Notebookcheck

Test: Apple iPhone 8 Plus (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/04/2017

Stort syskon, små förbättringar. Precis som sitt mindre syskon har Apple iPhone 8 Plus inte många nya funktioner. Vi får ett aningen uppdaterat chassi, nu med en glaspanel på baksidan, samt det nya A11-chippet. Det finns dock mindre förbättringar på flera områden.

Apple iPhone 8 Plus (iPhone 8 Serie)
Processor
Apple A11 Bionic
Grafikkort
Apple A11 Bionic GPU - 3072 MB
Minne
3072 MB 
, Samsung LPDDR4x
Skärm
5.5 tum 16:9, 1920x1080 pixlar 401 PPI, Multi-touch, IPS, Apple True Tone Retina HD, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus), 256 GB 
, 250 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Lightning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: 3-axels gyrosensor, accelerationssensor, närhetssensor, digital kompass, barometer, Galileo, QZSS, Lightning
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 och 2100 MHz), LTE (FDD-Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30 och 66; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40 och 41), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.5 x 158.4 x 78.1
Batteri
10.28 Wh, 2691 mAh Litiumjon, 3.82 V, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 21 tim
Operativsystem
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual-Kamera, Vidvinkelobjektiv: ƒ/1.8 Bländare, 5x Digital zoom, Optisk bildstabilisator; Teleobjektiv: ƒ/2.8 Bländare, 2 x Optisk Zoom, 10x Digital zoom, Porträttläge
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, nätadapter (5 watt), lightningkabel, lightning-headset, adapter (lightning till 3.5 mm stereo jack), 12 Månader Garanti, Trådlös laddning (Qi), IP67 certified, huvud SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless
Released
09/23/2017
Vikt
202 g
Pris
1079 Kr

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
914 MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel XL 2016
515 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
503 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
501 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
HTC U11
394 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 5
371 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei Mate 9
259 MBit/s ∼28% -72%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
653 MBit/s ∼100% +75%
HTC U11
639 MBit/s ∼98% +71%
OnePlus 5
539 MBit/s ∼83% +44%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
494 MBit/s ∼76% +32%
Google Pixel XL 2016
435 MBit/s ∼67% +16%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
374 MBit/s ∼57%
Huawei Mate 9
165 MBit/s ∼25% -56%
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Natural light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Studio light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Contour light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Stage light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Stage light monochrome
Telephoto iPhone 8 Plus
Telephoto OnePlus 5
Telephoto Galaxy Note 8

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Standard camera
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Telephoto
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Crop standard camera
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Crop Telephoto
Almost perfect grayscale performance
Almost perfect grayscale performance
Almost full sRGB gamut
Almost full sRGB gamut
No problems for the saturation
No problems for the saturation
High color accuracy
High color accuracy
534
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 559 cd/m² Medel: 537.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.47 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 559 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1471:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | - Ø
99.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Screen
1%
8%
-3%
-61%
Brightness
538
580
8%
553
3%
562
4%
680
26%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
97
8%
93
3%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.44
-16%
0.35
8%
0.42
-11%
Contrast
1471
1373
-7%
1591
8%
1657
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
1.4
-8%
1.7
-31%
4.3
-231%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.3
28%
1.6
11%
4.8
-167%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
CCT
6797 96%
6688 97%
6667 97%
6435 101%
7255 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.1
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.83
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7125 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.1
Compute Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
15295 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
14962 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
12425 Points ∼81% -19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
5922 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼64% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
3527 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼48% -52%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼80% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -55%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -280%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -161%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼63% -37%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼48% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼72% -28%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼69%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +45%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼51% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼32% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼33% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼33% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼91%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼78% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼44% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼78% -14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +95%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼54% +5%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼26% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼21% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼21% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
1854 Points ∼74% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points ∼79% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2512 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2417 Points ∼96% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
2783 Points ∼78% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points ∼60% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3571 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2723 Points ∼76% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
2505 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points ∼65% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3265 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2648 Points ∼81% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼81% -6%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼95% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼74% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼66% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼76% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼76% -13%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼70% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼81% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼89% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼31% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼32% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼58% -42%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼50% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -62%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼92% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼31% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼28% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
69.57 Points ∼31% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -55%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -280%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -161%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 40.7 °C39.8 °C35.8 °C 
 36.2 °C35.1 °C33.8 °C 
 34.8 °C34.5 °C34.1 °C 
Max: 40.7 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
33.9 °C38 °C40.6 °C
33.3 °C36 °C37.7 °C
33.3 °C35.6 °C35.6 °C
Max: 40.6 °C
Medel: 36 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.62525.437.83125.337.44032.933.85033.6386331.632.38028.432.31002738.212520.843.81602249.320021.351.825020.852.131521.253.640019.454.250019.562.463017.765.480017.965.1100017.866.3125017.365.8160017.468.4200016.767.7250017.267.8315018.270.4400017.971.3500017.669.8630017.771800017.871.31000017.965.31250018.162.81600018.257.6SPL3080.1N1.348.9median 17.9Apple iPhone 8 Plusmedian 65.3Delta1.37.331.635.225.433.125.329.932.92533.629.231.631.228.426.9272620.833.92243.521.349.920.854.821.257.519.462.319.566.417.767.317.96417.863.217.364.917.462.516.756.317.26018.26117.963.217.662.817.760.317.861.617.962.518.164.518.255.83075.61.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.61.34.831.635.825.440.125.335.532.931.933.631.631.638.928.433.82727.220.828.62236.421.342.620.851.521.258.619.465.719.571.417.770.717.968.317.870.717.370.317.462.516.760.817.258.318.265.317.967.817.672.417.770.617.871.517.97318.164.518.249.33081.41.351.2median 17.9HTC U11median 65.31.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPhone 8 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.14 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.45 / 2.52 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.84 / 9.02 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
34tim 45min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3 (Mobile Safari iOS 11)
10tim 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 13min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 31min
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Battery Runtime
-11%
-1%
5%
6%
3%
-20%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2085
1629
-22%
1835
-12%
1565
-25%
1538
-26%
1754
-16%
1333
-36%
1534
-26%
H.264
733
698
-5%
813
11%
742
1%
947
29%
802
9%
505
-31%
623
-15%
WiFi v1.3
657
585
-11%
587
-11%
736
12%
758
15%
695
6%
505
-23%
518
-21%
Load
211
202
-4%
225
7%
275
30%
219
4%
236
12%
230
9%
247
17%

För

+ True-Tone skärm
+ snabb SoC
+ bra kamera
+ exakt GPS
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ hög Wi-Fi prestanda
+ många LTE band
+ skydd mot vatten och damm
+ mycket välbyggd...

Emot

- ... men stor och tung
- lagringsutrymmet går inte att utöka
- bara 12 månaders garanti
- inget stereo-jack
- högtalarna är bara medelmåttiga
- skärmupplösningen kunde vara högre
- tyngre än sin föregångare
- väldigt begränsad NFC-funktionalitet
In review: Apple iPhone 8 Plus
In review: Apple iPhone 8 Plus

iPhone 8 Plus erbjudare en aning mer än sitt mindre syskon. Vi pratar inte bara om den rena vikten, som är påtaglig på mer än 200 gram, men framför allt dual-kameran. Skärmen erbjuder också fler pixlar och du får 1 GB mer RAM. Det omarbetade skalet med en glaspanel på baksidan ger blandade intryck. Det är välbyggt och praktisk att röra vid, men ytan blir dock kladdig efter ett par minuter. Plus-modellen är också väldigt stor för en smart telefon med en 5.5-tums skärm.

Kameran är väldigt lik den i iPhone 7 Plus och den andra linsen erbjuder 2x optisk zoom. Den möjliggör också en mjuk Bokeh-effekt för porträtt, vilket ser rätt bra ut. Bildkvaliteten är i allmänhet förbättrad jämfört med den föregående modellen och du kan nu spela in UltraHD-video i upp till 60 bildrutor per sekund. FullHD är möjligt att spela in i upp till 240 FPS, vilket kan skapa spektakulär slow-motion. iPhone 8 Plus är definitivt det bästa kamera-paket du kan få i en smart telefon - om du tycker om den grundläggande inställningsmenyn.

iPhone 8 Plus är ett utmärkt val för video-entusiaster. Om du planerar att köpa den för den anledningen bör du dock vara villig att betala för den större 256 GB-modellen eftersom [email protected] FPS kräver en hel del lagringsutrymme.

Den nya A11-SoC:en är återigen mycket snabbare och bortom rivalernas räckvidd. Du får också snabb LTE, lång batteritid och ett skal som står emot vatten och damm. I likhet med sitt mindre syskon kan vi inte hitta några större brister, men en del saker är irriterande. Dessa inkluderar en begränsad garanti och en svag nätadapter. Röst-kvaliteten kunde ha varit bättre i 3G-nätverk och ljudet är bara medelmåttigt, trots stereohögtalare.

Apples förflyttning mot förstärkt verklighet är viktig och kommer säkert att bli framgångsrik tack vare en stor plattform och enorm potential för snabba och lönsamma tekniska framsteg. AR fungerar redan bra, men är ännu inte så exakt eller sofistikerad som Asus Zenfone AR, till exempel.

Allt som allt, iPhone 8 Plus är en bra produkt med sofistikerade komponenter, men telefonen och användbara tillbehör är också väldigt dyra.

Apple iPhone 8 Plus - 09/29/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli

Design
91%
Tangentbord
73 / 75 → 97%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
43 / 60 → 72%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
65 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
81 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
90%
Medel
82%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone 8 Plus (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli, 2017-10- 4 (Update: 2017-10- 4)