Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Plats för förbättring. Samsung har uppgraderat sin flaggskepps-surfplatta, som troligen är en av de sista Android-plattorna som både har toppskiktsspecifikationer och penn-inmatning. Men Galaxy Tab S4 har en del tillkortakommanden. Få reda på vilka områden Tab S4 inte riktigt räcker till och för vem den är värd att köpa i den här detaljerade recensionen.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Galaxy Tab S9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.5 GHz, Kryo 280
Minne
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
10.50 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 288 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.7 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Kortläsare: Upp till 400 GB microSD/SDHC/SDXC-kort; Filsystem som stöds: FAT, FAT32, exFAT, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Iris-scanner, Ansiktsigenkänning, Accelerometer, Positionssensor, Hall-sensor, G-sensor, Digital kompass, OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung DeX
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7 x 249 x 164
Batteri
7300 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (Autofokus, LED-blixt, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfokus)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Fyra högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB Typ A till Typ C-kabel, Kortplatsverktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Samsung Experience 9.5, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – W/kg, Huvud – W/kg. LDAC, aptX, fanless
Vikt
482 g
Pris
699 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

267 mm 169.2 mm 8.9 mm 531 g262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 469 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g237.3 mm 169 mm 6 mm 434 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s -2%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s -59%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 MBit/s -59%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s +112%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s -19%
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 – Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 – Runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 – Runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 – Runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Slinga
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Vår testkarta i detalj
En titt på tangentbordet som finns som tillval till Tab S4
En titt på tangentbordet som finns som tillval till Tab S4
457
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 502 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 477.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 474 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.70
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.50
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Screen
14%
14%
-100%
-48%
-159%
Brightness middle
474
452
-5%
634
34%
384
-19%
426
-10%
340
-28%
Brightness
477
468
-2%
625
31%
360
-25%
399
-16%
320
-33%
Brightness Distribution
91
82
-10%
87
-4%
84
-8%
91
0%
84
-8%
Black Level *
0.39
0.8
0.38
0.19
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
1.8
28%
1.9
24%
6.83
-173%
4.5
-80%
15
-500%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
4
31%
3.9
33%
12.7
-119%
7.9
-36%
22.8
-293%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.2
43%
2.8
-33%
7.5
-257%
5.2
-148%
4
-90%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.11 104%
2.26 97%
2.199 100%
2.23 99%
2.09 105%
CCT
6281 103%
6500 100%
7027 93%
8544 76%
6875 95%
6940 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
Contrast
1626
480
1121
1789

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
217439 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
176131 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (150208 - 185487, n=17)
173235 Points -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
157445 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points -18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points -55%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points -64%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (201881 - 217442, n=8)
208685 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
175581 Points -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points -62%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6854 - 9927, n=20)
7925 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6830 Points -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5608 Points -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points -30%
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (5603 - 7510, n=20)
6743 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6039 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5432 Points -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points -24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points -42%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)
3631 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2702 - 3790, n=17)
3367 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2204 Points -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points -60%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points -69%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)
6543 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (4238 - 5926, n=17)
5690 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3639 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points -58%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points -65%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)
4284 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1501 - 4423, n=17)
3137 Points +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3108 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points -48%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points -67%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)
6639 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (5791 - 6273, n=17)
6052 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points -19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2284 Points -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points -86%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points -88%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1009 - 1329, n=17)
1222 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)
1205 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
913 Points -25%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points -34%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3933 Points +108%
Average of class Tablet (745 - 5713, n=16, last 2 years)
2876 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1809 - 1973, n=18)
1917 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1892 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points -8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points -36%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
9358 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 15310, n=16, last 2 years)
8283 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6006 - 6799, n=18)
6515 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6173 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points -49%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points -62%
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (7462 - 8281, n=13)
7893 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
7063 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=11, last 2 years)
6957 Points -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points -61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points -80%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
54237 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (12604 - 42278, n=20)
37906 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
30277 Points -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
26634 Points -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points -66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
110148 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (16794 - 58360, n=20)
53776 Points -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
35076 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34002 Points -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
21886 Points +15%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
19534 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6729 - 23046, n=20)
19196 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points -21%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
14456 Points -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3407 - 5030, n=18)
4583 Points +31%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4521 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3438 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 8472, n=19, last 2 years)
2878 Points -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2386 Points -32%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points -73%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
7212 Points +96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3682 - 6231, n=18)
5648 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4626 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points
Average of class Tablet (454 - 10759, n=19, last 2 years)
3021 Points -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2392 Points -35%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points -76%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4858, n=19, last 2 years)
2901 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1574 - 3092, n=18)
2807 Points -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2366 Points -20%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
1960 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1811 Points -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points -54%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2895 - 3810, n=19)
3616 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3558 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2578 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)
2019 Points -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1771 Points -49%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points -83%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4537 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3560 - 4072, n=19)
3907 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2943 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)
2126 Points -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1646 Points -55%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points -85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1628 - 3157, n=19)
2898 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)
2790 Points -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2416 Points -18%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2027 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1798 Points -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points -54%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=59, last 2 years)
61.1 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (54 - 79, n=19)
60.3 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps +2%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
59 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57 fps -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps -71%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
225 fps +226%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=59, last 2 years)
139.7 fps +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (69 - 119, n=18)
107 fps +55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
93 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps -68%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
58 fps +61%
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=59, last 2 years)
47.3 fps +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (29 - 58, n=19)
42.3 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
27 fps -25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps -74%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps -77%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
109 fps +82%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 494, n=59, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (43 - 64, n=19)
55.2 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
41 fps -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps -83%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps -86%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
43 fps +95%
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 118.3, n=59, last 2 years)
35 fps +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (15 - 59, n=19)
29.1 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps -27%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps -74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps -79%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
63 fps +54%
Average of class Tablet (5 - 340, n=59, last 2 years)
58 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (21 - 43, n=19)
37.9 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
28 fps -32%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps -85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps -88%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94.5, n=58, last 2 years)
21 fps +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (11 - 50, n=19)
19.5 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
9.3 fps -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps -76%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps -85%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 214, n=58, last 2 years)
33.9 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (22 - 26, n=19)
24.5 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps -36%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps -88%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps -92%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (32.1 - 38.7, n=5)
36.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
18.61 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=14, last 2 years)
2108 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (733 - 889, n=6)
832 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
615 Points

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
30333 Points +135%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
11854 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3086 - 14300, n=20)
11209 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
9531 Points -26%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points -34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
257 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
187 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
178 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (57 - 204, n=17)
164.4 Points -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
132 Points -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
200.6 Points +208%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (52.9 - 80.4, n=19)
66.1 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
65.1 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
57 Points -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.34 Points -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
42.73 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3976 ms * -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756 ms * -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
3575 ms * -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2425 - 4813, n=19)
3219 ms * -22%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2645 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2244 ms * +15%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
973 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 ProAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-39%
-34%
-52%
-48%
38%
181%
Sequential Read 256KB
741
288.6
-61%
278.6
-62%
262.2
-65%
173.7
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.8
87.6
-55%
94.1
-52%
147.7
-25%
92.4
-53%
Random Read 4KB
142
45.82
-68%
27.41
-81%
27.72
-80%
13.7
-90%
137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
24.43
13.13
-46%
15.35
-37%
9.37
-62%
8.77
-64%
84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52)
247%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
55.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
80.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
73.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
30.14 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-49%
56.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33)
-12%
Asphalt 9: Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4; 1.0.1a: Ø29 (25-31)
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4; 0.8.0: Ø39.7 (11-41)
Hög belastning
 31.4 °C29.9 °C27.7 °C 
 29.4 °C27.8 °C27.9 °C 
 28 °C27.4 °C28.4 °C 
Max: 31.4 °C
Medel: 28.7 °C
27.5 °C30 °C30.2 °C
26.6 °C26.5 °C28.3 °C
26.2 °C26.7 °C26.3 °C
Max: 30.2 °C
Medel: 27.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Värmekarta av enhetens framsida vid belastning
Värmekarta av enhetens framsida vid belastning
Värmekarta av enhetens baksida vid belastning
Värmekarta av enhetens baksida vid belastning
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203029.42530.123.53129.326.64026.924.55032.831.16324.826.78020.726.210019.535.212518.627.216021.445.92002551.425017.459.531516.266.540018.467.550015.467.963013.568.180013.768100013.769.3125014.670.3160014.972.6200014.471.1250014.768.1315014.665.1400014.863.2500014.764.5630014.666.180001561.41000014.952.41250015.147.91600014.938.5SPL27.280.1N0.947.6median 14.9median 65.1Delta1.48.13237.731.931.131.731.131.132.736.235.926.332.422.232.222.53825.445.518.952.817.159.816.962.41462.613.568.713.869.212.571.312.17511.47511.273.4117010.871.410.574.310.874.610.373.110.375.210.469.410.563.510.459.410.351.310.447.170.765.523.884.62718.20.562.7median 11.4median 68.7median 12.1median 73.65.210.111.611hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S4Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (110.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.76 / 4.22 / 4.25 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.52 / 7.35 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
-41%
-74%
-15%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
1.76
2.08
-18%
1.44
18%
3.3
-88%
1.55
12%
3.21
-82%
Idle Average *
4.22
3.5
17%
6.12
-45%
4.2
-0%
4.17
1%
5.97
-41%
Idle Maximum *
4.25
3.58
16%
6.14
-44%
7
-65%
4.25
-0%
6.19
-46%
Load Average *
4.52
6.97
-54%
8.55
-89%
10.4
-130%
7.13
-58%
9.72
-115%
Load Maximum *
7.35
7.4
-1%
10.62
-44%
13.8
-88%
9.63
-31%
9.97
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 27min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 8.0)
8tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 15min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 05min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Battery Runtime
34%
18%
3%
-5%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1227
1903
55%
2036
66%
1254
2%
960
-22%
735
-40%
H.264
735
551
-25%
629
-14%
629
-14%
585
-20%
WiFi v1.3
495
760
54%
693
40%
670
35%
542
9%
387
-22%
Load
245
375
53%
199
-19%
220
-10%
274
12%
175
-29%

För

+ tunn, tjusig design
+ bra prestanda
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ imponerande OLED-skärm
+ skapliga fyrdubbla högtalare
+ stöd för S Pen
+ DeX-integrering
+ LTE-modem som tillval
+ USB 3.1 med stöd för HDMI och DisplayPort

Emot

- SoC från förra årets flaggskepp
- svaga kameror
- lite intern lagring
- inget stöd för NFC
- enheten känns inte lyxig
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S4. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S4. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 är för tillfället den kraftigaste Android-surfplattan på marknaden. Den utmärkta Super AMOLED-skärmen är särskilt övertygande samtidigt som integreringen av DeX är utmärkt för produktiviteten, även om det finns begränsningar när det kommer till spel och multimedia. 64 GB lagring och 4 GB RAM är dessutom mycket, men det är synd att Samsung inte säljer versionen med 256 GB i fler områden och för tillfället begränsar det lagringsalternativet till WiFi-versionen. Batterilösa S Pen är också ett utmärkt verktyg.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 är en fantastisk surfplatta som tar priset som bästa Android-platta tack vare en utmärkt skärm och en brist på aktuella alternativ.

Men Samsung har inte riktigt lyckats med att skapa en toppskikts-surfplatta med en motsvarande känsla av lyx. Tab S4 är utrustad med förra årets flaggskepps-SoC samtidigt som lagring, RAM och kameror snarare skulle passa en mittenskikts-telefon än en flaggskeppsenhet från 2018. S Pen och tangentbordsfodralet som finns som tillval känns plastiga och vi upplever att Samsung kunde lyckats bättre med att leverera en känsla av att detta är en flaggskepps-produkt.

Tab S4 kostar från 6.499 kronor på Samsungs hemsida, vilket ökar till 7.490 kronor för WiFi-versionen med 256 GB lagring (i USA) och 7.299 kronor för LTE-varianten. Men de flesta Android-surfplattor är betydligt billigare, av vilka Huawei MediaPad M5 Pro för tillfället är det bästa alternativet. Tillbehören till den är dock svåra att få tag på och totalt sett hamnar den även en aning bakom Tab S4.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
86 / 98 → 88%
Tangentbord
67 / 80 → 83%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
59 / 70 → 84%
Vikt
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Batteri
85%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
39 / 78 → 50%
Programprestanda
60 / 92 → 66%
Temperatur
95%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Medel
76%
86%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-11-11 (Update: 2018-11-11)