Test: Google Pixel 4 - Står inte längre i det främre ledet (Sammanfattning)

Name: Google Pixel 4
Brand: Google

Andfådd. Pixel 4 har knappt några riktiga uppgraderingar alls bortsett från touchfri gestkontroll och en 90 Hz-skärm. I övrigt rör det sig i princip bara om ett ansiktslyft. Tyvärr har den inte längre någon fingeravtrycksläsare och batteriets kapacitet har minskat. Läs vidare för att få reda på huruvida det nya receptet faktiskt fungerar.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 12/03/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen Google Pixel

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 4 (Pixel 4 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485), Pixel, Neural Core, Titan M Säkerhetschip

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Minne

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

5.70 tum 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixlar 443 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, OLED, Smooth Display (upp till 90 Hz), Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, HDR, 90 Hz

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 51.45 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Active edge, närhetssensor, accelerometer, gyroskop, magnetometer

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5 och 8), LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17,20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 och 71), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 147.1 x 68.8

Batteri

2800 mAh Litiumjon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix (1,4 μm, dual-pixel fas-autofokus, OIS, EIS, f/1.7, UHD-video, täcker en vinkel på 77 °) + 16 MPix (1,0 μm, fas-autofokus, OIS, EIS, f/2.4, täcker en vinkel på 52 °)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (1,22 μm, f/2.0, fixfokus, täcker en vinkel på 90 °, FHD-video) + 2 NIR-kameror (punktprojektor, emitter)

Övrigt

Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, OTG-adapter, Snabbstartsguide, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR Huvud: 1.19 W/kg, SAR Kropp: 1.39 W/kg, IP68-certifierad, 3 mikrofoner, Nano- och eSIM, , fanless, waterproof

Vikt

162 g

Pris

749 Kr

Länkar

Google hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.7 %	12/2019	Google Pixel 4 SD 855, Adreno 640	162 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.70"	2280x1080
86.5 %	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	1792x828
85.1 %	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10e Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	150 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.80"	2280x1080
86.2 %	04/2019	Xiaomi Mi 9 SD 855, Adreno 640	173 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.39"	2340x1080
85.8 %	10/2019	OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
88.5 %	04/2019	Huawei P30 Pro Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10	192 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
83.9 %	12/2018	Google Pixel 3 SD 845, Adreno 630	148 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.50"	2160x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (542^min - 717^max) MBit/s +13%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	541 (129^min - 633^max) MBit/s -8%
Google Pixel 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	591 (461^min - 651^max) MBit/s 0%
Google Pixel 4 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	591 (564^min - 609^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -10%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	468 (351^min - 489^max) MBit/s -21%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	422 (238^min - 447^max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1014 (944^min - 1115^max) MBit/s +93%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (624^min - 683^max) MBit/s +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +29%
Google Pixel 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	659 (610^min - 698^max) MBit/s +25%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s +7%
Google Pixel 4 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	526 (413^min - 655^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	520 (445^min - 571^max) MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	430 (374^min - 485^max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -29%

Google Pixel 4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø526 (413-655)

Google Pixel 4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (564-609)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Google Pixel 4: 6.83 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 17.67 ∆E


549 cd/m²	552 cd/m²	556 cd/m²
549 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	559 cd/m²
524 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	555 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 549.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Google Pixel 4 OLED, 2280x1080, 5.70	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.10	Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.80	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Google Pixel 3 OLED, 2160x1080, 5.50
Screen		-2%	-64%	-10%	-127%	-57%	-34%
Brightness middle	554	679 23%	426 -23%	593 7%	693 25%	597 8%	393 -29%
Brightness	550	671 22%	427 -22%	587 7%	703 28%	608 11%	398 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	93 -1%	96 2%	94 0%	96 2%	89 -5%	91 -3%
Black Level *		0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.8	0.8 -0%	2.14 -168%	0.9 -13%	3.42 -328%	2.2 -175%	1.4 -75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.4	2.4 -71%	3.29 -135%	2 -43%	6.12 -337%	3.6 -157%	2.5 -79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	1.1 15%	1.8 -38%	1.5 -15%	3.3 -154%	1.6 -23%	1.2 8%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.111 ^104%	2.27 ^97%	2.265 ^97%	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6213 ^105%	6610 ^98%	6329 ^103%	6548 ^99%	6799 ^96%	6268 ^104%	6597 ^99%
Contrast		999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

367.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	725 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1343 Points +85%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	750 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	783 Points +8%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	698 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (725 - 750, n=8)	742 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=13, last 2 years)	949 Points +31%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2494 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3463 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2852 Points +14%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2753 Points +10%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2544 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2441 - 2852, n=8)	2616 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=13, last 2 years)	3110 Points +25%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2241 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2707 Points
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3494 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2218 - 2395, n=7)	2302 Points
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=7, last 2 years)	3975 Points
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2081 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1849 Points -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	2204 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1849 - 2154, n=7)	2032 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=6, last 2 years)	3373 Points +62%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4506 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3705 Points
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2355 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10553 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11388 Points
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7754 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10170 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8317 Points
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13620 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	12190 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10008 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points +7%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11744 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +24%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10254 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7966 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points -12%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points -11%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9063 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	73984 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	97276 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	56465 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points -16%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	75613 Points +2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points -30%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	62568 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	102168 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	209204 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	72022 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	117304 Points +15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points -38%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	84256 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37641 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33864 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	32155 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points -33%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	33697 Points -10%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points -16%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	32914 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7263 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4015 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points +12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points -32%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5059 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8765 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4507 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +14%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points +23%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points -38%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7075 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4540 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	2906 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points -20%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points -4%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points -16%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2533 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7196 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4321 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points +19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points -26%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4966 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9217 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4886 Points -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +12%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points +24%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points -37%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6404 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4072 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3077 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points -7%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points +11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points +2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2781 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5615 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4477 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points +13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points -24%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4560 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=20)	5489 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)	2738 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6214 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5206 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +2%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points +15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points -29%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5188 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5429 - 6362, n=20)	6201 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)	2733 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4199 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3005 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points -11%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points +7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points -8%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3203 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=20)	3954 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)	3156 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5685 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4620 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points +21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points -24%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4275 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=20)	5819 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)	6705 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6383 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5368 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +11%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points +25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points -32%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4882 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=20)	6793 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)	9675 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4112 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3106 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points -9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points +13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points +1%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2979 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=20)	3942 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)	4216 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4509 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points +9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5530 Points +23%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=20)	4719 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)	2654 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5228 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points +9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6640 Points +27%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=20)	5618 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)	2829 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3044 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points +8%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3489 Points +15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3452, n=20)	3045 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)	2672 Points -12%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	88 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	60 fps -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps -32%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps -33%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps -32%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	61 fps -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps -28%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	139 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +132%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	141 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +20%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps +33%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps -1%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	127 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153.1 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +78%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	67 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	59 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps -10%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps -12%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	54 fps -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +8%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	75 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	85 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +33%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	112 fps +49%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps +21%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	55 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +87%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +14%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	58 fps +14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps -8%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	41 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +19%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	57 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +21%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +39%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps -2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	46 fps -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +74%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	40 fps +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +27%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +37%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps -10%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	26 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +45%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	34 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +115%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	43 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +24%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +38%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps -3%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	28 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +76%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +12%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +24%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps -3%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	27 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=20)	32.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)	43.9 fps +33%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +172%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	41 fps +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +28%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +47%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps +13%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	29 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=21)	39.9 fps +25%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)	64 fps +100%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	28 fps +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps +13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps -17%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	23 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=20)	20.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)	32.7 fps +36%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	13 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +23%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps +38%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps +8%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=21)	16.2 fps +25%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)	25.5 fps +96%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	376698 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	440822 Points +17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	417287 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (376698 - 451559, n=8)	428445 Points +14%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	341863 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	456891 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	329444 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +10%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	395265 Points +16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points -8%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	280162 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points +4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5277 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4548 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points -13%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5124 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points -11%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4516 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +9%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8058 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7831 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +5%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8988 Points +12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7826 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +20%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6458 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4474 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -38%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4869 Points -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points -19%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4650 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9307 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	8484 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10611 Points +14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points -17%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7965 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +53%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1601 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	1439 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points -14%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1485 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points -12%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1435 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points -7%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points +134%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +87%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	65.3 Points +15%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.5 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)	58.8 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	56.7 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points +173%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	120.8 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	110.5 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (84.4 - 120, n=17)	108.4 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	107.5 Points
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points -3%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	86.3 Points -20%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min +154%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +73%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)	69.1 runs/min +12%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)	62 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	61.8 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points +96%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +42%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105.2 Points +12%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	100 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	99 Points +5%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	94 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points +116%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +48%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	25353 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21)	23749 Points +5%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	22572 Points
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	18697 Points -17%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	16454 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	2305 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	2240 ms * -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * -4%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)	2072 ms *
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	2021 ms * +2%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +10%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +23%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * +72%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 4	Samsung Galaxy S10e	Xiaomi Mi 9	OnePlus 7T	Huawei P30 Pro	Google Pixel 3	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-18%	24%	16%	21%	1%	-9%	167%
Sequential Read 256KB	655	792 21%	666 2%	1406 115%	849 30%	766 17%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) 6%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 130%
Sequential Write 256KB	247.7	194.1 -22%	388.3 57%	218.4 -12%	250.8 1%	181.8 -27%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) -10%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 351%
Random Read 4KB	122.4	136.9 12%	149.4 22%	170.1 39%	174.4 42%	149.8 22%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) 12%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 102%
Random Write 4KB	146.6	24.1 -84%	165.3 13%	29.9 -80%	159.2 9%	133.8 -9%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) -42%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 86%

PUBG Mobile (HD)

Google Pixel 4; 0.15.0: Ø59.7 (40-61)

Arena of Valor (Ultra)

Google Pixel 4; 1.31.1.5: Ø61.5 (35-63)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.5 °C	34.2 °C	33.1 °C
34.6 °C	34.5 °C	33.2 °C
34.1 °C	35.5 °C	33.3 °C

Max: 35.5 °C
Medel: 34 °C


31.4 °C	32 °C	32.3 °C
31.5 °C	31.9 °C	33.6 °C
31 °C	34.5 °C	33.7 °C

Max: 34.5 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.57 Watt
Låg belastning	1.01 / 1.63 / 1.69 Watt
Hög belastning	4.67 / 8.78 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-14%	10%	19%	-9%	-10%	-10%	1%	2%
Idle Minimum *	1.01	0.56 45%	0.6 41%	0.67 34%	0.9 11%	0.68 33%	1.21 -20%	0.939 ?(0.58 - 1.96, n=19) 7%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average *	1.63	2.99 -83%	1.2 26%	1.26 23%	1.4 14%	2.6 -60%	2.01 -23%	1.506 ?(0.85 - 2.8, n=19) 8%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Maximum *	1.69	3.02 -79%	1.5 11%	1.29 24%	2.9 -72%	2.77 -64%	2.05 -21%	1.799 ?(1 - 2.9, n=19) -6%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 4%
Load Average *	4.67	4.17 11%	5.2 -11%	3.71 21%	4.7 -1%	3.74 20%	4.06 13%	4.61 ?(3.64 - 5.8, n=19) 1%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	8.78	5.44 38%	10.2 -16%	9.3 -6%	8.3 5%	6.82 22%	8.79 -0%	9.04 ?(7.49 - 11.9, n=19) -3%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		16tim 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 78)		7tim 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 17min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 05min

	Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh
Battery Runtime		98%	7%	38%	76%	89%	11%
Reader / Idle	1007	2765 175%	1185 18%	1650 64%	2003 99%	1966 95%	1372 36%
H.264	617	1147 86%	795 29%	1008 63%	967 57%	1193 93%	727 18%
WiFi v1.3	460	866 88%	416 -10%	546 19%	896 95%	838 82%	471 2%
Load	185	267 44%	164 -11%	194 5%	283 53%	344 86%	159 -14%

För

+ välbyggd

+ balanserade högtalare

+ tillgång till uppdateringar under en lång tid

+ utmärkt dualkamera

+ 90 Hz-skärm med god färgprecision...

Emot

- ...som kunde haft högre ljusstyrka

- saknar stöd för WiFi 6

- mager lagringskapacitet utan möjlighet att utöka lagringen

- dålig batteritid

- dåligt förhållande mellan skärm och kropp

Recension av Google Pixel 4. Recensionsex från Google Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vi har svårt att inkludera Google Pixel 4 i samma liga som andra toppskiktstelefoner. Den påminner mer om billigare flaggskepp som OnePlus 7T eller ZenFone 6. Google fortsätter att fokusera på mjukvaran istället för på hårdvaruinnovationer. De touchlösa gesterna känns naturligare än på LG G8s; men de saknar funktioner och djup och känns generellt sett ofärdiga.

Kameran är återigen ett av Pixels största säljargument och nu har den dessutom ett extra teleobjektiv. Det är bara synd att den saknar en ultra-vidvinkelslins. Telefonen har ett ganska dåligt förhållande mellan skärm och kropp vilket till viss del kompenseras av en skaplig 90 Hz-skärm. Tyvärr är skärmen inte lika ljusstark som på en del av konkurrenterna och är därför inte lika bra på att visa HDR-innehåll ordentligt.

Googles Pixel 4 har en bra kamera och den senaste mjukvaran. Tyvärr är det pyttiga batteriet en stor nackdel.

Lagringskapaciteten är ytterligare ett snedsteg. 64 GB utan möjlighet till utökning är helt enkelt inte tillräckligt för det här prisskiktet, ett handikapp som inte ens kan kompenseras av tre års tillgång till uppdateringar. På plussidan hittar vi snabbladdning och ett IP68-certifierat hölje, men detta överskuggas snabbt av det pyttiga batteriet och den dåliga batteritiden.

Om du gillar ren vanilj-Android och vill vara säker på att du har de senaste systemfunktionerna är en Pixel-telefon ett måste. Men du kan vilja överväga Pixel 3a istället. Den är förvisso inte lika tekniskt avancerad som Pixel 4, men den har i gengäld mycket bättre batteritid.

Google Pixel 4 - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design

87%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

97%

Anslutningar

52 / 70 → 74%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

82%

Skärm

93%

Spelprestanda

54 / 64 → 84%

Programprestanda

79 / 86 → 92%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 86%

Camera

68%

Medel

80%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 4 - Står inte längre i det främre ledet (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-12- 3 (Update: 2019-12- 4)

Test: Google Pixel 4 - Står inte längre i det främre ledet (Sammanfattning)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile (HD)

Arena of Valor (Ultra)

Google Pixel 4 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare