Notebookcheck

Test: Google Pixel 3 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/02/2018

Inget flaggskepp. Google Pixel 3 är en dyr smartphone som kostar 8.000 kronor och den måste tävla mot jämförbart utrustade men betydligt billigare konkurrenter. I den här detaljerade recensionen får du reda på hur företagets nya flaggskepp står sig mot konkurrensen och huruvida Google har åtgärdat problemen vi hade med Pixel 2.

Google Pixel 3 (Pixel Serie)
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.5 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 439 PPI, Kapacitiv, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroskop, Magnetometer, USB Typ C, eSIM
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1900 MHz. CDMA: BC0, BC1, BC10. WCDMA: W1, W2. LTE/FDD: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B32, B66, B71. LTE TD: B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46., LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 145.6 x 68.2
Batteri
2915 mAh Litiumjon, Qi trådlös laddning
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix ,1.4μm, f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Dubbel: 8MP (f/2.2) & 8MP (f/1.8)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Snabbladdare, USB Typ C-kabel, Pixel USB Typ C Hörlurar, USB Typ C till 3.5 mm-adapter, USB Typ C till Typ A-adapter, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Huvud - 1.33 W/kg, Kropp - 1.49 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
148 g, Strömförsörjning: 82 g
Pris
850 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
659 (min: 610, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=307)
211 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 461, max: 651) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=307)
207 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (610-698)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (461-651)
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Översikt
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Översikt
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Slinga
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Foto av vårt testkarta
Foto av vårt testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 420 cd/m² Medel: 398.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 393 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Google Pixel 3
OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
14%
14%
-155%
-7%
Brightness middle
393
569
45%
639
63%
543
38%
395
1%
Brightness
398
578
45%
637
60%
542
36%
402
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
95
4%
94
3%
92
1%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1
29%
6.6
-371%
1.6
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.5
2.1
16%
2.2
12%
11
-340%
3.4
-36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.2
-83%
4.7
-292%
1.1
8%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
1.9 116%
1.835 120%
2.14 103%
CCT
6597 99%
6401 102%
6364 102%
6817 95%
6536 99%
Contrast
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8933 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
13620 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
13194 Points ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼33% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7754 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼58% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +50%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7934 Points ∼68% +2%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼75% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼37% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2355 Points ∼49%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +105%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2272 Points ∼47% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼50% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼26% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
9063 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
11744 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3
11474 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2979 Points ∼79%
Huawei P20 Pro
2942 Points ∼78% -1%
Apple iPhone XS
2998 Points ∼80% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3764 Points ∼100% +26%
HTC U12 Plus
2947 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼45% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4882 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
3109 Points ∼54% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
5139 Points ∼88% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5810 Points ∼100% +19%
HTC U12 Plus
4450 Points ∼77% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼95% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4275 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
3070 Points ∼59% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
4436 Points ∼86% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5184 Points ∼100% +21%
HTC U12 Plus
3997 Points ∼77% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼90% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2781 Points ∼76%
Huawei P20 Pro
2940 Points ∼80% +6%
Apple iPhone XS
2952 Points ∼80% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3672 Points ∼100% +32%
HTC U12 Plus
2656 Points ∼72% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼46% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
6404 Points ∼43%
Huawei P20 Pro
3503 Points ∼23% -45%
Apple iPhone XS
14951 Points ∼100% +133%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8369 Points ∼56% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
6419 Points ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼52% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼14% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4966 Points ∼63%
Huawei P20 Pro
3360 Points ∼43% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
7856 Points ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6517 Points ∼83% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
4882 Points ∼62% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼73% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼22% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
3203 Points ∼86%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼79% -9%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼80% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3703 Points ∼100% +16%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
5188 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5092 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4560 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -34%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼75% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
4700 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2533 Points ∼70%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼80% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3603 Points ∼100% +42%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼87% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼43% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7075 Points ∼88%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼42% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8014 Points ∼100% +13%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼70% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼98% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
5059 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6300 Points ∼100% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
32914 Points ∼89%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
36794 Points ∼100% +12%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
84256 Points ∼53%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -60%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83927 Points ∼52% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼51% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
62568 Points ∼81%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -52%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
65330 Points ∼85% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼81% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼20% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
127 fps ∼51%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼48% -5%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XZ3
152 fps ∼61% +20%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼39% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼57% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼13% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
61 fps ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
60 fps ∼96% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼94% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
55 fps ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼53% +11%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100% +109%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83 fps ∼72% +51%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼63% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼63% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼15% -69%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
54 fps ∼90%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼90% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
50 fps ∼83% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼58% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
46 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
57 fps ∼92% +24%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼88% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼23% -69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
41 fps ∼85%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼75% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
31 fps ∼65% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼65% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼97% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼29% -66%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
23 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Apple iPhone XS
35 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼57% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼29% -56%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
11 fps ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
8.6 fps ∼39% -22%
Apple iPhone XS
22 fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼64% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼70% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼30% -41%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
27 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼56% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
41 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
21 fps ∼51% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼35% -47%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
29 fps ∼60%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼48% -21%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +66%
Sony Xperia XZ3
37 fps ∼77% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼73% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼33% -46%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
28 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼61% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼100% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ3
35 fps ∼92% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼92% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼89% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼26% -65%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
26 fps ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼71% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
19 fps ∼61% -27%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼65% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% -66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
280162 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼60% -26%
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100% +24%
Sony Xperia XZ3
292268 Points ∼84% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼34% -58%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
220797 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼79% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
226853 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=390)
76481 Points ∼34% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
1435 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -11%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
1390 Points ∼81% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼41% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7965 Points ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼23% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7989 Points ∼50% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4650 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2317 Points ∼50% -50%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼27% -73%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7826 Points ∼64%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼49% -24%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +56%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8135 Points ∼67% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼21% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4516 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼54% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3804 Points ∼62% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼70% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼21% -72%

Legend

 
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +215%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼32% +2%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼32% +1%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
86.331 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -11%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼13% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +163%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼39% +3%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
16454 Points ∼38%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼13% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -398%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼34% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -25%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼21% -5%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
2304.5 ms * ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼20% -0%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
159 Points ∼100% +61%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
101 Points ∼64% +2%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
99 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼62% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼43% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼40% -36%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3Huawei P20 ProSony Xperia XZ3HTC U12 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-24%
-11%
-18%
-72%
Random Write 4KB
133.76
160.49
20%
22.22
-83%
104.24
-22%
50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34)
-62%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
149.82
144.33
-4%
135.67
-9%
118.14
-21%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=34)
-11%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.81
196.69
8%
196.14
8%
195.82
8%
193 (133 - 229, n=34)
6%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
766.41
831.82
9%
680.98
-11%
709.11
-7%
727 (529 - 895, n=34)
-5%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-70%
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; high HD: Ø57 (47-61)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040506070Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; Standard / low: Ø30.2 (27-31)
Hög belastning
 35.2 °C35.1 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C35 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C34.4 °C32 °C 
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 34.1 °C
31.6 °C31.4 °C34.2 °C
31 °C32.4 °C37 °C
30 °C33.3 °C35.5 °C
Max: 37 °C
Medel: 32.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.633.82528.926.53125.224.14026.120.45030.227.46326.919.68028.721.710029.120.812518.431.5160215220024.350.925017.459.231516.86240015.362.750015.665.663014.168.480015.273.1100014.173.1125014.673.7160014.673.6200014.272.4250013.873.431501475.6400014.667500014.470.6630014.676.3800014.474.81000014.871.41250014.660.31600014.763.3SPL2784.9N0.964.3median 14.6median 68.4Delta1.49.13030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.41 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.21 / 2.01 / 2.05 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.06 / 8.79 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
25%
22%
-10%
5%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.21
0.84
31%
0.95
21%
0.8
34%
0.77
36%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
34%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=637)
27%
Idle Average *
2.01
1.54
23%
1.34
33%
1.2
40%
2.18
-8%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
14%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=636)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
1.57
23%
1.48
28%
1.5
27%
2.21
-8%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-2%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=637)
3%
Load Average *
4.06
2.47
39%
4
1%
4.8
-18%
6.25
-54%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-18%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=631)
-0%
Load Maximum *
8.79
2.49
72%
5.13
42%
6.2
29%
10.16
-16%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
-5%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=631)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
22tim 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7tim 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 39min
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Battery Runtime
52%
21%
-8%
6%
Reader / Idle
1372
1727
26%
1442
5%
1270
-7%
1452
6%
H.264
727
784
8%
745
2%
420
-42%
464
-36%
WiFi v1.3
471
744
58%
570
21%
419
-11%
507
8%
Load
159
345
117%
245
54%
202
27%
230
45%

För

+ ren Android 9 Pie-upplevelse
+ USB 3.1 Typ C
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ bra högtalare
+ världsomspännande LTE-täckning
+ OLED-skärm

Emot

- minnet går inte att utöka
- medioker batteritid
- låg maximal ljusstyrka
- Active Edge-funktionen går inte att ställa in
Recension av Google Pixel 3. Recensionsex från Google Germany.
Recension av Google Pixel 3. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Google Pixel 3 är en gedigen toppskikts-telefon. I vårt tycke är den dyr och har en utdaterad design, men dess utmärkta bakåtriktade kamera, rena Android-upplevelse och framåtriktade stereohögtalare imponerar. Active Edge är dessutom ett användbart tillägg, även om bristen på inställningsmöjligheter begränsar dess användbarhet och hindrar den från att vara ett unikt säljargument.

Pixel 3 gör många saker bra. Men den saknar funktioner som står ut och som motivera en prislapp på 8.000 kronor, särskilt eftersom många av dess konkurrenter erbjuder mer för mindre.

Vidare har enheten en jämförelsevis mörk skärm och batteritiden gjorde oss besvikna. Vi hoppas att Google kommer förbättra detta i framtida uppdateringar då det begränsar ett i övrigt gediget flaggskepp. Pixel 3 gör inte mycket för att stå ut från konkurrensen, men den träffar rätt med det mesta. Vi rekommenderar Pixel 3 åt den som vill ha den renaste Android-upplevelsen som går att få för pengar, regelbundna uppdateringar, en bakåtriktad kamera som är bland de bästa i klassen och utmärkta högtalare.

Google Pixel 3 - 11/21/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Design
89%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
42 / 60 → 70%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
67 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
83%
Medel
82%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 3 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-12- 2 (Update: 2018-12- 2)