Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018, LTE, 256 GB) Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 632 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1975:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB IPS, 2736x1834, 12.30 | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -1% | -57% | -201% | -78% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 632 | 650 3% | 474 -25% | 384 -39% | 463 -27% | 530 -16% |
| Brightness | 605 | 614 1% | 477 -21% | 360 -40% | 450 -26% | 513 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 84 -8% | 83 -9% | 92 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.42 -31% | 0.8 -150% | 0.32 -0% | 0.61 -91% | |
| Contrast | 1975 | 1548 -22% | 480 -76% | 1447 -27% | 869 -56% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1 9% | 2.5 -127% | 6.83 -521% | 3.76 -242% | 1.2 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 1.9 21% | 5.8 -142% | 12.7 -429% | 7.35 -206% | 3.2 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.5 12% | 2.1 -24% | 7.5 -341% | 3.18 -87% | 1 41% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.199 100% | 2.53 87% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6794 96% | 6734 97% | 6281 103% | 8544 76% | 6994 93% | 6588 99% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.68 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (552676 - 566378, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (5216 - 5300, n=2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (278 - 279, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
| Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (44425 - 45734, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (603 - 614, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB (Edge 18) | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (172 - 182, n=2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Average Apple A12X Bionic (380 - 386, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
* ... smaller is better
Battle Bay
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
World of Tanks Blitz
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.23 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.42 / 9.35 / 9.38 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
12.75 / 14.96 Watt |
    
| |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 40% | -5% | -1% | -86% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.42 | 1.55 -9% | 1.76 -24% | 3.3 -132% | 2.2 -55% | 4.3 -203% |
| Idle Average * | 9.35 | 8.58 8% | 4.22 55% | 4.2 55% | 7.8 17% | 8.7 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.38 | 8.59 8% | 4.25 55% | 7 25% | 7.9 16% | 9.4 -0% |
| Load Average * | 12.75 | 10.09 21% | 4.52 65% | 10.4 18% | 12.6 1% | 24.5 -92% |
| Load Maximum * | 14.96 | 10.61 29% | 7.35 51% | 13.8 8% | 12.8 14% | 36 -141% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | -15% | -15% | -5% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1888 | 2919 55% | 1227 -35% | 1254 -34% | 1066 -44% | |
| H.264 | 899 | 676 -25% | 735 -18% | 629 -30% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 796 | 736 -8% | 495 -38% | 670 -16% | 714 -10% | 545 -32% |
| Load | 184 | 257 40% | 245 33% | 220 20% | 185 1% | 118 -36% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018) imponerade inte bara på oss under Apples presskonferens utan även när vi först fick vår testenhet. Ja, det är fortfarande en gigantisk surfplatta, men den är tunnare och lättare än sin föregångare. Nya Apple Pencil känns dessutom bra i handen.
Något som verkligen talar för nya iPad Pro 12.9 är dess påstådda prestanda, som Apple hävdar är bättre än 92% av alla bärbara datorer som släppts under 2018. Intressant nog inkluderar detta även en del Core i7-modeller. Företaget skryter också om att prestandan från A12X GPU:n bör kunna konkurrera med Xbox One S. Apple har verkligen tagit en risk med dessa stora påståenden och nya iPad Pro 12.9 kan inte riktigt leva upp till förväntningarna. A12X Bionic är för tillfället det snabbaste ARM-baserade chippet som finns på marknaden, men det finns inget exakt sätt att jämföra dess prestanda med x86-baserade processorer.
Tredje generationens iPad Pro 12.9 är en fantastisk surfplatta och är för tillfället den bästa ARM-baserade surfplattan som går att köpa för pengar. Men iOS fortsätter att hålla iPad Pro tillbaka och hindrar den från att verkligen vara en laptop-ersättning, vilket är synd eftersom den är tillräckligt kraftfull för att vara en sådan.
Den största bristen med iPad Pro 12.9 är iOS. Operativsystemet har inget användbart filsystem och enheten kan heller inte läsa från USB-minnen, för att bara nämna ett fåtal problem som finns med iOS. Galaxy Tab S4 är oändligt mycket mer flexibel i det hänseendet. Den som bara behöver en lätt enhet för epost, mediakonsumtion och kontorsprogram kommer vara nöjd med iPad Pro 12.9, även om den är synnerligen dyr. Men efter tre generationer håller Apple fortfarande inte vad de lovat: att erbjuda en surfplatta som kan ersätta en laptop.
Nya iPad Pro 12.9 är bra för den som värdesätter Apple Pencil och vet hur den ska användas. Vi rekommenderar dock att välja den mindre modellen om du vill ha med enheten på resan. Vidare bör modellen med 64 GB ha tillräckligt med lagring för de flesta användare som bara vill ha en stor surfplatta för mediakonsumtion.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
-
09/16/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
