Notebookcheck

Test: Apple iPhone 8 (Sammanfattning)

Patrick Afschar Kaboli, Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/03/2017

Steg för steg. Vi misstänkte sen tidigare att Apple bara skulle visa upp en smått förbättrad version av sin smartphone i år. Den åttonde generationen iPhone från Cupertino kommer med ett uppdaterat chassi och bättre prestanda, vilket åtminstone är mer än tidigare år.

Apple iPhone 8 (iPhone 8 Serie)
Processor
Apple A11 Bionic
Grafikkort
Apple A11 Bionic GPU
Minne
2048 MB 
, Samsung LPDDR4x
Skärm
4.7 tum 16:9, 1334x750 pixlar 326 PPI, Multi-touch, Apple Retina HD Display, IPS True Tone, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus), 256 GB 
, 250 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Lightning-port, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: 3-axels gyrosensor, accelerationssensor, närhetssensor, digital kompass, barometer, Galileo, QZSS, Lightning
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 och 2100 MHz), LTE (FDD-Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30 och 66; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40 och 41), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.3 x 138.4 x 67.3
Batteri
6.96 Wh, 1821 mAh Litiumjon, 3.82 V, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 14 tim
Operativsystem
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Vidvinkelobjektiv, bländare f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, optisk bildstabilisering
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Nätadapter (5 watt), lightning-kabel, lightning-hörlurar, adapter (lightning till 3.5mm audio jack), 12 Månader Garanti, Trådlös laddning (Qi), IP67 certifierad, huvud SAR: 1.32 W / kg), fanless
Released
09/22/2017
Vikt
148 g
Pris
969 Kr

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
915 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8
329 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
LG G6
325 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Huawei P10
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
651 MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Apple iPhone 8
354 MBit/s ∼54%
Huawei P10
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼53% -3%
LG G6
220 MBit/s ∼34% -38%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
577
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 604 cd/m² Medel: 580.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.25 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 604 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1373:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | - Ø
99.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Screen
-1%
1%
-11%
-69%
Brightness
580
538
-7%
519
-11%
562
-3%
680
17%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
90
-1%
93
2%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.44
0.38
14%
0.34
23%
0.42
5%
Contrast
1373
1471
7%
1635
19%
1657
21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
1.3
-8%
1.7
-42%
4.3
-258%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.8
-13%
1.9
-19%
1.6
-0%
4.8
-200%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
CCT
6688 97%
6797 96%
6818 95%
6435 101%
7255 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.15
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.71
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7125 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.1
Compute Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
14962 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
15295 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
12425 Points ∼81% -17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
5922 Points ∼56% -43%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼61% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼63% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼64% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
3527 Points ∼83% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼44% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼47% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼48% -51%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼65% -30%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼57% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼80% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -274%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -206%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -157%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼66% -32%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼48% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼62% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼63% -35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼85% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼72% -28%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼51% -49%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼32% -68%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼33% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼91% -9%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼78% -22%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼54% -46%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼26% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼21% -79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼21% -79%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
1854 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87% +18%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87% +18%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87% +18%
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points ∼79% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2512 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2417 Points ∼96% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
2783 Points ∼78%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93% +19%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93% +19%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93% +19%
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points ∼60% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3571 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2723 Points ∼76% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
2505 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91% +19%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91% +19%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91% +19%
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points ∼65% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3265 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2648 Points ∼81% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼86% +6%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼86% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼95% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼88% +19%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼66% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼76% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼87% +15%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼70% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼81% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼60% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼59% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼89% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼56% -43%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼31% -68%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼32% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼58% -39%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼42% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼45% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼50% -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -61%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +8%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼74% -20%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼31% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼28% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
69.57 Points ∼31% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -274%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -206%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -157%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 41 °C41 °C37.8 °C 
 39.4 °C38.4 °C36 °C 
 37.7 °C37.3 °C35.3 °C 
Max: 41 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C
38.1 °C42.8 °C43.9 °C
36 °C39 °C39.1 °C
35.7 °C35.7 °C36.6 °C
Max: 43.9 °C
Medel: 38.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.12525.437.63125.336.94032.940.85033.635.26331.633.38028.433.81002733.512520.842.81602250.820021.351.525020.849.831521.253.940019.45650019.558.763017.761.680017.962.9100017.866.2125017.368.2160017.468.4200016.768.5250017.267.3315018.268400017.969.8500017.668.8630017.767.5800017.861.71000017.959.11250018.160.61600018.256.2SPL3078.4N1.343.6median 17.9Apple iPhone 8median 61.6Delta1.37.531.635.125.433.525.334.832.93433.629.431.629.628.424.92731.220.834.72239.821.348.320.855.321.259.519.462.219.567.117.77017.973.617.874.217.373.217.472.716.773.217.272.118.269.717.96917.666.317.766.917.86717.951.618.145.218.247.73082.41.354.8median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8median 66.91.311.831.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.14 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.54 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.74 / 7.78 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 9min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3 (Mobile Safari iOS 11)
9tim 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 38min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 22min
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Battery Runtime
12%
-10%
17%
8%
-23%
16%
Reader / Idle
1629
2085
28%
1770
9%
1667
2%
1540
-5%
1125
-31%
1789
10%
H.264
698
733
5%
722
3%
771
10%
582
-17%
502
-28%
779
12%
WiFi v1.3
585
657
12%
517
-12%
719
23%
966
65%
438
-25%
692
18%
Load
202
211
4%
126
-38%
264
31%
176
-13%
187
-7%
252
25%

För

+ mycket välbyggd
+ True-Tone skärm
+ snabb SoC
+ bra kamera
+ exakt GPS
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ hög Wi-Fi prestanda
+ många LTE-band
+ vatten och dammskydd

Emot

- lagringsutrymmet går inte att utöka
- bara 12 månaders garanti
- ingen stereoljudutgång
- högtalarna är bara genomsnittliga
- upplösningen på skärmen kunde varit högre
- tyngre än sin föregångare
- väldigt begränsad NFC-funktionalitet
In review: Apple iPhone 8.
In review: Apple iPhone 8.

iPhone 8 kan vara den sista av sitt slag, den sista Apple-telefonen med en hem-knapp och IPS-skärm. Om så är fallet gav amerikanerna oss åtminstone ett bra avslutande kapitel. Vi saknar återigen viktiga nya funktioner och innovationer, men iPhone 8 slår sin föregångare på många sätt. En viktig faktor är det nya A11-chippet, som återigen är mycket snabbare och - likt många tidigare modeller - bortanför konkurrenternas grepp. Skalet är nu gjort av glas, vilket känns bra att hålla i men är tyvärr halkigare och drar på sig fler fingeravtryck än tidigare. (Undantaget är den kolsvarta iPhone 7) Det verkar som att man var tvungen att gå tillbaka till en glaspanel på baksidan för att kunna ha trådlös laddning.

Kameran är en riktig höjdpunkt för video-entusiaster eftersom detta är den första smarta telefon som har en kamera som kan spela in Ultra HD-video i 60 bildrutor per sekund. Full HD video går att spela in i upp till 240 FPS, vilket är utmärkt för spektakulära slow motion-inspelningar. Fotokvaliteten ligger på en väldigt hög nivå och behöver inte gömma sig bakom sina rivaler. iPhone 8 är definitivt det bästa kamera-paket du kan få i en smart telefon i dagsläget - om du tycker om den grundläggande inställningsmenyn.

iPhone 8 är kraftfull, håller länge och har en bra kamera. En uppgradering från iPhone 7 är inte nödvändig, men skillnaderna är mer märkbara om du har en iPhone 6S eller en ännu äldre modell.

Du får också snabb LTE, lång batteritid och ett skal som står emot vatten och damm. Vi kan inte hitta några större nackdelar, men en del saker är irriterande. Dessa inkluderar den begränsade garantitiden och den svaga nätadaptern. Röstkvaliteten kunde ha varit bättre i 3G-nätverk och ljudet är bara genomsnittligt, trots stereohögtalare.

Apples förflyttning mot förstärkt verklighet är viktig och kommer säkert att bli framgångsrik tack vare en stor plattform och enorm potential för snabba och lönsamma tekniska framsteg. AR fungerar redan bra, men är ännu inte så exakt eller sofistikerad som Asus ZenFone AR, till exempel.

Allt som allt, iPhone 8 är en bra produkt med sofistikerade komponenter, men telefonen och användbara tillbehör är också väldigt dyra.

Apple iPhone 8 - 09/29/2017 v6
Patrick Afschar Kaboli, Daniel Schmidt

Design
91%
Tangentbord
71 / 75 → 94%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
43 / 60 → 72%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
93%
Spelprestanda
66 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
85 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
89%
Medel
82%
91%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone 8 (Sammanfattning)
Patrick Afschar Kaboli, Daniel Schmidt, 2017-10- 3 (Update: 2017-10- 3)