Notebookcheck

Test: Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/05/2019

Googles återkomst till mittenskiktet. Google har än så länge bara släppt flaggskeppstelefoner i sin Pixel-serie. 3a och 3a XL ändrar på detta med sina mittenskiktspriser. Enheterna lovar flaggskeppskameror till budgetpris, men hur bra har Google lyckats genomföra detta? Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen.

Google Pixel 3a XL (Pixel Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv, OLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Active Edge, barometer, e-kompass,, eSIM
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. CDMA/EVDO: BC0, BC1, BC10. 4G/LTE: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66., LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 160.1 x 76.1
Batteri
3700 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4 μm, ƒ/1.8, 76° autofokus, dualpixel-fasigenkänning, optisk och elektronisk bildstabilisering
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1.12 μm, ƒ/2.0, 84° fixfokus
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär USB-laddare, USB Typ C till USB Typ C-kabel, USB Typ A till USB Typ C-adapter, hörlurar (endast för enheter som säljs i Australien, Frankrike, Tyskland, Indien, Italien och Spanien), 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.19 W/kg, Huvud - 1.17 W/kg., fanless
Vikt
167 g, Strömförsörjning: 81 g
Pris
479 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL

Storleksjämförelse

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156.5 mm 76.5 mm 6.75 mm 156 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% -53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼34% -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼33% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼37% -63%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼26% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (617-692)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (548-602)
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Översikt
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Översikt
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL - Slinga
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
407
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 418 cd/m² Medel: 409.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 409 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Screen
22%
-102%
-158%
-170%
Brightness middle
409
593
45%
567
39%
446
9%
572
40%
Brightness
410
587
43%
547
33%
451
10%
580
41%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
92
-4%
93
-3%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.61
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
4.39
-238%
6.58
-406%
4.5
-246%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.3
2
13%
7.28
-217%
11.94
-419%
12.2
-430%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.5
-0%
4.9
-227%
3.6
-140%
7.9
-427%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.248 98%
2.199 100%
2.16 102%
CCT
6621 98%
6548 99%
7642 85%
7116 91%
8726 74%
Contrast
930
1430

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9354 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +15%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼91% +5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4501 Points ∼60% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼57% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼74% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6090 - 6479, n=3)
6348 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=319)
4690 Points ∼63% -28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼53% +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4941 Points ∼45% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼44% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼53% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5164 - 5742, n=3)
5359 Points ∼49% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=378)
4703 Points ∼43% -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +118%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼51% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1330 Points ∼38% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼38% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1616 - 1712, n=3)
1651 Points ∼47% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=378)
1421 Points ∼40% -12%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼76% -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5640 Points ∼62% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼67% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼64% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6698 - 7387, n=3)
7154 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=370)
5253 Points ∼58% -29%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼76% -12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6457 Points ∼59% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼65% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼58% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8126 - 9458, n=3)
8994 Points ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=541)
5680 Points ∼52% -40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼82% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +304%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼14% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼49% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +217%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼19% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼52% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼68% 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼64% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼74% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2424 - 2763, n=3)
2573 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=378)
1959 Points ∼52% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +339%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼26% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
865 Points ∼12% -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼12% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼18% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1611 - 1612, n=3)
1612 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=378)
1765 Points ∼25% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +237%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼33% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1008 Points ∼17% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼17% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼24% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1742 - 1772, n=3)
1756 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=379)
1637 Points ∼28% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼66% +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼63% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2413 - 2771, n=3)
2560 Points ∼68% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1868 Points ∼49% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +306%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼28% +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1400 Points ∼14% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼14% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼17% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2533 - 2537, n=3)
2535 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=407)
2344 Points ∼23% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +195%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼37% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1541 Points ∼21% -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼21% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼25% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2506 - 2582, n=3)
2539 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=407)
1969 Points ∼26% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼67% +2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2327 Points ∼62% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼63% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼55% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2436 - 2728, n=3)
2543 Points ∼68% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=458)
1866 Points ∼50% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +327%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼27% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
815 Points ∼13% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼13% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼19% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1451 - 1487, n=3)
1473 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=458)
1455 Points ∼23% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +238%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼33% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
953 Points ∼17% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼17% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼25% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1594 - 1651, n=3)
1625 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=459)
1400 Points ∼25% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +45%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼68% -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼65% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼65% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼76% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2456 - 2708, n=3)
2551 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=499)
1729 Points ∼48% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +310%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼28% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1333 Points ∼13% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼13% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼19% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2357 - 2428, n=3)
2401 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=498)
1894 Points ∼19% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +194%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼38% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1474 Points ∼21% -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼20% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼29% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2378 - 2477, n=3)
2432 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=501)
1638 Points ∼23% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +73%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼58% +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16939 Points ∼67% +16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼73% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (13055 - 18523, n=3)
15403 Points ∼61% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=660)
14068 Points ∼56% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +199%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼37% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20908 Points ∼20% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼27% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (22381 - 35596, n=3)
31126 Points ∼29% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=658)
21690 Points ∼20% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +130%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19873 Points ∼32% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼41% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19315 - 29229, n=3)
25181 Points ∼40% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=658)
17606 Points ∼28% -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +188%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼39% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼21% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼28% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (46 - 58, n=3)
54 fps ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=681)
37.6 fps ∼23% -35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼50% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (32 - 53, n=3)
45.7 fps ∼76% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=690)
27.9 fps ∼47% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼32% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼23% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (29 - 29, n=3)
29 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=587)
21.6 fps ∼22% -26%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼52% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼35% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (17 - 28, n=3)
24 fps ∼40% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=596)
19.2 fps ∼32% -31%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼33% +15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼22% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=453)
17.7 fps ∼26% -11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +205%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼38% +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼14% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.9 - 19, n=3)
15 fps ∼26% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=455)
16.6 fps ∼29% -13%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +233%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼34% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼13% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼13% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.3 - 7.2, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼22% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=171)
10.2 fps ∼43% +42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +256%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼31% +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼14% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼30% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.4 - 7, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼33% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=170)
7.08 fps ∼44% +57%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +236%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼35% +18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼13% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼20% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.8 - 11, n=3)
9.6 fps ∼26% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=175)
14.9 fps ∼40% +35%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +242%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼34% +17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼15% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼21% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=175)
16.7 fps ∼41% +39%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +282%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼31% +18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼22% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8.5 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼24% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=378)
12.1 fps ∼29% +10%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼32% +9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼13% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼22% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.4 - 11, n=3)
9.13 fps ∼24% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=382)
10.9 fps ∼29% -1%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
13.79 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +171%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼38% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)
13.4 fps ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼45% +23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11.62 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +177%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼38% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼30% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼44% +22%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12.45 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100% +186%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼36% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (12 - 12.5, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼49% +41%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +136%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼45% +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
115656 Points ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼31% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼38% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (153450 - 158868, n=3)
156363 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=289)
141941 Points ∼38% -11%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1473 Score ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +237%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼34% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1423 - 1473, n=2)
1448 Score ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼43% +45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼78% -9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1052 Points ∼76% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼76% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼80% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1144 - 1229, n=3)
1186 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=625)
755 Points ∼55% -36%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +229%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼33% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1625 Points ∼18% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼17% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼25% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2815 - 2818, n=3)
2816 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=625)
2037 Points ∼22% -28%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼73% -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2208 Points ∼55% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼31% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼59% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2894 - 3316, n=3)
3166 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=625)
1504 Points ∼37% -55%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +53%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼67% +3%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4628 Points ∼55% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼51% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼60% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5315 - 5507, n=3)
5434 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=625)
2952 Points ∼35% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +64%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼59% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2044 Points ∼44% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼38% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2653 - 2811, n=3)
2753 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=625)
1480 Points ∼32% -47%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
447 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +217%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼34% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (444 - 447, n=2)
446 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼52% +63%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼62% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=3)
33.1 Points ∼58% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼45% -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +102%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼60% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.5 - 33.7, n=2)
33.1 runs/min ∼50% +2%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.5 runs/min ∼49%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼42% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +74%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼67% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=156)
67.2 Points ∼62% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (62 - 66, n=2)
64 Points ∼59% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼55% -5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points ∼51% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼52% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10844 - 11312, n=3)
11071 Points ∼45% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼41% -8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼35% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼33% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=683)
6705 Points ∼27% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=708)
10599 ms * ∼100% -215%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼45% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼45% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼36% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3589, n=3)
3482 ms * ∼33% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼32%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼29% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3a XLXiaomi Mi 9Nokia 8.1Motorola Moto Z3 PlaySony Xperia 10 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
95%
-29%
-12%
-23%
-33%
-47%
Random Write 4KB
86.96
165.32
90%
7.3
-92%
84.1
-3%
16.77
-81%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112)
-72%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=733)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
92.12
149.36
62%
69.9
-24%
60.6
-34%
77.67
-16%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112)
-41%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=733)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
179.09
388.27
117%
203.8
14%
182.5
2%
205.19
15%
171 (40 - 246, n=112)
-5%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=733)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
315.6
666.06
111%
279.3
-12%
271.7
-14%
280.34
-11%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=112)
-13%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=733)
-15%
PUBG Compare
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.5 (11-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.6 (50-60)
; high HD: Ø56 (36-60)
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; high: Ø59.4 (51-60)
; minimal: Ø59.4 (50-60)
Hög belastning
 36.4 °C34.2 °C31.6 °C 
 36.3 °C34.6 °C31.4 °C 
 34.2 °C34.4 °C31.1 °C 
Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C
32.4 °C32.3 °C35.7 °C
30.8 °C32.4 °C36.2 °C
30 °C32.5 °C34.8 °C
Max: 36.2 °C
Medel: 33 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.134.32527.4333125.524.44024.527.55036.135.46326.1278024.322.610022.129.612519.136.616020.253.220019.452.425016.553.531515.156.740015.3575001461.463014.567.88001467.9100014.571.2125014.570.7160014.371.1200014.668.325001470.3315014.769.1400014.367.2500014.860.2630014.666.4800014.473.91000014.677.31250014.774.1160001566.9SPL26.782.2N0.853.2median 14.6median 67.2Delta1.57.339.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3a XLXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.64 / 4.62 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-10%
-44%
-28%
-35%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.67
4%
0.8
-14%
1.3
-86%
0.68
3%
1.127 (0.61 - 2.07, n=3)
-61%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-25%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.26
23%
1.5
8%
2
-23%
2.12
-30%
2.38 (1.56 - 3.94, n=3)
-46%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
1.67
1.29
23%
1.8
-8%
2.7
-62%
2.17
-30%
2.41 (1.6 - 3.96, n=3)
-44%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
-21%
Load Average *
2.64
3.71
-41%
3.2
-21%
3.7
-40%
3.82
-45%
3.13 (2.64 - 4.07, n=3)
-19%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
-54%
Load Maximum *
4.62
9.3
-101%
5.4
-17%
5.1
-10%
6.44
-39%
4.89 (4.33 - 5.73, n=3)
-6%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 49min
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-15%
-8%
-28%
-27%
Reader / Idle
1822
1650
-9%
1682
-8%
1245
-32%
1400
-23%
H.264
960
1008
5%
857
-11%
648
-32%
701
-27%
WiFi v1.3
709
546
-23%
738
4%
595
-16%
635
-10%
Load
289
194
-33%
246
-15%
199
-31%
154
-47%

För

+ välbyggd
+ bra kameror
+ ren Android Pie
+ stryps inte ens vid långvarig belastning
+ bra högtalare
+ jämförelsevis bra batteritid

Emot

- stor skärminfattning
- Active Edge går inte att ställa in
- har ingen microSD-kortläsare
- batteritiden lever inte upp till förväntningarna
Recension av telefonen Google Pixel 3a XL. Recensionsex från Google Germany.
Recension av telefonen Google Pixel 3a XL. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Pixel 3a XL bevisar att Google inte har glömt hur man tillverkar en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon. 3a XL varken känns eller ser sämre ut än sina dyrare syskon samtidigt som den enklare hårdvaran fortfarande kan leverera smidig prestanda och hantera krävande applikationer. Även om vi har sett många tredubbla eller fyrdubbla kameror på mittenskiktstelefoner det senaste så utklassar Google sina rivaler med en enda sensor på 12.2 MP.

Google Pixel 3a XL är en ny tävlande i mittenskiktet som utmärker sig på många områden. Den har några mindre brister, men de hindrar inte enheten från att vara fantastiskt prisvärd.

Tyvärr ärver 3a XL en del av den kritik som vi riktat åt de andra Pixel-telefonerna. Bristen på riktigt stöd för dual-SIM är en miss, precis som faktum att Google vägrar att inkludera en microSD-kortläsare. Den tjocka skärminfattningen och plastdesignen kommer också att resultera i delade meningar, även om de har sina fördelar. I huvudsak: inget jack. Valet av en Snapdragon 670 SoC istället för något kraftigare har också resulterat i en del kritik från andra recensioner. Men Snapdragon 670 visar inte upp några praktiska begränsningar och kör i princip vilken app eller vilket spel som helst som du utsätter den för.

Sammanfattningsvis är Pixel 3a XL en exceptionell mittenskiktstelefon som har bättre kamera och batteritid än sina konkurrenter. Den är dessutom väldesignad och de flesta bristerna är en fråga om smak.

Google Pixel 3a XL - 09/13/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
81%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
47 / 70 → 66%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
19 / 64 → 30%
Programprestanda
61 / 86 → 71%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
58%
Medel
74%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 5)