Notebookcheck

Test: OnePlus 7T - En stor mängd förbättringar (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/18/2019

Pro blir standard. OnePlus 7T är en kraftfull uppdatering från sin föregångare och kommer med många funktioner som tidigare varit reserverade för "Pro"-modellen. Detta låter bra för alla intresserade köpare och i den här recensionen får du reda på om denna billiga toppskiktstelefon verkligen är värd pengarna.

OnePlus 7T (7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.55 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, Vattendropps-jack, 90 Hz, glansig: ja, HDR
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, , 101 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutgång genom USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.13 x 160.94 x 74.44
Batteri
3800 mAh Litiumpolymer, WarpCharge 30T Snabbladdning (30 watt)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.6, kontast-AF, fasdetekterande-AF, OIS, dubbel LED-blixt, video @2160p/​60fps (kamera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, teleobjektiv (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB C-kabel, Silikonfodral, SIM-verktyg, OnePlus Community, OnePlus Switch, Game Space, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps); A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a); SAR: 1.06 W/kg (Huvud), 0.93 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
190 g, Strömförsörjning: 128 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

RatingratingversionDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
86%710/2019OnePlus 7T
855+, Adreno 640
190 g8.13 mm6.55"2400x1080
85%705/2019OnePlus 7
855, Adreno 640
182 g8.2 mm6.41"2340x1080
86%705/2019OnePlus 7 Pro
855, Adreno 640
206 g8.8 mm6.67"3120x1440
89%608/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g8.8 mm6.39"2340x1080
87%710/2019Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g8.3 mm6.1"1792x828
85%704/2019Samsung Galaxy S10e
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
150 g7.9 mm5.8"2280x1080
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T

Storleksjämförelse

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (min: 445, max: 571) MBit/s ∼92% +21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼83% +9%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼76%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼69% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=456)
230 MBit/s ∼41% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼89% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (min: 351, max: 489) MBit/s ∼88% +11%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼62% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=456)
218 MBit/s ∼41% -48%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø430 (374-485)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø422 (238-447)
GPS OnePlus 7T – Översikt
GPS OnePlus 7T – Översikt
GPS OnePlus 7T – Vändplats
GPS OnePlus 7T – Vändplats
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bro
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Vändplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Vändplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med teleobjektivet
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med vidvinkelslinsen
Foto taget med nattläget
ColorChecker Photo
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.08 - max: 14.39 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
15.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 10.22 ∆E min: 3.21 - max: 19.38 ∆E
Testkartan vid perfekt ljus
Testkartan vid perfekt ljus
Testkartan vid 1 lux
723
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 723 cd/m² Medel: 703.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 693 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
Screen
-7%
23%
12%
33%
8%
Brightness middle
693
603
-13%
586
-15%
594
-14%
679
-2%
426
-39%
Brightness
703
605
-14%
584
-17%
607
-14%
671
-5%
427
-39%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
97
1%
91
-5%
93
-3%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.42
3.5
-2%
1.39
59%
1.51
56%
0.8
77%
2.14
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.12
7.7
-26%
2.7
56%
4.27
30%
2.4
61%
3.29
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.7
18%
1.6
52%
2.6
21%
1.1
67%
1.8
45%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.266 97%
2.243 98%
2.219 99%
2.24 98%
2.111 104%
CCT
6799 96%
6775 96%
6672 97%
6390 102%
6610 98%
6329 103%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 357 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2652 - 2727, n=4)
2701 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=34)
2039 Points ∼75% -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2519 - 2940, n=4)
2788 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=45)
1989 Points ∼57% -28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (761 - 792, n=4)
782 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=45)
576 Points ∼43% -26%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8317 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
8317 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=326)
4680 Points ∼46% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=385)
4718 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3705 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼78% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
3705 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=385)
1424 Points ∼32% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼89% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼96% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼90% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points ∼77% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 11690, n=4)
10384 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=396)
5356 Points ∼52% -38%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼95% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼92% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points ∼78% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 15193, n=4)
12758 Points ∼100% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=563)
5817 Points ∼46% -43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3489 - 3565, n=3)
3539 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=73)
2674 Points ∼76% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6521 - 6640, n=3)
6563 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=73)
2752 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5506 - 5530, n=3)
5515 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=73)
2504 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼95% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼70% -29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4635 - 4737, n=4)
4685 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4737, n=403)
1988 Points ∼42% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼87% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼83% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7912 - 8006, n=4)
7975 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=403)
1803 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6875 - 6916, n=4)
6898 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=404)
1673 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼94% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼71% -27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼74% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points ∼67% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4517 - 4725, n=4)
4613 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4725, n=432)
1898 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼58% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼58% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼38% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points ∼27% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (11344 - 11448, n=4)
11418 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=432)
2406 Points ∼13% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼86% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼59% -36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8531 - 8651, n=4)
8598 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=432)
2018 Points ∼22% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4438 - 4519, n=4)
4492 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=483)
1896 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7044 - 7150, n=4)
7080 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=483)
1493 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6253 - 6319, n=4)
6276 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=484)
1436 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points ∼65% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4370 - 4503, n=4)
4438 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=524)
1759 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼58% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10637 - 11259, n=4)
10829 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=523)
1959 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8136 - 8338, n=4)
8201 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=526)
1689 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼79% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points ∼94% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 41296, n=4)
34029 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=684)
14281 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼51% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points ∼34% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (113347 - 118129, n=4)
116727 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=682)
22374 Points ∼11% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼66% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points ∼58% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 81679, n=4)
75410 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=682)
18053 Points ∼19% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼52% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps ∼44% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (166 - 185, n=3)
179 fps ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=700)
38.3 fps ∼12% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 61, n=3)
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=709)
28.2 fps ∼41% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼57% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -20%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps ∼49% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (100 - 112, n=3)
108 fps ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=606)
22 fps ∼13% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (57 - 61, n=3)
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=615)
19.5 fps ∼33% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼57% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼61% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼53% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼45% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (71 - 79, n=3)
76.3 fps ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=471)
18 fps ∼15% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=3)
52 fps ∼87% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=473)
16.8 fps ∼28% -71%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼25% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +122%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps ∼47% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 27, n=4)
22 fps ∼37% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=194)
10.1 fps ∼17% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼73% +33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 19, n=4)
18.5 fps ∼56% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=193)
7.01 fps ∼21% -61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼38% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (25 - 41, n=4)
33.3 fps ∼56% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=198)
14.8 fps ∼25% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼49% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps ∼47% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 47, n=4)
47 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=198)
16.6 fps ∼19% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼58% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼58% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼49% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (43 - 48, n=3)
46 fps ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=396)
12.3 fps ∼17% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼35% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps ∼67% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼57% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=400)
11 fps ∼18% -73%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
395265 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼81% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼81% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼82% -6%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
456891 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
395265 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143005 Points ∼31% -64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=3)
1395 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=640)
763 Points ∼51% -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10467 - 10618, n=3)
10565 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=640)
2094 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼93% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼70% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 6077, n=3)
5346 Points ∼95% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=640)
1546 Points ∼28% -68%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼81% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8693 - 9294, n=3)
8992 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=640)
3022 Points ∼33% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5335, n=3)
5150 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=640)
1515 Points ∼29% -70%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 67.3, n=3)
65 Points ∼49% 0%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼47% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼47% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=112)
36.1 Points ∼27% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +143%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (115 - 121, n=3)
118 Points ∼40% -2%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
117.76 Points ∼40% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼33% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=537)
42.2 Points ∼14% -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +127%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44%
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼43% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼39% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=3)
58.2 runs/min ∼37% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼27% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=100)
39.8 runs/min ∼25% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +84%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼60% +11%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼60% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼58% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 111, n=3)
101 Points ∼55% +1%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=170)
67.1 Points ∼36% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +93%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼51% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼51% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23999 - 25353, n=3)
24641 Points ∼50% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=698)
6865 Points ∼14% -73%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=723)
10475 ms * ∼100% -418%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2239.5 ms * ∼21% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=3)
2054 ms * ∼20% -2%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼19%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +3%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼19% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼5% +72%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 7TOnePlus 7OnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9T ProApple iPhone 11Samsung Galaxy S10eAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
21%
17%
82%
-24%
77%
-58%
Random Write 4KB
29.9
28.7
-4%
24.8
-17%
148.51
397%
24.1
-19%
100 (29.9 - 170, n=2)
234%
22.7 (0.14 - 250, n=758)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
170.1
175.3
3%
174.1
2%
142.5
-16%
136.9
-20%
181 (170 - 192, n=2)
6%
48.1 (1.59 - 196, n=758)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
218.4
392
79%
387
77%
196.87
-10%
194.1
-11%
370 (218 - 522, n=2)
69%
98.6 (2.99 - 590, n=758)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
1406
1463
4%
1468
4%
808.76
-42%
792.2
-44%
1411 (1406 - 1416, n=2)
0%
277 (12.1 - 1504, n=758)
-80%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (48-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø29.7 (27-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)
Hög belastning
 48.2 °C45.7 °C41.1 °C 
 46.9 °C45.3 °C41.7 °C 
 46.7 °C45.2 °C41.1 °C 
Max: 48.2 °C
Medel: 44.7 °C
37.4 °C41.7 °C44.2 °C
38.4 °C42.2 °C44.1 °C
38.8 °C42.6 °C44.2 °C
Max: 44.2 °C
Medel: 41.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.843.92542.542.53134.235.24034.239.25039.240.5632932.18025.826.210024.227.912524.434.416022.64520021.452.525021.458.431519.958.140019.159.550019.462.363018.663.980017.866.8100019.169.9125017.874.7160019.274.920001877.1250017.476.6315016.975.2400016.975500016.967.7630016.962.8800017.268.71000017.270.11250017.266.11600017.359.4SPL71.772.930.185.2N26.627.71.359.2median 18median 66.1Delta1.86.940.242.244.145.434.135.238.141.338.939.5303425.928.825.329.123.236.120.546.220.451.92056.918.658.617.356.217.255.820.263.119.667.616.173.913.978.515.280.815.574.414.56614.266.714.169.515.969.815.368.814.96714.662.514.960.714.757.174.265.528.362.985.62818.11.115.556.2median 15.9median 63.12.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7TOnePlus 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.7 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
15%
-7%
12%
-22%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.6
33%
0.9
-0%
0.7
22%
0.56
38%
0.6
33%
1.445 (0.68 - 2.1, n=4)
-61%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=787)
2%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
1.8
-29%
1
29%
2.99
-114%
1.2
14%
2.11 (1.05 - 3, n=4)
-51%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=786)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2
31%
2.9
-0%
1.3
55%
3.02
-4%
1.5
48%
2.74 (1.07 - 3.5, n=4)
6%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=787)
30%
Load Average *
4.7
4
15%
5.5
-17%
5.2
-11%
4.17
11%
5.2
-11%
4.86 (4.14 - 5.3, n=4)
-3%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=781)
13%
Load Maximum *
8.3
8
4%
8.2
1%
10
-20%
5.44
34%
10.2
-23%
8.49 (8.3 - 9.05, n=4)
-2%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=781)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
33tim 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 43min
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-15%
-9%
12%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2003
1989
-1%
1745
-13%
1768
-12%
2765
38%
1185
-41%
H.264
967
933
-4%
802
-17%
987
2%
1147
19%
795
-18%
WiFi v1.3
896
901
1%
768
-14%
762
-15%
866
-3%
416
-54%
Load
283
278
-2%
236
-17%
249
-12%
267
-6%
164
-42%

För

+ 90 Hz-skärm
+ utmärkt trippelkamera
+ tjusigt och stabilt chassi
+ bra stereohögtalare
+ lång batteritid
+ exakt GPS
+ många LTE-frekvenser

Emot

- kraftig värmeutveckling vid belastning
- saknar microSD
- ej skyddad mot vatten och damm
- i många spel är 90 Hz-läget är inte aktiverat som standard

Omdöme – Utmärkt teknik med några små brister

Recension av OnePlus 7T. Recensionsex från OnePlus Germany.
Recension av OnePlus 7T. Recensionsex från OnePlus Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

OnePlus har gett OnePlus 7T en stor uppdatering med många funktioner som tidigare varit reserverade för Pro-modellen. Det är bra för köparen eftersom man får mer till ett lägre pris: Den har ännu snabbare WarpCharge 30T-snabbladdning, en bättre kamera, ett tjusigt chassi och förstås, framför allt, en fantastisk 90 Hz-skärm som är en välsignelse när man hanterar menyer till vardags. Tyvärr använder OnePlus ännu inte 90 Hz i spel.

Å ena sidan får man gratulera OnePlus för att de vågar ignorera funktioner som trådlös laddning: Enligt en intervju med deras grundare når tekniken ännu inte upp till kraven på hastighet och pålitlighet. Samtidigt kan vissa användare förstås tycka det är irriterande att även IP-certifiering och lagringsexpansion genom microSD-kort också saknas.

När det kommer till skärmen finns det skillnader gentemot Pro-modellen; OnePlus 7T ligger snarare på den lägsta nivån i toppskiktet och till och med förra årets Pro-modell erbjuder mer när det kommer till upplösning och färgprecision.

OnePlus 7T är ett utmärkt alternativ från toppskiktet. Om du inte bryr dig om trådlös laddning och skydd mot vatten kan du slå till på denna smartphone.

Totalt sett får du mycket för pengarna med OnePlus 7T. Med sin extremt snabba laddning och 90 Hz-skärm är OnePlus 7T en riktigt trevlig kollega i vardagslivet.

OnePlus 7T - 10/07/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
87%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
44 / 70 → 63%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
59 / 64 → 92%
Programprestanda
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperatur
84%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
70%
Medel
79%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: OnePlus 7T - En stor mängd förbättringar (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-10-18 (Update: 2019-10-18)