Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT (Ryzen 5 3550H, GTX 1650, SSD, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

En samproduktion från AMD och Nvidia. Hårdvaran, bestående av en Ryzen 5 3550H APU och en GeForce GTX 1650 GPU, kan spela alla aktuella och moderna spel smidigt på datorns 17.3 tums Full HD-skärm. Den har jämförelsevis låg energiförbrukning och blir bara måttligt varm. Till dess fördel finns också en NVMe SSD, en extra HDD och riktigt bra batteritid. Mindre bra är det aningen snåla portutbudet.
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T (TUF FX705 Serie)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1560 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bitars buss, Nvidia 430.64, Optimus
Minne
8 GB 
, DDR4-2666, Enkel kanal, två platser (en plats upptagen)
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
AMD CZ FCH
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB 
, NVMe SSD + Toshiba MQ04ABF100 (1 TB, 5400 rpm), 1100 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC233 @ AMD K17.1 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.6 x 399.8 x 279.4
Batteri
64 Wh, 4240 mAh Litiumjon, 15.2 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LiveSafe (Testversion), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.7 kg, Strömförsörjning: 442 g
Pris
1049 Euro
Länkar
Asus hemsida
Asus kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

❌
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg415.4 mm 279.2 mm 25 mm 3 kg413 mm 305 mm 21.95 mm 2.9 kg399.8 mm 279.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 260 mm 23.1 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +467%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +244%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (499min - 661max) MBit/s +220%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s +218%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
579 MBit/s +188%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
327 (275min - 394max) MBit/s +63%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
321 MBit/s +60%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Wireless AC 9462
317 (274min - 362max) MBit/s +58%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
201 (89min - 272max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +541%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +222%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +217%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
651 (547min - 681max) MBit/s +203%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s +193%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Wireless AC 9462
292 (204min - 344max) MBit/s +36%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
284 MBit/s +32%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
271 (246min - 281max) MBit/s +26%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
215 (199min - 221max) MBit/s
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø214 (199-221)
MSI GF75 8RD-001 Intel Wireless AC 9462; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø291 (204-344)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø270 (246-281)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø201 (89-272)
MSI GF75 8RD-001 Intel Wireless AC 9462; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (274-362)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (275-394)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)
275
cd/m²		266
cd/m²		283
cd/m²
300
cd/m²		316
cd/m²		311
cd/m²
290
cd/m²		294
cd/m²		309
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 316 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 293.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 316 cd/m²
Kontrast: 988:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.17 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GF75 8RD-001
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus TUF FX705GM
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Dell G3 17 3779
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
2%
-0%
1%
-1%
0%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
62.3
64
3%
66.4
7%
67.1
8%
63.1
1%
62.4
0%
63.9
3%
sRGB Coverage
89.1
90.1
1%
84.9
-5%
86.1
-3%
86.8
-3%
88.8
0%
89.8
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.7
65.2
2%
62.1
-3%
63
-1%
63.5
0%
63.8
0%
64.9
2%
Response Times
6%
7%
15%
20%
6%
75%
10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 ?(20, 21)
40 ?(20, 20)
2%
38 ?(18, 20)
7%
36.8 ?(18.8, 18)
10%
36 ?(18.8, 17.2)
12%
39 ?(21, 18)
5%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
82%
38 ?(18, 20)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
30 ?(16, 14)
27 ?(16, 11)
10%
28 ?(16, 12)
7%
24 ?(14, 10)
20%
22 ?(10.4, 11.6)
27%
28 ?(16, 12)
7%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
67%
26 ?(15, 11)
13%
PWM Frequency
122000 ?(95)
Screen
5%
14%
-29%
-30%
4%
13%
-14%
Brightness middle
316
322
2%
356
13%
328.7
4%
365
16%
299
-5%
234
-26%
323
2%
Brightness
294
303
3%
332
13%
318
8%
341
16%
291
-1%
228
-22%
306
4%
Brightness Distribution
84
84
0%
89
6%
91
8%
89
6%
90
7%
85
1%
89
6%
Black Level *
0.32
0.32
-0%
0.27
16%
0.51
-59%
0.32
-0%
0.28
12%
0.2
37%
0.31
3%
Contrast
988
1006
2%
1319
34%
645
-35%
1141
15%
1068
8%
1170
18%
1042
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.39
2.97
12%
2.73
19%
4.91
-45%
6.51
-92%
3.02
11%
2.16
36%
4.96
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.56
5.08
9%
4.7
15%
10.15
-83%
12.32
-122%
5.27
5%
3.39
39%
8.25
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.14
2.29
-7%
2.14
-0%
4.27
-100%
2.9
-36%
2.76
-29%
2.02
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.17
2.26
29%
2.38
25%
3.9
-23%
7.65
-141%
2.18
31%
2
37%
5.65
-78%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.45 90%
2.48 89%
2.13 103%
2.64 83%
2.48 89%
2.46 89%
2.24 98%
CCT
7098 92%
6892 94%
6643 98%
6911 94%
8066 81%
6392 102%
6394 102%
7441 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
51
57
12%
59
16%
55.6
9%
56
10%
57
12%
58
14%
58
14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
87
-2%
90
1%
84.7
-5%
86
-3%
87
-2%
89
0%
90
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 6%
8% / 11%
-5% / -18%
-3% / -18%
3% / 4%
29% / 18%
-1% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø709 (702.86-742.45)
MSI GF75 8RD-001 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (909.48-1089.06)
MSI GF75 8RD-001 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (909.48-1089.06)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø767 (738.02-807.05)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø710 (704.34-742)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1050 (994.7-1115.98)
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
Dell G3 17 3779 Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø759 (750.51-796.5)
CPU-klockfrekvesner under CB15-testet
CPU-klockfrekvesner under CB15-testet
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4606
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19002
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8016
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
742 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
82.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Speedometer 2.0 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=235, last 2 years)
269 Points +87%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +22%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points +20%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points +20%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points +19%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
169 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
144 Points
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
142 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (77 - 146, n=11)
137.9 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=236, last 2 years)
3108 Points +319%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
1230 Points +66%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1137 Points +53%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points +50%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
1089 (909min - 1089max) Points +47%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
1089 (909.48min - 1089.06max) Points +47%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points +9%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
798 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (635 - 769, n=11)
717 Points -3%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=25, last 2 years)
9139 Points +98%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
7893 Points +71%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
6445 Points +40%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
6236 Points +35%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (4575 - 7893, n=4)
5413 Points +18%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
4606 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=25, last 2 years)
59291 Points +212%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
34168 Points +80%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H
24718 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (19002 - 20097, n=4)
19535 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
19437 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
19002 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years)
700 Points +94%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
362 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
361 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (331 - 370, n=8)
354 Points -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years)
7460 Points +350%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1685 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1659 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (1421 - 1728, n=8)
1596 Points -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
21635 Points +61%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
14437 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (13474 - 15114, n=3)
14342 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
13474 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
3734 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (3348 - 3558, n=3)
3420 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3353 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3348 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=27, last 2 years)
49563 Points +316%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
18068 Points +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (11183 - 13441, n=7)
12118 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
11926 Points
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
11344 Points -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5986 - 8945, n=27, last 2 years)
7630 Points +100%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
4692 Points +23%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3807 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (3623 - 3938, n=7)
3797 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3699 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
1229 ms * -2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
1201 ms *
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1157 ms * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (1042 - 1229, n=8)
1145 ms * +5%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
1129 ms * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years)
519 ms * +57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 111243, n=54, last 2 years)
92851 Points +228%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
33833 Points +19%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
28917 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (28324 - 29361, n=4)
28827 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
28324 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Gaming
  (225 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
333 runs/min +691%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
43.5 runs/min +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (42.1 - 43.5, n=2)
42.8 runs/min +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
42.1 runs/min
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 650, n=29, last 2 years)
504 Points +164%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
250.6 Points +31%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
241.3 Points +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
  (190.9 - 210, n=4)
201 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Edge 44)
190.9 Points

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6405 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4593 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3628 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4898 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
4339 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +75%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4982 Points +15%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4975 Points +15%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4437 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4339 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
4339 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4237 Points -2%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +32%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
9110 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
8989 Points +10%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8791 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8149 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
8149 Points 0%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8057 Points -1%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7471 Points -8%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +47%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
7201 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
7057 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7025 Points +6%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6724 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6619 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
6619 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6209 Points -6%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +179%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6071 Points +48%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5290 Points +29%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5096 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4451 Points +8%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4377 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4110 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
4110 Points 0%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +14%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4593 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
4593 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points -7%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4230 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4148 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4041 Points -12%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3969 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +23%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points +17%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5461 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5340 Points +9%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5317 Points +9%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4898 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
4898 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4877 Points 0%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Sequential Read: 1408 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1297 MB/s
512K Read: 986 MB/s
512K Write: 593 MB/s
4K Read: 37.74 MB/s
4K Write: 130.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 316.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 233.2 MB/s
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		MSI GF75 8RD-001
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831		Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Dell G3 17 3779
SK hynix SC311 SATA		Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-23%
-56%
-63%
-10%
-36%
-4%
-60%
-5%
Write 4K
145
72.1
-50%
71.4
-51%
61.9
-57%
107.7
-26%
90.3
-38%
104.2
-28%
62.8
-57%
118.5 ?(81.7 - 172.9, n=13)
-18%
Read 4K
45.28
28.12
-38%
29.98
-34%
22.78
-50%
36.5
-19%
37.03
-18%
41.46
-8%
24.63
-46%
42 ?(34.4 - 47.9, n=13)
-7%
Write Seq
1301
746
-43%
129.6
-90%
136.1
-90%
988
-24%
320.3
-75%
1295
0%
203.9
-84%
1123 ?(645 - 1302, n=13)
-14%
Read Seq
1362
834
-39%
843
-38%
490.1
-64%
1115
-18%
1012
-26%
1325
-3%
550
-60%
1208 ?(803 - 1388, n=13)
-11%
Write 4K Q32T1
249.1
313.7
26%
88.9
-64%
136.2
-45%
334.9
34%
196.8
-21%
282.8
14%
160.1
-36%
324 ?(187.6 - 461, n=13)
30%
Read 4K Q32T1
342.1
348.7
2%
196.4
-43%
208.4
-39%
360.8
5%
271.5
-21%
321.3
-6%
184.3
-46%
322 ?(231 - 506, n=13)
-6%
Write Seq Q32T1
1301
854
-34%
130.5
-90%
136
-90%
1008
-23%
268.8
-79%
1301
0%
235
-82%
1091 ?(518 - 1302, n=13)
-16%
Read Seq Q32T1
1732
1587
-8%
1037
-40%
553
-68%
1609
-7%
1595
-8%
1704
-2%
554
-68%
1729 ?(1688 - 1751, n=13)
0%
3DMark 05 Standard
24001 poäng
3DMark 06 Standard Score
23061 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
27719 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
10635 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
58789 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16079 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7942 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
3437 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)
40513 Points +204%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
15436 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
14569 Points +9%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
13722 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Dual-Channel)
13417 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
13337 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13125 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13004 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10885 - 13575, n=30)
12797 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
9466 Points -29%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
9147 Points -31%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8741 Points -34%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
8220 Points -38%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
7761 Points -42%
3DMark
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (8527 - 180365, n=20, last 2 years)
92681 Points +252%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
31779 Points +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (26305 - 33601, n=12)
31333 Points +19%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Dual-Channel)
28187 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
26305 Points
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
25557 Points -3%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
20412 Points -22%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
19091 Points -27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)
29469 Points +218%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
12281 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
11640 Points +26%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Dual-Channel)
9332 Points +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9292 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
9274 Points
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9235 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (7741 - 9810, n=32)
9195 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
7860 Points -15%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
7791 Points -16%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
7610 Points -18%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7324 Points -21%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
6331 Points -32%
Dell G3 17 3779
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
6228 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)
12072 Points +244%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3506 Points
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (Dual-Channel)
3496 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
3433 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (2900 - 3700, n=31)
3430 Points -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
2536 Points -28%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1789 Points -49%
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
låg med. hög ultra
StarCraft 2 (2010) 267.9 125 123.7 102.2
Diablo III (2012) 139.5 123.7 122.9 103.3
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 200.8 182.6 162.1 130
BioShock Infinite (2013) 184.2 160 149 77
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 136 123.1 84.2 69.3
GTA V (2015) 99.1 93.6 67.7 38.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 134.9 97.9 59.1 33.3
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 90 86 68 45
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 75.8 69.1 63.3 58.5
World of Warships (2015) 124.7 105.9 84.6 84.2
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 46.4 40.6 36.5
Civilization VI (2016) 111.4 83 59.4 53.7
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 92 85 77 75
Destiny 2 (2017) 85.4 75.1 72.7 62.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 67 47.7 33.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 56.9 50.5 44.5
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 256.5 131.6 69.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 64 48 49 44
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 84 64 65 48
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 45 38 35 22
Darksiders III (2018) 96.8 64.8 57.4 52.3
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 59 47 44 40
Metro Exodus (2019) 67.7 40.5 30.4 24.9
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 145.7 81.4 68.9 42.1
The Division 2 (2019) 81 54 46 35
Anno 1800 (2019) 49.2 45.2 38 21.7
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Far Cry 5 | Dota 2 Reborn | Anno 1800 | Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | Far Cry New Dawn
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +252%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
43 (39min - 46max) fps +29%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
36.5 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (29.9 - 40.3, n=31)
35.6 fps +7%
Acer Nitro 5
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35.5 (28min) fps +7%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35.4 (28min) fps +6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
34.2 fps +3%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
33.3 fps
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
26 fps -22%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
26 fps -22%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
25.8 fps -23%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
21.7 fps -35%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
21.6 (13min - 26max) fps -35%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (68.5 - 99.4, n=18)
86.4 fps +12%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
77.8 fps +1%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
77 fps
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
74.5 fps -3%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
72.2 fps -6%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
64.3 fps -16%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
53 fps -31%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)
126.3 fps +187%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
53 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (44 - 57, n=9)
51.4 fps +17%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44 fps
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
42 fps -5%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
33 (29min - 38max) fps -25%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
33 fps -25%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=239, last 2 years)
143 fps +144%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (58.5 - 119, n=20)
93.2 fps +59%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
68.9 fps +18%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
60.7 fps +4%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
58.5 fps
Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11)
Acer Nitro 5
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
69.8 (60min) fps +54%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
60.8 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (43.3 - 69.8, n=5)
56.7 fps +25%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
45.2 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey - 1920x1080 High Preset
Acer Nitro 5
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
53 (28min) fps +51%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
52 fps +49%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
47 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (35 - 53, n=4)
45.8 fps +31%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
40 fps +14%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35 fps
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (82 - 131, n=5, last 2 years)
103 fps +158%
Acer Nitro 5
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
56 (44min) fps +40%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
53 (37min) fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (40 - 56, n=6)
49.8 fps +25%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel)
48 fps +20%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
43 (33min - 53max) fps +8%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
40 fps
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
33 fps -17%
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø35 (31-39)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø24.9 (22-28)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø22 (20-24)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831: Ø24.8 (22-27)
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3-testet
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3-testet

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.8 / 30.8 / 32.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
38.6 / 44.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.634.632.630.332.62531.733.533.632.931.73141.239.237.93741.24034.132.234.734.734.15030.530.332.832.330.56328.930.531.328.528.98027.228.728.227.927.210025.226.527.326.925.212525.627.226.92525.616024.52826.324.524.520024.228.425.823.424.225023.430.427.12223.43152434.429.520.32440022.633.63020.222.65002229.427.820.12263020.330.525.119.520.380020.531.825.118.720.5100020.834.427.918.520.8125021.135.730.218.521.1160020.134.527.317.820.1200020.635.728.418.220.6250019.633.626.918.219.631501934.629.118.419400018.831.522.618.518.8500019.130.321.318.719.1630019.127.220.318.819.180001924.119.518.819100001921.519.118.8191250018.919.71918.618.91600018.919.31918.718.9SPL32.244.838.630.932.2N1.64.62.81.31.6median 20.5median 30.4median 26.9median 18.8median 20.5Delta24.63.41.52hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 8RD-001
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
7%
-4%
-3%
-4%
-12%
-4%
0%
3%
4%
off / environment *
30.8
30.7
-0%
28
9%
29
6%
30.7
-0%
30.5
1%
29
6%
30
3%
30.5
1%
27.6 ?(24 - 30.8, n=23)
10%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Minimum *
30.8
32
-4%
28
9%
29
6%
32.5
-6%
31.2
-1%
32
-4%
30
3%
30.5
1%
28.1 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23)
9%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
30.8
32
-4%
28
9%
31
-1%
32.6
-6%
32.4
-5%
33
-7%
31
-1%
31.1
-1%
28.8 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23)
6%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
32.1
-0%
31.3
3%
33
-2%
33.3
-3%
32.8
-2%
44
-37%
33
-2%
32.1
-0%
31 ?(24 - 39, n=23)
4%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
38.6
33.6
13%
33.4
13%
45
-17%
38.7
-0%
43
-11%
46
-19%
46
-19%
43.4
-12%
41.7 ?(30.1 - 53, n=23)
-8%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Maximum *
44.8
40.6
9%
46.2
-3%
51
-14%
45
-0%
48.1
-7%
50
-12%
49
-9%
39.2
12%
46.4 ?(36.3 - 53, n=23)
-4%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years)
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.8
45
48
46

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 38.9 °C34.1 °C38.4 °C 
 28 °C41.6 °C28 °C 
 23.7 °C23 °C23.4 °C 
Max: 41.6 °C
Medel: 31 °C
37.5 °C37 °C38 °C
23.3 °C29.4 °C27.5 °C
23 °C23.3 °C24.1 °C
Max: 38 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  54 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.4 °C / 75.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.5 °C / 8.1 F).
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 8RD-001
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
7%
-14%
-16%
8%
-8%
-17%
-2%
-23%
-7%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.6
44.2
-6%
42
-1%
50
-20%
41.5
-0%
53.3
-28%
54
-30%
47
-13%
53
-27%
46 ?(39.8 - 52.8, n=23)
-11%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
-11%
Maximum Bottom *
38
39.1
-3%
51.2
-35%
52
-37%
39.6
-4%
44.7
-18%
53
-39%
50
-32%
60.5
-59%
49.2 ?(36.5 - 58.7, n=23)
-29%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Upper Side *
31.7
24.5
23%
31.8
-0%
33
-4%
25.7
19%
29.5
7%
30
5%
24
24%
30.3
4%
28.3 ?(22.9 - 35, n=23)
11%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Bottom *
29.5
25.5
14%
35.4
-20%
30
-2%
24.2
18%
27
8%
30
-2%
25
15%
32
-8%
28.9 ?(23 - 37.4, n=23)
2%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.333.62532.931313732.44034.730.35032.329.76328.536.58027.931.110026.927.71252529.316024.53420023.433.42502242.631520.349.540020.25550020.15163019.557.180018.761.7100018.560.1125018.557.1160017.860.6200018.263.3250018.265.9315018.465.9400018.564.3500018.762.5630018.861.8800018.853.81000018.850.51250018.643.61600018.746.7SPL30.974.2N1.330.1median 18.8median 55Delta1.59.737.537.934.63434.435.533.434.132.932.531.235.930.941.129.250.129.254.628.557.827.361.427.865.927.369.126.366.625.564.22566.725.466.425.963.524.662.724.363.524.660.22457.324.16123.959.923.760.223.461.223.361.723.259.523.155.12345.736.674.72.738.7median 24.6median 61.21.63.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705DT-AU068TLenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.55 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.9 / 9.6 / 12.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 59 / 80 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		MSI GF75 8RD-001
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-37%
-37%
-28%
-21%
-122%
-21%
-53%
-28%
-156%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
6.5
-67%
6.3
-62%
6
-54%
5.5
-41%
3.8
3%
13
-233%
5
-28%
7.7
-97%
4.96 ?(2 - 13, n=23)
-27%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
-254%
Idle Average *
9.6
11.9
-24%
11
-15%
9
6%
10.9
-14%
9
6%
17
-77%
7
27%
14
-46%
8.61 ?(5.3 - 15.7, n=23)
10%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-100%
Idle Maximum *
12.2
13.1
-7%
11.5
6%
13
-7%
12.2
-0%
11.2
8%
24
-97%
11
10%
15.5
-27%
14.8 ?(8.9 - 30.6, n=23)
-21%
27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-121%
Load Average *
59
86
-46%
89.8
-52%
95
-61%
77
-31%
101
-71%
106
-80%
89
-51%
95
-61%
81.7 ?(57 - 128, n=23)
-38%
111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-89%
Load Maximum *
80
131
-64%
130.7
-63%
134
-68%
123
-54%
119.7
-50%
179
-124%
132
-65%
106
-33%
131.9 ?(80 - 192.2, n=23)
-65%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-214%
Witcher 3 ultra *
102
102
151
90

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
13tim 35min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
7tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 05min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 04min
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh		Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh		MSI GF75 8RD-001
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 51 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-9%
9%
-41%
-50%
-25%
-19%
-17%
-26%
Reader / Idle
815
757
-7%
380
-53%
375
-54%
789
-3%
710
-13%
733
-10%
546 ?(57 - 1290, n=85, last 2 years)
-33%
H.264
485
399
-18%
260
-46%
204
-58%
315
-35%
400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years)
-18%
WiFi v1.3
469
430
-8%
513
9%
272
-42%
281
-40%
402
-14%
354
-25%
345
-26%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=183, last 2 years)
-22%
Load
124
122
-2%
95
-23%
67
-46%
52
-58%
100
-19%
126
2%
84.7 ?(36 - 173, n=145, last 2 years)
-32%

För

+ matt skärm
+ Full HD-upplösning
+ kompakt chassi
+ NVMe SSD
+ extra HDD
+ riktigt bra batteritid
+ bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord
+ låg energiförbrukning

Emot

- begränsad mängd portar
- har ej USB Typ C
- saknar kortläsare
- undermåligt WLAN
Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT-AU068T, recensionsex från:
Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT-AU068T, recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT har en hårdvarukombination man inte ser varje dag - en AMD Ryzen 5 3550H APU tillsammans med en Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GPU. Tillsammans klarar de alla aktuella och moderna spel galant i skärmens Full HD-upplösning med grafikinställningar på medel eller hög nivå. En del spel kan till och med köras i maximala inställningar. För att kunna använda hårdvarans potential fullt ut rekommenderar vi att du installerar en andra RAM-modul.

Kombinationen av CPU och GPU visar sig också vara exceptionellt energieffektiv - jämförbara bärbara datorer drar betydligt mer energi vid belastning. I Armory Create ControL Center finns det dessutom alternativ som 'Tyst Läge', vilket reducerar fläktens hastighet och ljudnivå, och det går också att sänka processorns klockfrekvenser. Prestandan är mer än tillräcklig för kontors- och internetanvändning.

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT visar sig vara en välavrundad spellaptop utan några större brister - det är bara det magra portutbudet som talar mot den.

En NVMe SSD sörjer för ett smidigt och kvickt system och datorns lagringskrav uppfylls av en 2.5 tums HDD på 1 TB. Båda enheterna kan, om så krävs, bytas ut. Detta kräver dock att chassit öppnas.

Den matta IPS-skärm med Full HD-upplösning får poäng för bra betraktningsvinklar och mer än godtagbar färgprecision. Den har också helt okej ljusstyrka och kontrast. Vidare har den ett RGB-bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord som passar bra för dagligt skrivande. Exceptionellt bra batteritid rundar av paketet.

Men vi får dra av poäng för det tillgängliga portutbudet. Precis som med syskonmodellerna vi också recenserat saknar den kortläsare och USB Typ C-portar. Den har dessutom bara en videoutgång. Om du tycker att ett stort utbud av portar är viktigt när du väljer laptop bör du leta någon annanstans. Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH har exempelvis två videoutgångar och Thunderbolt 3.

Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T - 09/20/2019 v7
Sascha Mölck

Design
78 / 98 → 80%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
47 / 80 → 59%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Batteri
77 / 95 → 81%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
78%
Programprestanda
83%
Temperatur
93 / 95 → 98%
Ljudnivå
85 / 90 → 95%
Audio
46%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
72%
78%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T (TUF FX705 Serie)
Test
•
Test: Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-875...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT (Ryzen 5 3550H, GTX 1650, SSD, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-06-12 (Update: 2019-06-12)