Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - En optimerad SoC utlovar bättre batteritid (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 683 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.80 | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.70 | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50 | Huawei Mate 20 X OLED, 2244x1080, 7.20 | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67 | LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -19% | 15% | 12% | 16% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 683 | 735 8% | 656 -4% | 421 -38% | 586 -14% | 539 -21% |
| Brightness | 694 | 735 6% | 659 -5% | 418 -40% | 584 -16% | 556 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 94 -2% | 88 -8% | 96 0% | 97 1% | 88 -8% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.9 -34% | 1.7 41% | 1.1 62% | 1.39 52% | 3.78 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.8 | 10.9 -127% | 2.8 42% | 2.2 54% | 2.7 44% | 6.95 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.4 36% | 1.7 23% | 1.4 36% | 1.6 27% | 2.2 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.09 105% | 1.998 110% | 2.23 99% | 2.243 98% | 2.274 97% |
| CCT | 6247 104% | 6549 99% | 6487 100% | 6723 97% | 6672 97% | 6013 108% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (39.1 - 39.7, n=2) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (27.5 - 37.3, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (33.4 - 33.7, n=2) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| LG G8s ThinQ | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (347082 - 347229, n=2) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4985 - 4996, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (42.7 - 48, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (97 - 118, n=2) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (18908 - 19135, n=2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (2478 - 2528, n=2) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | Huawei Mate 20 X | OnePlus 7 Pro | LG G8s ThinQ | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -56% | -11% | -33% | -43% | 2% | 41% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1504 | 816 -46% | 912 -39% | 1468 -2% | 791 -47% | 1573 ? 5% | 1505 ? 0% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 588 | 246.3 -58% | 182.7 -69% | 387 -34% | 182.4 -69% | 559 ? -5% | 1112 ? 89% |
| Random Read 4KB | 196.2 | 135 -31% | 144.4 -26% | 174.1 -11% | 138 -30% | 209 ? 7% | 247 ? 26% |
| Random Write 4KB | 183.6 | 23.79 -87% | 237.6 29% | 24.8 -86% | 29.6 -84% | 186.4 ? 2% | 271 ? 48% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71 ? | 83.1 ? 17% | 67.5 ? -5% | 70.6 ? -1% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.5 ? | 72 ? 21% | 46.7 ? -22% | 59.8 ? 1% |
PUBG Mobile HD
Asphalt 9 (High Details)
Battle Bay
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.22 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.7 / 1.81 / 1.92 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
7.57 / 9.34 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 9825 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 12% | 4% | -8% | -7% | -1% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.66 6% | 1 -43% | 0.79 -13% | 0.9 -29% | 1.2 -71% | 0.8 ? -14% | 0.897 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 1.81 | 1.82 -1% | 1.4 23% | 1.72 5% | 1.8 1% | 1.6 12% | 1.505 ? 17% | 1.452 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.92 | 1.83 5% | 1.7 11% | 1.83 5% | 2.9 -51% | 2 -4% | 1.96 ? -2% | 1.629 ? 15% |
| Load Average * | 7.57 | 6.11 19% | 4.6 39% | 5.53 27% | 5.5 27% | 5 34% | 7.64 ? -1% | 5.55 ? 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.34 | 9.81 -5% | 6.7 28% | 9.85 -5% | 8.2 12% | 10 -7% | 9.92 ? -6% | 8.31 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | -5% | 19% | 4% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1585 | 2340 48% | 1305 -18% | 1984 25% | 1745 10% | 1689 7% |
| H.264 | 934 | 1047 12% | 801 -14% | 986 6% | 802 -14% | 753 -19% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 533 0% | 742 39% | 786 48% | 768 44% | 693 30% |
| Load | 305 | 327 7% | 223 -27% | 300 -2% | 236 -23% | 203 -33% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ är ett riktigt tilltalande paket, men som allt åtråvärt har den sitt pris, särskilt med tanke på att den är märkbart dyrare än sin föregångare. Den ultraljudsbaserade fingeravtrycksläsaren och kamerorna är klara förbättringar jämfört med Note 9, men det är tveksamt hur användbara de nya S-Pen gesterna är. Och även om S-Pen är trevlig att ha misstänker vi att få kommer att ha nytta av den till vardags. Dessutom förstår vi inte varför Samsung inte har ett alternativ för 1 TB lagring och 3D-ansiktsigenkänning på sitt dyraste flaggskepp.
Stor, stark och vacker - Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ är en fantastisk smartphone även om den inte erbjuder särskilt mycket mer än sina direkta Galaxy Note- och Galaxy S-föregångare.
Trots detta är Note 10+ en välutrustad telefon som har allt förutom en hörlursanslutning; ytterligare en märklig uteslutning. Samsungs omedgörlighet när det kommer till stöd för vissa Bluetooth-kodek gör oss också irriterade.
Även om Exynos 9825 är mycket effektivare än sin föregångare framträder fördelarna bara vid ihållande belastning. Note 10+ har dessutom genomsnittlig till dålig batteritid, precis som de tidigare Galaxy-flaggskeppen vi testat.
I slutändan har vi ändå bara ett fåtal klagomål på Note 10+. I övrigt är den ett utmärkt flaggskepp och en av de bästa telefonerna som går att köpa för pengar.
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
-
09/03/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
