Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: OnePlus 7T - En stor mängd förbättringar (Sammanfattning)
Jämförelseenheter
Rating | ratingversion | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.8 % | 7 | 10/2019 | OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 8.13 mm | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.1 % | 7 | 05/2019 | OnePlus 7 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 182 g | 8.2 mm | 6.41" | 2340x1080 | |
| 85.7 % | 7 | 05/2019 | OnePlus 7 Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 206 g | 8.8 mm | 6.67" | 3120x1440 | |
| 88.6 % | 6 | 08/2019 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 191 g | 8.8 mm | 6.39" | 2340x1080 | |
| 86.5 % | 7 | 10/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 8.3 mm | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
| 85.1 % | 7 | 04/2019 | Samsung Galaxy S10e Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12 | 150 g | 7.9 mm | 5.80" | 2280x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 693 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
| OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | OnePlus 7 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41 | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.10 | Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.80 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -7% | 23% | 12% | 33% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 693 | 603 -13% | 586 -15% | 594 -14% | 679 -2% | 426 -39% |
| Brightness | 703 | 605 -14% | 584 -17% | 607 -14% | 671 -5% | 427 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 94 -2% | 97 1% | 91 -5% | 93 -3% | 96 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.42 | 3.5 -2% | 1.39 59% | 1.51 56% | 0.8 77% | 2.14 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.12 | 7.7 -26% | 2.7 56% | 4.27 30% | 2.4 61% | 3.29 46% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.7 18% | 1.6 52% | 2.6 21% | 1.1 67% | 1.8 45% |
| Gamma | 2.265 97% | 2.266 97% | 2.243 98% | 2.219 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.111 104% |
| CCT | 6799 96% | 6775 96% | 6672 97% | 6390 102% | 6610 98% | 6329 103% |
| Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| OnePlus 7 | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus () | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 70.9, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (113.9 - 120.8, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (89 - 111, n=5) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23781 - 25353, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 7T | OnePlus 7 | OnePlus 7 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | Apple iPhone 11 | Samsung Galaxy S10e | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 21% | 17% | 82% | -24% | 182% | 319% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1406 | 1463 4% | 1468 4% | 809 -42% | 792 -44% | 1520 ? 8% | 1508 ? 7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 218.4 | 392 79% | 387 77% | 196.9 -10% | 194.1 -11% | 546 ? 150% | 1118 ? 412% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 170.1 | 175.3 3% | 174.1 2% | 142.5 -16% | 136.9 -20% | 206 ? 21% | 247 ? 45% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 29.9 | 28.7 -4% | 24.8 -17% | 148.5 397% | 24.1 -19% | 193.9 ? 548% | 272 ? 810% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 7T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.4 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.9 / 1.4 / 2.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.7 / 8.3 Watt |
    
| |
| OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | OnePlus 7 3700 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | -9% | 15% | -7% | 12% | -11% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.6 33% | 0.9 -0% | 0.7 22% | 0.56 38% | 0.6 33% | 1.183 ? -31% | 0.897 ? -0% |
| Idle Average * | 1.4 | 1.1 21% | 1.8 -29% | 1 29% | 2.99 -114% | 1.2 14% | 1.883 ? -35% | 1.452 ? -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 2 31% | 2.9 -0% | 1.3 55% | 3.02 -4% | 1.5 48% | 2.32 ? 20% | 1.629 ? 44% |
| Load Average * | 4.7 | 4 15% | 5.5 -17% | 5.2 -11% | 4.17 11% | 5.2 -11% | 4.91 ? -4% | 5.55 ? -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.3 | 8 4% | 8.2 1% | 10 -20% | 5.44 34% | 10.2 -23% | 8.59 ? -3% | 8.31 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | OnePlus 7 3700 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | -15% | -9% | 12% | -39% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2003 | 1989 -1% | 1745 -13% | 1768 -12% | 2765 38% | 1185 -41% |
| H.264 | 967 | 933 -4% | 802 -17% | 987 2% | 1147 19% | 795 -18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 896 | 901 1% | 768 -14% | 762 -15% | 866 -3% | 416 -54% |
| Load | 283 | 278 -2% | 236 -17% | 249 -12% | 267 -6% | 164 -42% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Utmärkt teknik med några små brister
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
OnePlus har gett OnePlus 7T en stor uppdatering med många funktioner som tidigare varit reserverade för Pro-modellen. Det är bra för köparen eftersom man får mer till ett lägre pris: Den har ännu snabbare WarpCharge 30T-snabbladdning, en bättre kamera, ett tjusigt chassi och förstås, framför allt, en fantastisk 90 Hz-skärm som är en välsignelse när man hanterar menyer till vardags. Tyvärr använder OnePlus ännu inte 90 Hz i spel.
Å ena sidan får man gratulera OnePlus för att de vågar ignorera funktioner som trådlös laddning: Enligt en intervju med deras grundare når tekniken ännu inte upp till kraven på hastighet och pålitlighet. Samtidigt kan vissa användare förstås tycka det är irriterande att även IP-certifiering och lagringsexpansion genom microSD-kort också saknas.
När det kommer till skärmen finns det skillnader gentemot Pro-modellen; OnePlus 7T ligger snarare på den lägsta nivån i toppskiktet och till och med förra årets Pro-modell erbjuder mer när det kommer till upplösning och färgprecision.
OnePlus 7T är ett utmärkt alternativ från toppskiktet. Om du inte bryr dig om trådlös laddning och skydd mot vatten kan du slå till på denna smartphone.
Totalt sett får du mycket för pengarna med OnePlus 7T. Med sin extremt snabba laddning och 90 Hz-skärm är OnePlus 7T en riktigt trevlig kollega i vardagslivet.
OnePlus 7T
-
09/03/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt