Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Nokia 8 Sirocco Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 576 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.3
| Nokia 8 Sirocco P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70 | Motorola Moto Z2 Force OLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Nokia 8 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 34% | 1% | 31% | 27% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 576 | 630 9% | 511 -11% | 529 -8% | 568 -1% | 735 28% |
| Brightness | 597 | 632 6% | 526 -12% | 527 -12% | 562 -6% | 707 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 96 13% | 88 4% | 96 13% | 92 8% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.79 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 1.5 70% | 4.3 14% | 1.4 72% | 2.4 52% | 6.7 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8 | 4.3 46% | 9.6 -20% | 4 50% | 3.8 52% | 12.9 -61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.1 61% | 3.7 31% | 1.6 70% | 2.5 54% | 8.3 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.11 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7730 84% | 6513 100% | 7075 92% | 6358 102% | 6779 96% | 8906 73% |
| Contrast | 1432 | 1321 | 930 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (150208 - 185487, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (201881 - 217442, n=8) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (52.9 - 80.4, n=19) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3086 - 14300, n=20) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2425 - 4813, n=19) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (57 - 204, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Motorola Moto Z2 Force | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Huawei P10 Plus | Nokia 8 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | 63% | 1% | 144% | -11% | 135% | 429% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 738 | 679 -8% | 696 -6% | 815 10% | 733 -1% | 680 -8% | 760 ? 3% | 1505 ? 104% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 211.6 | 198.7 -6% | 213.6 1% | 206.9 -2% | 182.6 -14% | 199.1 -6% | 297 ? 40% | 1112 ? 426% |
| Random Read 4KB | 140.7 | 149.4 6% | 148.8 6% | 131 -7% | 173.1 23% | 145.7 4% | 152.9 ? 9% | 247 ? 76% |
| Random Write 4KB | 22.4 | 17 -24% | 78.6 251% | 23.07 3% | 149.8 569% | 14.57 -35% | 131.6 ? 488% | 271 ? 1110% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.25 ? | 77.4 ? | 79.2 ? | 54 ? | 76.8 ? | 76 ? | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.12 ? | 54.7 ? | 67.2 ? | 33.61 ? | 51.7 ? | 59.6 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 8 Sirocco audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.78 / 1.53 / 1.57 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.49 / 6.96 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Nokia 8 3090 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | 29% | 19% | -66% | -33% | -26% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.78 | 0.72 8% | 0.52 33% | 0.65 17% | 1.03 -32% | 0.86 -10% | 0.852 ? -9% | 0.897 ? -15% |
| Idle Average * | 1.53 | 2.21 -44% | 0.84 45% | 0.81 47% | 2.61 -71% | 2.13 -39% | 2.02 ? -32% | 1.452 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.22 -41% | 0.85 46% | 0.92 41% | 2.83 -80% | 2.16 -38% | 2.12 ? -35% | 1.629 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 3.49 | 4.6 -32% | 2.71 22% | 4.76 -36% | 7.03 -101% | 4.65 -33% | 4.69 ? -34% | 5.55 ? -59% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.96 | 9.34 -34% | 7.2 -3% | 5.16 26% | 10.08 -45% | 9.99 -44% | 8.46 ? -22% | 8.31 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Nokia 8 3090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | 1% | -31% | -7% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1603 | 1402 -13% | 1630 2% | 1182 -26% | 1655 3% | 1506 -6% |
| H.264 | 725 | 722 0% | 811 12% | 609 -16% | 756 4% | 733 1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 693 | 679 -2% | 531 -23% | 474 -32% | 760 10% | 650 -6% |
| Load | 317 | 159 -50% | 354 12% | 164 -48% | 174 -45% | 237 -25% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Nokia 8 Sirocco är definitivt en smartphone för individualister; Nokia har hållt vad dom lovade när dom gav den här telefonen ett ganska speciellt namn. Telefonen har alla funktioner som förväntas av en modern toppskikts-modell: Lång batteritid, hög prestanda, en högupplöst skärm, spel i 60 fps, en skaplig dual-kamera och snabbt LTE. Höljet ser väldigt elegant ut, är extremt robust och är dessutom vatten- och dammbeständigt.
Men Sirocco är inte perfekt: Nokia hade behövt hitta en bättre lösning för den underliga färgeffekten som skärmen skapar på vitt innehåll, löst det underliga GPS-beteendet i Google Maps och utrustat enheten med en bättre framåtriktad kamera. Högtalarna kan ge väldigt högt ljud, men ljudet är obalanserat och det finns ingen certifiering för högupplöst ljud. Den har ganska stark värmeutveckling vid belastning och dess SoC presterar inte konsekvent utan prestandan minskar betydligt efter en kort period av belastning.
Nokia 8 Sirocco är inte perfekt, men det är en bra toppskikts-telefon för individualister.
Trots sina svagheter så har Nokia 8 Sirocco stil och kan också erbjuda många fördelar, inklusive en generös uppsättning tillbehör och ren Android med garanterade uppdateringar. Vi kan därför rekommendera Nokia 8 Sirocco till alla som är redo att acceptera ovan nämna svagheter i utbyte mot någonting som är annorlunda från dom vardagliga modellerna.
Nokia 8 Sirocco
-
09/03/2022 v7
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
