼74% +14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼100% +55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
29.2 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼42% -34%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (min: 12.07, max: 47.94) fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
31.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼52% -48%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼76%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼57% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (min: 10.62, max: 99.35) fps ∼88% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼100% +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
33.9 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼45% -41%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
462516 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
347229 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼31%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
291772 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼30%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼99% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼99% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4997 Score ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=80)
2601 Score ∼52% -48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼82% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79% -6%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1256 Points ∼72% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
1462 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=688)
793 Points ∼45% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼37% -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼53% -10%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9339 Points ∼55% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
10112 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=688)
2322 Points ∼14% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼37% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼74% -24%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5140 Points ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼81% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6130 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=688)
1717 Points ∼27% -72%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼61% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼56% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9113 Points ∼64% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
9309 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=688)
3261 Points ∼23% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼84% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼83% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4841 Points ∼86% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5389 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6149, n=688)
1650 Points ∼29% -69%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
65.9 Points ∼51% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
63.096 Points ∼49% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 74)
48.44 Points ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=152)
39 Points ∼30% -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +161%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
115 Points ∼38% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼36% -5%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
106.73 Points ∼35% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=583)
45.2 Points ∼15% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +106%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
74.1 runs/min ∼48% 0%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)
66.8 runs/min ∼44% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)
58.6 runs/min ∼38% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=139)
42.5 runs/min ∼28% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0% -100%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼69% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
119 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% -22%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
90 Points ∼50% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=215)
68.9 Points ∼38% -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +110%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
23568 Points ∼48% 0%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
23506 Points ∼48% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=746)
7440 Points ∼15% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=771)
10092 ms * ∼100% -414%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼25% -29%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
2201.2 ms * ∼22% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
1963 ms * ∼19% -0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼19% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +71%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 30 ProHuawei Mate 20 ProSamsung Galaxy Note10+LG G8X ThinQOnePlus 7T ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
-7%
-33%
-33%
-7%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
5%
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
47.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
65.6 (59.5 - 69.2, n=3)
-5%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
1%
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
68.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
78.6 (71 - 82.5, n=3)
-5%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
259.21
157.84
-39%
183.59
-29%
30.2
-88%
26
-90%
164 (24.8 - 272, n=13)
-37%
29.7 (0.14 - 272, n=829)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
226.38
157.42
-30%
196.22
-13%
160.5
-29%
169
-25%
201 (169 - 265, n=13)
-11%
54.4 (1.59 - 265, n=829)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
401.79
196.39
-51%
588.06
46%
497.1
24%
405
1%
509 (387 - 750, n=13)
27%
114 (2.99 - 750, n=829)
-72%
Sequential Read 256KB
1780.5
853.28
-52%
1503.7
-16%
704.8
-60%
1489
-16%
1562 (1398 - 1781, n=13)
-12%
313 (12.1 - 1781, n=829)
-82%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; PUBG Mobile (0.15.0): Ø39.9 (30-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Asphalt 9 (1.8.1a): Ø29.7 (16-31)
; Dead Trigger 2; Dead Trigger 2 (1.6.3): Ø60 (58-61)
Hög belastning
 39.8 °C39.4 °C36.6 °C 
 38.2 °C38.2 °C34.7 °C 
 36.8 °C35.9 °C34.3 °C 
Max: 39.8 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C
31.8 °C35.6 °C41 °C
32.4 °C34.4 °C39.5 °C
31.3 °C34.8 °C37.3 °C
Max: 41 °C
Medel: 35.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.934.82529.224.73121.528.44024.2255034.330.76324.423.4802519.310024.322.812523.529.516023.845.520020.945.325019.446.931518.251.940016.752.850015.85863014.665.880014.468.310001472.8125014.573.4160014.271.2200014.368.8250013.570.5315014.870.340001572.6500014.472.1630014.966800014.554.4100001552.21250014.853.11600015.146.9SPL27.182N0.949.4median 14.9median 58Delta2.511.132.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 30 ProApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.85 / 6.64 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-24%
-25%
-11%
-73%
0%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.95
-9%
0.92
-6%
0.7
20%
1.1
-26%
2.1
-141%
0.87
-0%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.75
2.17
-24%
2.9
-66%
1.81
-3%
1.49
15%
3
-71%
1.75
-0%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
2.25
-23%
2.94
-61%
1.92
-5%
1.76
4%
3.5
-91%
1.83
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-11%
Load Average *
3.85
4.47
-16%
3.65
5%
7.57
-97%
4.2
-9%
5.3
-38%
3.85
-0%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
-6%
Load Maximum *
6.64
6.15
7%
6.18
7%
9.34
-41%
9.2
-39%
8.3
-25%
6.64
-0%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
36tim 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 78)
13tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 39min
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
35%
-10%
13%
5%
Reader / Idle
2174
1747
-20%
2618
20%
1585
-27%
2015
-7%
H.264
1098
854
-22%
1346
23%
934
-15%
957
-13%
WiFi v1.3
823
767
-7%
909
10%
532
-35%
930
13%
912
11%
Load
219
282
29%
408
86%
305
39%
283
29%

För

+ Kraftfull SoC
+ Snabb lagring som går att utöka
+ Kvicka kommunikationsmoduler
+ Bra skärm med exceptionella inmatningsmöjligheter
+ IP68-certifierad
+ Snabbladdning (Trådbunden och trådlös)
+ Exakt lokalisering
+ Utmärkt samtalskvalitet

Emot

- Endast hybrid-SIM
- Nano-minneskort istället för microSD
- Saknar aptX och aptX HD
- Saknar Googles tjänster
- Medelmåttiga högtalare

Omdöme - Huawei spänner musklerna

Recension av Huawei Mate 30 Pro. Recensionsex från TradingShenzen.
Recension av Huawei Mate 30 Pro. Recensionsex från TradingShenzen.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med Mate 30 Pro har Huawei återigen lyckats leverera en riktigt kraftfull toppskiktstelefon. Tyvärr har man också gjort en del nedskärningar. Den böjda skärmen är definitivt unik och har en del intressanta inmatningsalternativ som dessutom fungerar bra att använda till vardags. Men detta kommer på bekostnad av upplösning och färgprecision. Särskilt det sistnämnda är inte värdigt en telefon med det här priset. Vi hade också gärna sett en 90 eller 120 Hz-skärm med DC-dimmning som alternativ. Tyvärr är inget av detta möjligt.

En höjdpunkt med Huaweis telefon är den fyrdubbla kameran. I synnerhet den extra sensorn på 40 MP som verkligen får videoinspelningar eller ultravidvinkels-foton att fånga blicken när de tas i situationer med låg ljusnivå. I dagsljus vill vi rekommendera Huawei att justera kvaliteten på den medföljande kamera-appen då flera konkurrenter har en färgåtergivning vi föredrar.

Huawei Mate 30 Pro visar sig vara en kraftfull smartphone, men den visar också upp ett par svagheter.

Högtalaren som sitter under skärmen är däremot bra och känns som en bättre lösning än en högtalare i USB Typ C-porten även om ljudkvaliteten vid full volym lämnar en del att önska. Stöd för M-Pen är bra även om Huawei nog kan vilja göra det enklare att använda deras aktiva stylus. För att sammanfatta så känns det inte naturligt att skriva med pennan och handledsigenkänningen är inte fantastisk.

Totalt sett har Huawei lyckats skapa en riktigt bra smartphone som definitivt inte kommer göra några fans besvikna. Den som väljer den Kinesiska versionen bör känna till att den varken har DRM-certifiering eller Google Play-tjänsterna. De sistnämnda kan installeras manuellt, men en del tjänster som Google Pay kommer troligen inte fungera förrän handelstvisten mellan Kina och USA är löst.

Huawei Mate 30 Pro - 12/16/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
95%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
68 / 70 → 98%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
56 / 64 → 88%
Programprestanda
81 / 86 → 94%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 75%
Camera
81%
Medel
82%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - En kraftfull smartphone även utan Google (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-12-19 (Update: 2019-12-19)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj