Notebookcheck

Test: LG V40 ThinQ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 02/26/2019

Robust och med fem kameror - LG V40 har tillslut anlänt i Tyskland efter att ha utannonserats för tre månader sedan. V40 är en utveckling av sin föregångare och LG lovar särskilt att ha förbättrat skärmen och kamerorna. Läs vidare för att få reda på vad som får LG V40 ThinQ att stå ut från andra flaggskepp och för att se hur den presterar i våra tester.

LG V40 ThinQ (V Serie)
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.4 tum 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixlar 537 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.2 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 2 TB - Filsystem som stöds: FAT, FAT32, exFAT, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Digital kompass, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Fingeravtrycksläsare, USB 2.0 Typ C, USB-OTG, Miracast, WiFi Direct, Wi-Fi Concurrency
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA +: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8. LTE Cat. 18: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 158.7 x 75.8
Batteri
3300 mAh Litiumpolymer, Trådlös laddning (Qi), snabbladdning
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix , Supervidvinkel, 16 mm, f/1.9, 1.0 μm. 12MPix, standard, 27 mm, f/1.5, 1.4 μm. 12 MPix, teleobjektiv, 52 mm, f/2.4, 1.0 μm, 2 x optisk zoom. Camera2 API-Nivå: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , standard, 26 mm, f/1.9, 1.4 μm. 5 MPix, vidvinkel, 21 mm, f/2.2, 1.4 μm.
Övrigt
Högtalare: Boombox-högtalare, DTS:X-stöd, 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Hörlurar, Laddare, USB Typ C-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Mikrofiberduk, 24 Månader Garanti, Certifierad enligt IP68 och MIL-STD-810G1. SAR-värden: Huvud - 0.33 W/kg, Kropp - 1.353 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
169 g, Strömförsörjning: 73 g
Pris
899 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

157.8 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 218 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g156.5 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 179 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
674 (min: 646, max: 691) MBit/s ∼98% 0%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼90% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼72% -27%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼33% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼99% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼94% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼94% +20%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 613, max: 699) MBit/s ∼94% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% +9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼74% -6%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼42% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼30% -62%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (655-698)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø554 (492-579)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Översikt
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Översikt
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Sjö
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Sjö
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Slinga
GPS-test: LG V40 ThinQ - Slinga
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Standardlins
Standardlins
Teleobjektiv
Teleobjektiv
Teleobjektiv
Teleobjektiv
Standardlins
Standardlins
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Standardlins
Standardlins
Teleobjektiv
Teleobjektiv
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Testkarta (Teleobjektiv)
Testkarta (Vidvinkel)
580
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 580 cd/m² Medel: 558.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.46
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen
-83%
-2%
11%
13%
-22%
Brightness middle
567
432
-24%
565
0%
576
2%
656
16%
521
-8%
Brightness
559
428
-23%
571
2%
582
4%
659
18%
517
-8%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
96
8%
90
1%
88
-1%
96
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
4.18
-27%
2.3
30%
1.3
61%
1.7
48%
2.9
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
8.53
-40%
4.8
21%
3.5
43%
2.8
54%
5.5
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.1
5.3
-382%
1.9
-73%
1.6
-45%
1.7
-55%
2.7
-145%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
1.998 110%
2.01 109%
CCT
6495 100%
7487 87%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6487 100%
6288 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points ∼100%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
8016 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6202 Points ∼46% -54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13374 Points ∼98% -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼66% -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13505 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼34% -66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points ∼77%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6078 Points ∼54% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
8963 Points ∼80% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼89% +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8634 Points ∼77% -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼88% +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8988 Points ∼80% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼41% -47%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points ∼50%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1900 Points ∼40% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3776 Points ∼79% +58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼71% +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +99%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2333 Points ∼49% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼69% +38%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2418 Points ∼51% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼29% -43%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points ∼88%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5603 Points ∼61% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5319 Points ∼58% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8326 Points ∼90% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼100% +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8099 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7983 - 9868, n=28)
8069 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼55% -38%
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points ∼81%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6854 Points ∼54% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5822 Points ∼46% -44%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼98% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10052 Points ∼79% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9795 Points ∼77% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼43% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points ∼64%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2893 Points ∼66% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2546 Points ∼58% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼100% +55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼62% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2802 Points ∼64% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼100% +56%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3639 Points ∼83% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points ∼70% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=387)
1834 Points ∼42% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points ∼72%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3809 Points ∼66% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3792 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼74% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼84% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4480 Points ∼78% +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼65% -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5741 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points ∼95% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=387)
1602 Points ∼28% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points ∼74%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3559 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3420 Points ∼67% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼84% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼81% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3846 Points ∼76% +3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼76% +3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5088 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points ∼91% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=390)
1489 Points ∼29% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼65%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2855 Points ∼65% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2561 Points ∼58% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼100% +54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼67% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3060 Points ∼69% +7%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +53%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3649 Points ∼83% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points ∼70% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=402)
1811 Points ∼41% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points ∼58%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5819 Points ∼56% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4797 Points ∼46% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼56% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8245 Points ∼79% +37%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼51% -12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8341 Points ∼80% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points ∼74% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=402)
2185 Points ∼21% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points ∼73%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4728 Points ∼71% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4018 Points ∼60% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼82% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6054 Points ∼91% +25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼76% +5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6487 Points ∼97% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points ∼86% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=403)
1860 Points ∼28% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points ∼66%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2931 Points ∼70% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2469 Points ∼59% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼100% +53%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼72% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2653 Points ∼63% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +52%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3623 Points ∼87% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points ∼77% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=463)
1772 Points ∼42% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points ∼83%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3903 Points ∼75% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3582 Points ∼69% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼81% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼72% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4223 Points ∼82% -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼82% 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points ∼95% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=465)
1334 Points ∼26% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points ∼80%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3635 Points ∼77% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3256 Points ∼69% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼89% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼75% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3677 Points ∼78% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼90% +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4729 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=473)
1273 Points ∼27% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points ∼65%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2808 Points ∼67% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2496 Points ∼59% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼98% +52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼64% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3221 Points ∼76% +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +54%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3543 Points ∼84% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points ∼74% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=496)
1680 Points ∼40% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points ∼78%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5895 Points ∼72% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4637 Points ∼56% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼64% -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8236 Points ∼100% +28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼64% -18%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points ∼94% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=496)
1803 Points ∼22% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points ∼78%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4738 Points ∼75% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3895 Points ∼61% -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼79% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼82% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6118 Points ∼96% +24%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼78% +1%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points ∼91% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=504)
1549 Points ∼24% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points ∼82%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
14601 Points ∼39% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
26226 Points ∼71% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼99% +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼75% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35987 Points ∼97% +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35430 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points ∼90% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=654)
13712 Points ∼37% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points ∼50%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
55271 Points ∼35% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46610 Points ∼29% -42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼42% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83976 Points ∼53% +5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼42% -16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81640 Points ∼51% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=654)
20179 Points ∼13% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points ∼76%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
34139 Points ∼44% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
39745 Points ∼51% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼74% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64627 Points ∼83% +10%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼74% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63295 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=655)
16716 Points ∼22% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps ∼46%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
113 fps ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
147 fps ∼65% +40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼53% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +115%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼67% +45%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼52% +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼66% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=28)
142 fps ∼63% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=684)
35.2 fps ∼16% -66%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼98% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼97% 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=687)
27.1 fps ∼44% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼55%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
59 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
74 fps ∼69% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼68% +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
81 fps ∼76% +37%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼63% +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼77% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps ∼68% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=603)
19.4 fps ∼18% -67%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼56%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
35 fps ∼59% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
45 fps ∼76% +36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼71% +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +79%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼95% +70%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼100% +79%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps ∼92% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=608)
18 fps ∼31% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps ∼59%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
40 fps ∼58% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
47 fps ∼68% +15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼42% -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
59 fps ∼85% +44%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼72% +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps ∼78% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=464)
15.9 fps ∼23% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼36%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
19 fps ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼41% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼44% +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +180%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
50 fps ∼85% +138%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼81% +129%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼93% +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps ∼77% +116%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=467)
15.3 fps ∼26% -27%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼59% +58%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +168%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼62% +67%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼62% +67%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼44% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps ∼58% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=167)
8.89 fps ∼28% -26%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼42% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼53% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +158%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼45% +17%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼71% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps ∼50% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=167)
6.16 fps ∼20% -49%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps ∼34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼38% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +194%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼43% +25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼66% +94%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps ∼62% +82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=168)
13.5 fps ∼29% -16%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼89% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼99% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼81% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼92% +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps ∼95% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=168)
14.7 fps ∼40% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼65%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps ∼60% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼70% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼78% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼88% +35%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼80% +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼88% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps ∼84% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=393)
10.7 fps ∼27% -59%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼39%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
13 fps ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
14 fps ∼42% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼48% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼94% +138%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼91% +131%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼85% +115%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps ∼84% +113%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=397)
9.69 fps ∼29% -25%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (24.5 - 35.3, n=5)
30.9 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼49%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15.8 - 29.7, n=5)
22.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21.3 - 32.9, n=5)
27.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼52%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
250577 Points ∼82% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼98% +11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼99% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
292798 Points ∼96% +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼100% +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287049 Points ∼94% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points ∼91% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼43% -51%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points ∼91%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
173749 Points ∼69% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
222290 Points ∼88% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼99% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
228173 Points ∼90% -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points ∼100% +10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
231092 Points ∼91% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=486)
86413 Points ∼34% -62%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4598 - 4731, n=4)
4689 Score ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points ∼71%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1009 Points ∼58% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1109 Points ∼64% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼82% +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1386 Points ∼80% +13%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼81% +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1345 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points ∼78% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼43% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points ∼43%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5949 Points ∼38% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6370 Points ∼41% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼40% -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +133%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7891 Points ∼50% +17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼48% +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7930 Points ∼51% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points ∼50% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼13% -71%
Memory (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points ∼46%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2091 Points ∼33% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2625 Points ∼42% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +116%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼29% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3791 Points ∼60% +30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼89% +93%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4492 Points ∼71% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points ∼58% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼23% -49%
System (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points ∼58%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4238 Points ∼36% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6413 Points ∼55% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼74% +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8146 Points ∼70% +21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼74% +28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8212 Points ∼70% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points ∼65% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼25% -57%
Overall (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points ∼73%
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2702 Points ∼55% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3302 Points ∼67% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼96% +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4287 Points ∼88% +20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼97% +33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4454 Points ∼91% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points ∼84% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼29% -60%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1481 Points ∼62%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +230%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40% +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
108.07 Points ∼40% +31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼31% +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.61 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (0 - 90.9, n=27)
74.3 Points ∼27% -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
70.062 Points ∼26% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -16%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼19% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=516)
39.1 Points ∼14% -53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +171%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% +46%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼52% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼38% +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points ∼37%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
15819 Points ∼37% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points ∼35% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -7%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼24% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼15% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -354%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼34% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * ∼27% -23%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * ∼22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
2357.6 ms * ∼22% -0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼21% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼19% +13%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼19% +13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼18% +17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80% +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points ∼64% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
95 Points ∼61% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=18)
85.2 Points ∼55% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼41% -33%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96% +25%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
267 Points ∼77%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
263 Points ∼76% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (245 - 291, n=24)
236 Points ∼68% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -39%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼40% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=332)
119 Points ∼34% -55%

* ... smaller is better

LG V40 ThinQLG V30Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProXiaomi Mi Mix 3Honor View 20ZTE Axon 9 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-26%
3%
105%
-4%
143%
1%
46%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
-25%
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
15%
61.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
-3%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
-26%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
-2%
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
-9%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
23.36
10.21
-56%
22.74
-3%
157.84
576%
19.54
-16%
138.85
494%
22.52
-4%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
272%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
-12%
Random Read 4KB
130.13
78.17
-40%
129.68
0%
157.42
21%
133.24
2%
168.91
30%
141.34
9%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
7%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.92
193.22
-5%
204.94
1%
196.39
-4%
206.76
1%
250.06
23%
196.43
-4%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
1%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
689.59
669.48
-3%
818.69
19%
853.28
24%
674.98
-2%
847.48
23%
719.1
4%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
9%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-62%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.10.0: Ø39.3 (7-41)
Battle Bay
010203040506070Tooltip
; 4.2.22023: Ø60.3 (57-61)
Hög belastning
 32.9 °C33.4 °C30.5 °C 
 30.6 °C32 °C29.8 °C 
 29.6 °C30.5 °C28.9 °C 
Max: 33.4 °C
Medel: 30.9 °C
28.9 °C31.1 °C33.2 °C
28.4 °C30.2 °C31.6 °C
28.1 °C29.5 °C30.4 °C
Max: 33.2 °C
Medel: 30.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2019.931.12520.230.33121.423.84022.928.75026.931.76318.222.18022.82310019.126.512515.828.616016.534.720014.23925013.344.531515.345.140014.64750014.750.263014.564.680013.769.5100014.472125013.973.6160013.974.2200013.874.4250013.873.5315014.271400014.369.1500014.676630014.676.1800014.372.3100001561.11250015621600014.753.9SPL26.384.7N0.857.6median 14.5median 64.6Delta0.713.928.628.224.928.424.621.226.419.330.829.123.624.620.223.319.927.217.638.919.150.619.149.917.454.316.961.516.860.915.163.616.567.915.6701570.615.572.115.371.715.773.515.573.215.576.715.476.115.873.71677.415.872.916.169.816.164.817.357.227.985.6164.4median 16median 69.80.68.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG V40 ThinQSamsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG V40 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.39 / 1.41 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.96 / 8.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
20%
-22%
-6%
27%
-44%
-3%
-20%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.72
17%
0.68
22%
0.95
-9%
1
-15%
0.49
44%
0.97
-11%
0.86
1%
0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
1%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=752)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.39
1.37
1%
0.95
32%
2.17
-56%
1.4
-1%
0.67
52%
2.58
-86%
1.1
21%
1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
-24%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=751)
-25%
Idle Maximum *
1.41
1.41
-0%
1.09
23%
2.25
-60%
1.7
-21%
0.87
38%
2.63
-87%
1.21
14%
2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
-47%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=752)
-43%
Load Average *
3.96
3.46
13%
4.58
-16%
4.47
-13%
4.6
-16%
3.64
8%
5.24
-32%
5.02
-27%
4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
-23%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=746)
-3%
Load Maximum *
8.6
7.83
9%
5.16
40%
6.15
28%
6.7
22%
9.04
-5%
8.73
-2%
10.82
-26%
9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
-8%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=746)
32%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
19tim 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 71)
8tim 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 59min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 20min
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-1%
30%
13%
22%
42%
30%
Reader / Idle
1140
1914
68%
1343
18%
1747
53%
1305
14%
1810
59%
1928
69%
H.264
659
822
25%
674
2%
854
30%
801
22%
836
27%
932
41%
WiFi v1.3
510
774
52%
521
2%
767
50%
742
45%
719
41%
969
90%
661
30%
Load
320
267
-17%
237
-26%
282
-12%
223
-30%
194
-39%
222
-31%

För

+ ljusstark OLED-skärm med god färgprecision
+ snabb SoC
+ aptX HDH
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ hörlursanslutning
+ HiFi Quad DAC
+ trådlös laddning
+ de tre bakåtriktade kamerorna är bra
+ exakt GPS-modul
+ IP68- och MIL-STG-810G1-certifierad
+ upp till fyra års garanti

Emot

- medioker batteritid
- endast USB 2.0
- PWM-skärmflimmer
- det fördröjda släppet gör att den nu är överprissatt
LG V40 ThinQ. Recensionsex från LG Germany.
LG V40 ThinQ. Recensionsex från LG Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

LG V40 ThinQ är en förbättring över V30 och innehåller en del av de bra funktionerna från G7 ThinQ samtidigt som den har bättre kamera och systemprestanda än båda dessa enheter.

Men kamerorna, trots sin volym, står sig inte mot de bästa som finns på marknaden för tillfället. Batteriet är dessutom en aning för litet för den energi som går åt till dess högupplösta skärm, DAC och SoC. De tre högtalarna är heller inte så bra som de hade kunnat vara, vilket är en besvikelse.

LG V40 ThinQ kommer troligen glömmas bort när 2019 års flaggskepp anländer, vilket är synd eftersom det är en utmärkt smartphone som inte riktigt räcker till för att vara bra nog på vissa nödvändiga områden.

Det är dock de enda riktiga nackdelarna med V40. Den har en av de bästa videoinspelningsfunktionerna på hela smartphone-marknaden och den har en nedtonad men ändå lyxig design. HiFi Quad DAC och högupplösta Bluetooth-kodek gör också en välkomnad återkomst och bör garantera att V40 levererar exceptionell ljudkvalitet oavsett om du lyssnar trådbundet eller trådlöst.

Något vi måste påpeka med V40 är priset. LG G8 ThinQ släpps under de kommande dagarna och kommer att prestera bättre än V40 på många områden, så timingen för den sistnämndas släpp i Europa känns konstig. Vi förväntar oss dock att priset minskar under de kommande månaderna, precis som för V30, så LG V40 ThinQ kan vara en dold hit under 2019.

LG V40 ThinQ - 02/21/2019 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Design
90%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
50 / 60 → 83%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
65 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
74 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
80%
Medel
81%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG V40 ThinQ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-02-26 (Update: 2019-02-27)