Notebookcheck

Test: Apple iPhone XS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 09/27/2018

"My preciousss" Apple har hållt sig till "S"-nomenklaturen efter sin jubileums-iPhone och har således följt upp iPhone X med iPhone XS. Likt tidigare "S"-modeller är iPhone XS mer av en teknisk förfining av föregångaren snarare än en större avvikelse. iPhone XS bör göra allt bättre än sin föregångare utan att förnya sig själv. Läs vidare för vår recension av iPhone XS och få reda på om denna enhet kan svara upp mot förväntningarna.

Apple iPhone XS (iPhone Serie)
Processor
Apple A12 Bionic 2.49 GHz
Grafikkort
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
Minne
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
5.8 tum 2.16:1, 2436 x 1125 pixlar 463 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, True Tone, Fettfrånstötande överdrag, 3D Touch, P3-färgrymd, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs), 512 GB 
, 500.23 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
Ljudanslutningar: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Face ID, Barometer, Digital Kompass, Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Positionssensor och tre axlars gyroskop, Lightning, eSIM, Galileo, QZSS
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz; UMTS/HSPA+:850, 900, 1,700/2,100, 1,900 och 2,100 MHz); LTE Cat. 16: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 och 46, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 143.6 x 70.9
Batteri
10.13 Wh, 2658 mAh Litiumjon, 3,81 Volt, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 20 tim
Operativsystem
Apple iOS 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Vidvinkel: f/1.8, 1.4 µm, fokus-pixel, sex linselement, OIS. 12 MP (Teleobjektiv: f/2.4, six linselement, OIS, 2 x optisk zoom.), True Tone-blixt, UHD-video i 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, Full HD-video i 60 FPS
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Nätadapter, Lightning-kabel, Hörlurar, Snabbstartsguide, klistermärke, SIM-verktyg, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.99 W/kg, IP68-certifierad, Trådlös laddning (Qi), fanless
Vikt
177 g, Strömförsörjning: 46 g
Pris
1549 Kr

 

iPhone X och XS från vänster till höger
iPhone X och XS från vänster till höger

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼94% -2%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼29% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼95% +4%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼68% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼30% -67%
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Slinga
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS - Översikt
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS - Översikt
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS – Runt en sjö
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS – Runt en sjö
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS – Slinga
GPS-test: Apple iPhone XS – Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
2 x optisk zoom
2 x optisk zoom
5.5 x digital zoom
10 x digital zoom
2 x optisk zoom
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera - tagit från en cykel i rörelse
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
2 x optisk zoom
10 digital zoom
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Foto av vår testkarta – tagen av huvudkameran
Foto av vår testkarta – tagen av huvudkameran
Foto av vår testkarta – tagen av teleobjektivet
Foto av vår testkarta – tagen av teleobjektivet
Testkartan i detalj - tagen av huvudkameran
Testkartan i detalj - tagen av teleobjektivet
620
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 659 cd/m² Medel: 637.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.03 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 639 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-7%
-21%
-3%
-70%
-53%
-159%
-24%
Brightness middle
639
600
-6%
529
-17%
569
-11%
477
-25%
430
-33%
974
52%
395
-38%
Brightness
637
606
-5%
527
-17%
578
-9%
453
-29%
437
-31%
975
53%
402
-37%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
96
2%
95
1%
86
-9%
87
-7%
96
2%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.4
-40%
1.3
-30%
2.1
-110%
2.3
-130%
5.4
-440%
1.6
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
3
-36%
4
-82%
2.1
5%
8.2
-273%
4.6
-109%
13.1
-495%
3.4
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
2.4
-9%
5
-127%
1.1
50%
Gamma
1.9 116%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.28 96%
2.31 95%
2.14 103%
CCT
6364 102%
6707 97%
6358 102%
6401 102%
6425 101%
6160 106%
7480 87%
6536 99%
Contrast
1445
1988
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8811 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
12409 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone X
11107 Points ∼64% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8294 Points ∼48% -33%
HTC U12 Plus
17441 Points ∼100% +41%
LG G7 ThinQ
9149 Points ∼52% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
13795 Points ∼79% +11%
OnePlus 6
10660 Points ∼61% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
6736 Points ∼39% -46%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7312 - 12409, n=2)
9861 Points ∼57% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (2797 - 17441, n=138)
6490 Points ∼37% -48%
UX (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
66469 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
50699 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
55698 Points ∼84% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
54419 Points ∼82% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
57962 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
45397 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 6
57506 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
50408 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59570 - 66469, n=2)
63020 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6403 - 66469, n=137)
26644 Points ∼40% -60%
GPU (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
148790 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
94618 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
91292 Points ∼61% -39%
HTC U12 Plus
96681 Points ∼65% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
101265 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
77063 Points ∼52% -48%
OnePlus 6
106980 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
107528 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (129473 - 148790, n=2)
139132 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3116 - 148790, n=138)
32577 Points ∼22% -78%
CPU (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
120510 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
99873 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
88577 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
87198 Points ∼72% -28%
LG G7 ThinQ
87900 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
71704 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 6
91540 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81694 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (106600 - 120510, n=2)
113555 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7548 - 120510, n=138)
43157 Points ∼36% -64%
Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼73% -27%
LG G7 ThinQ
256276 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 348178, n=2)
325567 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=138)
109082 Points ∼31% -69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼64% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼83% -16%
LG G7 ThinQ
1374 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1711 - 1731, n=2)
1721 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=466)
678 Points ∼39% -60%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼40% -60%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼50% -50%
LG G7 ThinQ
7906 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼23% -77%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (15659 - 15875, n=2)
15767 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=466)
1622 Points ∼10% -90%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼64% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼87% -13%
LG G7 ThinQ
3744 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1815 - 4169, n=2)
2992 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=466)
1157 Points ∼28% -72%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼51% -49%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼64% -36%
LG G7 ThinQ
8070 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼67% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11675 - 12202, n=2)
11939 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=466)
2351 Points ∼19% -81%
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼54% -46%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼70% -30%
LG G7 ThinQ
4257 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼54% -46%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4895 - 6097, n=2)
5496 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=470)
1178 Points ∼19% -81%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼76% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼76% -24%
LG G7 ThinQ
9029 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼89% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11244 - 11598, n=2)
11421 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=213)
4133 Points ∼36% -64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼76% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼50% -50%
LG G7 ThinQ
2448 Points ∼51% -49%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -60%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4774 - 4824, n=2)
4799 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=214)
1218 Points ∼25% -75%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼69% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼88% +8%
LG G7 ThinQ
3255 Points ∼90% +10%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -1%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% +16%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼55% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2960 - 3027, n=2)
2994 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=319)
1572 Points ∼43% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼68% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
5006 Points ∼96% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -19%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +40%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼50% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3712 - 3726, n=2)
3719 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=319)
1103 Points ∼21% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼66% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼69% -8%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼72% -3%
LG G7 ThinQ
4471 Points ∼94% +27%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼63% -15%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% +33%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼51% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3514 - 3544, n=2)
3529 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=327)
1054 Points ∼22% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼75%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼80%
LG G7 ThinQ
3150 Points ∼91%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼51%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼74%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2713 - 2713, n=2)
1357 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=350)
1471 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼55%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68%
LG G7 ThinQ
7633 Points ∼92%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7055 - 7055, n=2)
3528 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=350)
1499 Points ∼18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼62%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73%
LG G7 ThinQ
5799 Points ∼92%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (5205 - 5205, n=2)
2603 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=358)
1279 Points ∼20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼70% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼73% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% +23%
LG G7 ThinQ
27817 Points ∼76% +2%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -18%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% +25%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼66% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (27400 - 27717, n=2)
27559 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7103 - 36762, n=505)
12408 Points ∼34% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼30% -70%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼51% -49%
LG G7 ThinQ
80534 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -79%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (159735 - 160199, n=2)
159967 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=505)
16687 Points ∼10% -90%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼53% -47%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼80% -19%
LG G7 ThinQ
56669 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -61%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (77128 - 77599, n=2)
77364 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=506)
14150 Points ∼18% -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼57% -43%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼39% -61%
LG G7 ThinQ
144 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼48% -52%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼64% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (226 - 251, n=2)
239 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=529)
29.2 fps ∼12% -88%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼50% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼49% -2%
LG G7 ThinQ
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (60 - 60, n=2)
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=532)
24.1 fps ∼20% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼63% -37%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼63% -37%
LG G7 ThinQ
63 fps ∼55% -45%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼57% -43%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (107 - 115, n=2)
111 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=452)
15.5 fps ∼13% -87%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼52%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼39% -25%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼31% -42%
LG G7 ThinQ
41 fps ∼36% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼47% -10%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼51% -3%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +91%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼51% -3%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59 - 60, n=2)
59.5 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=454)
15.2 fps ∼13% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼74% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼70% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼59% -37%
LG G7 ThinQ
51 fps ∼78% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼59% -37%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼85% -10%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼82% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼88% -6%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (62 - 69.3, n=2)
65.7 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=316)
13.3 fps ∼20% -79%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼44%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼40% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼22% -50%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼28% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
26 fps ∼24% -46%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼33% -25%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼49% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +129%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼51% +17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (48 - 58.9, n=2)
53.5 fps ∼49% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=318)
13.2 fps ∼12% -72%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼82% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼72% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼90% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
33 fps ∼85% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼59% -39%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼90% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼90% -8%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (38 - 40, n=2)
39 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=248)
9.16 fps ∼23% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼75% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼38% -55%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼54% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
17 fps ∼46% -45%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼59% -29%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +19%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (31 - 31, n=2)
31 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=251)
8.35 fps ∼23% -73%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
2606 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1436 Points ∼55% -45%
LG G7 ThinQ
1176 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼45% -55%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2606, n=2)
2507 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2606, n=68)
669 Points ∼26% -74%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
272.3 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
224 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
67.721 Points ∼25% -75%
HTC U12 Plus
87.036 Points ∼32% -68%
LG G7 ThinQ
88.081 Points ∼32% -68%
Huawei P20 Pro
58.255 Points ∼21% -79%
OnePlus 6
87.695 Points ∼32% -68%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71.172 Points ∼26% -74%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (272 - 273, n=2)
273 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=387)
35.1 Points ∼13% -87%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
609.1 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone X
718 ms * ∼6% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2077.8 ms * ∼18% -241%
HTC U12 Plus
2409.6 ms * ∼20% -296%
LG G7 ThinQ
2484.1 ms * ∼21% -308%
Huawei P20 Pro
3852.2 ms * ∼33% -532%
OnePlus 6
2445 ms * ∼21% -301%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼6% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3179 ms * ∼27% -422%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 609, n=2)
606 ms * ∼5% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=542)
11780 ms * ∼100% -1834%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
43280 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
35255 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
15233 Points ∼35% -65%
HTC U12 Plus
16285 Points ∼38% -62%
LG G7 ThinQ
16720 Points ∼39% -61%
Huawei P20 Pro
11584 Points ∼27% -73%
OnePlus 6
17026 Points ∼39% -61%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
13360 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (43114 - 43280, n=2)
43197 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=523)
5237 Points ∼12% -88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
345 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone X
354 Points ∼99% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
163 Points ∼45% -53%
HTC U12 Plus
257 Points ∼72% -26%
LG G7 ThinQ
252 Points ∼70% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
182 Points ∼51% -47%
OnePlus 6
252 Points ∼70% -27%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
211 Points ∼59% -39%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (345 - 347, n=2)
346 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=260)
104 Points ∼29% -70%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
159 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
130 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
63 Points ∼40% -60%
HTC U12 Plus
101 Points ∼64% -36%
LG G7 ThinQ
97 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei P20 Pro
69 Points ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 6
98 Points ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
75 Points ∼47% -53%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 159, n=2)
157 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 159, n=42)
58.6 Points ∼37% -63%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 39.8 °C39.9 °C36.5 °C 
 37 °C36.5 °C34.9 °C 
 33.1 °C35.1 °C33.3 °C 
Max: 39.9 °C
Medel: 36.2 °C
35.6 °C43 °C43.4 °C
34.1 °C38.1 °C39.6 °C
33.2 °C36 °C36 °C
Max: 43.4 °C
Medel: 37.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  33.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203030.12530.123.53129.328.44026.9265032.826.66324.824.58020.723.210019.535.712518.644.216021.451.72002552.625017.454.531516.255.440018.458.250015.461.763013.56580013.764.2100013.768.4125014.673.4160014.975.9200014.476.4250014.777.1315014.677.4400014.878.3500014.776.9630014.676.580001575.61000014.966.91250015.159.61600014.951.8SPL27.287.3N0.967.5median 14.9Apple iPhone XSmedian 65Delta1.411.628.62724.92424.624.526.42530.830.823.625.820.222.919.927.817.638.619.150.619.150.317.454.116.959.516.862.215.165.916.56915.670.71573.315.572.115.372.415.773.515.574.515.575.815.476.215.874.61678.215.873.216.169.916.165.517.359.327.986166.7median 16Samsung Galaxy S9median 69.90.68.33033.936.137.63228.229.429.431.541.127.928.722.123.1222421.223.521.528.120.337.718.442.617.351.516.757.81763.116.163.615.869.115.872.715.37015.870.214.9731571.514.770.914.772.51571.315.1761572.815.472.91561.716.34827.683.6157.3median 15.8Sony Xperia XZ2 Premiummedian 69.11.912.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.95 / 1.34 / 1.48 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4 / 5.13 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Average Apple A12 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-33%
18%
16%
-34%
-4%
-7%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.95
1.03
-8%
0.65
32%
0.84
12%
0.67
29%
0.6
37%
0.975 (0.95 - 1, n=2)
-3%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=603)
7%
Idle Average *
1.34
2.4
-79%
0.81
40%
1.54
-15%
2.5
-87%
1
25%
1.37 (1.34 - 1.4, n=2)
-2%
1.718 (0.6 - 6.2, n=602)
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.48
2.6
-76%
0.92
38%
1.57
-6%
2.51
-70%
1.6
-8%
1.59 (1.48 - 1.7, n=2)
-7%
1.987 (0.74 - 6.6, n=603)
-34%
Load Average *
4
2.96
26%
4.76
-19%
2.47
38%
4.3
-8%
4.3
-8%
4.3 (4 - 4.6, n=2)
-8%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=597)
-1%
Load Maximum *
5.13
6.6
-29%
5.16
-1%
2.49
51%
6.87
-34%
8.6
-68%
5.92 (5.13 - 6.7, n=2)
-15%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=597)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
24tim 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari Mobile 12.0)
9tim 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 25min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 05min
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
5%
-22%
24%
-11%
16%
Reader / Idle
1442
1292
-10%
1305
-10%
1182
-18%
1727
20%
1347
-7%
1806
25%
H.264
745
634
-15%
801
8%
609
-18%
784
5%
520
-30%
791
6%
WiFi v1.3
570
564
-1%
742
30%
474
-17%
744
31%
547
-4%
762
34%
Load
245
180
-27%
223
-9%
164
-33%
345
41%
235
-4%
246
0%

För

+ ljusstark och färgprecis OLED-skärm
+ täcker ett brett utbud av mobila nätverksfrekvenser
+ imponerande huvudkamera
+ utmärkt hantverk
+ stöd för eSIM (genom uppdatering)
+ damm- och vätske-beständig

Emot

- minnet går inte att utöka
- ingen hörlursanslutning
- begränsad NFC
- bara 12 månaders garanti
- mediokert teleobjektiv
Recension av Apple iPhone XS
Recension av Apple iPhone XS

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Apple iPhone XS är en övning i finjustering. Enheten har inte bara en snabbare och mer ekonomisk SoC än sin föregångare utan även en mer dynamisk kamera, större lagringsalternativ, en förbättrad IP-certifiering samt de operativsystemsförbättringar som kommer av övergången till iOS 12. Framför allt kan "screen time"-funktionen vara användbar för föräldrar som vill begränsa hur mycket tid deras barn får spela spel. Enhetens design förblir densamma, men det har vi kommit att förvänta oss med "S"-enheter. Den enda estetiska skillnaden är att Apple nu också säljer XS i en ny guldfärg, som vi gillade särskilt bra.

Apple iPhone XS har rikligt med bra teknik för samma pris som en liten MacBook Pro eller en iMac.

XS har en del nackdelar men inga riktiga brister. Batteritiden är bara okej, även om den är en aning bättre än iPhone X. Den nya iPhone XS-serien har också begravt Touch ID, istället förlitar sig alla nya iPhone-modeller på biometrisk säkerhet genom Face ID. Även om Apple har förbättrat hur kameran presterar i situationer med lite ljus så är teleobjektivet märkbart sämre än huvudkamerans sensor. Vi hade föredragit om Apple använde en bättre sensor till teleobjektivet, någon vi även kritiserade iPhone X för.

Vår största kritik mot iPhone XS rör dess pris. Modellen på 64 GB börjar på 11.490 kronor och versionen med 512 GB kostar absurda 15.490 kronor. Du får gräva djupt i fickorna om du ska köpa den senaste iPhone-modellen direkt och XS har inte tillräckligt med nya funktioner för att rättfärdiga en uppgradering från iPhone X. I slutändan är det din plånbok som kommer att få sista ordet.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone XS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-09-27 (Update: 2018-09-27)