Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/25/2019

Dvärggalax - Samsung har satt ett mer attraktivt pris på S10, den mindre varianten av toppskikts-modellerna i S10-serien. Utöver en mindre skärm har den ett batteri med lägre kapacitet, en enkel framåtriktad kamera och en mindre mängd intern lagring. Det går heller inte att få den keramiska baksidan som S10+ har. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur Galaxy S10 står sig mot sin Plus-motsvarighet och hur den står sig mot andra moderna flaggskepp.

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S10 (Galaxy S Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9820

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Minne

8192 MB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.1 tum 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixlar 551 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 108.5 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: MicroSD-kort på upp till 512 GB. Filsystem som stöds: FAT, FAT32 och exFAT, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyrosensor, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Sensor för hjärtfrekvens, Närhetssensor, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100 och AWS. LTE Cat. 20: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600 MHz, AWS och AWS-3., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 149.9 x 70.4

Batteri

12.71 Wh, 3400 mAh Litiumjon, 3.85 V, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Trådlös laddning, Wireless PowerShare

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 77°, f/1.5 & f/2.4, 1.4 μm, OIS) & 12 MPix (Teleobjektiv, 2 x förstoring, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, OIS) & 16 MPix (Ultra-vidvinkel, Fixfokus, 123°, f/2.2), Ultra HD-video; Camera2 API: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 80°, f/1.9); Camera2 API: Fullständigt

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, 2 OTG-adaptrar, AKG-headset, Snabbstartsguide, Säkerhetsinstruktioner, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Månader Garanti, IP68-certifierad, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.593 W/kg, Huvud - 0.477 W/kg., fanless

Vikt

157 g, Strömförsörjning: 57 g

Pris

899 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	650 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 MBit/s ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	278 MBit/s ∼41% -56%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=392)	221 MBit/s ∼33% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	587 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼99%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	550 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼81% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	437 MBit/s ∼74% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=392)	212 MBit/s ∼36% -63%

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø639 (612-683)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (558-592)

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 – Cykeltur runt en sjö

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Vår testkarta fotograferad med ultra-vidvinkelslinsen

Vår testkarta fotograferad med teleobjektivet

ColorChecker Passport: Den lägre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen


709 cd/m²	698 cd/m²	708 cd/m²
702 cd/m²	701 cd/m²	702 cd/m²
713 cd/m²	707 cd/m²	705 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 713 cd/m² Medel: 705 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 701 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1	Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8	Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4	Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6	Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen		10%	12%	-5%	4%	-62%	15%
Brightness middle	701	529 -25%	639 -9%	437 -38%	567 -19%	543 -23%	569 -19%
Brightness	705	527 -25%	637 -10%	442 -37%	559 -21%	542 -23%	578 -18%
Brightness Distribution	98	96 -2%	94 -4%	95 -3%	89 -9%	92 -6%	95 -3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.7	1.4 62%	1 73%	2.21 40%	3.3 11%	6.6 -78%	1.3 65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	10.3	4 61%	2.2 79%	4.27 59%	6.1 41%	11 -7%	2.1 80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.4	1.6 -14%	2.2 -57%	2.1 -50%	1.1 21%	4.7 -236%	1.6 -14%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.16 ^102%	1.9 ^116%	2.307 ^95%	2.46 ^89%	1.835 ^120%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6553 ^99%	6358 ^102%	6364 ^102%	6353 ^102%	6495 ^100%	6817 ^95%	6401 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9566 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6219 Points ∼46% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼55% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8025 Points ∼59% -21%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7865 Points ∼58% -22%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points ∼99% +32%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points ∼100% +33%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13194 Points ∼98% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10177, n=3)	10158 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=294)	4519 Points ∼33% -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	8786 Points ∼76% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼95% +8%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11598 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6756 Points ∼58% -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6701 Points ∼58% -34%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points ∼78% -11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points ∼75% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7934 Points ∼68% -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=3)	10325 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=348)	4470 Points ∼39% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3688 Points ∼76% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼73% -22%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4824 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1922 Points ∼40% -57%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1952 Points ∼40% -57%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points ∼49% -47%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points ∼50% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2272 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4506, n=3)	4503 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (437 - 4824, n=349)	1326 Points ∼27% -71%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5291 Points ∼59% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6982 Points ∼77% -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7193 Points ∼80% -5%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points ∼94% +12%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points ∼90% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=3)	7791 Points ∼86% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 10450, n=341)	4920 Points ∼54% -35%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5736 Points ∼50% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼96% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8115 Points ∼71% -17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7925 Points ∼69% -19%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points ∼92% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points ∼90% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11474 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9750 - 10008, n=3)	9850 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4290 - 14439, n=509)	5369 Points ∼47% -45%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2590 Points ∼69% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2998 Points ∼80% +1%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2942 Points ∼78% -1%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2382 Points ∼63% -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points ∼98% +23%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points ∼75% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3764 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2925 - 3106, n=3)	3004 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=357)	1811 Points ∼48% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3697 Points ∼52% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100% +32%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5139 Points ∼73% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3109 Points ∼44% -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4187 Points ∼59% -22%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points ∼83% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points ∼58% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5810 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5358 - 5371, n=3)	5366 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=357)	1547 Points ∼22% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3376 Points ∼57% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4436 Points ∼75% -3%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3070 Points ∼52% -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3584 Points ∼61% -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points ∼88% +14%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points ∼63% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5184 Points ∼88% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4529 - 4620, n=3)	4567 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=360)	1445 Points ∼24% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2650 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2952 Points ∼78%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2940 Points ∼78%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2119 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points ∼89%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3672 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (3077 - 3087, n=2)	3082 Points ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=372)	1786 Points ∼47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4843 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	14951 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3503 Points ∼23%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4514 Points ∼30%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points ∼56%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8369 Points ∼56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4449 - 4886, n=2)	4668 Points ∼31%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=372)	2136 Points ∼14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4091 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7856 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3360 Points ∼43%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3608 Points ∼46%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points ∼80%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6517 Points ∼83%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4052 - 4321, n=2)	4187 Points ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=373)	1818 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2486 Points ∼66% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼100% +32%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2960 Points ∼79% +4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2926 Points ∼78% +3%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2946 Points ∼78% +3%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points ∼94% +24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points ∼73% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3703 Points ∼99% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2854 - 3005, n=3)	2945 Points ∼78% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=433)	1740 Points ∼46% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3553 Points ∼56% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100% +23%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3712 Points ∼58% -28%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3017 Points ∼47% -42%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3926 Points ∼62% -24%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points ∼82% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points ∼67% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5092 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5176 - 5206, n=3)	5189 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=435)	1278 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3244 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3514 Points ∼64% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2996 Points ∼54% -32%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3656 Points ∼66% -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points ∼86% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points ∼69% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4700 Points ∼85% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4383 - 4477, n=3)	4437 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=443)	1224 Points ∼22% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2600 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2885 Points ∼80%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2287 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points ∼96%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3603 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2875 - 2906, n=2)	2891 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=466)	1647 Points ∼46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4569 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3335 Points ∼33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4511 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points ∼83%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8014 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4507 - 5303, n=2)	4905 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=466)	1746 Points ∼18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3911 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3223 Points ∼45%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3709 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points ∼88%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6300 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4015 - 4465, n=2)	4240 Points ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=474)	1499 Points ∼21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	26851 Points ∼73% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼69% -19%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27400 Points ∼74% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22441 Points ∼61% -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	21407 Points ∼58% -32%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points ∼95% +12%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points ∼83% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	36794 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (31297 - 32302, n=3)	31918 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (8253 - 45072, n=625)	13502 Points ∼37% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	48433 Points ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼67% +49%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	160199 Points ∼100% +125%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	33472 Points ∼21% -53%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	58018 Points ∼36% -19%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points ∼53% +19%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points ∼50% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83927 Points ∼52% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (70318 - 72022, n=3)	71211 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3585 - 162695, n=625)	19473 Points ∼12% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	41093 Points ∼53% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼81% +12%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77128 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	30176 Points ∼39% -46%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	42040 Points ∼55% -24%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points ∼84% +16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points ∼76% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	65330 Points ∼85% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (55524 - 56465, n=3)	55910 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=626)	16287 Points ∼21% -71%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	144 fps ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼67% +17%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	251 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	121 fps ∼48% -15%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	106 fps ∼42% -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps ∼61% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps ∼42% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	152 fps ∼61% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=3)	127 fps ∼51% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=651)	34 fps ∼14% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=3)	59.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=654)	26.4 fps ∼44% -56%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	73 fps ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼87% +18%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	115 fps ∼100% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	61 fps ∼53% -28%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	54 fps ∼47% -36%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼51% -31%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼51% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83 fps ∼72% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=3)	79 fps ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=570)	18.6 fps ∼16% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	45 fps ∼75% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	54 fps ∼90% +2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	37 fps ∼62% -30%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼98% +11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps ∼55% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	50 fps ∼83% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=3)	55 fps ∼92% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=575)	17.3 fps ∼29% -67%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	46 fps ∼67% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	62 fps ∼90% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	39 fps ∼57% -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	41 fps ∼59% -23%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼86% +11%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps ∼59% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	57 fps ∼83% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=3)	57.7 fps ∼84% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=432)	15.5 fps ∼22% -71%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	24 fps ∼41% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼100% +93%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps ∼83% +60%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	36 fps ∼62% +20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	24 fps ∼41% -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps ∼91% +77%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps ∼36% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	31 fps ∼53% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=3)	40 fps ∼69% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=435)	14.8 fps ∼26% -51%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼69% +50%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	35 fps ∼100% +119%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	14 fps ∼40% -12%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps ∼63% +38%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps ∼34% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps ∼40% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 28, n=3)	20 fps ∼57% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=136)	8.85 fps ∼25% -45%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼73% -6%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	22 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8.6 fps ∼39% -49%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼64% -18%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps ∼55% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps ∼64% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 17, n=3)	16.7 fps ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=136)	6.1 fps ∼28% -64%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼90% +48%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	41 fps ∼100% +64%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps ∼56% -8%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps ∼83% +36%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps ∼39% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	21 fps ∼51% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 26, n=3)	22.3 fps ∼54% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=137)	13.2 fps ∼32% -47%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼85% -7%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps ∼100% +9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps ∼48% -48%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps ∼77% -16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps ∼63% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps ∼77% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (41 - 46, n=3)	43.7 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=136)	14.7 fps ∼31% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	28 fps ∼67% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +20%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	38 fps ∼90% +9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps ∼55% -34%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	26 fps ∼62% -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼83% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps ∼62% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35 fps ∼83% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (35 - 43, n=3)	40.3 fps ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=361)	10.5 fps ∼25% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	14 fps ∼37% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +65%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps ∼82% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22 fps ∼58% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	15 fps ∼39% -35%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼82% +35%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps ∼34% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	19 fps ∼50% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (23 - 40, n=3)	28.7 fps ∼76% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=365)	9.41 fps ∼25% -59%

Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼65% -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35.34 fps ∼94% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3)	32.6 fps ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 651, n=57)	27 fps ∼72% -18%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼33% -61%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29.68 fps ∼92% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)	30.2 fps ∼94% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=53)	23.6 fps ∼73% -13%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps ∼93% -7%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼31% -69%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32.86 fps ∼85% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)	38.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=52)	29.1 fps ∼76% -24%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	243861 Points ∼65% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	348178 Points ∼93% +6%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	207959 Points ∼55% -37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	209729 Points ∼56% -36%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points ∼79% -10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points ∼72% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	292268 Points ∼78% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (328111 - 333277, n=3)	330277 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (63421 - 374820, n=253)	127177 Points ∼34% -61%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	269219 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	217950 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	257246 Points ∼94% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	179709 Points ∼66% -33%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	185487 Points ∼68% -31%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points ∼84% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	229374 Points ∼84% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	226853 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 274007, n=3)	272294 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 274007, n=460)	83838 Points ∼31% -69%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1980 Score ∼40%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4716 Score ∼95%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820	4967 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=54)	1981 Score ∼40%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	1099 Points ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼81% -1%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1711 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1273 Points ∼74% -8%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1202 Points ∼70% -13%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points ∼82% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1228 Points ∼72% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1390 Points ∼81% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1383 - 1439, n=3)	1402 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=583)	732 Points ∼43% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6373 Points ∼40% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼58% +26%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15875 Points ∼100% +116%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3725 Points ∼23% -49%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6084 Points ∼38% -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points ∼50% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6726 Points ∼42% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7989 Points ∼50% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7361 - 8484, n=3)	8082 Points ∼51% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=583)	1887 Points ∼12% -74%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2669 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4169 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	4050 Points ∼89% -11%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3162 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points ∼95% -5%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2910 Points ∼64% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2317 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4306 - 4570, n=3)	4450 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=583)	1408 Points ∼31% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6234 Points ∼51% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼69% +13%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	12202 Points ∼100% +63%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	5965 Points ∼49% -20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	5888 Points ∼48% -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points ∼67% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6717 Points ∼55% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8135 Points ∼67% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7476 - 8344, n=3)	7884 Points ∼65% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=583)	2792 Points ∼23% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3285 Points ∼54% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼75% +6%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6097 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3271 Points ∼54% -24%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3416 Points ∼56% -21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points ∼73% +3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3565 Points ∼58% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3804 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4320 - 4548, n=3)	4463 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=587)	1385 Points ∼23% -68%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1927 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	1436 Points ∼55% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points ∼54% -27%
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2606 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	887 Points ∼34% -54%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1201 Points ∼46% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3)	1931 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 2754, n=95)	717 Points ∼28% -63%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	272.3 Points ∼100% +224%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	110.54 Points ∼41% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=2)	87.9 Points ∼32% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	87.883 Points ∼32% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 23832, n=490)	86.8 Points ∼32% +3%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	86.123 Points ∼32% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	84.005 Points ∼31%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	82.61 Points ∼30% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	67.721 Points ∼25% -19%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	62.157 Points ∼23% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	58.255 Points ∼21% -31%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	43280 Points ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼57% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=3)	19944 Points ∼46% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	16982 Points ∼39% -16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points ∼39% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points ∼37% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	15233 Points ∼35% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	11584 Points ∼27% -43%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	11544 Points ∼27% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=645)	6101 Points ∼14% -70%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=664)	10917 ms * ∼100% -467%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	4812.6 ms * ∼44% -150%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	3852.2 ms * ∼35% -100%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms * ∼22% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	2295 ms * ∼21% -19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2281.6 ms * ∼21% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2077.8 ms * ∼19% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1857 - 2240, n=3)	2007 ms * ∼18% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924.2 ms * ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼17% +3%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	609.1 ms * ∼6% +68%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	159 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820	115 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼68%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	98 Points ∼62%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	94 Points ∼59%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	77 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	69 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=117)	63.6 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S9	63 Points ∼40%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	345 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	325 Points ∼94%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)	310 Points ∼90% -5%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	267 Points ∼77% -18%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points ∼75% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	238 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	204 Points ∼59% -37%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	182 Points ∼53% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	163 Points ∼47% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=324)	119 Points ∼34% -63%
Xiaomi Mi 9	Points ∼0% -100%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S10	Samsung Galaxy S9	Huawei P20 Pro	Nokia 8 Sirocco	LG V40 ThinQ	Sony Xperia XZ3	OnePlus 6T	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		0%	141%	-2%	-2%	-23%	-4%	36%	-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%			63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53%		64.7 (51.3 - 72.4, n=13) 0%	48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=391) -25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%			84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -56%		79.6 (73.2 - 85.4, n=13) 2%	66.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=391) -15%
Random Write 4KB	24.44	23.07 -6%	160.49 557%	22.4 -8%	23.36 -4%	22.22 -9%	22 -10%	78.6 (18.2 - 250, n=32) 222%	19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=694) -21%
Random Read 4KB	137.4	131 -5%	144.33 5%	140.7 2%	130.13 -5%	135.67 -1%	138.5 1%	136 (98.9 - 158, n=32) -1%	43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=694) -68%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.24	206.94 7%	196.69 2%	211.6 10%	203.92 6%	196.14 2%	204.4 6%	198 (183 - 212, n=32) 2%	90.2 (2.99 - 392, n=694) -53%
Sequential Read 256KB	831.94	815.43 -2%	831.82 0%	737.5 -11%	689.59 -17%	680.98 -18%	735.3 -12%	741 (427 - 912, n=32) -11%	254 (12.1 - 1468, n=694) -69%

PUBG Mobile

; Smooth; 0.11.0: Ø57.1 (20-60)

; Balanced; 0.11.0: Ø38.7 (19-41)

; HD; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (11-42)

Arena of Valor

; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.7 (45-60)

Dead Trigger 2

; 1.5.5: Ø59.7 (59-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


35.4 °C	34.3 °C	34.6 °C
35.1 °C	35.6 °C	36.2 °C
34.5 °C	35.8 °C	37.4 °C

Max: 37.4 °C
Medel: 35.4 °C


32.9 °C	34.2 °C	34.3 °C
31.9 °C	36.3 °C	36.5 °C
32.7 °C	37.3 °C	35.7 °C

Max: 37.3 °C
Medel: 34.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Låg belastning	0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Hög belastning	6.17 / 8.55 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	-0%	10%	5%	-5%	2%	-8%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.65 -7%	0.95 -56%	0.84 -38%	0.67 -10%	0.87 -43%	0.8 -31%	0.647 (0.6 - 0.73, n=3) -6%	0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724) -44%
Idle Average *	1.27	0.81 36%	1.34 -6%	1.54 -21%	1.26 1%	1.39 -9%	1.2 6%	1.333 (1.2 - 1.53, n=3) -5%	1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723) -37%
Idle Maximum *	1.3	0.92 29%	1.48 -14%	1.57 -21%	1.29 1%	1.41 -8%	1.5 -15%	1.623 (1.3 - 2.07, n=3) -25%	2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724) -55%
Load Average *	6.17	4.76 23%	4 35%	2.47 60%	3.71 40%	3.96 36%	4.8 22%	5.8 (5.2 - 6.17, n=3) 6%	4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718) 34%
Load Maximum *	8.55	5.16 40%	5.13 40%	2.49 71%	9.3 -9%	8.6 -1%	6.2 27%	9.31 (8.55 - 10.2, n=3) -9%	5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718) 31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		20tim 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.0)		7tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		2tim 50min

	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	52%	40%	19%	-8%	55%
Reader / Idle	1259	1182 -6%	1727 37%	1603 27%	1140 -9%	1270 1%	1936 54%
H.264	842	609 -28%	784 -7%	725 -14%	659 -22%	420 -50%	903 7%
WiFi v1.3	427	474 11%	744 74%	693 62%	510 19%	419 -2%	865 103%
Load	170	164 -4%	345 103%	317 86%	320 88%	202 19%	261 54%

Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Arena of Valor

Dead Trigger 2

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis