Notebookcheck

Test: LG G7 ThinQ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/18/2018

Skinande. LG G7 ThinQ är efterföljaren till G6, en av dom första telefonerna från 2017 med en 2:1-skärm, ofta refererat till som ett 18:9-förhållande. Värt att notera är att LG har följt 2018 års smartphone-trender och utrustat G7 ThinQ med ett jack. Skärmen är dock mer än sitt jack, för G7 ThinkQ är den första smartphone-modellen med en mLC-skärm, som kan bli extremt ljusstark. LG har även förbättrat kameran och uppgraderad hårdvaran till Qualcomms senaste flaggskepps-SoC. I den här recensionen får du reda på varför G7 ThinQ hamnar aningen efter de aktuella telefonerna i toppskiktet.

LG G7 ThinQ (G7 Serie)
Minne
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.1 tum 13:6, 3120 x 1440 pixlar 563 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, tio punkters multitouch, LG MLCD+, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR10, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 55.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning (hörlurar och mikrofon), Kortläsare: microSD med stöd för upp till 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, G-Sensor, Barometer, Digital kompass, BeiDou, Galileo, Miracast, WiFi Direct, WiFi Concurrency, USB-OTG, USB-PD
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1,800 MHz, 1900 MHz: UMTS/HSPA+ Band 1,2,4 och 5: LTE Kategori 18 – Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 och 46., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 153.2 x 71.9
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer, QuickCharge 3.0, PD 21W, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 15.5 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 100 tim
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dualkamera 16 MP. Primär sensor: f/1.6, 71 ° bildvinkel, 1.0 µm, OIS. Vidvinkelssensor: f/1.9, 107 ° bildvinkel, 1.0 µm.
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, f/1.9, 80 °
Övrigt
Högtalare: Enkel högtalare på undersidan samt en LG Boombox-högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Rengöringsduk, laddare, USB Typ A till Typ C-kabel, snabbstartsguide, säkerhetsinstruktioner, 24 Månader Garanti, MIL-STD-810G, IP68-certifierad, två mikrofoner, DTS:X Surround-Ljud, LG Boombox-högtalare, 32 Bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC, SAR-värden: Huvud – 0.24 W/kg, Kropp 1.47 W/kg., fanless
Vikt
162 g, Strömförsörjning: 68 g
Pris
849 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG G7 ThinQ till vänster bredvid LG G6
LG G7 ThinQ till vänster bredvid LG G6

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +43%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼68% -3%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼65% -7%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼35% -50%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼25% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼22% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼31% -69%
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Slinga
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ - Översikt
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ - Översikt
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ – Bro
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ – Bro
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ – Slinga
GPS-test: LG G7 ThinQ – Slinga
979
cd/m²
999
cd/m²
964
cd/m²
989
cd/m²
974
cd/m²
967
cd/m²
969
cd/m²
974
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 999 cd/m² Medel: 974.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.94 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 974 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1988:1 (Svärta: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.31
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
6%
17%
24%
24%
14%
9%
10%
Brightness middle
974
646
-34%
565
-42%
600
-38%
569
-42%
630
-35%
430
-56%
395
-59%
Brightness
975
611
-37%
571
-41%
606
-38%
578
-41%
632
-35%
437
-55%
402
-59%
Brightness Distribution
96
89
-7%
96
0%
94
-2%
95
-1%
96
0%
87
-9%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.49
0.23
53%
0.44
10%
0.37
24%
Contrast
1988
2809
41%
1432
-28%
1068
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.5
17%
2.3
57%
1.2
78%
1.3
76%
1.5
72%
2.3
57%
1.6
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.1
8.3
37%
4.8
63%
3
77%
2.1
84%
4.3
67%
4.6
65%
3.4
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
6
-20%
1.9
62%
1.6
68%
1.6
68%
2.1
58%
2.4
52%
1.1
78%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.27 97%
2.16 102%
2.23 99%
2.31 95%
2.17 101%
2.28 96%
2.14 103%
CCT
7480 87%
7996 81%
6332 103%
6707 97%
6401 102%
6513 100%
6160 106%
6536 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1174 Hz ≤ 42 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1174 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 42 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1174 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
223464 Points ∼97%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼66% -32%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% -11%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼98% +1%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=16)
224225 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼32% -67%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
256276 Points ∼93%
LG G6
158926 Points ∼58% -38%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼93% 0%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼97% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points ∼74% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼91% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼97% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=20)
274906 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=163)
115424 Points ∼42% -55%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
7717 Points ∼90%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼60% -33%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼96% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼81% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼81% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼62% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼94% +5%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8701 - 9868, n=20)
7951 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 9868, n=247)
4493 Points ∼52% -42%
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
9503 Points ∼93%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼56% -40%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼94% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼80% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼79% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼57% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼91% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=18)
10037 Points ∼98% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=415)
4907 Points ∼48% -48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
1374 Points ∼82%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼64% -22%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +22%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼82% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼71% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼85% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=17)
1351 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=491)
691 Points ∼41% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
7906 Points ∼85%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% -35%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼86% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=17)
7793 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=491)
1695 Points ∼18% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
3744 Points ∼92%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼48% -48%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼30% -67%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼94% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼72% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼65% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼54% -41%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼90% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=17)
3566 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=491)
1218 Points ∼30% -67%
System (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
8070 Points ∼78%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% -55%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +27%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼80% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼58% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼76% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8613, n=17)
7809 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=491)
2464 Points ∼24% -69%
Overall (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
4257 Points ∼99%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼58% -41%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% -12%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼77% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼87% -12%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3489 - 4693, n=17)
4111 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=495)
1229 Points ∼29% -71%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
13497 Points ∼94%
LG G6
7080 Points ∼49% -48%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼53% -44%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100% +6%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼87% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14489, n=16)
13824 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=188)
4393 Points ∼31% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
9029 Points ∼88%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼43% -52%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼61% -31%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼66% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83% -6%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼86% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7934 - 9231, n=18)
8727 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=238)
4242 Points ∼41% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
2448 Points ∼57%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼43% -25%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼45% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼45% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58% +1%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=18)
2430 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=239)
1251 Points ∼29% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
3255 Points ∼90%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼54% -40%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -27%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% -7%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +12%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=19)
3304 Points ∼91% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=343)
1630 Points ∼45% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
5006 Points ∼96%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼57% -40%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -31%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼74% -23%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼98% +2%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=19)
4969 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=343)
1169 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
4471 Points ∼95%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼57% -40%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -30%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼78% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% +5%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼73% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=19)
4456 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=351)
1117 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
3150 Points ∼86%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼54% -38%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼95% +10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼79% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼69% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +16%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=19)
3155 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=376)
1522 Points ∼42% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
7633 Points ∼92%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼50% -46%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% -23%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼98% +6%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=19)
7835 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=376)
1599 Points ∼19% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
5799 Points ∼91%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼51% -43%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼99% +9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% -17%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +10%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼72% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=19)
5870 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6454, n=384)
1361 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
27817 Points ∼78%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼62% -20%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -8%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼95% +23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼56% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼63% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼73% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +29%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼94% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 37475, n=18)
34271 Points ∼96% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=530)
12735 Points ∼36% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
80534 Points ∼72%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼29% -60%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼72% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼48% -33%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼30% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼73% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 84998, n=18)
81128 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=530)
17607 Points ∼16% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
56669 Points ∼88%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼46% -48%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼97% +10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼61% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼47% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98% +11%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼97% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 65330, n=18)
62152 Points ∼97% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=531)
14817 Points ∼23% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
144 fps ∼81%
LG G6
75 fps ∼42% -48%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼85% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼63% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼68% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼55% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=18)
144 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=554)
30.4 fps ∼17% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
60 fps ∼98%
LG G6
46 fps ∼75% -23%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼97% -1%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼96% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼98% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=17)
61.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=557)
24.5 fps ∼40% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
63 fps ∼71%
LG G6
38 fps ∼43% -40%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼75% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼67% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼69% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93% +30%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼82% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=17)
74.1 fps ∼84% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=476)
16.3 fps ∼18% -74%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
41 fps ∼69%
LG G6
27 fps ∼46% -34%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% +43%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% +41%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼59% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% +44%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼59% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=17)
56 fps ∼95% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=479)
15.6 fps ∼26% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
51 fps ∼85%
LG G6
29 fps ∼48% -43%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -4%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼93% +10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼68% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼65% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +18%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼65% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 60.9, n=18)
54.7 fps ∼91% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=339)
13.9 fps ∼23% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
26 fps ∼47%
LG G6
16 fps ∼29% -38%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% +70%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼98% +108%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼36% -23%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼65% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼44% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% +112%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼56% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (26 - 59, n=17)
48.5 fps ∼88% +87%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=342)
13.6 fps ∼25% -48%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
33 fps ∼94%
LG G6
20 fps ∼57% -39%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼91% -4%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼69% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% +6%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=18)
34.3 fps ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=271)
9.64 fps ∼28% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
17 fps ∼52%
LG G6
11 fps ∼33% -35%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼84% +63%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼97% +88%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼39% -24%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼67% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼42% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100% +94%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼61% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=18)
28.9 fps ∼88% +70%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=274)
8.71 fps ∼26% -49%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼65%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
25.93 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
35.83 fps ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼32%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
LG G7 ThinQ
1176 Points ∼69%
LG G6
647 Points ∼38% -45%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100% +45%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼69% -1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼50% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼52% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼41% -41%

Legend

 
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +154%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40% +2%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
88.081 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼39% 0%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 89.5, n=18)
75.1 Points ∼34% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% -21%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼29% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼26% -34%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼25% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=412)
36.1 Points ∼16% -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +111%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼48% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48% 0%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
16720 Points ∼47%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼46% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=19)
15280 Points ∼43% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼33% -31%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼32% -32%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼26% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=549)
5464 Points ∼15% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=569)
11571 ms * ∼100% -366%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼33% -55%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼30% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=19)
2939 ms * ∼25% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
2484.1 ms * ∼21%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼21% +1%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21% +2%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼21% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼21% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +17%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +71%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74% +4%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼73% +2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼71% 0%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=18)
223 Points ∼63% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼55% -23%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼51% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -35%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼34% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=277)
108 Points ∼31% -57%

* ... smaller is better

LG G7 ThinQLG G6Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2HTC U12 PlusHuawei P20 ProOnePlus 6Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
8%
-16%
62%
163%
9%
16%
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
63.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
50.5 (17.1 - 71.9, n=23)
-19%
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.72 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-60%
84.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.9 (18 - 85.3, n=23)
-21%
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
23.26
16.58
-29%
22.74
-2%
17
-27%
104.24
348%
160.49
590%
21.8
-6%
46.8 (8.77 - 156, n=30)
101%
15.5 (0.14 - 164, n=597)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
110.46
95.19
-14%
129.68
17%
149.4
35%
118.14
7%
144.33
31%
137
24%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=30)
21%
37.5 (1.59 - 173, n=598)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
176.45
122.85
-30%
204.94
16%
198.7
13%
195.82
11%
196.69
11%
201.4
14%
191 (133 - 214, n=30)
8%
78.5 (2.99 - 246, n=598)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
695.15
428.67
-38%
818.69
18%
679.2
-2%
709.11
2%
831.82
20%
725.6
4%
730 (529 - 895, n=30)
5%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=598)
-67%
Arena of Valor - high HD
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 (min: 23, max: 62) fps ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼98% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 (min: 56, max: 61) fps ∼98% +36%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 (min: 50, max: 60) fps ∼98% +36%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
59 (min: 55, max: 60) fps ∼97% +34%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 (min: 2, max: 60) fps ∼95% +32%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 (min: 27, max: 61) fps ∼72%
PUBG Mobile - HD
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 (min: 28, max: 42) fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 (min: 29, max: 46) fps ∼94% -6%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 (min: 20, max: 42) fps ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 (min: 27, max: 31) fps ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 (min: 1, max: 41) fps ∼86% -14%
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 HD35 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 high HD44 fps
Hög belastning
 34.4 °C34.8 °C33.8 °C 
 34 °C33.4 °C33.1 °C 
 32.8 °C32.4 °C33.2 °C 
Max: 34.8 °C
Medel: 33.5 °C
34.5 °C35.8 °C35.4 °C
32 °C33.8 °C35.5 °C
32 °C32 °C30.8 °C
Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 33.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.82532.941.83137.237.54031.735.85039.638.76328.329.88027.330.110026.924.912526.729.11602429.620020.934.325020.94031519.540.140018.547.250017.559.763017.561.280015.765.5100015.864.7125016.668160015.869.1200015.471.1250015.569.431501673400015.876.850001668.8630016.371800016.375.91000016.261.91250016.455.71600016.449.6SPL28.683.2N1.153.2median 16.4median 61.9Delta2.112.435.248.832.942.737.24331.742.939.642.228.337.827.337.826.937.226.741.52446.420.948.620.953.819.557.718.563.517.563.317.562.215.76515.86816.673.815.870.315.468.115.5681672.115.873.51671.716.370.116.364.916.262.716.453.916.445.528.6821.151.8median 16.4median 63.52.17.235.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4median 73.42.110.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG G7 ThinQHTC U12 PlusGoogle Pixel 2 XL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U12 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.57 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.16 / 1.98 / 2.07 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.51 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
1%
-9%
38%
3%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.16
0.62
47%
0.72
38%
0.77
34%
0.84
28%
0.826 (0.42 - 1.8, n=17)
29%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
24%
Idle Average *
1.98
1.43
28%
2.21
-12%
2.18
-10%
1.54
22%
1.802 (1 - 2.9, n=17)
9%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
1.48
29%
2.22
-7%
2.21
-7%
1.57
24%
2.18 (1.5 - 3.5, n=17)
-5%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
3%
Load Average *
4.51
5.52
-22%
4.6
-2%
6.25
-39%
2.47
45%
4.86 (3.7 - 7.2, n=17)
-8%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
11%
Load Maximum *
8.3
10.47
-26%
9.34
-13%
10.16
-22%
2.49
70%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=17)
-11%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 66)
9tim 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 08min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 20min
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
-22%
5%
-17%
12%
-2%
-22%
-15%
Reader / Idle
1662
1789
8%
1452
-13%
1806
9%
1343
-19%
1727
4%
1706
3%
1292
-22%
1402
-16%
H.264
908
779
-14%
464
-49%
791
-13%
674
-26%
784
-14%
672
-26%
634
-30%
722
-20%
WiFi v1.3
591
692
17%
507
-14%
762
29%
521
-12%
744
26%
581
-2%
564
-5%
679
15%
Load
260
252
-3%
230
-12%
246
-5%
237
-9%
345
33%
302
16%
180
-31%
159
-39%

För

+ tunn design
+ robust yttre
+ snabbt WiFi
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ Dual-SIM
+ bra samtalskvalitet
+ ljusstark skärm med HDR10-stöd
+ kraftfull prestanda
+ trådlös laddning

Emot

- ingen VoLTE eller VoWiFI
- färgnoggrannheten borde vara bättre
- PWM
- endast USB 2.0-hastigheter
- hög energiförbrukning i viloläge
LG G7 ThinQ recenseras. Testenhet från LG Germany.
LG G7 ThinQ recenseras. Testenhet från LG Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

LG G7 ThinQ är bättre än LG G6 på många områden. Den gigantiska skärmen på 6.1 tum kan kännas ovan för användare av LG G6, men vi hade bara lnskat att LG inte gjort G7 ThinQ så kompakt. Dess Snapdragon 845-SoC är ett stort steg framåt jämfört med Snapdragon 835, vilket är till fördel för systemprestandan. LG har gjort mycket rätt med ljudet tack vare bland annat Hi-Fi Quad DAC.

LG G7 ThinQ är från ett tekniskt perspektiv en imponerande smartphone. Men den gör inte mycket för att stå ut i en mättad marknad och dess höga pris utgör ett hinder för att locka bort intresserade köpare från andra flaggskepp.

Lägre batterikapacitet jämfört med LG G6 är synd, men G7 ThinQ kramar ut mycket ur sitt relativt lilla batteri på 3.000 mAh. Skärmen imponerar också, även om vi gärna hade sett att ljusstyrke-sensorn var lite mindre konservativ i ljusa områden som exempelvis när enheten befinner sig utomhus en solig dag. WiFi var också snabbt och stabilt, vilket är bra. En bonus är stöd för trådlös laddning av Europeiska varianter, vilket inte fanns hos LG G6. Det är också trevligt att se stöd för LTE Cat. 18, men detta känns ändå i huvudsak överflödigt med tanke på att enheten varken stödjer VoLTE eller VoWiFi i Tyskland.

En sak vi gärna hade sett är en mer modern USB-port, särskilt med tanke på prislappen på ca 8.500 kronor.

Vi kunde inte bedöma kameran i den här recensionen då vår testenhet körde en förhandsutgåva av mjukvaran. LG har angett att dom snart ska skicka ut den slutgiltiga mjukvaran. Vi kommer att gå igenom kameran och tillslut utvärdera LG G7 ThinQ när dom har gjort detta.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG G7 ThinQ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-06-18 (Update: 2018-06-18)