Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy Note20 - Inte alltid bättre än Note10 (Sammanfattning)

Dunkel. Samsung Galaxy Note20 kostar ca 3.000 kronor mindre än Ultra-modellen. Tittar vi på specifikationerna ser vi en del nedskärningar, men det är inte omedelbart tydligt huruvida den dyrare Note20-modellen verkligen är värd prispåslaget, eller kanske framför allt, om det är värt att byta från Note10.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.70 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 393 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, native pen support, Super AMOLED Plus, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.6 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Gyroskop, Accelerometer, Avståndssensor, Hall-sensor, Geomagnetisk sensor, Barometer
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 och 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1,900 och 2,100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66, 38, 39, 40 och 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 161.6 x 75.2
Batteri
4300 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (1/1.76", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultravidvinkel, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 64 MPix (Hybridtele, 1/1.72", f/2.0, OIS), Camera2-API-Level: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, 24 Månader Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, IP68-certifierad, Huvud SAR: W/kg, Kropp SAR: W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
192 g
Pris
925 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86 %
03/2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3168x1440
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88 %
04/2020
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242
89 %
09/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440

Storleksjämförelse

165.2 mm 74.4 mm 9.5 mm 202 g165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g161.6 mm 75.2 mm 8.3 mm 192 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (802min - 879max) MBit/s ∼86%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼75% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=619)
286 MBit/s ∼28% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (418min - 883max) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=619)
273 MBit/s ∼28% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (802-879)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (418-883)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelZoom (5-fach)UltraweitwinkelLow-Light
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
41 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
58.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20: 38.83 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 58.06 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20: 6.19 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 14.34 ∆E
614
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 637 cd/m² Medel: 620.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.52 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 610 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.30
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.70
Screen
-2%
-22%
26%
-5%
42%
36%
-38%
Brightness middle
610
764
25%
860
41%
790
30%
592
-3%
796
30%
753
23%
778
28%
Brightness
621
757
22%
878
41%
790
27%
605
-3%
779
25%
762
23%
775
25%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
97
2%
96
1%
94
-1%
96
1%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.66
-11%
4.5
-88%
1.4
42%
2.5
-4%
0.68
72%
0.9
62%
4.4
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.3
5.65
-31%
10.4
-142%
3.4
21%
5.5
-28%
1.55
64%
1.6
63%
8.7
-102%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
3.2
-14%
2.4
14%
1.9
32%
2.6
7%
1.1
61%
1.5
46%
5.6
-100%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.073 106%
2 110%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.237 98%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
CCT
6368 102%
6326 103%
6466 101%
6466 101%
6173 105%
6310 103%
6415 101%
7250 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9596 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5364 Points ∼98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (259 - 5532, n=47)
2003 Points ∼37% -63%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4667 Points ∼99%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=52)
1715 Points ∼36% -63%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2766 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼97% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼96% +21%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼95% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼88% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=144)
1963 Points ∼56% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
917 Points ∼69%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼68% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼69% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼59% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=144)
566 Points ∼43% -38%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9443 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
8648 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=361)
4905 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=425)
5018 Points ∼38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=425)
1533 Points ∼31%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10008 Points ∼88%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼96% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼98% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=544)
6033 Points ∼53% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
13627 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼91% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼94% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=700)
6633 Points ∼46% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3104 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +23%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=196)
2663 Points ∼68% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6136 Points ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼99% +33%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼77% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼88% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=196)
3075 Points ∼37% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5042 Points ∼76%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼97% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼99% +30%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼84% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼85% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=196)
2724 Points ∼41% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4143 Points ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼95% +27%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼99% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=550)
2262 Points ∼41% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
870 Points ∼9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100% +974%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% +975%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼100% +978%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% +665%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% +717%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=550)
2242 Points ∼24% +158%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7076 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼98% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼98% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼79% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=551)
2078 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4247 Points ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼95% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼78% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼94% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=582)
2177 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11868 Points ∼93%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼81% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=582)
3047 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8485 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼98% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼90% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼72% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=582)
2523 Points ∼26% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3993 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼92% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼98% +23%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼98% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=631)
2138 Points ∼43% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8005 Points ∼96%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼98% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=631)
1883 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6544 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼99% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=632)
1784 Points ∼25% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4077 Points ∼81%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼94% +16%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼98% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=673)
2008 Points ∼40% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11272 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼92% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼62% -32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼73% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=672)
2494 Points ∼20% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8097 Points ∼89%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼97% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼97% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼75% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼76% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=675)
2130 Points ∼23% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
39771 Points ∼92%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼75% -19%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼74% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=817)
15777 Points ∼36% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
87223 Points ∼42%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼71% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +72%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼72% +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +136%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=815)
28199 Points ∼14% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
68943 Points ∼71%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +20%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼85% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=815)
21747 Points ∼22% -68%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
191 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼70% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼72% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=814)
47.3 fps ∼16% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼66% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼91% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=823)
31.9 fps ∼35% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
114 fps ∼73%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼78% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼80% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=719)
28.1 fps ∼18% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼66% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=727)
23.2 fps ∼26% -61%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
80 fps ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼86% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +8%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼88% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=582)
22.5 fps ∼23% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼75%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼58% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼78% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=584)
20.1 fps ∼26% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27 fps ∼59%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼67% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=342)
11.6 fps ∼25% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
23 fps ∼79%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% -13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=340)
8.2 fps ∼28% -64%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼48% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -10%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼83% -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=346)
17.4 fps ∼30% -67%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
56 fps ∼75%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼71% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼72% -4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=345)
20 fps ∼27% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
49 fps ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=507)
15 fps ∼24% -69%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
44 fps ∼92%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼54% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=511)
13.3 fps ∼28% -70%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
522516 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼99% +14%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼98% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points ∼85% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=136)
325471 Points ∼54% -38%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=74)
19.1 fps ∼23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=91)
2604 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1394 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼86% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=751)
834 Points ∼48% -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10789 Points ∼63%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼68% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼70% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=751)
2591 Points ∼15% -76%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3829 Points ∼48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼80% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼91% +89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77% +60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼51% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=751)
1940 Points ∼24% -49%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9421 Points ∼66%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼67% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼71% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=751)
3545 Points ∼25% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4826 Points ∼79%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼91% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼99% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=751)
1819 Points ∼30% -62%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +130%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼50% +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
56.102 Points ∼43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=210)
42.2 Points ∼33% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +217%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +21%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼38% +21%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼38% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
95.185 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 343, n=643)
49.2 Points ∼16% -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +138%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +15%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼46% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼44% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
64.4 runs/min ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=191)
44.4 runs/min ∼29% -31%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +18%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼57% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
101 Points ∼56%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=280)
70.9 Points ∼39% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +147%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼48% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +18%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼47% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
20022 Points ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58488, n=812)
8212 Points ∼17% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=838)
9590 ms * ∼100% -318%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼25% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
2293.6 ms * ∼24%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼21% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +14%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼20% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note20Samsung Galaxy Note10Oppo Find X2 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProOnePlus 8 ProHuawei Mate 30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-7%
10%
-6%
-6%
9%
-79%
Random Write 4KB
233.79
191.9
-18%
204.98
-12%
258.54
11%
197.7
-15%
259.21
11%
244 (205 - 285, n=7)
4%
38.5 (0.14 - 319, n=912)
-84%
Random Read 4KB
207.64
194.2
-6%
202.63
-2%
264.9
28%
208.3
0%
226.38
9%
246 (187 - 325, n=7)
18%
61.6 (1.59 - 325, n=912)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
780.17
590.3
-24%
728.72
-7%
750.44
-4%
730.4
-6%
401.79
-48%
847 (732 - 1321, n=7)
9%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=912)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1682.85
1478.3
-12%
1605.6
-5%
1738.65
3%
1627.3
-3%
1780.5
6%
1753 (1675 - 2037, n=7)
4%
355 (12.1 - 2037, n=912)
-79%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø39.8 (27-41)
; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø58.9 (44-61)
Hög belastning
 35.5 °C34.7 °C31.2 °C 
 34.7 °C34.9 °C31.2 °C 
 34.2 °C33 °C29.4 °C 
Max: 35.5 °C
Medel: 33.2 °C
29 °C32.2 °C31.6 °C
28.1 °C31.5 °C32.6 °C
27.7 °C31.5 °C31.3 °C
Max: 32.6 °C
Medel: 30.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  24.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.537.92527.627.43120.725.3402326.65033.533.36326.823.68020.819.51002227.112518.238.516017.849.720014.750.925015.155.331513.46040012.262.650012.865.963011.568.680011.671.910001276.3125011.476.7160011.377.4200011.977.8250012.476.7315012.574.9400013.177.9500013.574.7630013.174.3800013.976.21000013.177.2125001478.51600013.767.7SPL24.887.9N0.673.4median 13.1median 74.3Delta1.59.736.923.32923.721.927.4222229.935.3222819.330.716.331.31440.316.956.114.954.614.158.61066.71165.711.766.710.969.411.972.31176.410.276.811.477.812.87912.97912.578.41378.513.175.813.475.315.776.113.573.51470.313.763.924.888.80.677.4median 13median 72.31.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.36 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.5 / 1.54 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.49 / 9.99 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-67%
23%
-78%
7%
-22%
-3%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
1.47
-60%
0.61
34%
2.2
-139%
0.87
5%
0.92
-0%
0.846 (0.65 - 1, n=5)
8%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=908)
3%
Idle Average *
1.5
3.43
-129%
1.19
21%
3.3
-120%
1.75
-17%
2.9
-93%
1.534 (1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-2%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=907)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.54
3.52
-129%
1.23
20%
3.7
-140%
1.83
-19%
2.94
-91%
1.858 (1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-21%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=908)
-32%
Load Average *
5.49
6.2
-13%
4.18
24%
5.9
-7%
3.85
30%
3.65
34%
5.14 (4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
6%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=902)
25%
Load Maximum *
9.99
10.63
-6%
8.53
15%
8.3
17%
6.64
34%
6.18
38%
10.7 (9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-7%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=902)
39%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
34tim 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
9tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 26min
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
-10%
11%
-1%
10%
3%
32%
Reader / Idle
2067
1392
-33%
1223
-41%
2133
3%
2103
2%
2174
5%
2618
27%
H.264
1123
803
-28%
993
-12%
973
-13%
1023
-9%
1098
-2%
1346
20%
WiFi v1.3
589
583
-1%
644
9%
654
11%
865
47%
923
57%
823
40%
909
54%
Load
326
246
-25%
338
4%
198
-39%
296
-9%
219
-33%
408
25%

För

+ Skärm med hög färgprecision
+ Kraftfull S-Pen
+ Rymlig och snabb UFS 3.1-lagring
+ Bra kameror
+ Skapliga högtalare

Emot

- 5G är inte standard utan ett tillval
- Saknar stöd för microSD
- Mörkare skärm än sin föregångare
- Endast 60 Hz-panel
- Har varken aptX HD eller Adaptive aptX

Omdöme – Bättre än sitt rykte

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Note20 (SM-N980F). Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Note20 (SM-N980F). Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Tittar vi på specifikationerna och jämför Note20 och Note 20 Ultra sida vid sida känns det som att den förstnämnda har en del kompromisser. Som exempel har den enklare modellen inte stöd för 5G och 60 Hz-skärmen är inte värdig den här klassen. Samsung har gått ännu längre och har återgått till en äldre skärmteknik än vad Note20:s föregångare hade. Föga förvånande är reaktionen från en typisk teknikentusiast något mellan ett höjt ögonbryn och en rätt så allvarlig hjärtattack. Grädden på det Europeiska moset är faktum att Samsung fortsätter att använda sin egna långsammare SoC till enheter som säljs i Europa trots faktum att aktuella processorer från Qualcomm har lyckats bredda prestanda-gapet ytterligare.

Samsung Galaxy Note20 saknar ett antal funktioner som vi förväntar oss från en aktuell toppskiktstelefon. Men trots detta är konceptet fortfarande riktigt starkt och kraftfullt.

För att sätta detta i perspektiv så är Galaxy Note20 fortfarande en kraftfull flaggskeppstelefon med ett utgångspris på under 10.000 kronor, som dessutom är betydligt lägre i butik. Om du letar efter en kraftfull smartphone med stöd för S-Pen och garanterade uppdateringar under en lång tid samtidigt som du vill tänka på budgeten kan Note20 vara rätt enhet för dig. En platt skärm och en mindre kamerabula gör det mycket mer praktiskt att arbeta med S-Pen och har du aldrig upplevt en skärm med snabbare bilduppdatering än 60 Hz kommer du troligen inte sakna en sådan. Den enda egentliga bristen är att skärmen är mörkare, men den har också naturligare färger än på Ultra-modellen.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 - 09/29/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
91%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
66 / 70 → 94%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
59 / 64 → 92%
Programprestanda
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 92%
Camera
74%
Medel
82%
88%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Note20 - Inte alltid bättre än Note10 (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10- 6 (Update: 2020-10- 6)