Notebookcheck

Test: Google Pixel 4a 5G - Billig Pixel 5 (Sammanfattning)

Bättre än flaggskeppet? Google Pixel 4a 5G gör livet svårt för Pixel 5. Den har samma SoC och samma kamerasystem. Den har dessutom en större skärm på 6.2 tum och är mycket billigare.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Pixel 4 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.20 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 416 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, OLED, FHD+, 16 miljoner färger, Always-on skärm, Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.2 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Ljussensor, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Magnetometer, Barometer, Spektral- och flimmer-sensor, 2x2 MIMO, aptX, aptX HD, Google Cast, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API: full
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66/71), 5G (Sub-6 Band n1/3/5/7/8/28/40/77/78), Huvud SAR 0,94 W/kg, Kropp SAR 1,40 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 153.9 x 74
Batteri
3885 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP Ultravid (1.0 μm pixelstorlek, ƒ/2.2, 107° synfält) + 12.2 MP dual-pixel (1.4 μm pixelstorlek, Dual Pixel-autofokus, Optisk + elektronisk bildstabilisering, ƒ/1.7, 77° synfält), videoinspelning i upp till [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP (1.12 μm pixelbredd, ƒ/2.0, , 83° synfält), videoinspelning upp till [email protected]
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, 18W-adapter med USB-PD 2.0, USB-C kabel, USB-C till USB-A adapter, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Minst 3 år av uppdateringar för OS och säkerhet, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
168 g, Strömförsörjning: 50 g
Pris
486 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 4a 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.20"2340x1080
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 5
SD 765G, Adreno 620
151 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2340x1080
84 %
09/2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
86 %
06/2020
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
83 %
06/2020
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080

Storleksjämförelse

163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g153.9 mm 74 mm 8.2 mm 168 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g144 mm 69.4 mm 8.2 mm 143 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (888min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (664min - 686max) MBit/s ∼74% +12%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼73% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼71% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼69% +4%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
603 (517min - 635max) MBit/s ∼66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=620)
286 MBit/s ∼31% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (414min - 930max) MBit/s ∼100% +183%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼79% +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (294min - 639max) MBit/s ∼74% +109%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼73% +107%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼66% +88%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼57% +61%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (211min - 318max) MBit/s ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=620)
273 MBit/s ∼32% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø602 (517-635)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (211-318)
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Ruttöversikt
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Ruttöversikt
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Damm
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Damm
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Svänga
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Svänga
Garmin Edge 500: Ruttöversikt
Garmin Edge 500: Ruttöversikt
Garmin Edge 500: Damm
Garmin Edge 500: Damm
Garmin Edge 500: Ruttöversikt
Garmin Edge 500: Ruttöversikt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photography 1Daylight photography 2Wide-angle5X zoomLowlight photography
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
41 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
75 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a 5G: 43.7 ∆E min: 14.06 - max: 74.99 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a 5G: 6.85 ∆E min: 0.95 - max: 16.94 ∆E
651
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 694 cd/m² Medel: 670.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.86 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 669 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Google Pixel 4a 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.20
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Screen
-4%
5%
-20%
-105%
-190%
-60%
Brightness middle
669
635
-5%
705
5%
584
-13%
679
1%
797
19%
529
-21%
Brightness
671
636
-5%
707
5%
583
-13%
690
3%
807
20%
531
-21%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
97
3%
97
3%
95
1%
94
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
0.8
20%
0.9
10%
1.17
-17%
3.2
-220%
5.4
-440%
2.53
-153%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
2.2
-22%
1.9
-6%
2.95
-64%
6.2
-244%
9.2
-411%
4.52
-151%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.7
-13%
1.3
13%
1.7
-13%
4.1
-173%
6.4
-327%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.231 99%
2.28 96%
2.27 97%
2.249 98%
CCT
6685 97%
6492 100%
6576 99%
6341 103%
6604 98%
7245 90%
6462 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1631 Points ∼53%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼53% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points ∼53% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼62% +17%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼100% +89%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼60% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼64% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=14)
1757 Points ∼57% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=148)
1968 Points ∼64% +21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
601 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼65% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points ∼60% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼74% +12%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼68% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼67% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=14)
599 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=148)
570 Points ∼62% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8319 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8954 Points ∼68% +8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points ∼66% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼59% -6%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +59%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼64% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼71% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=14)
8274 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=547)
6048 Points ∼46% -27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
10122 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10007 Points ∼51% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10200 Points ∼52% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼44% -14%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +95%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼51% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼55% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 10876, n=14)
9640 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=703)
6654 Points ∼34% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2978 Points ∼75%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2979 Points ∼75% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points ∼69% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼73% -3%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼70% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼73% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=14)
2718 Points ∼69% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=199)
2664 Points ∼67% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼26%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2364 Points ∼29% +10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points ∼26% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼39% +49%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100% +285%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼38% +47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼39% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=14)
3033 Points ∼37% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=199)
3059 Points ∼37% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2287 Points ∼34%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2478 Points ∼37% +8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points ∼34% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼47% +37%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +191%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼46% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼47% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=14)
2941 Points ∼44% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=199)
2715 Points ∼41% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3539 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼64% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points ∼60% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼63% -1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100% +56%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼60% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=14)
3248 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=554)
2268 Points ∼41% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2814 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼30% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points ∼26% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼38% +28%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +240%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼37% +27%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼37% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=14)
3448 Points ∼36% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=554)
2259 Points ∼24% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2948 Points ∼36%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼36% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points ∼32% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼44% +22%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +178%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼43% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼43% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=14)
3381 Points ∼41% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=555)
2088 Points ∼25% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3563 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3544 Points ∼65% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼61% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼64% -2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100% +54%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼57% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=14)
3232 Points ∼59% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=586)
2184 Points ∼40% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4053 Points ∼31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4036 Points ∼31% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points ∼29% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼41% +32%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +218%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼42% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼42% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=14)
5144 Points ∼40% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=586)
3080 Points ∼24% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3933 Points ∼40%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3915 Points ∼40% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼37% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼49% +24%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100% +152%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼47% +17%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼49% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=14)
4512 Points ∼46% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=586)
2536 Points ∼26% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3556 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3547 Points ∼70% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼68% -4%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100% +43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼67% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=14)
3324 Points ∼66% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=634)
2142 Points ∼42% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2048 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2106 Points ∼25% +3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points ∼28% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼40% +62%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +307%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼39% +59%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼39% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=14)
3109 Points ∼37% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=634)
1883 Points ∼23% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2261 Points ∼31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2315 Points ∼32% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points ∼34% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼46% +48%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% +223%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼45% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼46% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=14)
3133 Points ∼43% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=635)
1786 Points ∼24% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3501 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3529 Points ∼70% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points ∼65% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼69% -1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼65% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=14)
3200 Points ∼64% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=676)
2013 Points ∼40% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2862 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2844 Points ∼25% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points ∼31% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼51% +104%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼100% +303%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼45% +80%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼45% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=14)
4825 Points ∼42% +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=675)
2497 Points ∼22% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2983 Points ∼33%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2972 Points ∼33% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points ∼40% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼52% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100% +200%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼51% +53%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼52% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=14)
4256 Points ∼48% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=678)
2134 Points ∼24% -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
28116 Points ∼83%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
28331 Points ∼84% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points ∼46% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼60% -27%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼58% -30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼62% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=14)
20608 Points ∼61% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=820)
15818 Points ∼47% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56690 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60281 Points ∼41% +6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points ∼37% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼48% +23%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼100% +157%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼48% +23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼48% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 69645, n=14)
67110 Points ∼46% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=818)
28467 Points ∼20% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
46246 Points ∼55%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48201 Points ∼57% +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points ∼41% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼54% -2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼100% +81%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼53% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=14)
44131 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=818)
21881 Points ∼26% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼24%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼24% -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼41% +71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼47% +94%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼100% +316%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼46% +92%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼48% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=12)
86.8 fps ∼43% +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=818)
47.7 fps ∼23% -3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43 fps ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼73% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼96% +37%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +40%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼98% +40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼98% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=12)
61.3 fps ∼100% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=827)
32 fps ∼52% -26%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
31 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼33% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼40% +58%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼100% +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼45% +81%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼44% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=12)
50.3 fps ∼41% +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=723)
28.3 fps ∼23% -9%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
30 fps ∼50%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼50% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +83%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83% +67%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=12)
45.9 fps ∼77% +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=731)
23.3 fps ∼39% -22%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
22 fps ∼26%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼26% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼35% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼44% +73%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼100% +291%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼44% +73%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼44% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=12)
34.8 fps ∼40% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=586)
22.7 fps ∼26% +3%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼47% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 34, n=12)
31 fps ∼52% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=588)
20.2 fps ∼34% -4%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.9 fps ∼30%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼29% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼37% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼43% +46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼100% +237%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼43% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼43% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 13, n=14)
12 fps ∼40% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=346)
11.7 fps ∼39% +31%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5.5 fps ∼28%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼27% -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps ∼33% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +264%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=14)
8.37 fps ∼42% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=344)
8.24 fps ∼41% +50%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14 fps ∼30%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼28% -7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼37% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼46% +50%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +229%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼46% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼46% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 21, n=14)
19.8 fps ∼43% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=350)
17.4 fps ∼38% +24%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼34% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼45% +85%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼100% +308%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼45% +85%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼45% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 24, n=14)
22.1 fps ∼42% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=349)
20.1 fps ∼38% +55%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼24%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼24% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼33% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼41% +75%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +325%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼41% +75%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼41% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=12)
19.4 fps ∼38% +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=511)
15.1 fps ∼30% +26%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
11 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼30% +18%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼36% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼41% +64%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼100% +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼43% +73%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼43% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 19, n=12)
17.4 fps ∼40% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=515)
13.4 fps ∼30% +22%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
287407 Points ∼48%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼49% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points ∼45% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼54% +11%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100% +107%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼55% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼56% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332074, n=12)
310972 Points ∼52% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=139)
326530 Points ∼55% +14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1436 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼91% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points ∼81% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼93% +2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +10%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼90% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=12)
1360 Points ∼86% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=753)
835 Points ∼53% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2525 Points ∼22%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼22% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points ∼33% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼44% +106%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100% +363%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼45% +107%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼45% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=12)
4698 Points ∼40% +86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=753)
2592 Points ∼22% +3%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5046 Points ∼62%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼66% +7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points ∼55% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼69% +13%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼59% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼65% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=12)
5112 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=753)
1947 Points ∼24% -61%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5997 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼59% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points ∼67% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼60% +1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼66% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼67% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=12)
6459 Points ∼64% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=753)
3552 Points ∼35% -41%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3237 Points ∼52%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼53% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points ∼57% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼66% +26%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100% +92%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼63% +21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼65% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=12)
3792 Points ∼61% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=753)
1823 Points ∼29% -44%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼84% +20%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.811 Points ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼72% +2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.09 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.798 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=11)
46.9 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=213)
42.5 Points ∼61% -13%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.325 Points ∼57% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.67 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼81% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼80% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
92.693 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.938 Points ∼76% -4%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.731 Points ∼75% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.7, n=9)
79.4 Points ∼68% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=647)
49.6 Points ∼43% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min ∼100% +39%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼75% +5%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼73% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
48.5 runs/min ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=194)
44.9 runs/min ∼67% -7%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min ∼66% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼100% +36%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼99% +35%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
75 Points ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points ∼73% -1%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=284)
71 Points ∼70% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=11)
70.2 Points ∼69% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼81% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
19009 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼78% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼78% -2%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points ∼75% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=12)
16587 Points ∼70% -13%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points ∼70% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=816)
8273 Points ∼35% -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=842)
9571 ms * ∼100% -274%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=12)
3874 ms * ∼40% -51%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2949.9 ms * ∼31% -15%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼30% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689.4 ms * ∼28% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% -2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2560.6 ms * ∼27%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2469.8 ms * ∼26% +4%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼21% +22%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 4aXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5Grealme X50 ProOppo Find X2 NeoOnePlus NordAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-11%
20%
97%
18%
10%
-17%
-61%
Random Write 4KB
186.74
155.87
-17%
187.39
0%
138.47
-26%
251.98
35%
143.8
-23%
104.5
-44%
114 (18.2 - 290, n=69)
-39%
38.6 (0.14 - 319, n=914)
-79%
Random Read 4KB
168.63
138.93
-18%
162.89
-3%
156.45
-7%
229.38
36%
160.47
-5%
126.7
-25%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=69)
-15%
61.8 (1.59 - 325, n=914)
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB
228.73
189.99
-17%
246.79
8%
476.87
108%
756.21
231%
454.36
99%
473.1
107%
241 (182 - 511, n=69)
5%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=914)
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
945.02
851.37
-10%
502.06
-47%
979.54
4%
1756.1
86%
943.1
0%
955.5
1%
768 (427 - 999, n=69)
-19%
356 (12.1 - 2037, n=914)
-62%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø59.7 (57-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (25-32)
Hög belastning
 32.2 °C32.4 °C31.4 °C 
 32.7 °C34.3 °C31.2 °C 
 34.5 °C35.1 °C32.5 °C 
Max: 35.1 °C
Medel: 32.9 °C
30.1 °C31.9 °C32 °C
29.3 °C31.8 °C33.3 °C
30.8 °C34.7 °C34.9 °C
Max: 34.9 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.438.72523.334.4312629.94022.636.25034.535.16319.936.18014.736.610014.436.712514.943.116017.853.620018.951.325011.756.431513.964.54001362.350010.367.263010.470.680012.470.4100011.173.2125011.272.1160012.776.6200012.379.5250012.678.7315012.777.7400012.782.6500012.784630013.579.780001475.81000013.570.61250014.972.8160001668SPL24.890.5N0.681median 12.7median 70.6Delta18.630.435.123.336.72641.522.64034.540.719.942.114.740.814.439.714.944.517.853.918.952.811.754.913.958.91359.610.363.410.466.812.471.411.177.911.284.412.782.712.375.112.675.312.778.212.78012.783.213.582.91478.813.57114.9641658.524.891.90.688.5median 12.7median 71110.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 4a 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.96 / 0.98 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.95 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
4%
-105%
-67%
-57%
-85%
-59%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.69
1%
0.49
30%
1.5
-114%
1
-43%
0.8
-14%
1.8
-157%
0.958 (0.66 - 1.8, n=13)
-37%
0.892 (0.2 - 3.4, n=911)
-27%
Idle Average *
0.96
0.82
15%
0.96
-0%
2.2
-129%
1.77
-84%
2.21
-130%
2.1
-119%
1.924 (0.82 - 2.55, n=13)
-100%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=910)
-83%
Idle Maximum *
0.98
0.85
13%
1
-2%
2.9
-196%
1.86
-90%
2.23
-128%
2.3
-135%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=13)
-111%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=911)
-108%
Load Average *
2.95
2.73
7%
3.11
-5%
4.4
-49%
4.23
-43%
3.14
-6%
3.4
-15%
3.85 (2.73 - 6.8, n=13)
-31%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=905)
-40%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.4
15%
5.23
-1%
7.2
-38%
9.13
-76%
5.44
-5%
5.2
-0%
5.91 (4.4 - 7.5, n=13)
-14%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=905)
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
40tim 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22tim 17min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 41min
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-19%
5%
-26%
-7%
-12%
Reader / Idle
2459
2245
-9%
2270
-8%
1683
-32%
1507
-39%
2003
-19%
H.264
1337
1466
10%
1045
-22%
1403
5%
1029
-23%
1064
-20%
WiFi v1.3
768
808
5%
669
-13%
884
15%
775
1%
712
-7%
869
13%
Load
341
333
-2%
225
-34%
448
31%
194
-43%
261
-23%

För

+ Kompakt och lätt hölje
+ 5G & NFC
+ Android 11 & förlängt mjukvarustöd
+ Snabb fingeravtrycksläsare
+ Riktigt bra kamera
+ Ljusstark OLED-skärm
+ Riktigt bra batteritid

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering
- Minnet går inte att utöka
- Saknar stöd för WiFi 6
- Tunt stereoljud
- Saknar stöd för trådlös laddning

Omdöme - En billigare version av Pixel 5

Recension av Google Pixel 4a 5G. Recensionsex från Google Germany.
Recension av Google Pixel 4a 5G. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Pixel 4a 5G är en budgetversion av Pixel 5. Den har imponerande prestanda i förhållande till priset. Jämfört med tidigare "a"-telefoner har den egentliga inga svagheter.

Jämfört med Pixel 5 har Pixel 4a 5G exakt samma mittenskikts-SoC, exakt samma dualkamera-system och ett snarlikt batteri. Men den kostar 1.300 kronor mindre. Vidare har den en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, vilket den dyrare Pixel 5 saknar. Enligt Google kommer Pixel 4a 5G få uppdateringar för mjukvara och säkerhet i minst tre år framöver.

Högoddsare: Google Pixel 4a 5G får rejält med poäng, inte bara för sin stora OLED-skärm utan också för sin hårdvara, som påminner väldigt mycket om den som sitter i det 1.300 kronor dyrare flaggskeppet Pixel 5.

Det finns fler områden än skärmen där de båda Pixel-telefonerna skiljer sig åt. Pixel 4a 5G har bara 6 GB RAM medans Pixel 5 har 8 GB RAM. Vidare har Pixel 4a 5G stöd för färre 5G-frekvensband och använder en 60 Hz-skärm. Pixel 5 har istället en 90 Hz-skärm, IP-certifierat skydd mot vatten och damm, stöd för (omvänd) trådlös laddning och är dessutom gjord av lyxigare material och känns bättre i handen. Pixel 4a 5G har däremot bättre samtalskvalitet.   

Om du inte behöver 5G är Pixel 4a på 5.8 tum ett bra alternativ till Pixel 4a 5G: Den är nästan lika snabb, har också en OLED-skärm och bra batteritid och den är betydligt billigare (online kostar den runt 4.000 kronor för tillfället). Om du inte behöver 5G men ändå vill ha en toppskikts-telefon är det värt att överväga Pixel 4 XL. Den kostar just nu lika mycket som Pixel 4a 5G.

Google Pixel 4a 5G - 11/11/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
80%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
50 / 70 → 71%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
28 / 64 → 43%
Programprestanda
72 / 86 → 84%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
71%
Medel
77%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 4a 5G - Billig Pixel 5 (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-11-16 (Update: 2020-11-16)