XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) laptop recension: För bullerresistenta gamers

Name: SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
Brand: SCHENKER

AMD möter Nvidia. XMG Apex 17 är en bärbar spellaptop på 17 tum från Schenker Technologies som bygger på en stark Ryzen CPU och en kraftfull GeForce GPU. Den största höjdpunkten är det löstagbara batteriet, den största nackdelen är den höga ljudnivån.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/14/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

Som Schenker Technologies vet kan enheten konfigureras i stor utsträckning i den interna webbshopen bestware.com. Processorn är antingen en Ryzen 7 5800H eller en Ryzen 9 5900HXär grafikkortet en GeForce RTX 3060 med 6 GB VRAM eller ett GeForce RTX 3070 med 8 GB VRAM. I båda fallen är det en matt 144 Hz IPS-skärm som tar hand om bildåtergivningen. DDR4-arbetsminnet sträcker sig från 8 till maximalt 64 GB (2x SO-DIMM). I övrigt rymmer 17-tumshöljet upp till två M.2 SSD-diskar (PCIe 3.0 x4). Köparna kan också påverka WLAN-modulen, tangentbordets språk och operativsystemet.

Priset för Apex 17 börjar på 1 479 euro (~1 692 dollar). Vår testkonfiguration med Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070, 32 GB dubbelkanals RAM-minne och 1 TB SSD skulle för närvarande kosta över 2 000 euro (~2 289 dollar).

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 (XMG Apex Serie)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1560 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, ForceWare 472.12, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, two slots (both in use)

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, Full-HD, FreeSync, glansig: nej, 144 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, NVMe, two M.2-slots (one in use)

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC293 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 Headset, 1 Mic

Nätverk

Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 32.4 x 396 x 262

Batteri

49 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webbkamera: HD

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230 W Power Supply, Control Center, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.56 kg, Strömförsörjning: 688 g

Pris

2079 EUR

Länkar

SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Konkurrenterna till Apex 17 inkluderar andra 17-tums bärbara datorer med RTX 3070, som t.ex Razer Blade 17, den MSI GP76, den Acer Nitro 5 AN517 och den egna XMG Neo 17. Alla dessa bärbara datorer finns med i tabellerna som jämförelseenheter

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.4 %	11/2021	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	32.4 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 %		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
89.4 %		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 %	03/2021	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.3 %	09/2021	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	24.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Eftersom Apex 17 är nästan identiskt konstruerad med den nyligen testade Gigabyte A7 X1 (Clevo barebone) kommer vi inte att gå in närmare på höljet, utrustningen och inmatningsenheterna i den här artikeln. Du kan hitta motsvarande information i den länkade recensionen.

Size comparison

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 DIN A4 ❌

Kommunikation

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s +62%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1310 MBit/s +57%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1239 (1143^min - 1322^max) MBit/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s +36%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s +32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921	845 (560^min - 969^max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	835 (582^min - 967^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1491 (1415^min - 1540^max) MBit/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s +32%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s +22%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1038 (584^min - 1179^max) MBit/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921	140 (33^min - 562^max) MBit/s -87%

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (584-1179)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (582-967)

Webbkamera

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21: 9.71 ∆E min: 2.78 - max: 14.05 ∆E

Visa

Skärmen som används skiljer sig från A7 X1 trots identiska grundspecifikationer (Full HD, 144 Hz, IPS). I stället för en AU Optronics-panel använder Schenkers bärbara dator en panel från LG Philips, som tyvärr inte riktigt matchar Gigabytes motsvarighet. Förutom ljusstyrkan är även kontrasten svagare. Ett snitt på 285 cd/m² och 823:1 är ganska lågt i prisklassen runt 2 000 euro (~2 289 dollar). QHD-panelen i XMG Neo 17 med 381 cd/m² och 1108:1 visar hur det kan bli bättre.

Å andra sidan finns det pluspoäng för den korta svarstiden och det hyfsade färgutrymmet. 96 % sRGB är helt tillräckligt för en bärbar dator för spel. Färgåtergivningen kan heller knappast kritiseras, även om förbättringar fortfarande kan uppnås via kalibrering (vår ICC-fil är länkad nedan). Betraktningsvinkelstabiliteten ligger på den typiska IPS-nivån, så den är bra


294 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	289 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	292 cd/m²	284 cd/m²
275 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	275 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 294 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 292 cd/m²
Kontrast: 823:1 (Svärta: 0.355 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.298

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		7%	8%	1%	-43%
Display P3 Coverage	65	70.5 8%	71.7 10%	64.7 0%	36.7 -44%
sRGB Coverage	95.9	99.5 4%	98.8 3%	96.4 1%	55.3 -42%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.8	71.8 9%	73.6 12%	66.9 2%	37.9 -42%
Response Times		-4%	44%	24%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -11%	4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6) 72%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 51%	18 ?(8, 10) -18%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(6, 4.4)	10 ?(4, 6) 4%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 15%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -4%	14 ?(7, 7) -35%
PWM Frequency				24510 ?(39)
Screen		15%	-22%	22%	-19%
Brightness middle	292	410 40%	323.3 11%	328 12%	282 -3%
Brightness	285	381 34%	315 11%	314 10%	255 -11%
Brightness Distribution	94	88 -6%	91 -3%	87 -7%	85 -10%
Black Level *	0.355	0.37 -4%	0.33 7%	0.29 18%	0.24 32%
Contrast	823	1108 35%	980 19%	1131 37%	1175 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.47	2.55 -3%	4.59 -86%	1.93 22%	5.91 -139%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.69	4.33 50%	10.82 -25%	4.94 43%	10.98 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.96	1.28 -33%	1.4 -46%	0.68 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	3.4 21%	7.9 -84%	2.8 35%	5.85 -36%
Gamma	2.298 ^96%	2.275 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	2.18 ^101%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	7000 ^93%	6637 ^98%	5941 ^109%	7023 ^93%	7372 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		72		67	35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		95		89	55
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 11%	10% / -6%	16% / 18%	-30% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Provningsvillkor

Olika systeminställningar kan göras i det förinstallerade kontrollcentret, som kommer från barebone-tillverkaren Clevo. Dessa inkluderar bl.a. fläktkontrollen och prestandaprofilen. För att få ut maximal effekt ur Apex 17 använde vi prestandaläget för våra tester (endast batterimätningarna utfördes i underhållningsläget). Vi lämnade inställningen för fläkthastigheten på standardalternativet Automatic.

Obs: För att förhindra att Windows 11, som var installerat på testenheten, skulle påverka benchmarkresultaten negativt, väntade vi på AMD:s senaste moderkortsdrivrutin och en viss Microsoft-uppdatering (nyckelord L3-cache-bugg).

Effekt

Det spelar ingen roll vilken CPU eller GPU du väljer för konfigurationen: Apex 17 tenderar att ligga i det övre segmentet. För att vara tillräckligt förberedd för framtiden rekommenderar vi 16 GB RAM och minst 500 GB SSD. Grundkonfigurationen är extremt mager i detta avseende (8 GB & 250 GB).

Processor

Ryzen 7 5800H som installerades i recensionsexemplaret är en extremt snabb processor med åtta kärnor som kan bearbeta upp till 16 trådar parallellt via SMT. Det fanns inga obehagliga överraskningar i vår benchmarkbana. Cinebench-resultaten ligger alla på en hög nivå och kan hävda sig mot konkurrenterna. Prestandan förblev också ganska stabil i Loop-testet (jämför graf)

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance Test

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1865 (1855.12-1943.35)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2006 (1963-2025.09)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	85.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	65.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	63.1 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H	62.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	60.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	60.6 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG ^-2! Intel Core i7-10750H	46.3 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19514 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12693 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	12316 (11587.2^min - 12316.3^max) Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12262 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29)	11794 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11739 Points -8%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1813 Points +27%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	1504 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1431 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1429 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29)	1410 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1403 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7419 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4925 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4742 Points -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	4724 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31)	4568 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4510 Points -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	2998 Points -39%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	698 Points +25%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	560 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	556 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30)	550 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	540 Points -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	460 Points -18%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3089 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2108 (2036.87^min - 2108.48^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2086 (2064.09^min - 2085.83^max) Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2025 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28)	1963 Points -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	1943 (1855.12^min - 1943.35^max) Points -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1258 (1113.24^min - 1257.82^max) Points -40%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	268 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	233 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	229 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29)	228 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	227 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points -15%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * -48%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29)	260 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	256 Seconds * -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	250 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	245 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	242 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)	199.8 Seconds * +17%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	76978 MIPS +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	59986 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	57284 MIPS -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	54596 MIPS -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28)	54117 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	52870 MIPS -12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	36161 MIPS -40%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6122 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5590 MIPS +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5588 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5535 MIPS
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	5472 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29)	5472 MIPS -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	5236 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13567 Points +50%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	9062 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8035 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28)	7793 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7472 Points -18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	6392 Points -29%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)	1808 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1505 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1464 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28)	1450 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1354 Points -10%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1304 Points -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.2 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	16 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.6 fps -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.1 fps -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	15.1 fps -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)	14.5 fps -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	77.6 s * -59%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29)	64.3 s * -32%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	50.9 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	50.8 s * -4%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.2 s * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	48.7 s *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	44.1 s * +9%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	0.592 sec * -16%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.555 sec * -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)	0.525 sec * -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.514 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.512 sec * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.511 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4699 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2086 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

162 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

233 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	85.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	82.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	81 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	78.9 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	50 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 ^-9! Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)	18585 KRay/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14927 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14420 KRay/s -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14345 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29)	13933 KRay/s -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	9268 KRay/s -38%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94105 Points
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)	93302 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92324 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	90996 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29)	87478 Points -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	45746 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)	4316 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3223 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3199 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3100 MB/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29)	2979 MB/s -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2170 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)	109168 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	98276 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	97095 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29)	95793 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	95346 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	72096 Points -26%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)	12175 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11871 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11720 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11633 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29)	11517 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7581 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	51658 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	50532 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	50136 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29)	48035 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)	47772 Points -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	22957 Points -56%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	124712 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	123873 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	122777 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29)	114346 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)	107334 MB/s -14%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	28667 MB/s -77%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)	1208 MB/s +52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	803 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	795 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	793 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29)	768 MB/s -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	557 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)	10062 KRay/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7617 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7508 KRay/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7439 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29)	7343 KRay/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	5050 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)	36679 MPixel/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	25421 MPixel/s
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	21748 MPixel/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	19926 MPixel/s -22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29)	17883 MPixel/s -30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	15341 MPixel/s -40%

Systemprestanda

Systemprestanda ser också bra ut. Apex 17 tar också en av topplaceringarna här, även om de konkurrerande enheterna fortfarande testades med Windows 10, vilket kan innebära vissa avvikelser.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7580 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7311 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6972 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6717 - 6983, n=6)	6846 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	6749 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	6017 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10832 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10718 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	10226 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	10131 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9548 - 10226, n=6)	10028 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8652 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9716 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	9205 Points +1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9149 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9136 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8849 - 9514, n=6)	9133 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8657 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11450 Points +16%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10701 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9847 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8948 - 10389, n=6)	9523 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	8948 Points -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7893 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		6972 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)	59222 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	44180 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	41437 MB/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29)	39512 MB/s -11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	35427 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)	63097 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46438 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	45431 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29)	44498 MB/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	40473 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)	61557 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	47022 MB/s
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	41034 MB/s -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29)	37769 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37145 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * -17%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29)	83.3 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.3 ns *
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	57.2 ns * +29%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjningar

Det finns utrymme för förbättringar när det gäller latenstider. Enligt verktyget LatencyMon är Apex 17 inte riktigt lämplig för ljud- och/eller videoredigering i realtid i sitt leveranstillstånd, om sådana tillämpningsscenarier planeras (bör endast gälla för mycket få köpare)

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1454 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1164 μs * +20%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1082 μs * +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	395.1 μs * +73%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Vår testenhet hade en 1 TB SSD från Samsung ombord som masslagring. Som vanligt levererar 970 Evo Plus en alltigenom lyckad prestanda - vare sig det gäller läsning eller skrivning. Om du vill utöka lagringsutrymmet senare finns det en ledig M.2-plats under huven

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	93.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	66.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	65.9 pt
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	63.4 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	47.8 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	32.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=197, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3167 (2857.53^min - 3167.08^max) MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2874 (2868.48^min - 2874.36^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2818 (2809.93^min - 2818.13^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (338 - 2999, n=15)	2475 MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1156 (1142.97^min - 1155.53^max) MB/s -59%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1089 (1045.84^min - 1088.76^max) MB/s -61%
seq write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3840 (3826.15^min - 3839.76^max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=197, last 2 years)	3828 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2993 (2988.23^min - 2992.64^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2898 (2889.78^min - 2897.77^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (209 - 3244, n=15)	2645 MB/s -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	978 (969.51^min - 977.62^max) MB/s -66%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	548 (546.68^min - 547.73^max) MB/s -81%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6653 (6275.76^min - 6652.91^max) MB/s +87%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=197, last 2 years)	6385 MB/s +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3558 (3389^min - 3557.8^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3558 (3270.93^min - 3558.01^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (456 - 3562, n=15)	3291 MB/s -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1957 (251.74^min - 1957.34^max) MB/s -45%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1654 (1469.05^min - 1653.6^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4921 (4905.7^min - 4920.56^max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=197, last 2 years)	4807 MB/s +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3248 (3242^min - 3248.28^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3226 (3218.01^min - 3226.42^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (202 - 3327, n=15)	3081 MB/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	976 (973.29^min - 976.37^max) MB/s -70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	548 (546.94^min - 547.99^max) MB/s -83%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	78.2 (77.75^min - 78.19^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=197, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	59 (58.85^min - 58.97^max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	52.2 (51.61^min - 52.19^max) MB/s -33%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (13.7 - 78.2, n=15)	50.9 MB/s -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	46.2 (46.1^min - 46.22^max) MB/s -41%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	44.2 (43.82^min - 44.16^max) MB/s -43%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=197, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	182 (180.97^min - 181.81^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	178 (177.49^min - 178.18^max) MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	170 (169.81^min - 170.42^max) MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (39.8 - 232, n=15)	160.1 MB/s -12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	138 (137.1^min - 137.96^max) MB/s -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	131 (129.84^min - 130.68^max) MB/s -28%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4180 (4177.07^min - 4179.97^max) MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3256 (3252.29^min - 3256.47^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=197, last 2 years)	2586 MB/s -21%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (97.3 - 3256, n=15)	1929 MB/s -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1147 (1144.15^min - 1146.92^max) MB/s -65%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	412 (411.05^min - 412.02^max) MB/s -87%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	314 (313.08^min - 313.7^max) MB/s -90%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 (3290.66^min - 3545.47^max) MB/s +275%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2637 (2632.02^min - 2637.43^max) MB/s +179%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (140.4 - 2685, n=15)	2317 MB/s +145%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=197, last 2 years)	2154 MB/s +128%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	978 (971.43^min - 977.69^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	945 (941.72^min - 944.77^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	547 (544.27^min - 547.32^max) MB/s -42%

AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8874 Points +70%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=185, last 2 years)	6828 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	5842 Points +12%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (4450 - 6452, n=18)	5812 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5429 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5218 Points
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	2130 Points -59%
Score Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3300 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2708 Points
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=185, last 2 years)	2502 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2186 Points -19%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1846 - 2708, n=18)	2171 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1773 Points -35%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	680 Points -75%
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3963 Points +249%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=185, last 2 years)	3114 Points +175%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2759 Points +143%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2546 Points +125%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1134 - 2923, n=18)	2539 Points +124%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1134 Points
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1121 Points -1%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5302 MB/s +79%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=185, last 2 years)	4959 MB/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3020 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2964 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2891 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (2173 - 3002, n=18)	2800 MB/s -6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1659 MB/s -44%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3977 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=185, last 2 years)	3665 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2692 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2687 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (2469 - 2858, n=18)	2633 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2631 MB/s -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	921 MB/s -66%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	71.1 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=185, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	60.3 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	55 MB/s -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	52.6 MB/s -26%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (27.9 - 71.1, n=18)	51.2 MB/s -28%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	51 MB/s -28%
4K Write
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=185, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	171.6 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	157.7 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	148.7 MB/s -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	134.9 MB/s -14%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (86.3 - 188.1, n=18)	131.2 MB/s -17%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	120.1 MB/s -24%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2715 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2340 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=185, last 2 years)	1934 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1845 MB/s -21%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1579 - 2340, n=18)	1839 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1410 MB/s -40%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	463.5 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3416 MB/s +382%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=185, last 2 years)	2540 MB/s +259%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2324 MB/s +228%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (708 - 2512, n=18)	2144 MB/s +203%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2142 MB/s +203%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	909 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	708 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3571 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3227 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 618 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 359.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2826 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2889 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 76.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 172 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Grafikkort

Prestandan hos Nvidias förstärkargeneration beror i hög grad på inställd TGP. Schenker ger RTX 3070 hela 140 watt i prestandaläge (inklusive 15 watt Dynamic Boost), vilket är det maximala värdet för denna GPU. Därför är det inte förvånande att Apex 17 får ett ganska bra resultat i de grafiska riktmärkena. Analogt med CPU- och systemprestanda gör sig 17-tummaren också bekväm i den övre tredjedelen av testfältet här

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	78.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	66.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)	40451 Points +8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	38275 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37405 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	36224 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54)	32331 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27613 Points -26%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)	29442 Points +8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	29128 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27968 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27138 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27114 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52)	24302 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	20874 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)	12060 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10898 Points +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10850 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10797 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10595 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53)	9300 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7901 Points -27%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=154, last 2 years)	7720 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6540 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6427 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6391 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1640 - 6542, n=39)	5689 Points -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4835 Points -26%

3DMark 11 Performance		28685 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47429 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24012 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		10640 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Spelprestanda

I den ursprungliga Full HD-upplösningen 1 920 x 1 080 kan RTX 3070 visa alla aktuella spel med maximal detaljrikedom. Även särskilt krävande spel når vanligtvis över 60 FPS. Apex 17 skulle också fortfarande klara sig bra med en extern QHD-skärm

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)	220 fps +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	204.8 (183^min) fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	187 (5.75^min, 70.6^P0.1, 128^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	174 (147^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (122.1 - 207, n=34)	168 fps -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	135 (16.7^min, 43^P0.1, 83.5^P1) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)	116.8 fps +17%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H	109 (83^min) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	101 fps +1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	100.6 (94^min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	100 (85^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52)	91.8 fps -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	78.4 (34.9^min, 42.9^P0.1, 53.9^P1) fps -22%

Under uthållighetstestet med Witcher 3 (1 timme @FHD/Ultra) fanns inga avvikelser. Bildfrekvensen förblev ganska stabil under hela perioden, som den ska.

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø99.8 (95-102)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø97.3 (86-100)

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø93.6 (89-99)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø107 (96-112)

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø78.2 (75-81)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)		172	158	92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)		262	174	100
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	148	135	127	122
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		132	100
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	104	91.9	75
Far Cry 5 (2018)		124	119	110
Strange Brigade (2018)		203	183	173
Hitman 3 (2021)		176	170	162
Outriders (2021)		118	117	117
Resident Evil Village (2021)		178	176	156
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)				105
Days Gone (2021)		154	140	106
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021)		144	143
Deathloop (2021)		117	106	90.1
New World (2021)		96.8	92.7	86.8
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)		82.7	79.2
Far Cry 6 (2021)		103	91	87
Back 4 Blood (2021)		220	205	193
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)		112	111	110
Riders Republic (2021)		136	114	105

Utsläpp

Bullerutsläpp

En av de största svagheterna med Clevo barebones har alltid varit den dåliga fläktkontrollen. Även om Apex 17 förblir relativt tyst med 25-31 dB(A) i tomgångsläge, så ökar fläktarna till 57-59 dB(A) under belastning när man använder prestandaläget - en irriterande hög ljudnivå som i slutändan tvingar fram användning av ett headset. Om du vill att den ska vara tystare bör du byta till underhållningsläge eller tyst läge när du spelar och särskilt under mindre krävande uppgifter som att spela upp videor

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25 / 28 / 31 dB(A)
Hög belastning		57 / 59 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-3%	11%	1%	0%	6%
off / environment *	25	24 4%	24.2 3%	24 4%	26 -4%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Minimum *	25	29 -16%	24.7 1%	25 -0%	26 -4%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average *	28	32 -14%	24.7 12%	32 -14%	33.1 -18%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Maximum *	31	38 -23%	24.7 20%	34 -10%	31.3 -1%	30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average *	57	49 14%	44.3 22%	54 5%	49.8 13%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years) 24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57	53 7%	56.3 1%	51 11%
Load Maximum *	59	55 7%	47.7 19%	54 8%	49.6 16%	53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Temperaturutvecklingen hos Apex 17 är i linje med konkurrenterna trots den högre ljudnivån. Efter en timmes full belastning med verktygen FurMark och Prime95 kunde vi locka ut upp till 45 °C(113°F) ur chassit på ovansidan och upp till 49 °C (120,2°F) på undersidan. Särskilt processorn värms upp inne i höljet. Medan RTX 3070 nådde runt 83 °C(181,4°F) under stresstestet spräckte Ryzen 7 5800H nästan 100 °C (212°F) enligt HWMonitor-verktyget

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	45 °C
41 °C	43 °C	43 °C
32 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Max: 45 °C
Medel: 39.8 °C


49 °C	45 °C	43 °C
40 °C	43 °C	40 °C
38 °C	39 °C	34 °C

Max: 49 °C
Medel: 41.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 62 °C | Rumstemperatur 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25 °C
27 °C	27 °C	24 °C

Max: 27 °C
Medel: 25.9 °C


27 °C	27 °C	26 °C
27 °C	30 °C	30 °C
26 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Max: 30 °C
Medel: 28.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 35 °C | Rumstemperatur 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


38 °C	40 °C	41 °C
38 °C	41 °C	40 °C
33 °C	36 °C	31 °C

Max: 41 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C


46 °C	42 °C	39 °C
37 °C	38 °C	39 °C
36 °C	38 °C	32 °C

Max: 46 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 53 °C | Rumstemperatur 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-13%	-10%	-3%	-9%	-7%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	47 -4%	41 9%	43 4%	44 2%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years) -2%
Maximum Bottom *	49	51 -4%	47.2 4%	47 4%	52.7 -8%	49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Upper Side *	27	32 -19%	33.2 -23%	30 -11%	32.6 -21%	31.3 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years) -16%
Idle Bottom *	30	37 -23%	39 -30%	33 -10%	32.1 -7%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering

Energiförbrukning

Tack vare den grafiska omkopplingen (Nvidia Optimus) förbrukar Apex 17 inte för mycket energi under enkla uppgifter. 10 till 20 watt tomgångsförbrukning är mindre än konkurrenterna. Skillnaderna är begränsade under belastning

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.5 / 2.2 Watt
Låg belastning	10 / 14 / 20 Watt
Hög belastning	112 / 231 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-15%	-50%	-8%	-21%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	10	13 -30%	20.9 -109%	12 -20%	18.7 -87%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Average *	14	16 -14%	25.1 -79%	16 -14%	22 -57%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years) -37%
Idle Maximum *	20	26 -30%	45 -125%	28 -40%	25.2 -26%	26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years) -35%
Load Average *	112	125 -12%	102 9%	92 18%	134.7 -20%	111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years) 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	202	187 7%	189 6%	198 2%	135 33%
Load Maximum *	231	259 -12%	234.8 -2%	210 9%	157 32%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption Witcher 3

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21: Ø202 (197-222)

Batteriets livslängd

Batterikapaciteten är blygsam. 49 Wh är inte längre aktuellt år 2021, särskilt med tanke på priset. Som jämförelse: Konkurrensen erbjuder 62-70 Wh. Lyckligtvis sjunker inte körtiderna helt på grund av den måttliga energiförbrukningen. Apex 17 höll i cirka 5 timmar i vårt Wi-Fi-test med medelhög ljusstyrka - en hygglig takt.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		7tim 02min
WiFi Websurfing		4tim 54min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 02min

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-30%	15%	-18%	32%	30%
Reader / Idle	422	281 -33%	404 -4%	337 -20%	608 44%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 29%
WiFi v1.3	294	208 -29%	314 7%	252 -14%	334 14%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years) 25%
Load	62	44 -29%	88 42%	49 -21%	86 39%	84.4 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years) 36%
H.264					420	399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)

För

+ stabil strömförsörjning för CPU och GPU

+ många underhållsalternativ

+ relativt bra inmatningsenheter

+ individuell konfiguration

Emot

- ganska mycket bullerutveckling i prestandaläget

- Skärmen kunde vara bättre (ljusstyrka, kontrast)

- Höljet ser inte särskilt högkvalitativt ut

- låg batterikapacitet

Dom

XMG Apex 17: Testutrustning från Schenker Technologies (bestware.com)

Om du letar efter en bärbar dator för spel med bra underhållsalternativ är Apex 17 rätt val.

Ett externt åtkomligt och avtagbart batteri är sällan förekommande nuförtiden (även om batterikapaciteten lämnar mycket att önska).

Bortsett från den extremt höga ljudutvecklingen i prestandaläget - det finns olika prestandaprofiler - ser 17-tummaren i övrigt ganska ospectakulär ut. Höljet, inmatningsenheterna och gränssnitten gör en solid figur. Å andra sidan är det lite olyckligt att tillverkaren inte installerade en bättre skärm. Ljusstyrka och kontrast uppfyller de höga kraven endast i begränsad utsträckning.

I gengäld får Apex 17 poäng i prestandakategorin. Processorn och grafikkortet levererar över genomsnittet i benchmarks (inte minst tack vare den generösa TDP-nivån).

Ekonomifans som vill ha ett RTX 3070 bör hellre gå till Acer Nitro 5 AN517, som kostar några 100 euro (~114 dollar) mindre med liknande utrustning (men som också har en lägre TGP).

Pris och tillgänglighet

XMG Apex 17 finns i tillverkarens butik bestware.com från och med 1 479 euro (~1 692 dollar)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 - 2021-11-02 11/02/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Design

77 / 98 → 79%

Tangentbord

81%

Mus

78%

Anslutningar

58 / 80 → 72%

Vikt

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Batteri

63 / 95 → 66%

Skärm

84%

Spelprestanda

99%

Programprestanda

96%

Temperatur

86 / 95 → 90%

Ljudnivå

60 / 90 → 67%

Audio

74%

Camera

39 / 85 → 45%

Medel

73%

83%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) laptop recension: För bullerresistenta gamers

Florian Glaser, 2021-11-14 (Update: 2021-11-22)

XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) laptop recension: För bullerresistenta gamers

Possible competitors in comparison

Size comparison

Kommunikation

Webbkamera

Visa

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Provningsvillkor

Effekt

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance Test

Systemprestanda

DPC-fördröjningar

Masslagring

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

Utsläpp

Bullerutsläpp

Temperatur

Högtalare

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

Energihantering

Energiförbrukning

Energy consumption Witcher 3

Batteriets livslängd

För

Emot

Dom

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare