Notebookcheck

Test: HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Lyxig företags- och multimediakombination. Dells XPS 15 får mycket uppmärksamhet, något andra tillverkare också önskar sig. HP vill förstås också tävla med Dells lyxiga laptop. Så HP har släppt en enhet som försöker imponera med en helgjuten kropp, företagsfunktioner och kraftfulla komponenter. I den här utförliga recensionen får du reda på huruvida nya EliteBook 1050 G1 lyckas med detta.
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (EliteBook 1050 G1 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 4096 MB, Kärna: 1139 MHz, Minne: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 391.48, Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2 av 2 platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 282 PPI, AUO30EB, IPS LED, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel CM246
Hårddisk
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, 2048 GB 
, Två 2280 M.2 SSD-enheter (andra SSD-enheten är också en KXG50PNV2T04), 3610 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: 3-i-1 kortläsare, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.9 x 360 x 254
Batteri
96 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p infraröd kamera
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: 6 raders chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Återställningsdisk, HP Thunderbolt 3 Dock 230 W G2, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Connection Optimizer, HP Client Security Manager, HP Jumpstart, HP Power Manager, HP Support Assistant, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office (Testversion), 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.06 kg, Strömförsörjning: 319 g
Pris
3799 Euro
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

375 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg370 mm 252 mm 18.3 mm 1.8 kg365.8 mm 252.8 mm 20.2 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 254 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg349.3 mm 240.7 mm 15.5 mm 1.8 kg
Höger: SD-kortläsare, kombinerad ljudanslutning, HDMI, 2x USB-C / Thunderbolt 3, ström
Höger: SD-kortläsare, kombinerad ljudanslutning, HDMI, 2x USB-C / Thunderbolt 3, ström
Vänster: 2x USB 3.0 Typ A, Kensington-lås
Vänster: 2x USB 3.0 Typ A, Kensington-lås
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174 MB/s ∼94% +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
152.1 MB/s ∼82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 224, n=62, last 2 years)
78.5 MB/s ∼42% -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼42% -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210.7 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=62, last 2 years)
88.7 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.4 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=82, last 2 years)
984 MBit/s ∼100% +52%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼66%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
602 (543min - 628max) MBit/s ∼61% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼58% -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s ∼49% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
162 MBit/s ∼16% -75%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1548, n=82, last 2 years)
1063 MBit/s ∼100% +194%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (664min - 835max) MBit/s ∼77% +126%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 MBit/s ∼60% +76%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
632 MBit/s ∼59% +75%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼49% +45%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
362 MBit/s ∼34%
380
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO30EB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 440 cd/m² Medel: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 440 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1294:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.04
ΔE Greyscale 4.98 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.06% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.79% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.40
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
SHP1445, , 3840x2160, 15.60
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
AUO24ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE
LEN40BD, B156ZAN02.1, , 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
13%
27%
-1%
24%
-6%
26%
Display P3 Coverage
67.79
79.13
17%
98.67
46%
69.22
2%
82.63
22%
63.39
-6%
86.29
27%
sRGB Coverage
94.06
98.8
5%
99.95
6%
90.65
-4%
98.92
5%
88.83
-6%
99.52
6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.91
79.21
17%
86.6
28%
66.34
-2%
97.99
44%
64.45
-5%
99.27
46%
Response Times
4%
8%
4%
9%
20%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (26, 30)
46.4 (22.8, 23.6)
17%
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
23%
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
9%
44.8 (22, 22.8)
20%
42 (20, 22)
25%
40.8 (20.8, 20)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
29 (14, 15)
32 (18, 14)
-10%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-8%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-2%
30 (17.2, 12.8)
-3%
25 (14, 11)
14%
25.2 (14, 11.2)
13%
PWM Frequency
980.4 (25)
117000 (75, 150)
952.4 (99)
1497 (50)
Screen
-4%
32%
4%
15%
-20%
10%
Brightness middle
440
494
12%
520
18%
310
-30%
324
-26%
402
-9%
317
-28%
Brightness
389
457
17%
492
26%
283
-27%
338
-13%
383
-2%
309
-21%
Brightness Distribution
83
88
6%
88
6%
87
5%
78
-6%
88
6%
89
7%
Black Level *
0.34
0.34
-0%
0.39
-15%
0.24
29%
0.3
12%
0.41
-21%
0.36
-6%
Contrast
1294
1453
12%
1333
3%
1292
0%
1080
-17%
980
-24%
881
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.04
5.2
-3%
1.2
76%
3.1
38%
1.6
68%
5.25
-4%
2.7
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.99
17.5
-150%
2.3
67%
7.6
-9%
4.6
34%
8.65
-24%
4.1
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.04
2.2
-8%
5.19
-154%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.98
2.7
46%
1.3
74%
2.3
54%
2.5
50%
4
20%
3
40%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.1 105%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.68 82%
2.27 97%
CCT
7777 84%
7038 92%
6738 96%
6876 95%
6273 104%
6756 96%
6077 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
71.2
17%
59.1
-3%
85.7
40%
58
-5%
87.6
44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
98.8
5%
90.1
-4%
98.9
5%
89
-5%
99.5
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 1%
22% / 27%
2% / 3%
16% / 16%
-2% / -13%
19% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15274 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Minne
CPU-Z Minne
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z Intel UHD 630
GPU-Z Intel UHD 630
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701114101810221018101010231026102210101021102210181022102710231016102110201014102110199721022101910221015992101810149791007102310189949921019102097410141023101110071018997994102399110201019100711281097106810581054104210491041104210381034103310361030102610341026102710291030102710271025103810301023102710291021102810221023103210261029102410201019103210261029102210301033102910201024102510261219.851196.461123.471171.821156.971170.751171.31167.541154.91165.941156.4711671164.891162.761165.431167.541173.431174.51167.541160.061159.081176.641170.211170.211169.661168.091170.211164.891169.621165.941168.051167.541176.121173.431167.541162.721171.821162.791168.61169.151168.091169.151152.311159.491163.811168.051167.031177.751146.621173.981215.121070.861067.751058.031053.661050.231002.131021.321001.751005.661020.11002.131007.251015.64992.041011.221008.061004.44999.25999.781002.93999.78995.89996.291006.091003.311006.471010.82980.271002.911006.09994.73999.38995.871006.871010.431000.18993.961005.88990.121000.581002.13991.65985.561004.5997.061008.39997.46985.17990.49Tooltip
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1015 (972-1114)
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1019-1128)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 240, n=92, last 2 years)
190 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
177 Points ∼93% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼93%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points ∼91% -3%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
170 Points ∼89% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
163 Points ∼86% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1251 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1215 Points ∼97% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
1217 Points ∼97% +8%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
1131 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points ∼89% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1064 Points ∼85% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1057 Points ∼84% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
971 Points ∼78% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
953 Points ∼76% -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=106, last 2 years)
999 Points ∼80% -12%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
737 Points ∼59% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
660 Points ∼53% -42%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6811
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33110
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6643
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6829 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
41831 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8665 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.35 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
74.35 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
11.42 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
73.88 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.28 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1131 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4093 Points ∼100% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3959 Points ∼97% +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2742 - 5575, n=55, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼95% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
3735 Points ∼91% +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3669 Points ∼90% +7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3631 Points ∼89% +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3433 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
3433 Points ∼84% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3145 Points ∼77% -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5329 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2594 - 5681, n=54, last 2 years)
4673 Points ∼88% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4643 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4643 Points ∼87% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4575 Points ∼86% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points ∼83% -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4408 Points ∼83% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4063 Points ∼76% -12%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5605 Points ∼100% +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4920 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4920 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=84, last 2 years)
4845 Points ∼86% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4473 Points ∼80% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4348 Points ∼78% -12%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
3926 Points ∼70% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3116 Points ∼56% -37%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2807 Points ∼50% -43%
Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
7569 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=84, last 2 years)
7315 Points ∼97% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7037 Points ∼93% +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6770 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
6770 Points ∼89% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6649 Points ∼88% -2%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
6561 Points ∼87% -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5795 Points ∼77% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5079 Points ∼67% -25%
Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=84, last 2 years)
9014 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
8894 Points ∼99% +7%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
8514 Points ∼94% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8429 Points ∼94% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8298 Points ∼92% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8281 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
8281 Points ∼92% 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7262 Points ∼81% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6891 Points ∼76% -17%
Score
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4966 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6725, n=85, last 2 years)
4861 Points ∼98% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4805 Points ∼97% +3%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4666 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4666 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4428 Points ∼89% -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4323 Points ∼87% -7%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3517 Points ∼71% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3425 Points ∼69% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3433 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4643 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
4666 poäng
Hjälp
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Apple SSD AP0512
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Average Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-11%
0%
3%
51%
-9%
4%
Read Seq
1733
1804.5
4%

1804.5
4%

1511.4
-13%
943.5
-46%
2229
29%
2069
19%
1714 (1695 - 1733, n=2)
-1%
Write Seq
1030
523.1
-49%

523.1
-49%

1465.6
42%
924
-10%
1562
52%
393.4
-62%
1039 (1030 - 1048, n=2)
1%
Read 512
547.3
807.4
48%

807.4
48%

1014.86
85%
555.3
1%
391.4
-28%
913.9
67%
599 (547 - 652, n=2)
9%
Write 512
802.3
499.74
-38%

499.74
-38%

1165.66
45%
564.8
-30%
1279
59%
284.9
-64%
922 (802 - 1042, n=2)
15%
Read 4k
27.81
29.02
4%

29.02
4%

10.97
-61%
63.93
130%
56.54
103%
31.76
14%
27.2 (26.5 - 27.8, n=2)
-2%
Write 4k
112.4
79.45
-29%

79.45
-29%

19.53
-83%
135.3
20%
182
62%
99.15
-12%
108 (104 - 112, n=2)
-4%
Read 4k QD32
415.8
279.02
-33%

279.02
-33%

525.27
26%
336.2
-19%
645.3
55%
282
-32%
437 (416 - 458, n=2)
5%
Write 4k QD32
345.2
351.92
2%

351.92
2%

212.44
-38%
264.9
-23%
595.1
72%
338.5
-2%
372 (345 - 400, n=2)
8%
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Sequential Read: 1733 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1030 MB/s
512K Read: 547.3 MB/s
512K Write: 802.3 MB/s
4K Read: 27.81 MB/s
4K Write: 112.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 415.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 345.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 31866, n=83, last 2 years)
9416 Points ∼100% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
9079 Points ∼96% +32%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T
7831 Points ∼83% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
7590 Points ∼81% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (6874 - 7385, n=4)
7142 Points ∼76% +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
6874 Points ∼73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
6115 Points ∼65% -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
5515 Points ∼59% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4392 Points ∼47% -36%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T
37975 Points ∼100% +9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
34926 Points ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (27059 - 36630, n=4)
33618 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=68, last 2 years)
33348 Points ∼88% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
32449 Points ∼85% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
31396 Points ∼83% -10%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
26860 Points ∼71% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
18916 Points ∼50% -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7428 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 23674, n=91, last 2 years)
6736 Points ∼91% +19%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T
6066 Points ∼82% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
5699 Points ∼77% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
5677 Points ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (5616 - 5792, n=4)
5677 Points ∼76% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
4843 Points ∼65% -15%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
4118 Points ∼55% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3291 Points ∼44% -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=78, last 2 years)
2415 Points ∼100% +51%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2278 Points ∼94% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (1596 - 1634, n=2)
1615 Points ∼67% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
1614 Points ∼67% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1596 Points ∼66%
3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P GPU no PhysX
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
33189 Points ∼100% +30%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
25577 Points ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (25008 - 25577, n=2)
25293 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9484 - 40643, n=5, last 2 years)
21725 Points ∼65% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
21687 Points ∼65% -15%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Sala GPUs-only
Average of class Multimedia
  (905 - 10574, n=6, last 2 years)
3129 Samples/s ∼100% +83%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2100 Samples/s ∼67% +23%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1712 Samples/s ∼55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (1692 - 1712, n=2)
1702 Samples/s ∼54% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
1260 Samples/s ∼40% -26%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
852 Samples/s ∼27% -50%
Room GPUs-only
Average of class Multimedia
  (221 - 9770, n=6, last 2 years)
2176 Samples/s ∼100% +125%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1167 Samples/s ∼54% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (967 - 968, n=2)
968 Samples/s ∼44% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
967 Samples/s ∼44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
713 Samples/s ∼33% -26%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
656 Samples/s ∼30% -32%
3DMark 06 Standard
29687 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
26117 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
7396 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
51461 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14739 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5114 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
1709 poäng
Hjälp
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
74.6 fps ∼100% +20%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
62.1 fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (59 - 62.1, n=4)
60.9 fps ∼82% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
51.3 fps ∼69% -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
48.8 fps ∼65% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.6 - 84.3, n=19, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼57% -32%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.1 - 170, n=71, last 2 years)
51 fps ∼100% +50%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
48.2 fps ∼95% +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (34 - 41, n=3)
36.5 fps ∼72% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
34 (29min - 38max) fps ∼67% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
34 fps ∼67%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
29.9 fps ∼59% -12%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.9 - 92.1, n=74, last 2 years)
30.5 fps ∼100% +65%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
26 fps ∼85% +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (18.5 - 30, n=3)
23.1 fps ∼76% +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
19.7 (16min - 22max) fps ∼65% +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
18.5 fps ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
15.7 fps ∼51% -15%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
51.7 fps ∼100% +15%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
45 fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
45 fps ∼87% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
39.2 (36min - 46max) fps ∼76% -13%
låg med. hög ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 285.1 172.6 150.4 62.1 fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 79.7 71.8 48.7 21.87 fps
GTA V (2015) 118.7 112.9 62.1 27 26.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 103.2 59.3 34 18.5 12 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 149.5 134.1 115.5 104.1 37.1 fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 108 93.5 67.5 62.8 22.1 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 105.5 56 33.9 30.3 12.9 fps
The Division (2016) 109.9 69.8 32.3 24.8 10.9 fps
Overwatch (2016) 256.9 160 80.5 48.9 26 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 71.5 52.6 28.3 20.3 9 fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 144.7 89.2 45 41.3 15.9 fps
Civilization VI (2016) 141 82.7 35 28.6 23 fps
For Honor (2017) 140.5 53.5 49.8 38.1 14.7 fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 80.6 35.7 32.5 17.1 10.5 fps
Rocket League (2017) 240.3 155.4 98.8 36.7 fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 191.1 88 47.1 26.2 15.4 fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 136 128 120 118 55 fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 51.4 33.6 11.3 fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 254.7 153.2 127.5 127 55.5 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 97 44 31 24 10 fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 82.2 57.4 51.6 38.1 13.5 fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 59 40 35 28 11 fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 144.8 99.6 46.7 36.7 16.1 fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 82.5 56.5 48.8 32.7 7.4 fps
Fortnite (2018) 142.8 111.8 49.4 36.5 9.3 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 56.9 29.3 20.6 7.9 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 82.1 36.8 29.5 21.5 6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 88.8 80.9 65.1 30.3 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 66 35 33 30 10 fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 42 37 33.4 10.4 fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 73.7 32 24 20 5.8 fps
F1 2018 (2018) 104 63 47 29 13 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.25 / 30.25 / 31.8 dB(A)
Hög belastning
44.7 / 42 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203434.833.232.9342538.635.332.940.138.63143.437.936.839.443.44036.231.532.130.536.25035.936.536.534.735.96330.328.330.729.930.38028.530.72926.628.510026.52925.824.926.512528.725.526.225.428.716024.624.725.223.924.6200242424.122.82425022.222.723.12222.231521.724.123.521.321.740020.526.625.119.920.550019.724.424.219.319.763019.927.425.218.919.980020.12927.118.520.1100020.930.929.11820.9125021.431.729.617.621.4160020.532.630.717.520.520002035.132.617.420250019.736.33417.419.7315018.735.632.717.518.7400018.936.532.217.618.950001829.225.617.91863001826.223.11818800018.222.720.11818.21000018.22018.71818.21250018.518.918.417.918.51600018.218.418.117.918.2SPL31.844.74230.331.8N1.54.23.41.21.5median 20median 26.6median 25.2median 18median 20Delta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median 24.9median 22.6median 21.4median 20.6median 19.2median 18.7median 24.92.921.41.30.71.43.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EADell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Hög belastning
 33.5 °C44.4 °C42.6 °C 
 33.2 °C39.7 °C38.4 °C 
 28 °C26 °C29.3 °C 
Max: 44.4 °C
Medel: 35 °C
39.3 °C46.4 °C36.2 °C
34.7 °C40.3 °C33.1 °C
28.3 °C27.9 °C27.2 °C
Max: 46.4 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.432.934.42536.640.136.63143.839.443.84035.730.535.75037.734.737.76330.929.930.98035.626.635.610045.824.945.812551.325.451.316055.723.955.720054.422.854.425046.42246.431550.421.350.440063.319.963.350065.719.365.763067.218.967.280070.718.570.71000731873125077.117.677.116006917.569200072.717.472.7250072.217.472.231507117.571400067.817.667.8500070.117.970.1630071.81871.8800070.31870.3100007018701250068.917.968.91600062.217.962.2SPL83.530.383.5N54.51.254.5median 68.9median 18median 68.9Delta61.4633.933.532.632.430.130.831.129.830.627.537.52846.425.557.525.664.625.267.523.966.822.871.521.970.521.872.820.874.320.474.519.771.218.870.318.570.91874.717.471.817.475.317.173.417.570.317.172.917.376.517.269.117.369.117.365.317.264.417.38583.430.270.561.21.4median 70.9median 182.91.838.833.738.841.234.141.242.635.742.64230.54244.437.644.446.328.746.346.426.246.447.32647.348.326.748.35024.85052.223.652.255.123.255.159.222.659.261.922.761.965.42065.472.119.372.173.718.773.769.118.169.169.61869.672.617.972.671.21871.27217.97272.518.272.562.918.562.960.518.660.561.518.761.564.818.964.861.31961.363.919.163.959.519.459.581.73181.7491.449median 62.9median 19median 62.96.61.96.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EAApple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6.1 / 10.2 / 13.4 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 82 / 122 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.40
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-32%
11%
-50%
12%
17%
45%
13%
8%
Idle Minimum *
6.1
9.48
-55%
3.4
44%
12.6
-107%
4.02
34%
5.3
13%
2.7
56%
4.48 (2.3 - 6.8, n=4)
27%
6.06 (2.4 - 28.6, n=81, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
10.2
16.1
-58%
11
-8%
17.1
-68%
7.2
29%
10.2
-0%
8.1
21%
9.58 (8 - 10.3, n=4)
6%
10.5 (3 - 26.5, n=81, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
13.4
16.9
-26%
14.9
-11%
19.3
-44%
11.46
14%
13.6
-1%
10.1
25%
11.6 (10.6 - 13.4, n=4)
13%
13.8 (4.6 - 42, n=81, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
82
90.8
-11%
78.9
4%
88.3
-8%
76.3
7%
58.3
29%
39
52%
77.3 (74 - 82, n=4)
6%
66 (24.8 - 150, n=81, last 2 years)
20%
Load Maximum *
122
134.4
-10%
91.2
25%
147.3
-21%
154
-26%
65.3
46%
37.2
70%
106 (89 - 122, n=4)
13%
94.1 (28.8 - 235, n=81, last 2 years)
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
74.8
74
47.8

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
17tim 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
8tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 41min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 08min
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 105 Wh
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 64 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-1%
19%
9%
-61%
20%
15%
2%
Reader / Idle
1027
1181
15%
410
-60%
1066
4%
1519
48%
1173 (274 - 2407, n=48, last 2 years)
14%
H.264
581
738
27%
701
21%
565
-3%
627
8%
733
26%
651 (284 - 1122, n=29, last 2 years)
12%
WiFi v1.3
523
576
10%
614
17%
522
0%
201
-62%
556
6%
637
22%
517 (198 - 912, n=84, last 2 years)
-1%
Load
128
76
-41%
158
23%
50
-61%
207
62%
79
-38%
106 (41 - 265, n=66, last 2 years)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra
62
88
90 (54 - 130, n=4, last 2 years)

För

+ metallhölje av riktigt hög kvalitet
+ bra inmatningsenheter
+ matt 4K-skärm med bra ljusstyrka
+ gedigen anslutningsutrustning
+ infraröd kamera med integritetsbländare
+ goda expansionsmöjligheter: två M.2 SSD-platser
+ höljet förblir svalt även vid belastning
+ bra högtalare
+ hög prestandaförmåga
+ lämplig för spel

Emot

- högt pris
- tyngsta och största modellen i sin klass
- svagare GPU än i Dell XPS 15
- markant strypning under stresstestet
- högfrekvent fläkt som är igång alldeles för ofta
- skärmen har dålig ljusfördelning
- högljutt spoltjut
- dålig placering av fläktventilerna
- den bättre DreamColor-skärmen är fortfarande förbehållen den snarlika ZBook
- färre företagsfunktioner än EliteBook 850 G5
- prestandabegränsningar i batteriläge
HP EliteBook 1050 G1, recensionsex från HP
HP EliteBook 1050 G1, recensionsex från HP

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Helt nya laptop-modeller utan föregångare, likt HP EliteBook 1050 G1, är alltid intressanta. Har HP lyckats med sin första riktiga multimedia-modell från EliteBook-serien, och är den en värdig utmanare till Dell XPS 15?

HP har definitivt lyckats med EliteBook 1050:s hölje och design: extremt hög kvalitet, riktigt robust och visuellt attraktiv – lämplig för sitt prisskikt. Det finns heller inget att klaga på när det kommer till inmatningsenheterna. HP använder en bekväm styrplatta i glas och ett bra tangentbord (även om det inte är perfekt). Vad det gäller skärmen erbjuder HP en matt 4K UHD LCD-skärm, vilket är ett alternativ som ingen av konkurrenterna har. Den har dessutom bra ljusstyrkevärden på nästan 400 cd/m². Anslutningsutrustningen är gedigen och betydligt mer omfattande än på exempelvis Apple MacBook Pro 15. Även om webbkameran inte är bättre än den på Dell XPS 15 så är den åtminstone placerad korrekt ovanför skärmen. Den har dessutom lite fler funktioner med sin integritetsbländare och infraröda sensorer. Tack vare en andra M.2 2280-plats så har EliteBook 1050 G1 mer expansionsmöjligheter än Dell XPS 15. Dessutom håller sig EliteBook betydligt svalare i jämförelse och den har bra högtalare (för en laptop).

Men är detta tillräckligt för att stå upp mot konkurrenterna? Troligen inte, då EliteBook 1050 G1 inte bara är betydligt dyrare utan även har en del svagheter. Dessa inkluderar exempelvis faktum att även om höljet är robust så är det också relativt tungt och det är stor infattning ovanför och under skärmen. EliteBook 1050 G1 är inte bara den tyngsta modellen i sin klass, den är dessutom inte i närheten så kompakt som Dell XPS 15. Vidare har den sämre prestanda än konkurrenten från Dell: Även om ett Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q i kombination med Intels sexkärniga processor i princip gör den lämplig för spel så är det Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q som sitter i Dell XPS 15 märkbart snabbare. Vidare så stryptes EliteBook betydligt i stresstestet – nackdelen med de låga temperaturerna. Vi gillade heller inte EliteBooks ljudnivå. Fläkten är igång alldeles för ofta och med en frekvens som är alldeles för hög. Den är relativt högljudd, det finns dessutom en del spoltjut på det och fläktarna blåser varm luft direkt i handen på musanvändare på grund av ventilernas suboptimala placering.

Vi har också en del klagomål som rör skärmen, som att ljusfördelningen är ganska ojämn. Men mer allvarligt är att HP håller tillbaka den betydligt mer ljusstarka och levande DreamColor 4K UHD-skärmen från EliteBook 1050 G1, trots att den finns tillgänglig i den identiskt utrustade HP ZBook Studio G5. Det är ett obegripligt beslut för en såpass dyr laptop. Generellt hade vi önskat fler företagsfunktioner såsom PointStick, en SmartCard-läsare eller Ethernet. HP missar chansen att göra EliteBook 1050 G1 till en riktigt företags-allt-i-allo.

Ibland är riktigt bra inte tillräckligt: HP EliteBook 1050 G1 är en företags- och multimedialaptop av hög kvalitet som tyvärr totalt sett är underlägsen Dell XPS 15.

I slutändan får HP EliteBook 1050 G1 ett riktigt bra resultat på 89% i vår utvärdering. Även om detta vid en första anblick kan verka överraskande med tanke på våra klagomål så ligger vår kritik ändå på en hög nivå. Priset är trots allt motsvarande högt och konkurrenterna är väldigt starka. Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 får ett resultat på 90% och Dell XPS 15 9570 når till och med 92% – och den är ett billigare alternativ. Även om HP EliteBook 1050 G1 får vår rekommendation så finns det inga uppenbara anledningar att föredra den framför konkurrenterna. I synnerhet Dell XPS 15 har ett bättre förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. Så även om Dell inte behöver oroa sig för EliteBook så kan det ändå bli intressant i den här kategorin, då Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme snart når marknaden. Huruvida den kan utgöra en fara för XPS 15 får vår kommande recension att visa.

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA - 10/25/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Design
90 / 98 → 92%
Tangentbord
86%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
67 / 80 → 83%
Vikt
63 / 20-72 → 82%
Batteri
83 / 95 → 87%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
71 / 90 → 79%
Programprestanda
83 / 90 → 92%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
85 / 95 → 89%
Audio
76%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Medel
77%
86%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-09-24 (Update: 2018-09-24)