Notebookcheck

Test: OnePlus 6 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/06/2018

Superb för sjätte gången. OnePlus håller fast vid sin höga släpptakt och släpper efter bara sex månader efterföljaren till OnePlus 5T: OnePlus 6. Denna smartphone har en ny SoC, en ny glasbaksida, ett jack och dessutom ska kamerorna ha förbättrats. I vår recension ska vi ta reda på huruvida ett snabbt byte är värt det.

OnePlus 6
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.28 tum 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, Optic AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 2 filer, 116 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB och 3.5mm ljudanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Hall, accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, elektronisk kompass, sensor-nav, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, USB OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast,
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 och 1.900 MHz), UMTS/WCDMA/HSPA+ (Band 1/2/4/5/8/9/19), CDMA (BC0/BC1), LTE Cat. 16 (FDD: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/66/71, TDD: 34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.75 x 155.7 x 75.4
Batteri
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Litiumjon, Snabbladdning upp till 20 watt
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 519, 1.22 µm, OIS, EIS, DCAF, f/1.7, Ultra-HD-Video) + 20 MPix (Sony IMX 376K, 1.0 µm, f/1.7, PDAF)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 371, 1.0 µm, EIS, Fixfokus, f/2.0, Full-HD-Video)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Skärmskydd, skyddsfodral, laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, säkerhetsinformation, snabbstartsguide, OxygenOS 5.1, 24 Månader Garanti, aptX och aptx HD, RGB-LED för meddelanden; Bandbredd (nerladdning/​uppladdning): 1000Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR-värden FCC: 1,26 W/kg (Huvud), 0,9 W/kg (Kropp); SAR-värden EU: 1,33 W/kg (Huvud), 1,38 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
177 g, Strömförsörjning: 111 g
Pris
529 Kr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71% +10%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼70% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% +7%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼65%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼41% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=211)
201 MBit/s ∼21% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼90% +3%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼74% -15%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼65% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=211)
194 MBit/s ∼28% -68%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Grove
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Grove
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 6 – Overview
GPS OnePlus 6 – Overview
GPS OnePlus 6 – Grove
GPS OnePlus 6 – Grove
GPS OnePlus 6 – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 6 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Reference card photographed
Reference card photographed
Reference card detail
429
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 471 cd/m² Medel: 436.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 430 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
97.4% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.28
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Screen
26%
15%
-48%
34%
6%
Brightness middle
430
630
47%
565
31%
432
0%
600
40%
425
-1%
Brightness
437
632
45%
571
31%
428
-2%
606
39%
423
-3%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
96
10%
87
0%
94
8%
92
6%
Black Level *
0.44
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.5
35%
2.3
-0%
4.18
-82%
1.2
48%
2.1
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.6
4.3
7%
4.8
-4%
8.53
-85%
3
35%
3.4
26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.1
12%
1.9
21%
5.3
-121%
1.6
33%
2.5
-4%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.17 111%
2.16 111%
2.33 103%
2.23 108%
2.32 103%
CCT
6160 106%
6513 100%
6332 103%
7487 87%
6707 97%
6455 101%
Contrast
1432

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 236 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 236 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 236 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10390 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -4%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 230421, n=6)
214821 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=307)
71466 Points ∼31% -69%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (255739 - 266981, n=7)
263395 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21088 - 266981, n=81)
114287 Points ∼43% -57%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼64% -36%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7717 - 8601, n=7)
8168 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4673 - 8601, n=170)
4525 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼60% -40%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (9179 - 10264, n=6)
9579 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=335)
4698 Points ∼49% -51%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -20%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼60% -27%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼79% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1234 - 1437, n=6)
1361 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=410)
673 Points ∼40% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼86%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -20%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -25%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7868 - 7957, n=6)
7924 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=410)
1530 Points ∼17% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼57% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼68% -31%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼54% -45%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼32% -68%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 3799, n=6)
3155 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=410)
1115 Points ∼29% -71%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% -22%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -48%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=6)
7798 Points ∼76% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=410)
2214 Points ∼22% -73%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼77% -23%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3614 - 4308, n=6)
4016 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=413)
1131 Points ∼26% -74%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14362, n=3)
13643 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=108)
3998 Points ∼28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 8937, n=5)
8637 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=152)
4105 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2429 - 2464, n=5)
2449 Points ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=153)
1231 Points ∼29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -28%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼81% -15%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -31%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2606 - 3669, n=6)
3298 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (585 - 3669, n=260)
1555 Points ∼43% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -31%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5212, n=6)
4861 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=260)
1096 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -30%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -22%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3419 - 4732, n=6)
4373 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=268)
1042 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼69% -28%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -19%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=6)
3043 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (581 - 3642, n=290)
1448 Points ∼40% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8252, n=6)
7399 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=290)
1460 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -38%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% -25%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4540 - 6378, n=6)
5593 Points ∼88% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=298)
1247 Points ∼20% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼73% -23%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼41% -57%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -25%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼60% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36494, n=6)
33069 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=443)
12098 Points ∼34% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼72%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -43%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼49% -32%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼52% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 81726, n=6)
79918 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=443)
15622 Points ∼14% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -36%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼53% -45%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼65% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 63084, n=6)
60664 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=444)
13452 Points ∼21% -78%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% -2%
LG V30
113 fps ∼64% -25%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 151, n=6)
141 fps ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=469)
27 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
LG V30
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (59 - 60, n=5)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=472)
23.4 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% +12%
LG V30
59 fps ∼67% -11%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +34%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼68% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (66 - 82, n=5)
73.8 fps ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=394)
14.4 fps ∼16% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -22%
LG V30
35 fps ∼59% -40%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=5)
54 fps ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=396)
14.5 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -16%
LG V30
40 fps ∼67% -29%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -13%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼68% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (39 - 60.9, n=6)
56 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=259)
12.8 fps ∼21% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼44% -56%
LG V30
19 fps ∼35% -65%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -18%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼67% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (31 - 55, n=5)
50 fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 110, n=261)
12.8 fps ∼23% -76%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
LG V30
24 fps ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 35, n=5)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.9 - 35, n=191)
8.91 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼42% -56%
LG V30
13 fps ∼39% -59%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼70% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 34, n=5)
30.4 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 50, n=194)
7.98 fps ∼24% -75%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87% +27%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
1169 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=59)
587 Points ∼34% -50%

Legend

 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +155%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40% +2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (69.8 - 89.5, n=7)
85.2 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% -21%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% -24%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=327)
34.7 Points ∼15% -60%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14491 - 17131, n=7)
16340 Points ∼46% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% -13%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼35% -27%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=463)
5019 Points ∼14% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=482)
11875 ms * ∼100% -386%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼31% -48%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2394 - 2868, n=7)
2492 ms * ∼21% -2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼17% +16%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +71%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (228 - 291, n=7)
255 Points ∼72% +1%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼51% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -35%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼39% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=230)
97.9 Points ∼28% -61%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 6Sony Xperia XZ2Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusLG V30OnePlus 5TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
4%
-27%
-3%
108%
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
58.2 (51.3 - 65.1, n=2)
42.7 (8.29 - 87.1, n=240)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
78.2 (75.4 - 81, n=2)
61 (13.5 - 96.5, n=240)
Random Write 4KB
21.8
17
-22%
22.74
4%
10.21
-53%
20
-8%
114 (20 - 164, n=10)
423%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=516)
-39%
Random Read 4KB
137
149.4
9%
129.68
-5%
78.17
-43%
138.1
1%
140 (132 - 147, n=10)
2%
33.6 (1.59 - 173, n=516)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.4
198.7
-1%
204.94
2%
193.22
-4%
203.4
1%
202 (192 - 212, n=10)
0%
69 (2.99 - 216, n=516)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
725.6
679.2
-6%
818.69
13%
669.48
-8%
698.7
-4%
768 (699 - 832, n=10)
6%
207 (12.1 - 832, n=516)
-71%
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 Smooth60 fps
 Balanced40 fps
 HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 45.3 °C40.2 °C36.9 °C 
 43.3 °C40.1 °C37.5 °C 
 42.3 °C39.2 °C36.9 °C 
Max: 45.3 °C
Medel: 40.2 °C
35.7 °C37.8 °C42.5 °C
35.5 °C37.4 °C38.7 °C
35.8 °C37.6 °C39.3 °C
Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C
Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.924.32524.224.13125.1254022.230.25027.739.96317.420.78017.517.210014.918.61251419.516014.732.120012.243.425013.649.531513.153.940010.857.25009.754.26309.357.18009.66210008.26612508.168.11600869.920007.771.325007.875.131507.874.440007.869.450007.864.463007.857.480008.159.7100008.157.9125008.147.9160008.129.2SPL57.920.681.6N9.90.343.5median 8.1OnePlus 6median 57.4Delta2.21135.240.732.946.337.244.431.748.639.648.928.337.627.329.926.933.726.732.92445.520.955.320.956.619.559.118.568.417.564.917.567.415.766.215.87016.672.715.873.815.474.415.575.91679.315.8781671.816.371.516.371.416.272.416.464.716.446.328.686.31.165.5median 16.4OnePlus 5Tmedian 68.42.18.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.6 / 1 / 1.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.3 / 8.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-39%
11%
-44%
-2%
-31%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.75
-25%
0.72
-20%
0.68
-13%
1.03
-72%
0.58
3%
0.737 (0.42 - 1.16, n=6)
-23%
0.848 (0.2 - 3.4, n=543)
-41%
Idle Average *
1
2.25
-125%
2.21
-121%
0.95
5%
2.4
-140%
1.44
-44%
1.86 (1 - 2.25, n=6)
-86%
1.686 (0.6 - 6.2, n=542)
-69%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.26
-41%
2.22
-39%
1.09
32%
2.6
-63%
1.53
4%
1.988 (1.57 - 2.26, n=6)
-24%
1.914 (0.74 - 6.6, n=543)
-20%
Load Average *
4.3
4.89
-14%
4.6
-7%
4.58
-7%
2.96
31%
3.17
26%
4.92 (4.3 - 6.25, n=6)
-14%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=537)
8%
Load Maximum *
8.6
9.6
-12%
9.34
-9%
5.16
40%
6.6
23%
8.54
1%
9.17 (8.3 - 10.2, n=6)
-7%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=537)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 06min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 11min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 06min
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Battery Runtime
-6%
-19%
-19%
-1%
-25%
Reader / Idle
1806
1678
-7%
1402
-22%
1343
-26%
1754
-3%
1292
-28%
H.264
791
718
-9%
722
-9%
674
-15%
799
1%
634
-20%
WiFi v1.3
762
716
-6%
679
-11%
521
-32%
718
-6%
564
-26%
Load
246
239
-3%
159
-35%
237
-4%
257
4%
180
-27%

För

+ hölje av väldigt hög kvalitet
+ väldigt slimmad mjukvara
+ väldigt snabbt internet
+ gigabit-LTE
+ exakt GPS
+ bra samtalskvalitet
+ väldigt bra kameror
+ bra utbud av tillbehör
+ många inställningar för användbarhet
+ stor mängd prestanda finns tillgänglig
+ ekonomisk energiförbrukning
+ väldigt bra batteritid
+ väldigt snabb laddning

Emot

- ingen IP-certifiering
- ingen microSD-kortläsare
- skärmen är en aning för mörk och flimmrar
- stryps vid belastning
- märkbar ökning av temperaturen
Recension: OnePlus 6
Recension: OnePlus 6

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

OnePlus 6 är en smartphone av väldigt hög kvalitet som erbjuder toppskikts-funktioner med ett utmärkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. OnePlus struntar helt i VR, vilket även märks på skärmteknologin, där en FHD+-upplösning får räcka. Generellt verkar det inte finnas några framsteg när det gäller panelen. Jacket är helt och hållet en fråga om smak. Vi hade önskat något i stil med Apples True Tone-skärm eller en 120 Hz-panel. Avvikandet från en helkropp i aluminium följer också en trend, men den ger inte denna OnePlus-telefon trådlös laddning. Dessutom, i stället för en snabbare överföringsstandard som hade kunnat erbjuda fler funktioner såsom videoutmatning eller ett desktop-läge så förlitar man sig på USB 2.0.

OnePlus fokuserar istället på telefonens kärnfunktioner och utrustar sin senaste smartphone med högre hastighet, lagring som både är större och snabbare, uppdaterad mjukvara och en bra kamera. Men framstegen jämfört med föregångaren är marginella. Batteritiden är ungefär samma som föregångarens, vilket, även om det inte är en överraskning, fortfarande är trevligt då OnePlus 5T klarade sig riktigt länge. Dessutom kommer den med samma blixtsnabba snabbladdnings-teknik som vi känner igen från OnePlus 5T, även om den inte längre bär namnet Dash Charge (namnet behövde bytas på grund av licenskonflikter).

OnePlus har återigen producerat en utmärkt smartphone. Den föregår en del toppskickts-gimmicks, men OnePlus 6 lyckas utmärkt med att kombinera hög prestanda med ett lågt pris.

För att summera så levererar OnePlus återigen en riktigt bra smartphone. Men konkurrensen i det här området ökar. I synnerhet Honor 10 med sin aggressiva prissättning (utgångspris från 4.000 kronor) är inte att skratta åt och den snart tillgängliga Asus ZenFone 5z samt Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s spelar i samma liga både i fråga om teknologi och pris.

OnePlus 6 - 05/29/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer

Design
91%
Tangentbord
70 / 75 → 94%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
47 / 60 → 79%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
69 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
87%
Medel
81%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: OnePlus 6 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 6 (Update: 2018-06- 6)