Notebookcheck

Test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/30/2018

Allt i HDR. HDR är en nyckelterm för Sonys nya toppskikts-telefon Xperia XZ2: Skärmen stödjer HDR 10 och är kapabel till att skala upp innehåll till HDR samtidigt som kameran kan spela in video i HDR. Är detta en sann innovation eller är det otillräckligt för att konkurrera på marknaden?

Sony Xperia XZ2 (Xperia Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.7 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, TRILUMINOS-skärm för mobil, Dynamic Contrast Enhancer, X-Reality för mobil, Bravia TV Uppskalning till HDR, HDR 10, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: ljudutgång via USB-C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 400 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, barometer, USB-C 3.1, DLNA, Miracast, USB OTG, aptX, aptX HD
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (800/​850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 11.1 x 153 x 72
Batteri
12.08 Wh, 3180 mAh Litiumjon, Quick Charge 3.0
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix f/​2.0, kontrast-AF, laser-AF, fasskift-AF, färgspektrum-sensor, LED-blixt, video @2160p/​30fps, video @1080p/​960fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, video @1080p
Övrigt
Högtalare: framåtriktade stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, USB-laddare, USB-kabel, adapter för USB-C till 3.5 mm, headset, 3D Creator, Skizze, Playstation App, AVG Protection, 24 Månader Garanti, bandbredd (nerladdning/​uppladdning): 1200Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR-värde: 0.56W/​kg (huvud), 0.94W/​kg (kropp); trådlös laddning (Qi); IP65/​IP68-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
198 g, Strömförsörjning: 71 g
Pris
799 Kr

 

Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼52% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼36% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=200)
201 MBit/s ∼21% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=200)
193 MBit/s ∼30% -70%
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - loop
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
646
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 646 cd/m² Medel: 632.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6.73 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 630 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1432:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.17
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Screen
-54%
1%
-2%
11%
Brightness middle
630
620
-2%
529
-16%
629
0%
600
-5%
Brightness
632
610
-3%
527
-17%
636
1%
606
-4%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
96
0%
94
-2%
94
-2%
Black Level *
0.44
0.79
-80%
Contrast
1432
785
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
4.2
-180%
1.4
7%
1.7
-13%
1.2
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.3
5.8
-35%
4
7%
3.6
16%
3
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
3.9
-86%
1.6
24%
2.4
-14%
1.6
24%
Gamma
2.17 111%
2.02 119%
2.16 111%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
CCT
6513 100%
7086 92%
6358 102%
6337 103%
6707 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 28 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 230421, n=4)
210873 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (39089 - 230421, n=296)
70951 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼79% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points ∼65% -34%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼85% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8069 - 8358, n=5)
8172 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2152 - 8282, n=159)
4529 Points ∼55% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points ∼61% -38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (9179 - 9630, n=4)
9427 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 9630, n=324)
4660 Points ∼49% -50%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼65% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -8%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1234 - 1390, n=4)
1339 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 1682, n=399)
674 Points ∼40% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼64% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -54%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7868 - 7957, n=4)
7923 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=399)
1516 Points ∼16% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼42% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼64% +22%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼100% +89%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 3799, n=4)
2887 Points ∼70% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=399)
1106 Points ∼27% -50%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼57% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼61% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -38%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=4)
7714 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=399)
2189 Points ∼21% -74%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼96%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼75% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼84% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼81% -16%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3614 - 4308, n=4)
3896 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=402)
1124 Points ∼29% -70%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14073 - 14362, n=2)
14218 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (912 - 14362, n=100)
4040 Points ∼28% -72%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼63% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼86% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼66% -20%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 8937, n=4)
8594 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=142)
4147 Points ∼40% -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼44% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼86% +50%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼45% -23%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2442 - 2464, n=4)
2454 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=143)
1256 Points ∼29% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2606 - 3669, n=4)
3334 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1111 - 3669, n=251)
1544 Points ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -44%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼67% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5122 - 5212, n=4)
5169 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=251)
1092 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼61% -39%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4248 - 4732, n=4)
4587 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=259)
1037 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=4)
3084 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1120 - 3642, n=280)
1434 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (6630 - 8252, n=4)
7780 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8252, n=280)
1454 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4540 - 6378, n=4)
5794 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (71 - 6378, n=288)
1238 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (30245 - 36494, n=4)
34197 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=434)
12043 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼43% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼43% -40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼30% -58%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 81269, n=4)
79313 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9479 - 113380, n=434)
15429 Points ∼14% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼64% -35%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼48% -51%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56913 - 63084, n=4)
61291 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9202 - 64405, n=435)
13316 Points ∼21% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼63% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼81% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼63% -25%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (149 - 151, n=5)
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5.1 - 177, n=459)
27.1 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.7 - 120, n=462)
23.4 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼63% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼61% -34%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (66 - 82, n=4)
74.3 fps ∼84% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=385)
14.4 fps ∼16% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 59, n=4)
58.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=387)
14.5 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56 - 60.9, n=5)
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=251)
12.9 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 55, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 110, n=253)
12.8 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 35, n=4)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 35, n=183)
8.99 fps ∼26% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼42% -58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 34, n=4)
33 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 50, n=186)
8.05 fps ∼24% -76%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
9670 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8294 Points ∼61% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
13626 Points ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone X
11107 Points ∼82% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7910 - 12310, n=5)
10007 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4042 - 16148, n=70)
7066 Points ∼52% -27%
UX (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
56292 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9
55698 Points ∼97% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
44584 Points ∼78% -21%
Apple iPhone X
50699 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (55456 - 58498, n=5)
57194 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (14353 - 58218, n=70)
28551 Points ∼50% -49%
GPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
106371 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9
91292 Points ∼85% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
81761 Points ∼76% -23%
Apple iPhone X
94618 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (106371 - 107334, n=5)
107017 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (11512 - 107334, n=70)
35554 Points ∼33% -67%
CPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
94648 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S9
88577 Points ∼89% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
72307 Points ∼72% -24%
Apple iPhone X
99873 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (88739 - 94648, n=5)
92131 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (24715 - 99873, n=70)
45634 Points ∼46% -52%
Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (265569 - 266981, n=5)
266350 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (54622 - 266981, n=70)
116948 Points ∼44% -56%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (69.8 - 89.5, n=5)
84.3 Points ∼38% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼30% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼27% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=316)
34.8 Points ∼16% -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +110%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14491 - 17131, n=6)
16277 Points ∼46% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼43% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼29% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=453)
5021 Points ∼14% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=472)
11866 ms * ∼100% -396%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼30% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼28% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2394 - 2868, n=6)
2493 ms * ∼21% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼18% +13%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (228 - 291, n=5)
255 Points ∼72% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼46% -38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼45% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=225)
96.6 Points ∼27% -63%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XZ2Sony Xperia XZ1Samsung Galaxy S9Huawei Mate 10 ProApple iPhone XAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
24%
50%
217%
45%
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58%
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
123%
47.5 (17.1 - 67.2, n=17)
58%
42 (8.29 - 87.1, n=230)
39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
91%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
131%
64 (18 - 80.6, n=17)
87%
60.4 (13.5 - 96.5, n=230)
76%
Random Write 4KB
17
14.93
-12%
23.07
36%
164.45
867%
38.5 (8.77 - 152, n=22)
126%
12.8 (0.14 - 164, n=505)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
149.4
156.61
5%
131
-12%
132.27
-11%
137 (78.2 - 173, n=22)
-8%
33.2 (1.59 - 173, n=505)
-78%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.7
204.43
3%
206.94
4%
208.72
5%
194 (133 - 214, n=22)
-2%
67.5 (2.99 - 215, n=505)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
679.2
679.13
0%
815.43
20%
732.46
8%
725 (529 - 819, n=22)
7%
205 (12.1 - 832, n=505)
-70%
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 InställningarVärde
 half resolution60 fps
 full resolution60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 39.7 °C39.1 °C36.3 °C 
 39.3 °C38.6 °C38.2 °C 
 36.3 °C37.3 °C38 °C 
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C
33.3 °C35.3 °C37.4 °C
32.9 °C34.8 °C37.3 °C
32.9 °C33.9 °C35.7 °C
Max: 37.4 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2422532.937.23137.232.14031.738.65039.640.36328.332.98027.328.710026.932.812526.730.41602433.320020.939.425020.947.231519.554.740018.559.150017.565.863017.569.980015.773.3100015.876.7125016.674.4160015.873.5200015.476.7250015.577.131501674.7400015.868.350001666.6630016.369.6800016.374.31000016.2711250016.4621600016.452.5SPL28.685.6N1.162.7median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ2median 68.3Delta2.111.535.234.832.932.637.230.531.73139.635.128.329.927.32826.922.626.723.32426.120.934.120.940.719.550.518.557.217.56417.565.115.768.215.869.416.668.215.867.915.473.715.572.71670.615.8651666.616.364.116.364.716.263.616.460.916.455.228.680.91.146.3median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ1median 64.12.110.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia XZ2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.16 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.21 / 2.22 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.6 / 9.34 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-6%
35%
19%
-1%
10%
15%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.51
29%
0.65
10%
0.85
-18%
1.03
-43%
0.623 (0.42 - 0.75, n=4)
13%
0.849 (0.2 - 3.4, n=532)
-18%
Idle Average *
2.21
2.16
2%
0.81
63%
1.15
48%
2.4
-9%
1.75 (1 - 2.25, n=4)
21%
1.684 (0.6 - 6.2, n=531)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.22
2.23
-0%
0.92
59%
1.23
45%
2.6
-17%
1.913 (1.57 - 2.26, n=4)
14%
1.916 (0.74 - 6.6, n=532)
14%
Load Average *
4.6
7.45
-62%
4.76
-3%
4.12
10%
2.96
36%
4.68 (4.3 - 4.94, n=4)
-2%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=526)
14%
Load Maximum *
9.34
9.28
1%
5.16
45%
8.42
10%
6.6
29%
9.14 (8.6 - 9.6, n=4)
2%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=526)
40%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
23tim 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 39min
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-15%
56%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1402
1612
15%
1182
-16%
1744
24%
1292
-8%
H.264
722
580
-20%
609
-16%
929
29%
634
-12%
WiFi v1.3
679
601
-11%
474
-30%
818
20%
564
-17%
Load
159
172
8%
164
3%
398
150%
180
13%

För

+ blixtsnabb smartphone
+ spel i 60 fps är möjligt
+ ljusstark skärm med levande färger
+ huvudkamera med många funktioner...
+ ...och riktigt bra bildkvalitet
+ 3D-scanning är möjligt
+ höljet skyddat enligt IP68
+ väldigt exakt touch-inmatning
+ snabbt LTE med många band
+ exakt GPS
+ bra hårdvara
+ utförlig mjukvara av hög kvalitet

Emot

- en del bloatware-appar
- drar på sig fingeravtryck
- fingeravtrycksläsaren är svår att känna
- högtalaren dundrar för starka röster
- medelmåttig högtalarkvalitet
- relativt långsam åtkomst till microSD
- stundvis hög energiförbrukning
- relativt bred infattning
- ingen 3.5 mm anslutning
- stryps vid belastning
The Sony Xperia XZ2 in review, courtesy of Sony Germany.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 in review, courtesy of Sony Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Åh Sony... vi vill ge era smartphones beröm för att dom är vågade och för att ni kan presentera dom väl. Men sen påminns vi om att ni har sovit er förbi hela trenden med infattningsfria telefoner och att ni nu släpper en telefon som helt och hållet ignorerar alla designtraditioner som ert märke har. Samt att ni alltid är aningen efter när det kommer till hur mycket minne ni installerar i era telefoner. Anledningen till att samtalskvaliteten och ljudet från högtalaren har fortsatt att försämras ända sedan Xperia Z3 är det nog ingen annan än er själva som känner till.

Vi kan inte ge Xperia XZ2 beröm utan förbehåll, även om den fortfarande är en bra smartphone: Kamerorna med HDR-stöd för video och möjligheten att scanna in 3D-objekt låter inte bara bra på papperet. Även om den framåtriktade kamerans upplösning är betydligt lägre än på den föregående telefonen så tar den fortfarande bra bilder. Telefonens prestanda är utmärkt och möjliggör spelande i 60 fps. Dessutom är värmeutvecklingen på en acceptabel nivå. Batteritiden är bra, men den kunde förbättrats genom lägre energiförbrukning.

Sony Xperia XZ2 är en smartphone av hög kvalitet. Dess prestanda och utmärkta kameror är starka anledningar att köpa den.

Trots en del hinder så levererar denna smartphone från Sony ändå tillräckligt med bra anledningar för att rekommendera den. Den utmärkta hårdvaran och blixtsnabba prestandan är bara två av dom anledningarna.

Sony Xperia XZ2 - 04/23/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
92%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 91%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
48 / 60 → 81%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
70 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
72 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
87%
Medel
81%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-04-30 (Update: 2018-04-30)