Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)

Name: Google Pixel 3a
Brand: Google

Förvånansvärt bra. Pixel 3a har samma förtjänster som de tidigare Google Nexus-enheterna: Den är kompakt, har bra prestanda och är billig. Men det finns en viktig skillnad mellan Google Pixel 3a och de äldre Nexus-telefonerna. Få reda på vad skillnaden är i vår recension.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/15/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 3a (Pixel 3 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 8 x 2 GHz, Kryo 360 Gold / Silver

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 616

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

5.60 tum 18.5:9, 2220 x 1080 pixlar 441 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, P-OLED, Asahi Dragontrail Glass, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 50 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, accelerometer, gyrometer, magnetometer, barometer, USB-C, OTG, Active Edge, Miracast

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: Quadband 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Band 1/2/4/5/8, LTE-band: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/25/26/28/32/38/40/41/66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 151.3 x 70.1

Batteri

3000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, 28 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm, HDR, camera2 API: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1.12 µm, HDR

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, USB-C AC-adapter, USB C-kabel (USB 2.0), snabbstartsguide, Quick Switch-adapter, SIM-verktyg, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Android 9, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR: Huvud: 1,390 W/Kg, Kropp: 0,900 W/Kg, LTE Cat.11 (600 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, fanless

Vikt

147 g, Strömförsörjning: 52 g

Pris

399 Kr

Länkar

Google hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	591 (461^min - 651^max) MBit/s +9%
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	541 (422^min - 570^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	264 (221^min - 293^max) MBit/s -51%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s -53%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	659 (610^min - 698^max) MBit/s +3%
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	637 (275^min - 679^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	338 (302^min - 356^max) MBit/s -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s -51%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -70%

Google Pixel 3a; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (275-679)

Google Pixel 3a; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø541 (422-570)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


415 cd/m²	408 cd/m²	404 cd/m²
415 cd/m²	403 cd/m²	404 cd/m²
418 cd/m²	416 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 410.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.61 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 403 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Google Pixel 3a P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.60	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6.00	Samsung Galaxy A70 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70	Google Pixel 3 OLED, 2160x1080, 5.50
Screen		31%	20%	-6%	9%	30%
Brightness middle	403	583 45%	451 12%	547 36%	554 37%	393 -2%
Brightness	411	577 40%	430 5%	525 28%	552 34%	398 -3%
Brightness Distribution	96	97 1%	90 -6%	93 -3%	98 2%	91 -5%
Black Level *			0.55	0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	1.6 69%	1.4 73%	4.6 10%	3.3 35%	1.4 73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11	3.9 65%	4.4 60%	12.1 -10%	9.2 16%	2.5 77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	2.7 -35%	2.5 -25%	3.9 -95%	3.4 -70%	1.2 40%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.17 ^101%	2.08 ^106%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6589 ^99%	6267 ^104%	6422 ^101%	7158 ^91%	6606 ^98%	6597 ^99%
Contrast			820	1519

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

271.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 271.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 271.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1624 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points +15%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2380 Points +47%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2355 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)	1651 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +222%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5164 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points +16%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6446 Points +25%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7754 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)	5359 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +172%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	6475 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points +12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6104 Points -6%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13620 Points +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)	6348 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +68%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9458 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9288 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11744 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7988 - 9458, n=4)	8742 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +60%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7387 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points -8%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7315 Points -1%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9063 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6633 - 7387, n=4)	7024 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +47%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29229 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	23013 Points -21%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	62568 Points +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=4)	25989 Points -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35401 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points +23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	26348 Points -26%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	84256 Points +138%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35619, n=4)	32249 Points -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	18523 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points -26%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15948 Points -14%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	32914 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=4)	15710 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2477 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1606 Points -35%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5059 Points +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=4)	2438 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2419 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1427 Points -41%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7075 Points +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=4)	2407 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2708 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -8%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2869 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2533 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=4)	2556 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2582 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -14%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1734 Points -33%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4966 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=4)	2541 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=113, last 2 years)	9235 Points +258%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2533 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1571 Points -38%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6404 Points +153%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2541, n=4)	2536 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=112, last 2 years)	16095 Points +535%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2771 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -10%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2727 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2781 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=4)	2562 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=112, last 2 years)	4393 Points +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1651 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points +26%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	978 Points -41%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4560 Points +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=4)	1629 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)	2770 Points +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1482 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points +34%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	823 Points -44%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5188 Points +250%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=4)	1476 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)	2769 Points +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2728 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -9%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2886 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3203 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=4)	2553 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)	3166 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1772 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points +25%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1110 Points -37%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4275 Points +141%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=4)	1758 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=179, last 2 years)	6717 Points +279%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1611 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points +33%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	949 Points -41%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4882 Points +203%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=4)	1612 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=178, last 2 years)	9680 Points +501%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -9%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2719 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2979 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=4)	2584 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=178, last 2 years)	4214 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1063 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1563, n=3)	1551 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)	2687 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	914 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1425, n=3)	1416 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)	2871 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2482 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2365, n=3)	2322 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)	2676 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	52 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps +12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	37 fps -29%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	61 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=4)	47.5 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=182, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +63%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps +28%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	41 fps -29%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	127 fps +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=4)	55 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=182, last 2 years)	247 fps +326%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	27 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps +22%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	19 fps -30%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	54 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=4)	24.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=184, last 2 years)	72 fps +167%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps +24%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	20 fps -31%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	55 fps +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=4)	29 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=184, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +385%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps +26%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	13 fps -32%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	41 fps +116%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=4)	15.7 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=184, last 2 years)	60.8 fps +220%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps +30%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15 fps -25%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	46 fps +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=4)	19.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=184, last 2 years)	99.1 fps +396%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	10 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps +30%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7 fps -30%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	26 fps +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=4)	9.6 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=184, last 2 years)	43.3 fps +333%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps +36%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps -37%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8 fps -27%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	28 fps +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=4)	10.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=184, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +445%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps +27%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8 fps -27%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	27 fps +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=4)	9.7 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=223, last 2 years)	43.9 fps +299%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps +33%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9 fps -25%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	29 fps +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=4)	12 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=223, last 2 years)	64.6 fps +438%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps +30%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	4.7 fps -33%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	23 fps +229%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=4)	6.38 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 105, n=223, last 2 years)	32.6 fps +366%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.4 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps +32%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3 fps -32%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11 fps +150%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 4.5, n=4)	4.45 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=223, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +484%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	153450 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points +17%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	167836 Points +9%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	280162 Points +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)	156363 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2811 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points +3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2756 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4516 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2621 - 2811, n=4)	2720 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +104%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5480 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points +8%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6137 Points +12%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7826 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5024 - 5507, n=4)	5332 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +77%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3288 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -10%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3285 Points 0%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4650 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2877 - 3316, n=4)	3094 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +90%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2818 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points +23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2272 Points -19%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7965 Points +183%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2790 - 2818, n=4)	2810 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +400%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1229 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -17%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1259 Points +2%
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1435 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=4)	1182 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +22%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +215%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	43.42 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points +11%
Google Pixel 3a	33.56 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4)	33 Points -2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points -52%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)	33573 Points +210%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	16454 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	15716 Points +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4)	10864 Points 0%
Google Pixel 3a	10844 Points
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms * -186%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * -15%
Google Pixel 3a	3589 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4)	3525 ms * +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	2807 ms * +22%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)	2305 ms * +36%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1599 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 3a	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Huawei P30 Lite	Sony Xperia 10	Samsung Galaxy A70	Google Pixel 3	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		11%	-10%	-30%	7%	74%	-29%	299%
Sequential Read 256KB	302	492.5 63%	293.2 -3%	273.8 -9%	508 68%	766 154%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201) -10%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 398%
Sequential Write 256KB	253.9	190.1 -25%	158.6 -38%	232.9 -8%	194 -24%	181.8 -28%	176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201) -30%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 338%
Random Read 4KB	63.6	115.8 82%	71.6 13%	53.1 -17%	103.8 63%	149.8 136%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201) -7%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 288%
Random Write 4KB	99.9	21.86 -78%	87.3 -13%	14.39 -86%	21.95 -78%	133.8 34%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201) -68%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 171%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard			76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard			67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


37.3 °C	36.6 °C	32 °C
37.4 °C	37.1 °C	31.7 °C
36.4 °C	34.5 °C	31.3 °C

Max: 37.4 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C


30.4 °C	32 °C	35.9 °C
30.5 °C	32 °C	36.5 °C
30.5 °C	32.2 °C	35.2 °C

Max: 36.5 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 25.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 3a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Låg belastning	0.61 / 1.56 / 1.6 Watt
Hög belastning	2.67 / 4.33 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh	Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		7%	-60%	-28%	-19%	-62%	-67%	-48%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.53 13%	0.91 -49%	0.72 -18%	0.66 -8%	1.21 -98%	1.18 ?(0.61 - 2.07, n=4) -93%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Average *	1.56	1.18 24%	2.41 -54%	2.16 -38%	1.69 -8%	2.01 -29%	2.89 ?(1.56 - 4.43, n=4) -85%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	1.2 25%	2.43 -52%	2.17 -36%	1.8 -13%	2.05 -28%	2.94 ?(1.6 - 4.52, n=4) -84%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -2%
Load Average *	2.67	3.04 -14%	4.57 -71%	3.32 -24%	3.42 -28%	4.06 -52%	3.82 ?(2.64 - 5.91, n=4) -43%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -108%
Load Maximum *	4.33	4.83 -12%	7.57 -75%	5.34 -23%	5.88 -36%	8.79 -103%	5.65 ?(4.33 - 7.91, n=4) -30%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -92%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing

10tim 12min

	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh	Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	612	510 -17%	515 -16%	541 -12%	736 20%	471 -23%

För

+ Tilltalande OLED-skärm

+ Snabbt WiFi

+ Riktigt bra högtalare

+ Bra vibrationsmotorer

+ Kamerorna

Emot

- Skärmens ljusstyrka

- Svag SoC för det här prisskiktet

- Litet batteri

- Plasthölje

Omdöme - Google klarar också av mittenskiktet

Recension av Google Pixel 3a. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Företagets tidigare toppskikts-telefoner med sina breda infattningar har gjort det tydligt att Google inte riktigt hänger med i fråga om designspråk. Vi förväntade oss detsamma från den här mittenskiktstelefonen ur Pixel-serien. Men bortsett från den punkten sökmotor-mästaren Google visat att de också är kapabla att producera en riktigt bra mittenskiktstelefon, både i fråga om teknik och i fråga om mjukvara.

Den som älskar kompakta enheter kommer märka att Pixel 3a är en av de bästa telefonerna som finns att tillgå just nu.

Trots en ganska gammaldags design är Pixel 3a en riktigt kompakt enhet som dessutom är trevlig att hantera tack vare bakstycket i plast. Även om Pixel ser ganska slätstruken ut på papperet har den trevlig vardagsprestanda. Pixel lyckas få ut riktigt tilltalande resultat ur sina båda kameror. Vi imponerades också av högtalaren och vibrationsmotorn som båda får Pixel 3a att stå ut gentemot sina konkurrenter.

På papperet får det höga priset på 4.000 kronor en telefon utrustad med Snapdragon 670 att se utdaterad ut och det kan till och med verka som ett riskabelt drag. Pixel 3a hade klarat sig ännu bättre med ett Snapdragon 700-chip: Den har en del brister när det kommer till prestandan trots sin väloptimerade mjukvara. Vidare förstår vi inte riktigt varför Google inte inkluderar en SD-kortplats i en mittenskiktsenhet som bara har 64 GB intern lagring.

Google Pixel 3a - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design

80%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

92%

Anslutningar

48 / 70 → 68%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

88%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

19 / 64 → 30%

Programprestanda

63 / 86 → 73%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 91%

Camera

58%

Medel

74%

80%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 308 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07-15 (Update: 2019-07-15)

Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Google Pixel 3a audio analysis

Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Google klarar också av mittenskiktet

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare