Notebookcheck

Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/15/2019

Förvånansvärt bra. Pixel 3a har samma förtjänster som de tidigare Google Nexus-enheterna: Den är kompakt, har bra prestanda och är billig. Men det finns en viktig skillnad mellan Google Pixel 3a och de äldre Nexus-telefonerna. Få reda på vad skillnaden är i vår recension.

Google Pixel 3a (Pixel Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.6 tum 18.5:9, 2220 x 1080 pixlar 441 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, P-OLED, Asahi Dragontrail Glass, glansig: ja
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, accelerometer, gyrometer, magnetometer, barometer, USB-C, OTG, Active Edge, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: Quadband 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Band 1/2/4/5/8, LTE-band: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/25/26/28/32/38/40/41/66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 151.3 x 70.1
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, 28 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm, HDR, camera2 API: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1.12 µm, HDR
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, USB-C AC-adapter, USB C-kabel (USB 2.0), snabbstartsguide, Quick Switch-adapter, SIM-verktyg, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Android 9, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR: Huvud: 1,390 W/Kg, Kropp: 0,900 W/Kg, LTE Cat.11 (600 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
Vikt
147 g, Strömförsörjning: 52 g
Pris
399 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension

Storleksjämförelse

164.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 183 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g151.3 mm 70.1 mm 8.2 mm 147 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g145.6 mm 68.2 mm 7.9 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
659 (min: 610, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670
637 (min: 275, max: 679) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (min: 302, max: 356) MBit/s ∼51% -47%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼51% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼47% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼34% -65%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼29% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 461, max: 651) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670
541 (min: 422, max: 570) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼47% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
264 (min: 221, max: 293) MBit/s ∼45% -51%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼43% -53%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼37% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼36% -61%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (275-679)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø541 (422-570)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a
Foto taget med huvudkameran på  12 MP
Foto taget med huvudkameran på 12 MP
Porträttläge
Porträttläge
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
Google Pixel 3a Smartphone - Recension
415
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 418 cd/m² Medel: 410.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.61 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 403 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 3a
P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A70
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Google Pixel 3
OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5
Screen
31%
20%
-6%
9%
30%
Brightness middle
403
583
45%
451
12%
547
36%
554
37%
393
-2%
Brightness
411
577
40%
430
5%
525
28%
552
34%
398
-3%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
90
-6%
93
-3%
98
2%
91
-5%
Black Level *
0.55
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
1.6
69%
1.4
73%
4.6
10%
3.3
35%
1.4
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11
3.9
65%
4.4
60%
12.1
-10%
9.2
16%
2.5
77%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2.7
-35%
2.5
-25%
3.9
-95%
3.4
-70%
1.2
40%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
2.08 106%
2.19 100%
CCT
6589 99%
6267 104%
6422 101%
7158 91%
6606 98%
6597 99%
Contrast
820
1519

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 271.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 271.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 271.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6475 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼53% +12%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼26% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼28% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6104 Points ∼45% -6%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13620 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6090 - 6479, n=3)
6348 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼34% -29%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5164 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼77% +16%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼70% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼51% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6446 Points ∼83% +25%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7754 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5164 - 5742, n=3)
5359 Points ∼69% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼59% -11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1624 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼79% +15%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼65% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼35% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2380 Points ∼100% +47%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2355 Points ∼99% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1616 - 1712, n=3)
1651 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼58% -15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼75% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼72% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼66% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7315 Points ∼81% -1%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9063 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6698 - 7387, n=3)
7154 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼56% -32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼69% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼42% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9288 Points ∼79% -2%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11744 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8126 - 9458, n=3)
8994 Points ∼77% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼47% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2482 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
914 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼97%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1063 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼84% -9%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼86% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼56% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2719 Points ∼91% -2%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2979 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2424 - 2763, n=3)
2573 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=387)
1834 Points ∼62% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼44% +33%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼17% -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼16% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
949 Points ∼19% -41%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4882 Points ∼100% +203%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1611 - 1612, n=3)
1612 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=387)
1602 Points ∼33% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼52% +25%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼23% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼21% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1110 Points ∼26% -37%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4275 Points ∼100% +141%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1742 - 1772, n=3)
1756 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=390)
1489 Points ∼35% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼62% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2727 Points ∼98% -2%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2781 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2413 - 2771, n=3)
2560 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=402)
1811 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼34% -15%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼21% -47%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼20% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1571 Points ∼25% -38%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6404 Points ∼100% +153%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2533 - 2537, n=3)
2535 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=402)
2185 Points ∼34% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼45% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼30% -42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼28% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1734 Points ∼35% -33%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4966 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2506 - 2582, n=3)
2539 Points ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=403)
1860 Points ∼37% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼77% -9%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼78% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼51% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2886 Points ∼90% +6%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3203 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2436 - 2728, n=3)
2543 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=463)
1772 Points ∼55% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼38% +34%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼16% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼14% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
823 Points ∼16% -44%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5188 Points ∼100% +250%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1451 - 1487, n=3)
1473 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=465)
1334 Points ∼26% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼45% +26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼21% -42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼18% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
978 Points ∼21% -41%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4560 Points ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1594 - 1651, n=3)
1625 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=473)
1273 Points ∼28% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼86% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼87% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼59% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2869 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2533 Points ∼88% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2456 - 2708, n=3)
2551 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=496)
1680 Points ∼59% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼28% -18%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼18% -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼17% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1427 Points ∼20% -41%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7075 Points ∼100% +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2357 - 2428, n=3)
2401 Points ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=496)
1803 Points ∼25% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼41% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼28% -43%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼26% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1606 Points ∼32% -35%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5059 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2378 - 2477, n=3)
2432 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=504)
1549 Points ∼31% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼42% -26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼37% -35%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼38% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15948 Points ∼48% -14%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
32914 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (13055 - 18523, n=3)
15403 Points ∼47% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=654)
13712 Points ∼42% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼52% +23%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼26% -39%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼21% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26348 Points ∼31% -26%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
84256 Points ∼100% +138%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (22381 - 35596, n=3)
31126 Points ∼37% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=654)
20179 Points ∼24% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼47% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼29% -37%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
23013 Points ∼37% -21%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
62568 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19315 - 29229, n=3)
25181 Points ∼40% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=655)
16716 Points ∼27% -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼58% +28%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼26% -43%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼23% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
41 fps ∼32% -29%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
127 fps ∼100% +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (46 - 58, n=3)
54 fps ∼43% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=684)
35.2 fps ∼28% -39%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼95% +12%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼51% -40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼41% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
37 fps ∼61% -29%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
61 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (32 - 53, n=3)
45.7 fps ∼75% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=687)
27.1 fps ∼44% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼65% +24%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼31% -41%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼24% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
20 fps ∼36% -31%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
55 fps ∼100% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (29 - 29, n=3)
29 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=603)
19.4 fps ∼35% -33%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼61% +22%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼30% -41%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼20% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
19 fps ∼35% -30%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
54 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (17 - 28, n=3)
24 fps ∼44% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=608)
18 fps ∼33% -33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼57% +30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼26% -40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼21% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15 fps ∼33% -25%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=464)
15.9 fps ∼35% -20%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼59% +26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼27% -42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼19% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
13 fps ∼32% -32%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
41 fps ∼100% +116%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.9 - 19, n=3)
15 fps ∼37% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=467)
15.3 fps ∼37% -19%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼40% +107%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼18% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.7 fps ∼20% +7%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +423%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.3 - 7.2, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼23% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=167)
8.89 fps ∼39% +102%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼53% -17%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼24% -63%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼15% -76%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼27% -57%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.4 - 7, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼48% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=167)
6.16 fps ∼56% -12%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼52% +27%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼24% -42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼16% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼30% -27%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
27 fps ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.8 - 11, n=3)
9.6 fps ∼36% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=168)
13.5 fps ∼50% +23%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼55% +33%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼24% -42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼17% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9 fps ∼31% -25%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=168)
14.7 fps ∼51% +23%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼54% +36%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼25% -37%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼19% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼29% -27%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
28 fps ∼100% +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8.5 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼36% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=393)
10.7 fps ∼38% -3%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼50% +30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼25% -35%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼17% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7 fps ∼27% -30%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.4 - 11, n=3)
9.13 fps ∼35% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=397)
9.69 fps ∼37% -3%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
153450 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼64% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼47% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼32% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
167836 Points ∼60% +9%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
280162 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (153450 - 158868, n=3)
156363 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼47% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼71% -17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼57% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1259 Points ∼88% +2%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1435 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1144 - 1229, n=3)
1186 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼52% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼43% +23%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼19% -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2272 Points ∼29% -19%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7965 Points ∼100% +183%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2815 - 2818, n=3)
2816 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼25% -30%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼64% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼65% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼21% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3285 Points ∼71% 0%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4650 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2894 - 3316, n=3)
3166 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼32% -55%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼76% +8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼66% -6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6137 Points ∼78% +12%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7826 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5315 - 5507, n=3)
5434 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼37% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼64% +3%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼49% -22%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼30% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2756 Points ∼61% -2%
Google Pixel 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4516 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2653 - 2811, n=3)
2753 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼32% -49%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
43.423 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼86% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
33.563 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=3)
33.1 Points ∼76% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼73% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=93)
30.6 Points ∼70% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼37% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
16454 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
15716 Points ∼96% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼82% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10844 - 11312, n=3)
11071 Points ∼67% +2%
Google Pixel 3a
10844 Points ∼66%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼59% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼39% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼30% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -199%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼96% -186%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39% -15%
Google Pixel 3a
3589.4 ms * ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3589, n=3)
3482 ms * ∼32% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
2806.8 ms * ∼26% +22%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
2304.5 ms * ∼21% +36%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3aXiaomi Mi 9 SEHuawei P30 LiteSony Xperia 10Samsung Galaxy A70Google Pixel 3Global Average -3Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
11%
-10%
-30%
7%
74%
-54%
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
48 (9.5 - 87.1, n=464)
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=464)
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
Random Write 4KB
99.86
21.86
-78%
87.29
-13%
14.39
-86%
21.95
-78%
133.76
34%
17.2 (0.13 - 250, n=941)
-83%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
-79%
Random Read 4KB
63.6
115.83
82%
71.57
13%
53.12
-16%
103.8
63%
149.82
136%
39.3 (1.32 - 175, n=941)
-38%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB
253.87
190.1
-25%
158.63
-38%
232.87
-8%
193.97
-24%
181.81
-28%
80.6 (2.04 - 503, n=941)
-68%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
301.99
492.48
63%
293.23
-3%
273.8
-9%
508.48
68%
766.41
154%
227 (4.36 - 1468, n=941)
-25%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-13%
Hög belastning
 37.3 °C36.6 °C32 °C 
 37.4 °C37.1 °C31.7 °C 
 36.4 °C34.5 °C31.3 °C 
Max: 37.4 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
30.4 °C32 °C35.9 °C
30.5 °C32 °C36.5 °C
30.5 °C32.2 °C35.2 °C
Max: 36.5 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.237.22531.230.13127.229.14023.726.4503135.76322.725.78022.823.810024.427.212520.93716020.349.420019.151.525016.453.93151656.240017.658.950015.262.963014.668.580015.468.9100014.872.5125015.271.9160015.670.5200014.871250014.670.9315014.370.4400014.669.8500014.763.1630015.366.9800015.372.51000014.973.31250015.369.31600015.661.5SPL27.382.2N0.954.3median 15.3median 68.5Delta1.27.532.633.828.926.525.224.126.120.430.227.426.919.628.721.729.120.818.431.5215224.350.917.459.216.86215.362.715.665.614.168.415.273.114.173.114.673.714.673.614.272.413.873.41475.614.66714.470.614.676.314.474.814.871.414.660.314.763.32784.90.964.3median 14.6median 68.41.49.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3aGoogle Pixel 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.56 / 1.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.67 / 4.33 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
-60%
-28%
-19%
-62%
-44%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.53
13%
0.91
-49%
0.72
-18%
0.66
-8%
1.21
-98%
1.127 (0.61 - 2.07, n=3)
-85%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=752)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.18
24%
2.41
-54%
2.16
-38%
1.69
-8%
2.01
-29%
2.38 (1.56 - 3.94, n=3)
-53%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=751)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.2
25%
2.43
-52%
2.17
-36%
1.8
-13%
2.05
-28%
2.41 (1.6 - 3.96, n=3)
-51%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=752)
-26%
Load Average *
2.67
3.04
-14%
4.57
-71%
3.32
-24%
3.42
-28%
4.06
-52%
3.13 (2.64 - 4.07, n=3)
-17%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=746)
-52%
Load Maximum *
4.33
4.83
-12%
7.57
-75%
5.34
-23%
5.88
-36%
8.79
-103%
4.89 (4.33 - 5.73, n=3)
-13%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=746)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 12min
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
612
510
-17%
515
-16%
541
-12%
736
20%
471
-23%

För

+ Tilltalande OLED-skärm
+ Snabbt WiFi
+ Riktigt bra högtalare
+ Bra vibrationsmotorer
+ Kamerorna

Emot

- Skärmens ljusstyrka
- Svag SoC för det här prisskiktet
- Litet batteri
- Plasthölje

Omdöme - Google klarar också av mittenskiktet

Recension av Google Pixel 3a. Recensionsex från Google Germany.
Recension av Google Pixel 3a. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Företagets tidigare toppskikts-telefoner med sina breda infattningar har gjort det tydligt att Google inte riktigt hänger med i fråga om designspråk. Vi förväntade oss detsamma från den här mittenskiktstelefonen ur Pixel-serien. Men bortsett från den punkten sökmotor-mästaren Google visat att de också är kapabla att producera en riktigt bra mittenskiktstelefon, både i fråga om teknik och i fråga om mjukvara.

Den som älskar kompakta enheter kommer märka att Pixel 3a är en av de bästa telefonerna som finns att tillgå just nu.

Trots en ganska gammaldags design är Pixel 3a en riktigt kompakt enhet som dessutom är trevlig att hantera tack vare bakstycket i plast. Även om Pixel ser ganska slätstruken ut på papperet har den trevlig vardagsprestanda. Pixel lyckas få ut riktigt tilltalande resultat ur sina båda kameror. Vi imponerades också av högtalaren och vibrationsmotorn som båda får Pixel 3a att stå ut gentemot sina konkurrenter.

På papperet får det höga priset på 4.000 kronor en telefon utrustad med Snapdragon 670 att se utdaterad ut och det kan till och med verka som ett riskabelt drag. Pixel 3a hade klarat sig ännu bättre med ett Snapdragon 700-chip: Den har en del brister när det kommer till prestandan trots sin väloptimerade mjukvara. Vidare förstår vi inte riktigt varför Google inte inkluderar en SD-kortplats i en mittenskiktsenhet som bara har 64 GB intern lagring.

Google Pixel 3a - 07/08/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Design
82%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 75%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
80%
Spelprestanda
56 / 63 → 89%
Programprestanda
70 / 70 → 99%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
85%
Medel
79%
88%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07-15 (Update: 2019-07-15)