Notebookcheck

Test: Acer Predator Triton 500 - Superstjärna (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/26/2020

Uppdaterad prestanda. Nvidia uppdaterade nyss sina energibesparande Max-Q chips. Acers Predator Triton 500 är en av de första bärbara datorerna som utrustats med en matchande Super-GPU. Läs vår recension för att få reda på vilken prestanda den här toppskiktsmodellen erbjuder.

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 (Predator Triton 500 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Kärna: 815 MHz, Minne: 1353 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna, Max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, Full HD, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, NVMe, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280
Ljudkort
Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 hörlurar, 1 mikrofon
Nätverk
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 359 x 255
Batteri
84 Wh, 5550 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 watt, Predator Sense, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.1 kg, Strömförsörjning: 736 g
Pris
2500 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
04/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
06/2019
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
89 %
05/2019
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.2 kg17.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
09/2019
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.2 kg18.3 mm15.6"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

360.5 mm 276 mm 18.3 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1620, n=307)
657 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=307)
612 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: 10.61 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 18.71 ∆E
No screenshots found ()
310
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 335 cd/m² Medel: 318.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 320 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1333:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.03 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-5%
6%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 (7.2, 7.2)
13.6 (8, 5.6)
6%
12.8 (6.8, 6)
11%
16.4 (7.6, 6.8)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-15%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-0%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
15%
PWM Frequency
23260 (19)
23810 (10)
23810 (24)
Screen
10%
7%
-26%
Brightness middle
320
282.3
-12%
293
-8%
324.2
1%
Brightness
318
269
-15%
270
-15%
304
-4%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
87
-1%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.24
0.32
-33%
0.29
-21%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1333
882
-34%
1010
-24%
853
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.03
1.17
71%
1.69
58%
5.01
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.43
3.29
61%
3.37
60%
12.7
-51%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.98
1.06
-8%
1.24
-27%
1.64
-67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.94
1.3
78%
2.3
61%
7.9
-33%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.2 100%
2.3 96%
2.35 94%
CCT
6751 96%
6643 98%
6758 96%
8455 77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
63.8
-3%
63
-5%
60.8
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
97.5
-2%
98.5
-1%
95.5
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 7%
7% / 7%
-13% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=564)
159 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (min: 1201.27, max: 1287.87) Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1175 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1126 Points ∼87% -13%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
1046 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=568)
871 Points ∼68% -32%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=84)
438 Points ∼94% -6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼92% -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=85)
2774 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
2429 Points ∼83% -17%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37299
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7478
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13620
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
14.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
82.13 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.22 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1288 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points ∼98% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points ∼94%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=257)
5291 Points ∼91% -4%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to precess latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6243.8 μs * ∼100%

* ... smaller is better

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-21%
-11%
1%
Write 4K
131.7
91.32
-31%
137.2
4%
108.8
-17%
Read 4K
47.34
40.73
-14%
46.82
-1%
45.41
-4%
Write Seq
2884
1915
-34%
1221
-58%
2467
-14%
Read Seq
2303
2051
-11%
1217
-47%
2456
7%
Write 4K Q32T1
423.9
308.3
-27%
526.6
24%
532.3
26%
Read 4K Q32T1
487.7
417.4
-14%
614
26%
589.8
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
2822
1922
-32%
1986
-30%
2801
-1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3478
3395
-2%
3234
-7%
3172
-9%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3478 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2822 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 487.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2303 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2884 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.7 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard
38265 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
60306 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
22730 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38107 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18678 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8043 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
5086 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5006 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4275 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6005, n=85)
4074 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4032 Points ∼79% -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8379 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8342 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7840 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7266 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=202)
5881 Points ∼70% -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
22326 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21758 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20718 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18962 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=589)
11830 Points ∼53% -47%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
30456 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28369 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27762 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
24926 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=666)
14092 Points ∼46% -54%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø84.4 (72-91)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
83.4 (min: 67) fps ∼100%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
78.3 fps ∼94% -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66.9 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼62% -38%
låg med. hög ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 179 172 153 85.8 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 236 143 83.4 58.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146 134 123 118 fps
Fortnite (2018) 121 114 99.5 80.3 44.5 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 103 80.8 37.6 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 119 100 72 56.1 31.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 93.4 79.5 fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 105 97.7 90 63.3 31.9 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 111 105 97 72 39 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 92 78 58 53 32 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 86.7 78.6 77 76 46.1 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 139 127 119 96.1 58.7 fps
Darksiders III (2018) 112 109 103 82.1 43.2 fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 152 113 105 73.9 41.3 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 194 165 163 118 65 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 103 97 87 71 48 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 101 77.8 63.4 51.2 31.6 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 166 162 98.8 76.4 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 129 112 80 59 31 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 94 74.4 44.9 38.8 23.2 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 126 106 103 68.4 34.1 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 174 141 138 122 74 fps
Control (2019) 107 79.8 48.4 24.9 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 107 84.3 68.1 49.1 26.6 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 251 241 240 239 190 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 102 92 70 53 31 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 85.9 77.7 72 66.4 46.9 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 134 129 107 78.9 44.5 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 93 86.6 83.3 66.9 40.9 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 95.7 93.1 89.9 76.2 42.7 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 98 67.4 43.7 37 23.8 fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 121 119 83.1 39.7 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 119 101 68.8 32.4 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 164 150 147 108 58 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.532.533.730.633.92539.734.435.438.534.93131.328.329.229.928.94033.73031.228.331.55042.628.729.627.241.26335.526.92826.938.98029.628.127.624.230.11003027.528.124.63012532.726.627.723.933.416037.827.227.623.432.720035.525.427.121.733.725036.125.625.820.536.73153724.626.719.936.740038.224.626.318.637.950039.724.227.918.739.36303721.924.717.936.880037.321.724.917.637.7100038.621.124.917.338.2125038.921.625.619.338.8160039.12125.518.739200039.922.425.217.540250039.619.124.817.339.6315039.118.920.517.338.6400038.618.82017.438.4500034.618.419.217.534.4630031.618.318.317.331.5800028.518.318.217.428.41000024.5181817.324.41250021.11817.917.320.91600019.218.218.117.318.8SPL49.932.935.830.149.7N7.31.92.41.37.1median 37median 21.6median 24.9median 17.6median 36.7Delta3.63.23.51.74.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 33 / 36 dB(A)
Hög belastning
50 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
13%
-3%
4%
off / environment *
30
28.3
6%
28.3
6%
28.3
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=359)
2%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.4
-1%
28.8
4%
28.5
5%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=781)
-5%
Idle Average *
33
30.5
8%
28.8
13%
28.5
14%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=781)
1%
Idle Maximum *
36
30.6
15%
29
19%
49
-36%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=782)
4%
Load Average *
50
37.6
25%
33.5
33%
49
2%
40.9 (30.1 - 59, n=782)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
46
4%
45
6%
49
-2%
Load Maximum *
50
55.1
-10%
45.2
10%
55
-10%
48.3 (38.9 - 64.1, n=782)
3%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C44 °C43 °C 
 41 °C41 °C38 °C 
 38 °C39 °C36 °C 
Max: 44 °C
Medel: 40 °C
50 °C49 °C40 °C
46 °C46 °C41 °C
40 °C40 °C40 °C
Max: 50 °C
Medel: 43.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  49 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 42.4 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-5%
-1%
-11%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
45.6
-4%
47
-7%
53.8
-22%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=747)
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
50
53.8
-8%
49.2
2%
58
-16%
49.7 (25.9 - 78, n=745)
1%
Idle Upper Side *
29
28.6
1%
28.6
1%
29.8
-3%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=699)
-6%
Idle Bottom *
31
33.2
-7%
31.4
-1%
32.2
-4%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=697)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.633.32538.536.63129.929.44028.334.35027.232.36326.932.18024.228.910024.630.212523.933.516023.445.120021.75025020.560.831519.962.540018.66750018.767.163017.970.480017.672.3100017.371.3125019.372.2160018.773.3200017.573.2250017.372.8315017.370.4400017.467.2500017.564.8630017.369.7800017.473.51000017.369.41250017.364.31600017.356.9SPL30.183.1N1.358.1median 17.6median 67.2Delta1.77.444.243.839.440.638.838.938.338.136.636.538.236.736.636.534.238.633.342.333.447.432.951.331.456.231.460.230.361.929.967.429.372.128.779.828.379.428.280.62881.128.380.427.874.127.974.327.673.227.268.627.173.426.880.526.77226.767.126.660.240.389.43.979.6median 28.3median 721.87.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 25 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 95 / 211 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-2%
-71%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
11
18.3
-66%
12.5
-14%
19
-73%
19.3 (1.9 - 113, n=743)
-75%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
15.3
-2%
40.5
-170%
24.7 (6.6 - 119, n=743)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
25
28.8
-15%
20.7
17%
52
-108%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=743)
-21%
Load Average *
95
93
2%
90.2
5%
132.3
-39%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=733)
-9%
Load Maximum *
211
215.9
-2%
209.3
1%
217.2
-3%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=732)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
140
142.6
-2%
162
-16%
183.3
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 15min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 18min
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-4%
43%
-15%
-19%
Reader / Idle
495
953
93%
554
12%
351 (39 - 1174, n=697)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
378
362
-4%
393
4%
332
-12%
261 (62 - 622, n=407)
-31%
Load
78
102
31%
44
-44%
79.2 (18 - 202, n=664)
2%

För

+ Lätt och kompakt hölje
+ Responsiv 300 Hz-skärm
+ G-Sync och Optimus
+ Riktigt bra prestanda
+ Thunderbolt 3

Emot

- Hög ljudnivå vid 3D-bruk
- Irriterande boot-ljud (som kan deaktiveras)
- Begränsade servicemöjligheter
Predator Triton 500: Recensionsex från Acer Germany
Predator Triton 500: Recensionsex från Acer Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Även under 2020 imponerar Predator Triton 500 med sin kombination av låg vikt, kompakta dimensioner och generös styrka.

Det relativt lätta och tunna höljet på 15 tum kan ta sig an betydligt tjockare kollegor i ett flertal prestandatester, men Max-Q-versionen av RTX 2080 Super är inte direkt det bästa valet ur ett pris-prestanda perspektiv. Oavsett så säkrar den snabba GPU:n smidig bilduppdatering i Full HD även i moderna titlar (med maximala inställningar, förstås). En annan höjdpunkt är 300 Hz-skärmen, som inte bara kändes responsiv utan också hade rik kontrast.

Totalt sett finns det knappt något att ge den nya versionen av Triton 500 kritik för. Det enda vi har att anmärka på är, som ofta är fallet, hög ljudnivå vid belastning.

Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Acer Predator Triton 500 - Superstjärna (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2020-04-26 (Update: 2020-04-26)