Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 80°, f/1.9); Camera2 API: Fullständigt
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=664) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=664) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 701 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.10 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.80 | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41 | LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.40 | Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00 | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 10% | 12% | -5% | 4% | -62% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 701 | 529 -25% | 639 -9% | 437 -38% | 567 -19% | 543 -23% | 569 -19% |
Brightness | 705 | 527 -25% | 637 -10% | 442 -37% | 559 -21% | 542 -23% | 578 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 96 -2% | 94 -4% | 95 -3% | 89 -9% | 92 -6% | 95 -3% |
Black Level * | |||||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 3.7 | 1.4 62% | 1 73% | 2.21 40% | 3.3 11% | 6.6 -78% | 1.3 65% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 10.3 | 4 61% | 2.2 79% | 4.27 59% | 6.1 41% | 11 -7% | 2.1 80% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 2.2 -57% | 2.1 -50% | 1.1 21% | 4.7 -236% | 1.6 -14% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.16 102% | 1.9 116% | 2.307 95% | 2.46 89% | 1.835 120% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6553 99% | 6358 102% | 6364 102% | 6353 102% | 6495 100% | 6817 95% | 6401 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10192, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=367) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14895, n=434) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4529, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 5099, n=434) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=582) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=730) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=844) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=853) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=749) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 119, n=757) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=612) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=614) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=74) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=64) | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=62) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
OnePlus 6T | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 283270, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=102) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=150) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=667) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=839) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=865) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=306) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (165 - 362, n=347) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S10 | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Huawei P20 Pro | Nokia 8 Sirocco | LG V40 ThinQ | Sony Xperia XZ3 | OnePlus 6T | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | 141% | -2% | -2% | -23% | -4% | 65% | -15% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4% | 63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3% | 30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53% | 60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42) -7% | 51.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=576) -20% | |||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9% | 34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -56% | 76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42) -2% | 69.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=576) -10% | |||
Random Write 4KB | 24.44 | 23.07 -6% | 160.49 557% | 22.4 -8% | 23.36 -4% | 22.22 -9% | 22 -10% | 115 (18.2 - 290, n=74) 371% | 42 (0.14 - 319, n=953) 72% |
Random Read 4KB | 137.4 | 131 -5% | 144.33 5% | 140.7 2% | 130.13 -5% | 135.67 -1% | 138.5 1% | 144 (92.6 - 239, n=74) 5% | 64.7 (1.59 - 325, n=953) -53% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 193.24 | 206.94 7% | 196.69 2% | 211.6 10% | 203.92 6% | 196.14 2% | 204.4 6% | 250 (182 - 511, n=74) 29% | 144 (2.99 - 1321, n=953) -25% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 831.94 | 815.43 -2% | 831.82 0% | 737.5 -11% | 689.59 -17% | 680.98 -18% | 735.3 -12% | 779 (427 - 999, n=74) -6% | 370 (12.1 - 2037, n=953) -56% |