Notebookcheck

Test: Sony Xperia L4 - Smartphone från 2020 med Android från 2018 (Sammanfattning)

Ny utsida, gammal insida. Om du inte vill ha en halvtråkigt designad smartphone har Sony alltid varit ett bra val. Med sitt vinklade utseende kan till och med en billig smartphone som Xperia L4 skilja sig från sina konkurrenter på ett trevlig sätt. Om bara inte mjukvaran också skiljde sig så mycket...
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4 (Xperia Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8320
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
6.20 tum 21:9, 1680 x 720 pixlar 295 PPI, Tryckkänslig, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 64 GB eMMC, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B40) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.7 x 159 x 71
Batteri
3580 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, Fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, Video @1080p/​30fps (Kamera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, Vidvinkelobjektiv (Kamera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, Skärpedjup (Kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, Headset, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.68W/kg (huvud), 1.33W/kg (kropp); LTE Cat 6 (300Mbps/50Mbps); Notis-LED (framsidan), fanless
Vikt
178 g, Strömförsörjning: 62 g
Pris
199 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
75 %7
10/2020
Sony Xperia L4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"1680x720
78 %7
06/2020
realme 6i
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
81 %7
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %7
05/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4
Sony Xperia L4

Storleksjämförelse

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.4 mm 75.4 mm 9 mm 199 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g159 mm 71 mm 8.7 mm 178 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s ∼100% +138%
Sony Xperia L4
802.11 b/g/n
120 (106min - 124max) MBit/s ∼42%
Motorola Moto G8
802.11 b/g/n
54.4 (38min - 57max) MBit/s ∼19% -55%
realme 6i
802.11 b/g/n
36.1 (9min - 57max) MBit/s ∼13% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s ∼100% +135%
Sony Xperia L4
802.11 b/g/n
109 (103min - 114max) MBit/s ∼43%
realme 6i
802.11 b/g/n
66.5 (34min - 69max) MBit/s ∼26% -39%
Motorola Moto G8
802.11 b/g/n
55.8 (40min - 67max) MBit/s ∼22% -49%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø120 (106-124)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø109 (103-114)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
74.3 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
85.6 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia L4: 46.14 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 85.56 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia L4: 8.61 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 12.81 ∆E
394
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 429 cd/m² Medel: 403.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 429 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1650:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.14 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Sony Xperia L4
IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
realme 6i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.40
Response Times
25%
27%
188%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58 (33, 25)
50.4 (25.2, 25.2)
13%
44 (21, 23)
24%
46 (23, 23)
21%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (19, 15)
21.6 (7.6, 14)
36%
24 (9, 15)
29%
28 (11, 17)
18%
PWM Frequency
100 (15)
625
525%
Screen
6%
6%
20%
Brightness middle
429
518
21%
622
45%
504
17%
Brightness
404
484
20%
612
51%
452
12%
Brightness Distribution
92
89
-3%
94
2%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.26
0.26
-0%
0.56
-115%
0.28
-8%
Contrast
1650
1992
21%
1111
-33%
1800
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.14
5.8
6%
3.98
35%
3.84
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.51
11
-5%
7.33
30%
6.1
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
7.3
-11%
4.5
32%
2.7
59%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.206 100%
2.235 98%
CCT
8346 78%
8037 81%
7361 88%
7125 91%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 10%
17% / 10%
104% / 66%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9604 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼45%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1348 Points ∼69% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼86% +91%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1280 Points ∼65% +45%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (475 - 883, n=6)
729 Points ∼37% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=141)
1964 Points ∼100% +122%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
150 Points ∼26%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
387 Points ∼68% +158%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼99% +273%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼54% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (134 - 150, n=6)
142 Points ∼25% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=141)
567 Points ∼100% +278%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5251 Points ∼60%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8733 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points ∼88% +46%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6969 Points ∼80% +33%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5380, n=20)
4693 Points ∼54% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=541)
6024 Points ∼69% +15%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6909 Points ∼57%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12043 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points ∼75% +31%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9051 Points ∼75% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 7465, n=17)
5863 Points ∼49% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=698)
6624 Points ∼55% -4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1102 Points ∼34%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2689 Points ∼83% +144%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +195%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼73% +116%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1187, n=19)
1025 Points ∼31% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=547)
2256 Points ∼69% +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
467 Points ∼18%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼46% +152%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +446%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼39% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 467, n=19)
420 Points ∼16% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=547)
2234 Points ∼88% +378%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
536 Points ∼20%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1347 Points ∼50% +151%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +400%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼42% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 536, n=19)
483 Points ∼18% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=548)
2070 Points ∼77% +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼34%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2552 Points ∼78% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +195%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼72% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=20)
1022 Points ∼31% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=579)
2173 Points ∼67% +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
782 Points ∼21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼43% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +386%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼44% +113%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 823, n=20)
713 Points ∼19% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=579)
3035 Points ∼80% +288%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
836 Points ∼23%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1772 Points ∼48% +112%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +339%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼49% +113%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 873, n=20)
763 Points ∼21% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=579)
2515 Points ∼69% +201%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1078 Points ∼34%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2607 Points ∼83% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +192%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼76% +123%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1131, n=19)
1007 Points ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=628)
2133 Points ∼68% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
405 Points ∼17%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼50% +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +485%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼40% +133%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (222 - 405, n=19)
321 Points ∼14% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=628)
1878 Points ∼79% +364%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
470 Points ∼19%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1342 Points ∼54% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +433%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼44% +133%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (269 - 470, n=19)
377 Points ∼15% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=629)
1779 Points ∼71% +279%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1084 Points ∼35%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2610 Points ∼85% +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +183%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼78% +122%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=20)
1010 Points ∼33% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=670)
2004 Points ∼65% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
680 Points ∼19%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1625 Points ∼45% +139%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +436%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼45% +140%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 750, n=20)
555 Points ∼15% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=669)
2485 Points ∼68% +265%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
741 Points ∼21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1774 Points ∼51% +139%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +372%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼50% +137%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 830, n=20)
616 Points ∼18% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=672)
2123 Points ∼61% +187%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14930 Points ∼61%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16820 Points ∼69% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼82% +34%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9080 - 15891, n=20)
12110 Points ∼50% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=814)
15761 Points ∼64% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11549 Points ∼22%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25518 Points ∼48% +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +356%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼47% +115%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 13491, n=20)
11373 Points ∼22% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=812)
28064 Points ∼53% +143%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12161 Points ∼31%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22888 Points ∼59% +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +218%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼64% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 13960, n=20)
11460 Points ∼30% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=812)
21675 Points ∼56% +78%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼35%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼95% +168%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼95% +168%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼78% +122%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.8, n=18)
4.33 fps ∼37% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=339)
11.6 fps ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼40% +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼85% +400%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼34% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=18)
1.394 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=337)
8.2 fps ∼100% +486%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼94% +166%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼83% +134%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.4 - 7.6, n=18)
6.89 fps ∼38% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=343)
17.3 fps ∼96% +170%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼19%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼46% +142%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼41% +116%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=18)
3.82 fps ∼19% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=342)
19.9 fps ∼100% +424%
Sony Xperia L4realme 6iXiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
109%
108%
79%
-0%
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
58 (11.2 - 74.7, n=131)
-7%
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=546)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
77.1 (21.1 - 87.2, n=131)
-8%
69.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=546)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
22.5
150.87
571%
123.6
449%
128.1
469%
27.7 (3.4 - 147, n=149)
23%
38.1 (0.14 - 319, n=907)
69%
Random Read 4KB
61.2
73.46
20%
137
124%
57.3
-6%
56.2 (11.4 - 149, n=149)
-8%
61.3 (1.59 - 325, n=907)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
165
256.36
55%
214.8
30%
239
45%
175 (40 - 254, n=149)
6%
134 (2.99 - 1321, n=907)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.4
309.45
5%
496.6
69%
301
3%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=149)
-7%
353 (12.1 - 2037, n=907)
20%
Hög belastning
 41.1 °C36.8 °C35.9 °C 
 41 °C36.7 °C35.9 °C 
 39.7 °C36.9 °C36.7 °C 
Max: 41.1 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
32.9 °C34.9 °C39.3 °C
34.6 °C35.9 °C40 °C
35 °C36.4 °C39.5 °C
Max: 40 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  37.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.742.72537.3403129.229.54032.432.2503233.66323.623.48021.719.610021.920.112522.525.216018.525.320014.828.325012.335.331512.542.440011.941.350013.153.263014.557.880018.759.4100019.366.2125018.268.6160016.465.1200014.366.1250014.963.3315014.662.4400015.462.6500016.159.1630016.761.9800017.761.41000018.659.51250019.451.61600020.340.5SPL28.775.6N133.4median 16.4median 59.1Delta2.311.432.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.41.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia L4Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia L4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Sony Xperia L4
3580 mAh
realme 6i
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
783
1318
68%
1187
52%
988
26%
704 (223 - 2636, n=776)
-10%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 03min

För

+ Chic och tunn design
+ Håller sig sval
+ Huvudkameran har skaplig bildkvalitet
+ Ganska snabbt WLAN

Emot

- Inte särskilt kraftfull
- Utdaterad mjukvara
- Jämförelsevis kort batteritid
- Skärmen har en blå ton

Omdöme - Det räcker inte att se bra ut

Recension av Sony Xperia L4. Recensionsex från Sony Mobile Germany och
Recension av Sony Xperia L4. Recensionsex från Sony Mobile Germany och
cyberport.com

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xperia L4 har en nedtonad men väldigt chic design och ser mycket dyrare ut än den är. Tyvärr hjälper detta inte särskilt mycket om insidan inte håller måttet: Mjukvaran är utdaterad, precis som säkerhetspatcharna. Skärmen är inte tillräckligt ljusstark och har en kraftig blå ton.

På fördelssidan så låter högtalarna trevligt, den har aningen snabbare WLAN än en del jämförbara enheter och det finns möjlighet att ladda telefonen snabbt om du köper en lämplig laddare. Dessutom tar kameran skapliga bilder och är ganska flexibel med sina många linser.

Konkurrensen är dock hård i den här miljön och Sony Xperia L4 är definitivt inte en vinnare i sin klass när det kommer till prestanda i förhållande till priset.

Sony Xperia L4 har ett övertygande utseende men den utdaterade mjukvaran håller inte måttet.

Men om du förälskat dig i den här telefonens design och undrar om du får en ordentlig telefon för dina pengar kan jag säga följande: Om priset går ner kan du absolut ta en titt på den. Men då får du inte vara så noggrann med uppdaterad mjukvara och lång batteritid.

Sony Xperia L4 - 08/13/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
81%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
39 / 70 → 56%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
7 / 64 → 11%
Programprestanda
55 / 86 → 64%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
46 / 90 → 51%
Camera
53%
Medel
68%
75%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Sony Xperia L4 - Smartphone från 2020 med Android från 2018 (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-10-20 (Update: 2020-10-20)