Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23) bärbar dator för budgetspel: Mycket prestanda till ett lägre pris än Pro 15

Pro 15 för budgeträvar. Om du kan klara dig utan ett metallhölje och ett komplett RGB-tangentbord behöver du inte nödvändigtvis välja den dyra XMG Pro 15. I vårt test är XMG Focus 15 lika högpresterande och behöver bara ta ett baksäte i några få aspekter. I gengäld är grundpriset för Focus 15 cirka 400 euro lägre än för Pro 15 för praktiskt taget samma prestanda.
Granskning av XMG Focus 15

Vi testade förstXMG Focus 15i slutet av 2021. Focus 15 var en bärbar dator som pressade den då helt nyaRTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPUtill sin yttersta gräns. Trots sin kylning visade XMG Focus 15 endast prestanda över genomsnittet under höga temperaturer.

Schenker förlitar sig återigen på ett barebone från Clevo för den nuvarande Focus 15, och den här gången är det NP50SNC-chassit. I likhet med den nyligen testadeXMG Pro 15, vi hittar enIntel Core i9-13900HXinstallerad i den nya Focus 15.

Den avancerade processorn i Focus 15 kompletteras av en nybörjar-GPU,Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 32 GB arbetsminne och en 1 TB Crucial NVMe SSD.

Som vanligt erbjuder Schenker ett brett utbud av konfigurationsalternativ. Köpare kan också konfigurera Focus 15 med enRTX 4060 bärbar GPUeller enRTX 4070 bärbar GPUtillsammans med ytterligare RAM-alternativ.

På grund av instegsgrafiken i vårt granskningsexemplar klassificerar vi XMG Pro 15 som en bärbar dator för spel på instegsnivå. Men bärbara datorer för spel på nybörjarnivå har vanligtvis inte en så högpresterande processor och inte mer än 16 GB arbetsminne, så vi letar också efter motsvarande jämförelseenheter bland avancerade bärbara datorer för multimedia.

Bland dem finns enheter somMSI Katana 15ellerAsus TUF A15som bärbara datorer för spel ochSamsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16ellerAcer Swift X SFX14-71Gsom bärbara multimediadatorer. Den bärbara datornXMG Pro 15får också en plats i denna jämförelse - Schenkers dyrare bärbara dator skiljer sig från sin billigare kusin endast i några få aspekter.

Clevo NP50SNC (XMG Focus 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 162 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Intel UHD Graphics 770
Minne
32 GB 
, 2 x 16 GB DDR5-5600 SK Hynix (SO-DIMM)
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 2569 x 1440 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE0AD1, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Kombistecker Headset , Kortläsare: microSD
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.9 x 359.5 x 238
Batteri
73 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: FullHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet Tastatur RGB , Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.4 kg, Strömförsörjning: 990 g
Pris
1800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.1 %
07/2023
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.9 mm15.60"2569x1440
86.2 %
07/2023
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.3 %
06/2023
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.9 %
03/2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
07/2023
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.5 kg17.9 mm14.50"2880x1800
89.4 %
04/2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
89.4 %
05/2023
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.4 kg17 mm14.00"2880x1800

Chassi: Robust plast

Den bärbara datorns hölje är helt tillverkat av robust plast. Metall är endast synlig från utsidan bakom gallren i form av kylflänsen. Clevo och Schenker har hållit designen ganska enkel. Varumärket finns bara i form av den svarta XMG-logotypen på en svart bakgrund.

Även om fodralet huvudsakligen är tillverkat av plast, hittar vi inga svagheter när det gäller kvalitet. Den bärbara datorn verkar motståndskraftig i alla aspekter, knakar inte när den vrids och visar mycket smala och jämna luckor. Displaylocket kan öppnas till ca 140° med en hand och håller hela tiden sin position.

Varken vikten eller tjockleken är ovanlig för en 15,6-tums gaming-laptop i 16:10-format. En jämförelse med andra bärbara multimediadatorer visar dock att de med liknande hårdvara också skulle kunna vara lite tunnare.

Storleksjämförelse

359.5 mm 238 mm 26.9 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 251 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.8 kg332.8 mm 228.1 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg311 mm 220.8 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Utrustning: USB-portar på tre sidor

Anslutningsaspekterna hos XMG Focus 15 har knappast förändrats sedan vår senaste recension. Det enda nya tillskottet är ytterligare en USB-C-port, men SD-kortläsaren har reducerats till microSD-format.

Båda USB Type-C-portarna erbjuder inte strömförsörjning. Därför kommer du förmodligen alltid att behöva ta med dig nätadaptern, som väger nästan ett kg.

Kensington säkerhetslucka, USB typ-A 3.2 Gen1, USB-A 2.0, mikrofoningång, 3,5 mm kombinationsuttag
Kensington säkerhetslucka, USB typ-A 3.2 Gen1, USB-A 2.0, mikrofoningång, 3,5 mm kombinationsuttag
microSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB4.0 Gen 3x1 med DisplayPort, RJ45 Gigabit LAN
microSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB4.0 Gen 3x1 med DisplayPort, RJ45 Gigabit LAN
USB Typ-C Gen 2x1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a (G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (G-Sync; HDCP 2.3), Strömkontakt
USB Typ-C Gen 2x1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a (G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (G-Sync; HDCP 2.3), Strömkontakt

SD-kortläsare

SD-kort: AS SSD
SD-kort: AS SSD

SD-kort överföringshastigheter är bra med AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 med vår testenhet eller Pro 15även om den inte är enastående.

De andra två bärbara speldatorerna i vår jämförelse har ingen kortläsare.

SD Card Reader - maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
186.02 MB/s +107%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.98 MB/s
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
86.1 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s -8%

Kommunikation

Intel AX211 Wi-Fi-modulen i Focus 15 ger höga överföringshastigheter i Wi-Fi 6E-nätverket med vår referens Asus ROG Rapture AXE-GT11000-router.

Å andra sidan verkar överföringshastigheterna i 5 GHz Wi-Fi 6-nätverket under genomsnittet med samma testuppsättning.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1601 (1494min, 1511.98P1 - 1649max) MBit/s +70%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1574 (1478min - 1665max) MBit/s +67%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1529 (623min - 1608max) MBit/s +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1493 (1452min - 1534max) MBit/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)
1274 MBit/s +35%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=188)
1242 MBit/s +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
MediaTek MT7921
985 (902min - 1065max) MBit/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
941 (465min - 984max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1679 (1641min - 1697max) MBit/s +75%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1666 (840min - 1685max) MBit/s +74%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1638 (1438min - 1710max) MBit/s +71%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1419 (1355min, 1363.41P1 - 1447max) MBit/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1405 MBit/s +47%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=188)
1392 MBit/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
957 (480min - 968max) MBit/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507
MediaTek MT7921
917 (797min - 933max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1609 (844min - 1675max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1594 (1492min - 1637max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)
1477 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=174)
1369 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1677 (838min - 1686max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1667 (1652min - 1678max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)
1516 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=173)
1488 MBit/s -11%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (844-1675)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1594 (1492-1637)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1649 (838-1686)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1652-1678)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1601 (1494-1649)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1452-1534)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1574 (1478-1665)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1419 (1355-1447)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1438-1710)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1641-1697)

Webbkamera

Full HD-webbkameran i nya Focus 15 fokuserar bara perfekt på mitten av bilden. Därför är mitten skarp och kontrastrik, medan kanterna ser lite urtvättade ut.

Kamerans höga färgavvikelser är irriterande, och särskilt hudtoner återges dåligt.

ColorChecker
22.2 ∆E
25 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
24 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23): 18.54 ∆E min: 10.44 - max: 25.04 ∆E

Säkerhet

Det finns inga biometriska autentiseringsalternativ för Focus 15. En Kensington-säkerhetslucka ger fysiskt stöldskydd.

TPM 2.0 och SecureBoot kan skydda mot obehörig åtkomst till data.

Tillbehör

I kartongen hittar vi ett omfattande tillbehörspaket utöver strömförsörjning och dokumentation. Du får en stor musmatta med XMG-logotypen och en matchande flasköppnare tillsammans med en installations-CD och ett USB-minne som innehåller Windows med matchande program och drivrutiner.

Underhåll

SSD, arbetsminne och WLAN-modul i XMG Focus 15 är utbytbara. En gratis M.2 PCIe 4.0-kortplats finns tillgänglig i vår testenhet.

Hela den bärbara datorns basplatta är säkrad med 11 PH0-skruvar och kan tas bort ganska enkelt för att komma åt motsvarande komponenter. Efter att skruvarna har lossats kan locket lyftas av utan problem.

Garanti

Schenker erbjuder en kostnadsfri grundgaranti på 24 månader för den bärbara datorn. Ytterligare garantialternativ kan läggas till via Bestware i kassan.

Input devices: RGB keyboard

Tangentbord

Det går bra att skriva på den bärbara datorns svarta tangentbord med vita tangenter tack vare stark haptisk återkoppling och 1,5 mm slaglängd. På begäran kan Schenker lasergravera in alla tänkbara språklayouter i den svarta ytan. RGB-belysningen låter tangentbordet lysa i önskad färg.

Pekplatta

Pekplattan på Focus 15 är cirka 7 cm × 12 cm och därmed mindre än på de flesta bärbara speldatorer. Den är dock tillräckligt stor för att man bekvämt ska kunna navigera över hela skärmen med flera fingrar på den och utföra alla möjliga multi-touch-gester.

Pekplattans placering och storlek ger också tillräckligt med utrymme för att undvika felaktiga inmatningar från handens häl. Den släta ytan och de bekväma klicken gör musinmatningen smidig.

Pekplatta och tangentbord
Pekplatta och tangentbord

Bildskärm: QHD vid 240 Hz

Subpixelmatris bakom matt bildskärmsyta
Subpixelmatris bakom matt bildskärmsyta
Knappt någon blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
Knappt någon blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen

Focus 15 använder samma högkvalitativa IPS-panel som XMG Pro 15. Den är dock något mörkare än i Pro 15 med en genomsnittlig ljusstyrka på 302 cd/m² i vårt granskningsexemplar. Skärmen har en uppdateringsfrekvens på 240 Hz och en upplösning på 2 560 × 1 440.

Den matta skärmens svartvärde och kontrast är acceptabla, och belysningen är också bra. Blödning från bakgrundsbelysningen syns knappt på skärmen.

Förutom QHD-skärmen erbjuder Schenker även ett full HD-skärmalternativ för XMG Focus 15. Detta har en uppdateringsfrekvens på 165 Hz och representerar endast 95% av sRGB-färgrymden enligt Schenker. Båda visningsalternativen stöder dock G-Sync.

De som köper den bärbara datorn som en ren spelenhet och vill använda den med RTX 4050 bör överväga att välja full HD-skärmen, som är cirka 80 € billigare. De flesta spel stöder ändå bara sRGB-färgrymden och kan utnyttja skärmens kapacitet fullt ut i kombination med RTX 4050.

QHD- eller 4K-spel är endast möjligt i begränsad utsträckning med Nvidias instegsgrafik.

302
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE0AD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 278.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 302 cd/m²
Kontrast: 839:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.87 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
BOE0AD1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus TUF A15 FA507
N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
ATNA45AF03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00
Display
-1%
-20%
-53%
4%
4%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
98.6
97.8
-1%
64.9
-34%
38.1
-61%
99.9
1%
99.9
1%
99.8
1%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.9
0%
96.5
-3%
56.8
-43%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.3
85.4
-1%
66.6
-23%
39.3
-54%
96.2
11%
96.3
12%
88.7
3%
Response Times
14%
-87%
-140%
96%
96%
82%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2)
14 ?(6.6, 7.4)
10%
30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6)
-95%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-149%
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
97%
0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23)
97%
2.4 ?(1.4, 1)
85%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8)
9.6 ?(4.2, 5.4)
17%
20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1)
-79%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-131%
0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3)
95%
0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28)
94%
2.4 ?(1.4, 1)
79%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
240 ?(100)
300
Screen
10%
30%
-38%
30%
215%
103%
Brightness middle
302
322
7%
288
-5%
261
-14%
388
28%
400
32%
423
40%
Brightness
278
301
8%
271
-3%
258
-7%
390
40%
399
44%
427
54%
Brightness Distribution
85
85
0%
91
7%
92
8%
98
15%
93
9%
98
15%
Black Level *
0.36
0.36
-0%
0.17
53%
0.19
47%
0.03
92%
0.1
72%
Contrast
839
894
7%
1694
102%
1374
64%
13333
1489%
4230
404%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.24
1.98
12%
1.9
15%
5.57
-149%
2.2
2%
2.3
-3%
0.55
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.52
5.24
5%
3.3
40%
20.6
-273%
3.9
29%
4.15
25%
1.15
79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.87
2.44
37%
2.7
30%
3.19
18%
1.4
64%
2.7
30%
0.69
82%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.42 91%
2.32 95%
2.45 90%
2.22 99%
2.266 97%
2.42 91%
CCT
6936 94%
6984 93%
6535 99%
6146 106%
6380 102%
7047 92%
6479 100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.98
0.9
4.63
1.9
1.66
1.15
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 8%
-26% / 0%
-77% / -57%
43% / 35%
105% / 148%
62% / 76%

* ... smaller is better

För videofilmare och innehållsskapare bör den nästan kompletta Display P3-färgrymdtäckningen i XMG Focus 15 vara ett plus. AdobeRGB-färgrymden är viktigare för fotoredigering och utskrift, och Focus 15 lyckas bara återge 88% av detta.

sRGB
sRGB
DCI-P3
DCI-P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

Skärmen i vår testenhet har en bra färgåtergivning med en genomsnittlig färgavvikelse på ΔΕ 2,24 från fabrik. Värdena förbättras ytterligare vid kalibrering.

Vi fann att färgåtergivningen också kan förbättras när belysningen är inställd på 150 nits.

Gråskala
Gråskala
Mättnad
Mättnad
Färgkontroll
Färgkontroll
Gråskala kalibrerad
Gråskala kalibrerad
Mättnad kalibrerad
Mättnad kalibrerad
ColorChecker kalibrerad
ColorChecker kalibrerad
Gråskalekalibrerad 150 nits
Gråskalekalibrerad 150 nits
Mättnad kalibrerad till 150 nits
Mättnad kalibrerad till 150 nits
ColorChecker kalibrerad till 150 nits
ColorChecker kalibrerad till 150 nits

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.8 ms rise
↘ 5.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.4 ms rise
↘ 8.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Med sin matta yta är den relativt ljusstarka skärmen även användbar utomhus, så länge placeringen och vinkeln mot solen är korrekt. Lyckligtvis går det oftast att hitta en gynnsam position eftersom skärmens betraktningsvinklar är ganska stabila.

Användning utomhus
Användning utomhus
Montering av betraktningsvinkel
Montering av betraktningsvinkel
Användning utomhus
Användning utomhus

Prestanda: Core i9 med extrem prestanda

Schenker erbjuder ett brett utbud av konfigurationsalternativ för XMG Focus 15. Processorn i alla dessa är Intel Core i9-13900HX. Detta stöds av ett Nvidia-chip med GeForce RTX 4050, RTX 4060 eller RTX 4070alternativ som finns tillgängliga i konfigurationsprocessen hos Bestware tillsammans med flera minnesalternativ.

Vår testenhet är utrustad med Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU och 32 GB arbetsminne. Med det lägsta grafikchipet i Ada Lovelace-generationen kan den bärbara datorn spela många aktuella spel smidigt, även om du förmodligen måste begränsa kvalitetsinställningarna om du vill använda skärmens fulla QHD-upplösning.

 
 
 

Testförhållanden

Fyra olika prestandaplaner kan nås via Schenkers Control Center. Medan energisparläget och viloläget märkbart begränsar testenhetens prestanda, ligger riktmärkena för Performance- och Entertainment-lägena ofta ganska nära varandra när mycket prestanda krävs från den bärbara datorn under längre perioder.

Med detta sagt varar processorns boostfas betydligt längre i Performance-läget. Med nästan 1,5 minuter i boost tar sig processorn enkelt igenom riktmärken som Cinebench R23 eller Blender-tester. Effektgränserna i de enskilda lägena är följande:

Läge: Strömläge Underhållningsläge Energisparläge
CPU PL1 135 W 55 W 15 W
CPU PL2 162 W 130 W 30 W
Måltemperatur CPU 93 °C 87 °C 85 °C
GPU TGP + Dynamic Boost 115 W + 25 W 115 W + 0 W 115 W + 0 W
Måltemperatur GPU 87 °C 87 °C 87 °C

Den bärbara datorn kan uppnå de höga målnivåerna för Performance-läget i våra tester. Dessa motsvarar exakt de värden som Schenker också uppnådde med XMG Pro 15. Prestanda för de två processorerna i Focus och Pro är alltså nästan identiska.

För att göra en bättre jämförelse mellan de två enheterna beslutade vi i slutändan att köra alla riktmärken i Performance-läge även i XMG Focus 15.

Effektstyrning
Effektstyrning
Belysning av tangentbord
Belysning av tangentbord
Makrokontroll
Makrokontroll
Batteriinställningar
Batteriinställningar

Processor

Med Intel Core i9-13900HXär en av de mest avancerade processorerna för bärbara datorer från Raptor Lake-HX-generationen installerad i XMG Focus 15. Här är processorn till och med något snabbare än den i Pro 15.

Skillnaden är mer märkbar när det gäller den smidiga driften av moderna processorer. Med 8 P-kärnor och 16 E-kärnor har processorn 32 trådar som ger extrem multitasking. Focus 15 och Pro 15 ligger i topp bland jämförelseenheterna.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop Test

0205410615820102512301435164018452050225524602665287030753280348536903895Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3332 (3186.24-3913.13)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1577 (1282.09-2465.48)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2029 (1995.31-2490.5)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
85.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
75.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
72.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
58.9 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
58 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
55.9 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
55.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
52.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (24270 - 32623, n=22)
28225 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
24574 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
24270 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19692 Points -19%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
15609 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
15306 Points -37%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
14325 (12974.5min - 14324.9max) Points -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13750 Points -43%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1867 - 2105, n=19)
2044 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1935 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
1896 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1867 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1840 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1821 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1698 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1546 Points -20%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9152 - 12541, n=20)
10766 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9250 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9152 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7486 Points -18%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
6070 Points -34%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5926 Points -35%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
5373 Points -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5354 Points -41%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (722 - 810, n=20)
784 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
742 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
732 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
722 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
712 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
701 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
657 Points -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
603 Points -19%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (3913 - 4970, n=21)
4522 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4086 (3477.05min - 4085.8max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
3913 (3186.24min - 3913.13max) Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years)
3111 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
2515 Points -38%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
2491 (1995.31min - 2490.5max) Points -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
2465 (1282.09min - 2465.48max) Points -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2274 (2188.66min - 2273.89max) Points -44%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (247 - 304, n=21)
292 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
274 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
270 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years)
269 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
268 Points -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
249 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
247 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
246 Points -9%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
299 Seconds * -121%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * -73%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
233 Seconds * -73%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
223 Seconds * -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
221 Seconds * -64%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.4 Seconds * -47%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
148 Seconds * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
135 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (101 - 153, n=21)
117.9 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (90675 - 127283, n=20)
111796 MIPS +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
99191 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
90675 MIPS -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77655 MIPS -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
60842 MIPS -39%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
60612 MIPS -39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS -40%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
58703 MIPS -41%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
55929 MIPS -44%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (6340 - 7177, n=20)
6848 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6367 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6340 MIPS 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6145 MIPS -3%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
6100 MIPS -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
6041 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5786 MIPS -9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5510 MIPS -13%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17614 - 21075, n=21)
19809 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
18308 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
17614 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13697 Points -25%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
11556 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
11497 Points -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points -39%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
10955 Points -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9346 Points -49%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1345 - 2093, n=21)
1988 Points +48%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1869 Points +39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
1840 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1818 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1815 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1692 Points +26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1507 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1345 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)
29.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
23.5 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.4 fps -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps -30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.4 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.8 fps -33%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
15.7 fps -37%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
13.2 fps -47%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
51.1 s * -29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50.6 s * -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
49.6 s * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)
42.5 s * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
41.1 s * -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
41 s * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
39.5 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.4964 sec * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.489 sec * -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.468 sec * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4564 sec * -5%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.447 sec * -3%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4398 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4345 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)
0.402 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4086 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
230 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
270 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
99.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76.7 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66.7 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
61.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
47.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17589 - 27615, n=21)
24097 KRay/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
20615 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)
18752 KRay/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17906 KRay/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
16315 KRay/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
15620 KRay/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
14049 KRay/s -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
12817 KRay/s -38%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8777 KRay/s -57%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (88686 - 137015, n=21)
120602 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
108878 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
102221 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95763 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)
94075 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76434 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69259 Points -36%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64115 Points -41%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
43430 Points -60%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (4362 - 7029, n=21)
6061 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
5324 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4747 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)
4359 MB/s -18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3421 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3247 MB/s -39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3244 MB/s -39%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3016 MB/s -43%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2374 MB/s -55%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
134897 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (125644 - 141385, n=21)
133924 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
133669 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)
109963 Points -18%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
107159 Points -21%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
105541 Points -22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103991 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100136 Points -26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87225 Points -35%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (12334 - 17179, n=21)
14889 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13789 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
12579 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
12458 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)
12237 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9065 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8708 Points -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8694 Points -37%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
6318 Points -54%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (43850 - 69202, n=21)
59821 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
55524 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
51986 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)
48099 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
44710 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37738 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34531 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
31971 Points -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
22194 Points -57%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (89413 - 237881, n=21)
139015 MB/s +35%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
112823 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)
108239 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
102731 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92203 MB/s -10%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83025 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67264 MB/s -35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66845 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66447 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1284 - 1958, n=21)
1755 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1587 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1410 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)
1220 MB/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
997 MB/s -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
879 MB/s -45%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s -47%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
671 MB/s -58%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
651 MB/s -59%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9481 - 15279, n=21)
13066 KRay/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
11242 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)
10153 KRay/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9779 KRay/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8556 KRay/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8448 KRay/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7496 KRay/s -33%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
6913 KRay/s -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
4595 KRay/s -59%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52727 MPixel/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
50110 MPixel/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
50064 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (42994 - 51994, n=21)
48439 MPixel/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48148 MPixel/s -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
39826 MPixel/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37023 MPixel/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)
36937 MPixel/s -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
28318 MPixel/s -43%

Systemets prestanda

Med Nvidias nybörjar-GPU, RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050kan Focus inte få riktigt lika många poäng i PCMark 10-riktmärket som Pro 15. Focus 15 lyckas dock hålla jämna steg med de andra jämförelseenheterna.

Den något snabbare processorn i Focus 15 är återigen märkbar i CrossMark-riktmärket. Granskningsexemplet fick något högre poäng än Pro 15. CrossMark tar hänsyn till grafikkortets prestanda mycket mindre än PCMark.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years)
7594 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
7521 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7273 Points +5%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7271 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7210 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6926 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
6926 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6822 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11549 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
11458 Points +18%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11450 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years)
10732 Points +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10573 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10544 Points +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9726 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
9726 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
10510 Points +9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years)
9729 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9674 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
9674 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9435 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9390 Points -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
9313 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8578 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years)
11483 Points +20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10333 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9658 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9627 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9588 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9585 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
9585 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9527 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -7%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2114 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
2114 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1957 Points -7%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1842 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1569 Points -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1550 Points -27%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1949 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1949 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1877 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1798 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1793 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1517 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1479 Points -24%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2384 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
2384 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2212 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points -14%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1995 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1925 Points -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points -23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1709 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1691 Points -29%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1898 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1878 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
1878 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1749 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1725 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points -9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1495 Points -20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1231 Points -34%
PCMark 10 Score
6926 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
78081 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77899 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76591 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71912 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
61369 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)
59647 MB/s -23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48432 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84974 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84877 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (73998 - 88462, n=21)
82199 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79656 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69534 MB/s -18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)
63620 MB/s -25%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62651 MB/s -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
49994 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92353 MB/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88988 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76412 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75215 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (65472 - 77045, n=21)
73168 MB/s -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71966 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)
61811 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54997 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
106 ns * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns * -15%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -12%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.9 ns * -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)
86.3 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
85 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.1 ns * +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.2 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Vårt latens-test med olika webbläsarflikar, YouTube-uppspelning och Prime95 visar att gaming-laptopen tyvärr har ganska höga DPC-latenstider.

ACPI-drivrutinen, som upprättar anslutningen mellan BIOS/UEFI och Windows, är iögonfallande här. En UEFI-uppdatering förbättrade inte detta.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivrutin
LatencyMon drivrutin
Test av uppspelning på YouTube
Test av uppspelning på YouTube
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs * -188%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6692.6 μs * -167%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4545.9 μs * -81%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2504.7 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2089.1 μs * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
873.9 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Crucial P5 och ledig SSD-plats
Crucial P5 och ledig SSD-plats

Crucial P5 PlusCrucial P5 Plus i testenheten erbjuder bra överföringshastigheter. Det överhettas dock uppenbarligen under längre belastningar.

I vårt långsiktiga test av skrivhastigheten förlorar NVMe SSD tydligt prestanda efter en tid.

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Sequential Read: 4887.18MB/s
Sequential Write: 4286.27MB/s
4K Read: 58.79MB/s
4K Write: 169.41MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2146.9MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2546.59MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.052ms
Access Time Write: 0.025ms
Copy ISO: 4875.34MB/s
Copy Program: 1210.23MB/s
Copy Game: 2943.42MB/s
Score Read: 2712Points
Score Write: 3145Points
Score Total: 7213Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
97 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
82.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
76.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
73.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
72.8 pt
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
 
71.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
54.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
36.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4537 (4515.8min - 4536.98max) MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3972 (3827.09min - 3972.22max) MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=197, last 2 years)
3533 MB/s +4%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (2945 - 3972, n=4)
3456 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3396 (3160.41min - 3395.84max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3005 (2951.71min - 3004.87max) MB/s -12%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2582 (2345.38min - 2582.01max) MB/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1759 (1754.48min - 1759.3max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1759 (1754.48min - 1759.3max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4564 (4538.66min - 4564.03max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4252 (3845.2min - 4251.56max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4251 (4012.48min - 4251.35max) MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (2991 - 4252, n=4)
3864 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=197, last 2 years)
3826 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3530 (3501.32min - 3530max) MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2236 (2165.59min - 2236.4max) MB/s -47%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1554 (1534.35min - 1553.61max) MB/s -63%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1554 (1534.35min - 1553.61max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7026 (6220.99min - 7025.88max) MB/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6868 (5469.58min - 6868.07max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6677 (5800.93min - 6677.12max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6638 (5706.05min - 6638.12max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6601 (5818.24min - 6601.01max) MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (6520 - 6677, n=4)
6597 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=197, last 2 years)
6386 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3886 (3200.77min - 3885.81max) MB/s -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3886 (3200.77min - 3885.81max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5254 (5116min - 5253.79max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5004 (4799.12min - 5003.59max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4914 (4501.33min - 4914.49max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4886 (4877.24min - 4885.61max) MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (4562 - 5004, n=4)
4847 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=197, last 2 years)
4814 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3742 (3596.76min - 3741.95max) MB/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1640 (1630.54min - 1639.84max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1640 (1630.54min - 1639.84max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
93.8 (92.89min - 93.79max) MB/s +48%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
77.9 (72.17min - 77.89max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=197, last 2 years)
67.7 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
64.8 (63.71min - 64.77max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
63.2 (62.77min - 63.18max) MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (49.8 - 64.8, n=4)
57.9 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.1 (52.47min - 53.13max) MB/s -16%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.6 (32.27min - 32.56max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.6 (32.27min - 32.56max) MB/s -48%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (305.92min - 312.76max) MB/s +56%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
280 (275.43min - 280.06max) MB/s +39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
267 (258.43min - 266.75max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=197, last 2 years)
225 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
214 (213.09min - 214.01max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
201 (197.55min - 200.57max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
200 (196.37min - 200.15max) MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (119.3 - 205, n=4)
181.3 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
129.5 (125.88min - 129.52max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
129.5 (125.88min - 129.52max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3650 (3141.55min - 3649.99max) MB/s +86%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3543 (3531.54min - 3542.72max) MB/s +80%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2852 (2785.11min - 2852.4max) MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=197, last 2 years)
2587 MB/s +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2518 (2508.69min - 2518.06max) MB/s +28%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (1350 - 2852, n=4)
2250 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1963 (1812.48min - 1962.92max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1678 (1211.7min - 1678.15max) MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
789 (769.77min - 789.25max) MB/s -60%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
789 (769.77min - 789.25max) MB/s -60%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3594 (3143.37min - 3593.51max) MB/s +35%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3182 (2542.74min - 3182.4max) MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2659 (2629.9min - 2658.76max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2654 (2528.72min - 2653.61max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=197, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s -19%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (601 - 2664, n=4)
2145 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2002 (1558.72min - 2002.2max) MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1509 MB/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
314 (293.25min - 314.3max) MB/s -88%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
314 (293.25min - 314.3max) MB/s -88%
AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8828 Points +22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8118 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
7213 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7141 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6835 Points -5%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (5751 - 7213, n=4)
6506 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6430 Points -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4020 Points -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3315 Points -54%
Score Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3356 Points +24%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3263 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2712 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2549 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2505 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2447 Points -10%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (1890 - 2712, n=4)
2436 Points -10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1726 Points -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1116 Points -59%
Score Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3783 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3504 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3205 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3145 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3115 Points -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (2602 - 3145, n=4)
2857 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2602 Points -17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1735 Points -45%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1456 Points -54%
Seq Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5185 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4887.18 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4685.43 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4493.54 MB/s -8%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (3333 - 4887, n=4)
4097 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3792 MB/s -22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3466 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3333.37 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4526 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4286.27 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4062.33 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3677 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3440.79 MB/s -20%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (2496 - 4286, n=4)
3398 MB/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2772 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2633.33 MB/s -39%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1295 MB/s -70%
4K Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
89.2 MB/s +52%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.14 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.8 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
59.24 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
58.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
57.42 MB/s -2%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (49.3 - 59.2, n=4)
55.2 MB/s -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51.2 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
30.4 MB/s -48%
4K Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
246 MB/s +45%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
225 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +25%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
206.22 MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
186.47 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
169.41 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
165.94 MB/s -2%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (149.1 - 177.9, n=4)
165.6 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
137.5 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2748 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2733.5 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2156.47 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2146.9 MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (1358 - 2205, n=4)
1967 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1938 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1920.85 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1296 MB/s -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
739 MB/s -66%
4K-64 Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3084 MB/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2973.32 MB/s +17%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2592.88 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2546.59 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2539 MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (2078 - 2608, n=4)
2351 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2172.75 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1468 MB/s -42%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
954 MB/s -63%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.079 ms * -52%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.061 ms * -17%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (0.03 - 0.085, n=4)
0.055 ms * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05358 ms * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.053 ms * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.052 ms *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.039 ms * +25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.029 ms * +44%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.018 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.139 ms * -456%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.108 ms * -332%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04643 ms * -86%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.025 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.024 ms * +4%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
  (0.023 - 0.025, n=4)
0.024 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.018 ms * +28%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.017 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø5260 (1672.91-6655)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6581 (5718.09-6666.34)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø2344 (298.22-7080.82)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø6485 (5652.89-6541.77)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6770 (4434.37-6888.93)

Grafikkort

I vårt Focus 15-urval är grafikkretsens prestanda cirka 15 till 20% lägre än förRTX 4060 i Pro 15. En titt på Aorus 15X ASF visar också var prestandan hos Focus 15 i kombination med en RTX 4070 kan ligga. Eftersom alla tre bärbara datorer har motsvarande TGP-värden bör prestanda vara jämförbara här när de bärbara datorerna är utrustade med samma grafikchip.

Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU är klassificerad till upp till 140 W TGP. Detta värde är högst upp i de TGP-konfigurationer som rekommenderas av Nvidia. Detta ger dock inte grafikkortet någon fördel jämfört med de andra bärbara speldatorerna i varje riktmärke.

Grafikchipet kan väljas direkt i Focus 15 via Optimus- och MUX-omkopplare - Core i9: s iGPU är också tillgänglig. Med detta sagt är Intel UHD Graphics 770 med 32 EUs i 13900HX ett av de svagare grafikalternativen som Intel erbjuder i nuvarande processorer. Således kan den bara utföra grundläggande uppgifter.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
81.5 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
75.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
72.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
71.3 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
56.8 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
53.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
49.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40568 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36220 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
31690 Points +3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
30959 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
30877 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13339 - 32642, n=36)
28539 Points -8%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24092 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
22469 Points -27%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
20485 Points -34%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29509 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
26769 Points +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
23443 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
22899 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
22480 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13591 - 24007, n=34)
21045 Points -6%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
17505 Points -22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
17061 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16174 Points -28%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)
12091 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
10429 Points +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
8692 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
8626 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
8500 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (5107 - 9040, n=34)
7763 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6258 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5859 Points -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5675 Points -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
159354 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=140, last 2 years)
136003 Points +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (51138 - 161152, n=24)
126241 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
122538 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
105057 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
91970 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
65080 Points -38%
3DMark 11 Performance
27613 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
134251 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
52615 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20964 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
9236 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds *
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
31 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (25 - 37, n=35)
29 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
27 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
27 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
24 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)
23.1 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
62 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
61 Seconds *
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
57 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 175, n=35)
56.7 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
53 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
52 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)
39.2 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
586 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
441 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
420 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (243 - 907, n=35)
400 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
386 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
314 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
263 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
243 Seconds *
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=129, last 2 years)
2035 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1744 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1503 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1465 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (1021 - 1588, n=20)
1419 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1364 mpaths
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1123 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=132, last 2 years)
1466 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1189 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1079 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1075 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (735 - 1123, n=20)
1022 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
898 mpaths
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
858 mpaths
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=233, last 2 years)
121704 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
106180 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
87670 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
87554 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
86024 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (63538 - 90075, n=33)
82182 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
77339 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
71151 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
70438 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)
116331 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
93524 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
83483 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
81622 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (66574 - 84452, n=12)
76353 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
69452 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
69227 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
66944 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
66574 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=76, last 2 years)
118162 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
83663 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (60815 - 86892, n=16)
78903 Points

* ... smaller is better

Prestanda för spel

Som tidigare nämnts kan grafiken hanteras antingen av Intel-chipet eller av Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050. Vi ville faktiskt använda dual-GPU-läget med automatisk växling för alla riktmärken. Det automatiska valet fungerade dock inte bra i alla fall. Därför kördes våra spelbenchmarks i enbart dGPU-läge.

Bland jämförelseenheterna med RTX 4050 uppvisar Focus 15 den bästa spelprestandan. Med undantag för The Witcher 3 , producerar RTX 4050 något högre fps än vanligt här. Resultaten frånDota 2 Reborn och X-Plane 11kan verka iögonfallande. Focus 15 uppnår fler fps i båda spelen änPro 15 med den starkare RTX 4060.

Men båda spelen begränsas nu mer av CPU-prestandan än av GPU-prestandan. Detta blir särskilt tydligt när du jämför prestandan hos Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 med Acer Swift Go. Båda enheterna använderIntel Core i7-13700H med liknande TDP-värden och kan visa liknande fps i Dota 2 Reborn.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) -1!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
91.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79.4 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
75.9 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68.6 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62.9 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52.1 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
20.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +150%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)
117.4 fps +83%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.2 (79min, 80P1) fps +28%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.7 (63min, 65P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps -6%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59.5 (55min, 55P1) fps -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.3 fps -73%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)
107.7 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.2 (3.65min, 71.4P1) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93.7 (3.52min, 58.8P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.2 (4.55min, 55.6P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.5 (2.82min, 58.8P1) fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
74.3 (2.72min, 47.6P1) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.3 (21.8min, 35.7P1) fps -30%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.6 (7.36min, 25.6P1) fps -35%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.9 (2.26min, 6.17P1) fps -88%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)
111.7 fps +31%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
85 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.8 fps -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.5 fps -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.1 fps -23%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.5 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.9 fps -33%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.7 fps -79%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)
207 fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.3 (43.8min, 135P1) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
151.2 (35.6min, 115.5P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
148.7 (20.2min, 114.3P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
147 fps -3%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
117 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.9 (65min, 77.7P1) fps -31%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100.2 (67.8min, 76.1P1) fps -34%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.7 (5.6min, 9.49P1) fps -81%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
160.7 (136.8min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
154.3 (130.7min) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)
143.2 fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.5 (121.3min) fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
129.1 (114min) fps -20%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
123.9 (102.5min) fps -23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
115.8 (102.7min) fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.5 (63.9min) fps -54%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
61.7 (53.9min) fps -62%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
117 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)
102.3 fps -13%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
98.2 fps -16%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.6 fps -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79 fps -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.8 fps -34%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
70.7 fps -40%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.1 fps -66%
låg med. hög ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 185.6 175.8 93.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 64
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 193.2 181.6 175.8 160.7 106.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 114.1 85 58.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 165.2 144.9 117 108.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 141 131 123 86
Strange Brigade (2018) 417 218 175.4 151.2
F1 22 (2022) 244 234 174.7 55.7
F1 23 (2023) 259 235 164.5 45.3 36.9

Utsläpp: Varm höger handflata vila

Utsläpp av buller

Focus 15 har fläktljudnivåer som är typiska för bärbara speldatorer. Med upp till 55 dB(A) uppmätt på ett avstånd av 15 cm blir testenheten ibland obehagligt högljudd i Performance-läget.

I underhållningsläget ligger ljudnivån runt 50 dB(A). Du kan också köra notebooken nästan ljudlöst med viloläget, men då förlorar du en betydande del av datorkraften.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
24 / 25.14 / 35.14 dB(A)
Hög belastning
55.93 / 56.34 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.128.433.12530.730.630.73134.235.434.24025.630.125.65023.331.223.36327.72527.78029.717.829.710025.722.425.712523222316026.917.926.920027.92027.925028.415.628.431529.215.529.240032.412.232.450035.19.635.163037.58.537.580035.98.535.91000408.240125042.38.842.3160041.89.441.8200042.610.142.6250046.110.446.1315047.710.847.7400048.311.248.3500046.111.346.1630044.911.644.9800043.11243.11000040.711.940.71250037.911.637.9160003410.834SPL56.323.156.3N100.510median 37.9median 11.3median 37.9Delta7.92.97.934.928.434.938.330.638.339.535.439.526.930.126.933.731.233.733253327.517.827.531.922.431.928.52228.52717.92730.32030.330.615.630.630.715.530.733.612.233.637.19.637.138.18.538.1378.53738.28.238.241.68.841.642.59.442.542.210.142.243.210.443.243.710.843.744.611.244.642.911.342.941.311.641.338.91238.934.111.934.128.811.628.824.210.824.253.623.153.68.80.58.8median 37.1median 11.3median 37.15.72.95.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Asus TUF A15 FA507
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Noise
7%
20%
13%
1%
12%
6%
off / environment *
24
24
-0%
23.3
3%
24
-0%
24.8
-3%
25
-4%
24
-0%
Idle Minimum *
24
24
-0%
23.3
3%
24
-0%
28.2
-18%
26
-8%
24
-0%
Idle Average *
25.14
24
5%
23.3
7%
24
5%
31.8
-26%
27
-7%
24
5%
Idle Maximum *
35.14
24
32%
23.3
34%
24
32%
31.8
10%
28
20%
35.71
-2%
Load Average *
55.93
53.65
4%
29.6
47%
37.71
33%
38.2
32%
40
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.62
53.53
2%
43
21%
45.75
16%
50
8%
39
29%
40.22
26%
Load Maximum *
56.34
53.65
5%
43
24%
54.55
3%
52.2
7%
41
27%
51.93
8%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Gränssnitt vid installation av de testade spelen
Gränssnitt vid installation av de testade spelen

Yttemperaturerna på den här bärbara speldatorn är inte alls svala. Vi uppmätte hotspots på 51 °C, men dessa är lyckligtvis långt borta från de vanliga beröringspunkterna.

Den bärbara datorn blir dock också mycket varm på höger handledsstöd under användning. Eftersom du vanligtvis använder en extern mus för spel, är detta förmodligen inte en stor sak för högerhänta. Det vänstra handledsstödet och tangenterna W, A, S, D förblir svala.

Även den längre belastningen av den installerade NVMe SSD verkar vara tillräckligt för att öka temperaturen på handledsstödet avsevärt. Den nådde nästan 46 °C när vi installerade våra testspel.

 40 °C51 °C36 °C 
 39 °C46 °C39 °C 
 30 °C33 °C36 °C 
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 38.9 °C
42 °C53 °C49 °C
34 °C44 °C35 °C
32 °C24 °C28 °C
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39 °C | Rumstemperatur 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).


Witcher 3 - Överst
Witcher 3 - Överst
The Witcher 3 - Botten
The Witcher 3 - Botten
Witcher 3 - Strömförsörjning
Witcher 3 - Strömförsörjning
Stresstest - Topp
Stresstest - Topp
Stresstest - botten
Stresstest - botten
Stresstest - Strömförsörjning
Stresstest - Strömförsörjning
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF A15 FA507
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Heat
-3%
9%
-8%
9%
18%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
50
2%
48.9
4%
47
8%
46.4
9%
41
20%
42
18%
Maximum Bottom *
53
50
6%
44.6
16%
48
9%
49
8%
44
17%
52
2%
Idle Upper Side *
29
33
-14%
27.1
7%
35
-21%
26.5
9%
23
21%
26
10%
Idle Bottom *
30
32
-7%
27.5
8%
38
-27%
26.6
11%
26
13%
27
10%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

XMG Focus 15 klarar stresstestet med Prime95 och Furmark vid höga temperaturer med konstant prestanda. Vi kunde inte se någon minskning av CPU- eller GPU-klockan efter boostfasen.

I gengäld är Core i9:s temperaturer relativt höga på cirka 90 °C. Men när vi tittar på loggarna från stresstestet måste vi notera att de värden som Schenker anger inte upprätthålls i det långa loppet.

Efter cirka 10 minuter i stresstestet ligger CPU-prestandan på cirka 60 W och GPU-effektförbrukningen på 100 W. Under tiden växlas 15 W Dynamic Boost mellan processorn och grafikchipet då och då.

Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest av logg
Stresstest av logg

Högtalare

Högtalarna i Focus 15 presenterar mellanregistret och diskanten relativt bra, men kan knappast leverera någon bas. Focus 15 låter därför lite bättre än Pro 15.

Om de inbyggda högtalarna inte räcker till kan du alltid använda externa enheter som ansluts via Bluetooth eller 3,5 mm-uttaget.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.328.434.32539.330.639.33144.735.444.74030.330.130.35030.131.230.16331.22531.28027.517.827.510027.822.427.812521.82221.816025.117.925.120029.92029.925034.615.634.631542.915.542.940051.312.251.350056.29.656.263059.48.559.480061.28.561.2100067.48.267.4125065.58.865.5160066.49.466.4200066.710.166.7250067.110.467.1315067.510.867.5400066.311.266.3500066.611.366.6630062.711.662.7800063.41263.41000058.811.958.81250058.311.658.31600054.410.854.4SPL77.423.177.4N37.80.537.8median 59.4median 11.3median 59.4Delta12.42.912.430.728.430.734.730.634.735.435.435.430.630.130.62531.22534.32534.331.417.831.43122.43136.32236.343.217.943.245.52045.548.115.648.149.615.549.65112.25157.29.657.264.88.564.8648.56464.48.264.464.58.864.556.99.456.960.310.160.359.710.459.758.310.858.361.811.261.855.611.355.655.211.655.254.11254.153.211.953.253.511.653.546.410.846.472.523.172.5300.530median 55.2median 11.3median 55.26.72.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering: Energikrävande bärbar gamingdator

Energiförbrukning

Schenker XMG Focus 15 kommer med en energihunger av klassstandard. Inkluderat är ett stort nätaggregat som kan leverera upp till 280 W.

Intressant nog är topplastförbrukningen högre i Focus 15 än i Pro 15, så nätaggregatets effekt utnyttjas också fullt ut.

När datorn körs på en extern bildskärm är den till och med stabil över 280 W i stresstestet. Med den interna bildskärmen sjönk energiförbrukningen lite på kort tid.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.06 / 1.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 11.4 / 16.7 / 25.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 139 / 280 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-39%
40%
41%
47%
64%
54%
24%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
11.4
21.6
-89%
8
30%
8.5
25%
8.4
26%
3
74%
7.4
35%
9.98 ?(2 - 21.1, n=28)
12%
Idle Average *
16.7
29
-74%
12.1
28%
10.2
39%
11.5
31%
5
70%
8.3
50%
15 ?(5 - 32, n=28)
10%
Idle Maximum *
25.8
42.7
-66%
12.5
52%
11.3
56%
11.9
54%
11
57%
8.7
66%
Load Average *
139
190
-37%
74.9
46%
84
40%
84.9
39%
72
48%
76
45%
Witcher 3 ultra *
265
189
29%
136.6
48%
128
52%
83.6
68%
69.7
74%
70
74%
Load Maximum *
280
269
4%
185
34%
189
32%
104.2
63%
108
61%
132
53%
179.8 ?(104.2 - 280, n=28)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø265 (247.89-312.51)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø188.8 (168.85-204.21)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø225 (193.43-280.44)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø215 (195.91-268.73)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.7 (7.552-41.912)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø29 (13.104-57.116)

Power consumption: External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø150.6 (139.29-279.04)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø266 (254.05-270.59)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø136.3 (87.91-261.8)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø280 (274.94-286.3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø244 (237.77-250.89)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.9 (15.02-45.958)

Batteriets livslängd

73 Wh batteri i Focus 15
73 Wh batteri i Focus 15

I det praktiska Wi-Fi-testet för webbsurfning uppmätte vi nästan sex timmars drifttid. Därmed ligger testenheten bara två minuter under den genomsnittliga bärbara speldatorn.

Under tiden kan spelare hantera betydligt längre drifttider i batteriläge. Batteriets kapacitet på 73 Wh töms dock ganska snabbt.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
5tim 55min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 17min
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus TUF A15 FA507
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
23%
37%
-6%
-10%
50%
24%
7%
WiFi v1.3
355
343.1
-3%
701
97%
260
-27%
462
30%
576
62%
457
29%
Load
77
115
49%
59
-23%
89
16%
39
-49%
106
38%
92
19%
H.264
747
264
571
803
Reader / Idle
1093
678

För

+ kraftfull hårdvara
+ 240 Hz QHD-skärm
+ stort urval av portar
+ många konfigurations- och uppgraderingsalternativ

Emot

- höga temperaturer och volym
- ingen USB-C PowerDelivery
- långsam microSD-kortläsare
- hög energiförbrukning

Omdöme: XMG fångar essensen av spelande

XMG Focus 15: Granskningsenhet tillhandahållen av Schenker
XMG Focus 15: Granskningsenhet tillhandahållen av Schenker

Om du vill ha en 15,6-tums bärbar dator med en aktuell Nvidia GPU från Schenker eller XMG, har du valet mellanXMG Apex 15 Max och Focus samt Schenker Key och Media. Den XMG Pro 15 och XMG Focus 15 är mycket nära varandra i testet.

Focus 15 fokuserar på grunderna. Den bärbara speldatorn övertygar främst med högpresterande datorhårdvara. DenIntel Core i9-13900HX och Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 arbetar på en mycket högpresterande nivå. Medan detta resulterar i höga poäng i riktmärken, bidrar det också till höga yttemperaturer, högljudda fläktar och kortare batteritider jämfört med många av dess samtida, som Asus TUF A15.

Huruvida chassit måste ha mycket metall som Pro 15 eller om det kan vara tillverkat av plast är en smaksak. Från utsidan ser Pro 15 och Focus 15 väldigt lika ut. Granskningsexemplaret erbjuder dock mindre anslutningsmöjligheter och saknar en USB Type-C-port med Power Delivery.

XMG Focus 15 uppfyller de grundläggande kraven för en bärbar speldator. Tack vare de många konfigurationsalternativen kan den anpassas till användarens behov.

Precis som med Pro 15 finns det bara ett fåtal negativa punkter i Focus 15. Detta beror på att alla nackdelar som den bärbara datorn visar är typiska för dess pris- och prestandaklass.

Jämfört med andra billigare bärbara speldatorer som Asus TUF A15 eller MSI Katana 15, den extremt kraftfulla Core i9-13900HX och den bra QHD-skärmen på XMG Focus sticker ut positivt.

Pris och tillgänglighet

XMG Focus 15 kan konfigureras fritt hos Bestware. Två skärmalternativ, tre GPU-alternativ och flera minneskombinationer finns tillgängliga. I den absoluta grundkonfigurationen, med endast 8 GB arbetsminne och utan SSD eller Windows, är instegspriset cirka 1 440 euro (~ 1 618 USD).

För en konfiguration med Full HD-skärm, 16 GB arbetsminne och en 1 TB Samsung SSD tar Bestware ut cirka 1 560 euro. Vår testkonfiguration kostar ca 300 euro mer. Om du planerar att gå hela vägen och välja de dyraste komponenterna kan du förvänta dig att spendera mer än 3 500 euro för den här bärbara datorn.

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) - 07/10/2023 v7
Marc Herter

Design
81 / 98 → 83%
Tangentbord
86%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
70 / 80 → 87%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Batteri
68 / 95 → 72%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
92%
Programprestanda
94%
Temperatur
84 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
64%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Medel
76%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23) bärbar dator för budgetspel: Mycket prestanda till ett lägre pris än Pro 15
Marc Herter, 2023-07-17 (Update: 2023-07-17)