Test: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - RTX 3070 som körs med 140 Watt (Sammanfattning)

Name: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Brand: MSI

Maximal TGP. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 visar innehållet med maximalt TGP på MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG:s 17-tumsskärm. Vår recension visar vad detta innebär för vardagsspelande och hur resten av hårdvaran står sig i jämförelse.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 03/09/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows MSI Gaming Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook Geforce

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG (GP76 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 84 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1720 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, NVIDIA 461.40, Intel UHD Graphics 630

Minne

16 GB

, Dubbla kanaler

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM470

Hårddisk

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB

, 400 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Anslutningar

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

Nätverk

Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26 x 397 x 284

Batteri

65 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, MSI Dragon Center, MSI App Player, Power Director 17, Photo Director 10, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.9 kg, Strömförsörjning: 595 g

Pris

2 Kr

Länkar

MSI hemsida
MSI kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 %	03/2021	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.1 %	02/2021	Aorus 15P XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	27 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85 %	02/2021	Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	27.2 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.1 %		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

Storleksjämförelse

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Aorus 15P XC Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: Kensington-lås, 1x USB Typ-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Headset-anslutning

Baksidan: 1x USB Typ-C 3.2 Gen. 2, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, Nätadapter

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus 15P XC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1390 MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1310 MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1190 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Aorus 15P XC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1390 MBit/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1310 MBit/s +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s -1%

ColorChecker MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG: 8.71 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 14.49 ∆E


288 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
321 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	328 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Chi Mei CMN176E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 331 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 314.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1131:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Aorus 15P XC Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display		3%	2%	6%
Display P3 Coverage	64.7	67.2 4%	67.7 5%	70.5 9%
sRGB Coverage	96.4	98.7 2%	94.3 -2%	99.5 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.9	68.6 3%	68.2 2%	71.8 7%
Response Times		-14%	2%	-60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -51%	8.2 ?(2.6, 5.6) -11%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -127%
Response Time Black / White *	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 11%	9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8) 15%	10 ?(4, 6) 7%
PWM Frequency	24510 ?(39)	24040 ?(25) -2%
Screen		9%	-20%	-9%
Brightness middle	328	298 -9%	308 -6%	410 25%
Brightness	314	278 -11%	288 -8%	381 21%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	86 -1%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.29	0.29 -0%	0.23 21%	0.37 -28%
Contrast	1131	1028 -9%	1339 18%	1108 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.93	0.96 50%	3.28 -70%	2.55 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.94	3.22 35%	8.51 -72%	4.33 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.68	0.83 -22%	0.83 -22%	1.28 -88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	1.3 54%	5 -79%	3.4 -21%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.242 ^98%	2.057 ^107%	2.275 ^97%
CCT	7023 ^93%	6519 ^100%	7393 ^88%	6637 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	67	69 3%	68 1%	72 7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	89	91 2%	90 1%	95 7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 4%	-5% / -13%	-21% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.6 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.8 ms rise
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

24510 Hz

≤ 39 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 39 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)

Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1597 (1574.49-1728.16)

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2058 (1969.09-2151.12)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)	268 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	238 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points +17%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	200 Points +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)	3090 Points +146%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2151 (1969.09^min - 2151.12^max) Points +71%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2108 (2036.87^min - 2108.48^max) Points +68%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	1728 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1258 (1113.24^min - 1257.82^max) Points

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds *
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	292 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	245 Seconds * +32%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	245 Seconds * +32%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=226, last 2 years)	199.5 Seconds * +44%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=227, last 2 years)	6128 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5590 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5568 MIPS +6%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	5244 MIPS 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	5236 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=227, last 2 years)	77071 MIPS +113%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	57284 MIPS +58%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	55335 MIPS +53%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	46431 MIPS +28%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	36161 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS -6%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=228, last 2 years)	698 Points +52%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	577 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	540 Points +17%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	473 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	460 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=228, last 2 years)	7423 Points +148%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5045 Points +68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4510 Points +50%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	3721 Points +24%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	2998 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points -5%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=232, last 2 years)	1809 Points +39%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1487 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1354 Points +4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1304 Points
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	1285 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=232, last 2 years)	13583 Points +113%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8035 Points +26%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	7758 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	7518 Points +18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	6392 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=230, last 2 years)	21.2 fps +104%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.6 fps +50%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	14.4 fps +38%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	12.9 fps +24%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps -8%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	53.3 s * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * -5%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	50.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	50.8 s * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	50.3 s * +1%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=224, last 2 years)	49.2 s * +3%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	0.592 sec *
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H	0.586 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.512 sec * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.512 sec * +14%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years)	0.4694 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1258 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

144 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

198 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7580 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6922 Points +15%
Aorus 15P XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	6463 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6017 - 6034, n=2)	6026 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	6017 Points
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10718 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points +16%
Aorus 15P XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	9193 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8652 - 8953, n=2)	8803 Points +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8652 Points
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9716 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8657 Points
Aorus 15P XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	8353 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8022 - 8657, n=2)	8340 Points -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11450 Points +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points +32%
Aorus 15P XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	9539 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7893 - 8300, n=2)	8097 Points +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7893 Points

PCMark 10 Score		6017 poäng
Hjälp

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * -68%
Aorus 15P XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	1201 μs * -11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1082 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	466.9 μs * +57%

* ... smaller is better

	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Aorus 15P XC ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		64%		101%	6%
Write 4K	143.7	130.2 -9%		206.1 43%	194.5 ?(107.3 - 286, n=8) 35%
Read 4K	45.1	45.47 1%		53 18%	47.3 ?(42.5 - 50.4, n=8) 5%
Write Seq	978	2269 132%		3018 209%	978 ?(965 - 985, n=8) 0%
Read Seq	1163	1643 41%		2575 121%	1299 ?(1043 - 1990, n=8) 12%
Write 4K Q32T1	519	547 5%		535 3%	505 ?(327 - 625, n=8) -3%
Read 4K Q32T1	302.7	654 116%		608 101%	301 ?(298 - 303, n=8) -1%
Write Seq Q32T1	981	2512 156%		3242 230%	978 ?(968 - 982, n=8) 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	1983	3382 71%		3617 82%	1930 ?(1631 - 1986, n=8) -3%
AS SSD		105%	87%	114%	-4%
Seq Read	1659	2694 62%	2881 74%	3020 82%	1570 ?(252 - 1777, n=10) -5%
Seq Write	921	2327 153%	1570 70%	2631 186%	904 ?(716 - 941, n=10) -2%
4K Read	51	47.77 -6%	52.4 3%	60.3 18%	48.2 ?(36.2 - 60.2, n=10) -5%
4K Write	120.1	98.8 -18%	124 3%	171.6 43%	118.9 ?(66 - 170.5, n=10) -1%
4K-64 Read	463.5	1746 277%	1334 188%	1410 204%	415 ?(163.6 - 473, n=10) -10%
4K-64 Write	909	2267 149%	2189 141%	2324 156%	829 ?(263 - 928, n=10) -9%
Access Time Read *	0.179	0.079 56%	0.055 69%	0.045 75%	0.1294 ?(0.081 - 0.191, n=10) 28%
Access Time Write *	0.032	0.039 -22%	0.03 6%	0.024 25%	0.0371 ?(0.019 - 0.084, n=10) -16%
Score Read	680	2063 203%	1675 146%	1773 161%	619 ?(379 - 701, n=10) -9%
Score Write	1121	2598 132%	2470 120%	2759 146%	1036 ?(429 - 1178, n=10) -8%
Score Total	2130	5698 168%	4943 132%	5429 155%	1955 ?(976 - 2184, n=10) -8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		85% / 88%	87% / 87%	108% / 108%	1% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1983 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 981 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 302.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 519 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1163 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 978 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 143.7 MB/s

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)	40470 Points +6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	38275 Points
Aorus 15P XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	36675 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	33862 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54)	32331 Points -16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	31092 Points -19%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=235, last 2 years)	29450 Points +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	29128 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	27968 Points -4%
Aorus 15P XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	27764 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	25509 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52)	24302 Points -17%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	23893 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)	12063 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10898 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	10850 Points
Aorus 15P XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	10500 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	10148 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53)	9300 Points -14%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	9131 Points -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		25847 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		22121 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		9933 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Far Cry 5 | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	109 (83^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	101 fps -7%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	101 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92.9 (70^min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52)	91.8 fps -16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.7 (83^min - 95^max) fps -18%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=226, last 2 years)	111.2 fps +23%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	90.2 fps
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88.9 fps -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	87.5 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (27.9 - 107, n=49)	86.4 fps -4%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=125, last 2 years)	126.3 fps +11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (89 - 140, n=36)	108.6 fps -5%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	108 (84^min - 137^max) fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92 (68^min - 117^max) fps -19%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=241, last 2 years)	101.8 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)	81.1 fps +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.2 fps
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	79.5 fps -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	76.4 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	75.8 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	70.1 fps -13%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=236, last 2 years)	142.5 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	128 (112.9^min) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (26.9 - 163.9, n=58)	120.7 fps +3%
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	120 (103.4^min) fps +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	117 (101.8^min) fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	107 (89.3^min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	107 (95.3^min) fps -9%

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø107 (96-112)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)				109
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	140	139	123	117
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			90.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	105	93.9	80.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)				114
Anno 1800 (2019)	38.9	38.3	34.5	24.4
Doom Eternal (2020)				216

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25 / 32 / 34 dB(A)
Hög belastning		54 / 54 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


41 °C	42 °C	43 °C
35 °C	39 °C	39 °C
27 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Max: 43 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C


47 °C	40 °C	42 °C
39 °C	40 °C	30 °C
26 °C	28 °C	30 °C

Max: 47 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 56 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Max: 30 °C
Medel: 27.7 °C


33 °C	32 °C	33 °C
31 °C	30 °C	29 °C
24 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Max: 33 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 33 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


42 °C	45 °C	45 °C
38 °C	40 °C	40 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Max: 45 °C
Medel: 37.3 °C


48 °C	41 °C	45 °C
41 °C	40 °C	33 °C
27 °C	28 °C	33 °C

Max: 48 °C
Medel: 37.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 54 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.9 / 1.5 Watt
Låg belastning	12 / 16 / 28 Watt
Hög belastning	92 / 210 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Aorus 15P XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-10%	8%	-9%	-0%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	12	14 -17%	4 67%	13 -8%	12.9 -8%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Average *	16	17 -6%	9 44%	16 -0%	15.4 4%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum *	28	33 -18%	36 -29%	26 7%	27.1 3%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) 4%
Load Average *	92	96 -4%	130 -41%	125 -36%	98.2 -7%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	198	179 10%	174 12%	187 6%	164.9 17%
Load Maximum *	210	256 -22%	227 -8%	259 -23%	232.9 -11%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		5tim 37min
WiFi Websurfing		4tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		0tim 49min

	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh	Aorus 15P XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		70%	90%	-15%	108%	60%
Reader / Idle	337	571 69%		281 -17%	649 93%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 61%
WiFi v1.3	252	399 58%	441 75%	208 -17%	426 69%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) 46%
Load	49	89 82%	100 104%	44 -10%	129 163%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) 72%

För

+ Väldigt stabilt hölje

+ RTX 3070 laptop GPU med stöd för maximalt TGP

+ Två SSD-platser

Emot

- Insidan är svår att komma åt

- Saknar Thunderbolt-port

Omdöme - Kraftfull spellaptop

Recension av MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG. Recensionsex från: MSI Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG är en klassisk spellaptop. Då den kommer med en 144 Hz-skärm på 17 tum kan den inte betraktas som liten, men det finns exempelvis inga större skillnader i tjocklek jämfört med enheter på 15 tum. Höjdpunkten är en mobil Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 som körs i maximalt TGP-läge på 140 Watt. Detta ger ganska mycket högre grafikprestanda jämfört med de strypta varianterna och ger därför lite högre FPS i spel.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG kan visa moderna spel på sin skärm utan problem. Men det är onödigt svårt att utföra service på den.

Inga nedskärningar har gjorts på den övriga utrustningen heller, vilket gör GP76 Leopard till en högkvalitativ spellaptop som passar till lite allt möjligt. Vi hade däremot gärna sett att det var lättare att komma åt insidan. Understycket är inte bara fastskruvat och ikrokat, utan det går runt datorns framsida och nästan upp till hörnen. Som ett resultat måste man ta loss framstycket också, så alla krokar lossnar på baksidan och sidorna. Detta är väldigt opraktiskt och svårt att genomföra för den som är ovan, vilket gör det onödigt svårt att lägga till en andra SSD-enhet eller mer RAM.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - 2021-03-05 03/05/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Design

83 / 98 → 84%

Tangentbord

79%

Mus

88%

Anslutningar

61 / 80 → 76%

Vikt

58 / 10-66 → 85%

Batteri

59 / 95 → 62%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

99%

Programprestanda

91%

Temperatur

87 / 95 → 92%

Ljudnivå

64 / 90 → 72%

Audio

83%

Camera

37 / 85 → 44%

Medel

75%

85%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - RTX 3070 som körs med 140 Watt (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2021-03- 9 (Update: 2021-03- 9)

Test: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - RTX 3070 som körs med 140 Watt (Sammanfattning)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Kraftfull spellaptop

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare