Notebookcheck

Test: Sony Xperia XZ1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Inge Schwabe (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/05/2017

Familjen spelar roll. XZ1 är efterföljaren till Sony XZ, Sony:s ursprungliga lyx-modell. Som sådan verkar den ha ärvt den senares förmåga att införliva brister. Oavsett så är XZ1 definitivt medlem i den övre kvalitets-gruppen.

Sony Xperia XZ1 (Xperia Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), åtta-kärnig, 64 Bit
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.2 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, kapacitiv 10-punkters tryckkänslig skärm, IPS, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursutgång, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: fingeravtrycksläsare (på sidan), accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, barometer, kompass, färgspektrum
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900), HSPA+ (800, 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100), LTE (700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,700, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600) CAT16, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 148 x 73.4
Batteri
13.5 Wh, 2700 mAh Litiumjon, Qualcomm QuickCharge 3.0
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix 1/2.3" sensor, EIS (gyro), LED, [email protected], [email protected]/60fps, [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 22 mm, 1/3" sensor, 1080p
Övrigt
Högtalare: framåtriktade stereo-högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Sony Xperia UI, 24 Månader Garanti, damm och vatten-resistant (IP65/68), USB 3.1, Typ-C 1.0, OTG, Miracast, DLNA, Wifi Direct, SAR: 0.8 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
156 g, Strömförsörjning: 54 g
Pris
699 Kr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +87%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼54%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼41% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼36% -33%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼36% -34%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼34% -37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼77%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼57% -25%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼53% -31%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -56%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Sony Xperia XZ1
Sony Xperia XZ1
Sony Xperia XZ1
main camera with manual focus
main camera with manual focus
secondary camera, colors cooler, higher brightness
secondary camera, colors cooler, higher brightness
secondary camera with no modifications
secondary camera with no modifications
secondary camera, colors warmer
secondary camera, colors warmer

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
612
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 633 cd/m² Medel: 610.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.05 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 620 cd/m²
Kontrast: 785:1 (Svärta: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.02
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Screen
-10%
18%
-0%
36%
28%
Brightness middle
620
566
-9%
550
-11%
547
-12%
559
-10%
646
4%
Brightness
610
560
-8%
535
-12%
556
-9%
538
-12%
611
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
92
-1%
86
-8%
90
-3%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.79
0.53
33%
0.42
47%
0.43
46%
0.38
52%
0.23
71%
Contrast
785
1068
36%
1310
67%
1272
62%
1471
87%
2809
258%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.6
-10%
3.3
21%
4.8
-14%
1.3
69%
4.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.8
9.4
-62%
4.5
22%
8.8
-52%
2.7
53%
8.3
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
6.5
-67%
3.6
8%
4.5
-15%
1.8
54%
6
-54%
Gamma
2.02 119%
2.14 112%
2.38 101%
2.39 100%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
CCT
7086 92%
8189 79%
7226 90%
7194 90%
6797 96%
7996 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 24 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10415 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points ∼75% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
150208 Points ∼65% -10%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼76% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points ∼79% +8%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼77% +6%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% +4%
Google Pixel 2
166939 Points ∼72% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +2%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% +18%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼89% +22%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points ∼62% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6421 Points ∼62% 0%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points ∼65% +4%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +2%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -13%
Google Pixel 2
7223 Points ∼70% +12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points ∼75% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
7496 Points ∼73% +6%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼81% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points ∼74% +7%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼76% +11%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼67% -3%
Google Pixel 2
8550 Points ∼83% +21%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼80% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼59% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points ∼73% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1213 Points ∼72% +3%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points ∼74% +7%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +9%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -15%
Google Pixel 2
1210 Points ∼71% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼70% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% -2%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼99% +42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points ∼65% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5791 Points ∼63% -2%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points ∼67% +5%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +4%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% 0%
Google Pixel 2
6052 Points ∼65% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +3%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points ∼78% +97%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1501 Points ∼34% -14%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points ∼92% +131%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +152%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% +19%
Google Pixel 2
2942 Points ∼67% +68%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼66% +67%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +73%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼28% -30%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points ∼57% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5336 Points ∼52% -9%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points ∼57% 0%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +1%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -27%
Google Pixel 2
5918 Points ∼58% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% -8%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼68%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points ∼81% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2739 Points ∼64% -6%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼70% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points ∼86% +27%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼88% +30%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -7%
Google Pixel 2
3360 Points ∼78% +16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼76% +13%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% +28%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points ∼55% -1%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼58% +4%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼56% 0%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% 0%
Google Pixel 2
7462 Points ∼52% -6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼59% +6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points ∼22% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6541 Points ∼23% +1%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼22% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points ∼23% +3%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼24% +5%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼21% -6%
Google Pixel 2
6256 Points ∼22% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼22% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼23% +3%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼36% +58%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼36% +60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points ∼32% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1915 Points ∼32% +3%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points ∼33% +4%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +6%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% +2%
Google Pixel 2
1924 Points ∼32% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +8%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼72% +130%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼70% +124%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points ∼44% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2658 Points ∼72% -9%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points ∼82% +3%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼82% +3%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% 0%
Google Pixel 2
3078 Points ∼84% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼68% -15%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼64% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼54% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points ∼69% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3925 Points ∼73% -1%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points ∼76% +3%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% -5%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -1%
Google Pixel 2
3974 Points ∼74% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% -12%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼64% -13%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼48% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points ∼61% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3549 Points ∼75% -3%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼76% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points ∼80% +3%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼75% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -1%
Google Pixel 2
3733 Points ∼79% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼67% -13%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼66% -15%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼51% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points ∼43% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2675 Points ∼73% +4%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points ∼80% +14%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼83% +17%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% +10%
Google Pixel 2
3080 Points ∼85% +20%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼67% -5%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼49% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points ∼62% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6007 Points ∼73% -1%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼71% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points ∼76% +3%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼58% -21%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% -3%
Google Pixel 2
6040 Points ∼73% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼60% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points ∼53% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
4705 Points ∼74% +1%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼74% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points ∼78% +7%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼66% -9%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% +2%
Google Pixel 2
4977 Points ∼78% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼63% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points ∼17% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
22530 Points ∼29% -2%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼25% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points ∼26% -12%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼25% -16%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -37%
Google Pixel 2
20482 Points ∼26% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼27% -7%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼32% +11%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼31% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points ∼11% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
54415 Points ∼12% +14%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points ∼12% +22%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼12% +21%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% +15%
Google Pixel 2
55247 Points ∼12% +15%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% -24%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼24% +135%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼24% +135%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points ∼15% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
41396 Points ∼20% +31%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼19% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points ∼20% +30%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼19% +27%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% +8%
Google Pixel 2
40116 Points ∼19% +27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼15% 0%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼31% +103%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼30% +96%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps ∼6% -2%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼5% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps ∼7% +7%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼7% +4%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% +2%
Google Pixel 2
112 fps ∼7% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼7% +9%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼10% +60%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼9% +45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps ∼13% 0%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 2
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼13% -1%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼26% +100%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
53 fps ∼10% -5%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps ∼11% +13%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +9%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% +5%
Google Pixel 2
52 fps ∼9% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +11%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼16% +58%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼13% +26%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps ∼13% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
58 fps ∼16% +12%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps ∼15% +8%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +8%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -33%
Google Pixel 2
54 fps ∼15% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% -21%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼16% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼31% +120%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps ∼6% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
40 fps ∼7% -2%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps ∼8% +5%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼8% +2%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% -2%
Google Pixel 2
31 fps ∼6% -24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼4% -41%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼9% +19%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼10% +32%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼24%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps ∼21% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
59 fps ∼34% +40%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps ∼24% 0%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% -2%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -55%
Google Pixel 2
40 fps ∼23% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% -45%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼25% +5%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼62% +161%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps ∼6% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
24 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼7% +8%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% +4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Google Pixel 2
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼6% +4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps ∼21% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
50 fps ∼43% +100%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼22% +4%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼21% 0%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Google Pixel 2
25 fps ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 6
32.14 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 2
38.4 fps ∼99%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps ∼79%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 6
38773 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points ∼96%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
44696 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points ∼97%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 6
733 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 2
836 Points ∼45%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼91%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60.1 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps ∼97%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +265%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼92% +237%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼32% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.453 Points ∼31% +15%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼29% +7%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
64.791 Points ∼29% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
63.675 Points ∼28% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
61.5 Points ∼27% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
54.201 Points ∼24% -12%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +249%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% +238%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼37% +28%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼34% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points ∼34% +18%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
11424 Points ∼32% +13%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
11380 Points ∼32% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
10672 Points ∼30% +6%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
9069 Points ∼26% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼100% -11%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
3414.7 ms * ∼94% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
3393.2 ms * ∼93% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼90%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
3199 ms * ∼88% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
2768 ms * ∼76% +15%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼76% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2667.5 ms * ∼73% +18%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼72% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼52% +42%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼20% +78%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼20% +78%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +111%
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼99% +108%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼54% +14%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
190 Points ∼53% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
166 Points ∼46% -2%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% -5%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼45% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
149 Points ∼42% -12%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼38% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
90 Points ∼25% -47%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XZ1Sony Xperia XZ PremiumHTC U11Xiaomi Mi 6Google Pixel 2Samsung Galaxy S8Huawei Mate 10 Pro
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
67%
16%
10%
1%
249%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-30%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-44%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
5%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
Random Write 4KB
14.93
17.2
15%
79.97
436%
25.19
69%
18.03
21%
15.25
2%
164.45
1001%
Random Read 4KB
156.61
74.1
-53%
91.45
-42%
143.49
-8%
173.13
11%
127.17
-19%
132.27
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.43
194
-5%
206.41
1%
196.7
-4%
196.22
-4%
193.23
-5%
208.72
2%
Sequential Read 256KB
679.13
687
1%
717.33
6%
728.2
7%
758.35
12%
792.86
17%
732.46
8%
Hög belastning
 32.2 °C33.8 °C37.3 °C 
 32.8 °C34.3 °C38.3 °C 
 31.7 °C34.1 °C36.6 °C 
Max: 38.3 °C
Medel: 34.6 °C
31.8 °C31.3 °C31.1 °C
32.1 °C32.1 °C31.1 °C
31.1 °C31.6 °C31.3 °C
Max: 32.1 °C
Medel: 31.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.234.82532.932.63137.230.54031.7315039.635.16328.329.98027.32810026.922.612526.723.31602426.120020.934.125020.940.731519.550.540018.557.250017.56463017.565.180015.768.2100015.869.4125016.668.2160015.867.9200015.473.7250015.572.731501670.6400015.86550001666.6630016.364.1800016.364.71000016.263.61250016.460.91600016.455.2SPL28.680.9N1.146.3median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ1median 64.1Delta2.110.931.635.125.433.525.334.832.93433.629.431.629.628.424.92731.220.834.72239.821.348.320.855.321.259.519.462.219.567.117.77017.973.617.874.217.373.217.472.716.773.217.272.118.269.717.96917.666.317.766.917.86717.951.618.145.218.247.73082.41.354.8median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8median 66.91.311.831.63725.434.125.333.632.932.533.630.531.631.828.428.42724.920.829.62242.221.352.620.859.721.260.419.459.919.56217.766.617.96717.866.117.368.117.468.816.771.617.271.618.270.417.970.317.667.917.762.217.856.717.953.518.15118.238.13080.41.345.9median 17.9LG G6median 621.39hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG G6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.31 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.51 / 2.16 / 2.23 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 7.45 / 9.28 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2700 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-0%
8%
16%
7%
27%
22%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.62
-22%
0.58
-14%
0.85
-67%
0.73
-43%
0.78
-53%
0.45
12%
0.73
-43%
Idle Average *
2.16
2.44
-13%
1.76
19%
1.15
47%
1.96
9%
1.1
49%
1.67
23%
1.44
33%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
2.59
-16%
1.81
19%
1.23
45%
1.98
11%
1.16
48%
1.69
24%
1.5
33%
Load Average *
7.45
4.94
34%
6.33
15%
4.12
45%
4.82
35%
4.15
44%
4.07
45%
6.91
7%
Load Maximum *
9.28
7.91
15%
9.18
1%
8.42
9%
7.15
23%
5.12
45%
8.54
8%
8.51
8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 62)
10tim 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 40min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 52min
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
25%
59%
-6%
-5%
23%
8%
Reader / Idle
1612
1754
9%
1744
8%
1457
-10%
1250
-22%
1534
-5%
H.264
580
802
38%
929
60%
564
-3%
498
-14%
623
7%
WiFi v1.3
601
695
16%
818
36%
575
-4%
560
-7%
739
23%
518
-14%
Load
172
236
37%
398
131%
161
-6%
212
23%
247
44%

För

+ modern och snabb SoC
+ uppdaterat operativsystem
+ stereohögtalare
+ ljusstark högupplöst skärm
+ fingeravtrycksläsare
+ IP65/68-certifierad
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ DLNA
+ stöd för ett brett utbud av mobilband

Emot

- bred infattning
- dålig uthållighet
- ingen dual-SIM
- kameran kunde varit känsligare för ljus
In review: Sony Xperia XZ1. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Xperia-smartphones går fortfarande lätt att känna igen tack vare sin unika design, och XZ1 passar perfekt in i detta. Tyvärr är den breda infattningen nedanför och ovanför skärmen nedslående och borde hänvisats till det förflutna. På plussidan så är materialvalet och tillverkningskvaliteten lika bra som vi förväntar oss från Sony, och den höga nivån av damm och vattenskydd som XZ1 har är inte så vanlig hos moderna smartphones som vi hade hoppats. Från en teknisk synvinkel finns det en del brister här och där, såsom dålig GPS-mottagning inomhus och ganska dålig uthållighet vid belastning. På grund av detta kan vi inte rekommendera enheten till den som ofta använder telefonen på fri fot. Den verkar dock vara en perfekt telefon för den som reser utomlands ofta tack vare sitt breda stöd för olika 3G- och 4G/LTE-band. Men det sagt, Dual-SIM modellen finns nu tillgänglig från Sony och borde passa den kategorin användare ännu bättre.

Modern på insidan snarare än utsidan. På plussidan, Xperia XZ1 kommer med ett uppdaterat operativsystem, en snabb processor, stereohögtalare och en bra kamera. Höljet är damm och vattenbeständigt men dess gammaldags infattning ovanför och nedanför skärmen får den att se utdaterad och otrendig ut.

Funktioner som fingeravtrycksläsare förväntar vi oss av XZ1:s pris på runt 5 000 SEK ($600), men telefonens interna lagring känns nästan för litet vid jämförelse. Stereohögtalare har alltid varit sällsynta hos smartphones och stöd för DLNA har också blivit mer sällsynt och kan därmed ses som ett stort plus för dom som har motsvarande mediaservrar och mottagare hemma, särskilt för cineasterna bland våra läsare. Synd bara att högtalarna inte är särskilt bra.

Kameran är sofistikerad och hyfsad och den tämligen mångsidiga kamera-appen kommer inte göra någon användare besviken. Men om du tycker kameran är en av dom viktigaste, eller kanske till och med den viktigaste, faktorn hos en smartphone så föreslår vi att du tar en titt på alternativen från Apple, Samsung, Huawei och OnePlus.

Vad som vände det hela i slutändan var ZX1:s ljusa och intensiva skärm och dess höga prestanda,  som båda är viktiga att överväga för gamers. Den unika kompatibiliteten med Playstation 4-kontroller är värd att nämna igen vid det här tillfället. Det kanske inte är ny funktion eller det viktigaste säljargumentet med tanke på att i princip vilken smartphone som helst kan användas i kombination med en tredjeparts-kontroll, men det är definitivt en fördel om du redan råkar ha en PS4-kontroll.

Sony Xperia XZ1 - 11/28/2017 v6
Inge Schwabe

Design
89%
Tangentbord
71 / 75 → 95%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
51 / 60 → 85%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
65 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
81%
Medel
81%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Sony Xperia XZ1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Inge Schwabe, 2017-12- 5 (Update: 2017-12- 5)