Recension av Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE - Fullt utrustad spellaptop med RTX 3080 Ti

Name: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Brand: Asus

Intel HX med bromsarna nere. Med nya ROG Strix Scar 17 SE från 2022 erbjuder Asus en spellaptop i toppklass med den bästa hårdvaran som finns på marknaden. Förutom GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ingår även Core i9-12950HX och en snabb 240 Hz-skärm.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/21/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

ROG Strix Scar SE är Asus flaggskepp inom spelområdet, och även 2022 är den utrustad med de snabbaste komponenterna som för närvarande finns på marknaden. Vi testar toppmodellen G733CX med Intel Core i9-12950HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, två SSD-diskar på 2 TB från Samsung och en snabb QHD-panel med en uppdateringsfrekvens på 240 Hz. Priset är också högklassigt, eftersom den högsta försäljningspriset för vår testenhet ligger på 3 999 euro (~4 129 dollar).

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W (ROG Strix Scar 17 G733 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12950HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1590 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), 526.86, Optimus, MUX

Minne

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 170 PPI, NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)

Hårddisk

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, 2x 2TB RAID-0, 3640 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Alder Lake-S PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm audio port

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 28.3 x 395 x 282

Batteri

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Övrigt

Tangentbord: chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 330W PSU, switchable ROG face plates, Asus Keystone, ROG software, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.927 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.1 kg

Pris

4000 Kr

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 %	11/2022	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	28.3 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
88.9 %	09/2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.3 %	08/2022	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.3 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.6 %	09/2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89.2 %	05/2022	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	20.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Hölje - Spellaptop med en design som sticker ut och omfattande belysning

ROG Strix Scar 17 är helt klart en bärbar dator för spel som inte alls döljer sina ambitioner. Höljet är till stor del identiskt med förra årets G733QS, och en del av basenheten är återigen transparent. Dessutom finns det omfattande belysta element och några ytterligare designelement eller gimmicks som den speciella skrivningen på locket som bara blir synlig när du lyser med UV-ljus på den

Kvaliteten på plasthöljet är överlag bra, även om ytorna fortsätter att vara känsliga för fingeravtryck och du kan höra ett och annat litet knarrande ljud när du till exempel öppnar displayen. Stabiliteten hos den tjocka basenheten är hyfsad, men du kan fortfarande trycka ner basenheten minimalt i tangentbordets centrala område. Även om det relativt smala skärmlocket gör ett bra jobb, kan gångjärnet fortfarande inte förhindra en viss lätt vinglighet när den bärbara datorn till exempel flyttas.

Även om det går att ta bort det nedre locket på fodralet måste man vara försiktig när man gör det. Eftersom belysningen är integrerad i delen måste du först koppla bort två små platta kablar, innan du kan ta bort locket. Med tillgång till fläktarna, de två SSD-enheterna, två RAM-moduler och WLAN-modulen är underhållsalternativen goda.

Storleksjämförelse

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 Alienware x17 R2 P48E MSI Titan GT77 12UHS SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE DIN A4 ❌

Utrustning - ROG Strix Scar 17 med HDMI 2.1 och Wi-Fi 6E

Förutom en Thunderbolt-anslutning har G733CX en HDMI 2.1-port, och USB-porten på baksidan kan också användas för laddning på vägen (max. 100 watt). De flesta anslutningarna finns på baksidan, och du hittar bara två vanliga USB-A-portar och 3,5-mm-ljudporten på vänster sida. På höger sida finns också en plats för Asus Keystone, så att du kan lagra systeminställningar och data.

WLAN-prestandan med Intel AX211 är mycket bra, och vi kunde även ansluta till 6 GHz-nätverket i vår referensrouter från Asus utan problem. Det finns även en Ethernet-anslutning med 2,5 Gbit/s för trådbundna anslutningar. Användare av ROG Strix Scar 17 måste klara sig utan webbkamera, men vid behov erbjuder tillverkaren en motsvarande extern webbkamera (ROG Eye S).

Baksidan: USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.1, 2,5 Gbit/s Ethernet, strömförsörjning

Vänster: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3,5-mm-ljudport

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1732 (1685^min - 1744^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1723 (1681^min, 1688.83^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1680 (1438^min - 1732^max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=78, last 2 years)	1512 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=171)	1492 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1655 (1613^min, 1615.32^P1 - 1702^max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1645 (1589^min - 1741^max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1488 (1300^min - 1531^max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=76, last 2 years)	1474 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=172)	1375 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1691 (1589^min - 1731^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)	1406 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=182)	1394 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1610 (1421^min - 1675^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)	1274 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=182)	1245 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1589-1741)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1732 (1685-1744)

Inmatningsenheter - Asus har ett bra tangentbord

Asus har ändrat tangentbordslayouten igen och använder nu en mer konventionell layout med mindre specialknappar. Det finns också ett "vanligt" nummerblock igen, vilket också innebär att piltangenterna har flyttats något till vänster och nu är mindre. Det är inte alla användare som skulle gilla detta. Kvaliteten på tangentbordet är dock mycket bra med den långa navet på 2 mm, och du kan gå loss på belysningen, som gör att du kan konfigurera varje tangent separat, inklusive spelspecifika lägen via AuraSync-tekniken. Den stora ClickPad erbjuder bra glidegenskaper och fungerar tillförlitligt, men den är också ganska högljudd när du trycker på den.

Skärm - QHD med 240 Hz

Förutom Full-HD-panelen med 360 Hz som vi testade i förra årets Scar 17 G733QSerbjuder Asus även en QHD-panel med 240 Hz uppdateringsfrekvens, vilket är panelen i vår testenhet. Det subjektiva bildintrycket av den matta IPS-panelen (2560 x 1440 pixlar, 16:9) är mycket bra, och förutom Dolby Vision HDR stöds även Adaptive Sync. Svarstiderna är extremt snabba och PWM används inte. Ljusstyrkan ligger på cirka 300 cd/m² i genomsnitt, vilket också är samma nivå som Full-HD-panelen med 360 Hz. Å andra sidan är svartvärdet lite högt, vilket också resulterar i ett mediokert kontrastförhållande på cirka 1 000:1.


302 cd/m²	303 cd/m²	279 cd/m²
311 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
303 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	294 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

NE173QHM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 320 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 302.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 320 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1067:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00	Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-16%	-14%	-16%	-8%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	97.1	69.3 -29%	70.8 -27%	69 -29%	79.2 -18%	71 -27%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	98.2 -2%	98.9 -1%	99.8 0%	99.8 0%	99.4 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.8	70.8 -17%	73 -14%	69.6 -18%	79.6 -6%	72.2 -15%
Response Times		-38%	48%	-25%	-55%	-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.7 ?(2.7, 3)	12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7) -121%	3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75) 47%	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) -89%	12.4 ?(6.4, 6) -118%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.4) -16%
Response Time Black / White *	10.1 ?(5, 5.1)	5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1) 45%	5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96) 48%	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 40%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) 9%	10.8 ?(5.2, 5.6) -7%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-41%	-63%	-9%	-89%	-25%
Brightness middle	320	547 71%	280 -12%	415 30%	365.4 14%	303.8 -5%
Brightness	303	523 73%	275 -9%	399 32%	344 14%	292 -4%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	79 -9%	90 3%	85 -2%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.3	0.44 -47%	0.4 -33%	0.43 -43%	0.29 3%	0.23 23%
Contrast	1067	1243 16%	700 -34%	965 -10%	1260 18%	1321 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	2.1 -91%	2.1 -91%	1.44 -31%	3.17 -188%	1.87 -70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	7 -159%	5.83 -116%	2.33 14%	7.69 -185%	3.26 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	3.2 -191%	3.3 -200%	1.8 -64%	5.3 -382%	2.7 -145%
Gamma	2.13 ^103%	2.23 ^99%	2.13 ^103%	2.132 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6599 ^98%	6979 ^93%	7060 ^92%	6327 ^103%	5879 ^111%	6436 ^101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		0.9	1.58	0.89	0.51	1.45
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)						65.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						99.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-32% / -35%	-10% / -35%	-17% / -13%	-51% / -65%	-17% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen täcker P3-färgrymden, och vår analys med den professionella CalMAN-programvaran visar att skärmen är mycket exakt redan vid leverans. Det finns inte heller någon färgton, och vår egen kalibrering ledde inte till någon ytterligare förbättring, så vi erbjuder ingen profil för dig här. Den här QHD-panelen lämpar sig för bild- och videobearbetning utan några begränsningar.

CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 målfärgrymd)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.7 ms rise
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Prestanda - Intel HX med bromsarna i gång

Testförhållanden

ROG-programvaran erbjuder omfattande konfigurationsalternativ och strömprofiler. Du kan till exempel helt avaktivera den integrerade GPU:n (MUX) eller manuellt ställa in effektvärdena för CPU och GPU. För våra benchmarks och mätningar nedan använder vi prestandaprofilen, eftersom denna redan gör den fulla GPU-prestandan tillgänglig. Även om CPU-prestandan till och med är något högre i Turbo-läget rättfärdigar detta inte det betydligt högre fläktljudet enligt vår mening.

Processor - Core i9-12950HX

Intel Core i9-12950HX är för närvarande den snabbaste mobila processorn från Intel. Även om den kan förbruka upp till 175 watt håller den sig långt ifrån detta värde i vår testenhet. Istället ser vi en maximal förbrukning på 115 watt (även i turboläge), och vid något tillfälle planar värdet ut på 70 watt (105 watt i turboläge). Även om CPU-prestandan inte alls är dålig kan du också få detta med en vanlig Core i9, och den extra premien för HX-chipet är inte värd den extra kostnaden

I batteridrift är strömförbrukningen begränsad till 35 watt, vilket leder till en flerkärnig prestanda som minskar med cirka 40 %. Du kan hitta ytterligare CPU-jämförelser i vårt motsvarande tekniska avsnitt.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)

Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	78.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	76.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	74.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	59.2 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	57.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	22449 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	19965 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7)	19930 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19422 Points -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	18870 (18654.1^min - 18869.7^max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	13618 (13498.1^min - 13618.3^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1935 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1905 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	1903 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7)	1835 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1809 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1497 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	8522 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7)	7689 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	7511 Points
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7383 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	7169 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5277 Points -30%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	743 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	741 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	727 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7)	727 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	697 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	572 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	3512 (3244.91^min - 3512.16^max) Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	3101 (2605.18^min - 3101.02^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7)	3090 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3074 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	2918 (2849.61^min - 2917.79^max) Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2223 (2202.89^min - 2222.96^max) Points -28%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	274 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	272 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	268 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7)	257 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	240 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	230 Seconds * -31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * -23%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)	201 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	175 Seconds *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	173.6 Seconds * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7)	171.4 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * +15%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * +16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	86384 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7)	77515 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	77003 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	76641 MIPS 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	69146 MIPS -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	62023 MIPS -19%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	6358 MIPS +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	6255 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7)	6174 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6113 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	5803 MIPS -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5747 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	16447 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	15144 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7)	15046 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	13717 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13504 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points -33%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8732 Points -42%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7)	1891 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1878 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1874 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	1868 Points
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)	1805 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points -15%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1539 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.4 fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	22.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7)	22.3 fps -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.1 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps -22%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	16.9 fps -25%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * -61%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.3 s * -42%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	45.9 s * -32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	40.7 s * -17%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7)	40.2 s * -16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	34.7 s *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	34.5 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4964 sec * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * -13%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4706 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7)	0.4374 sec * -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4323 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	0.4251 sec *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4209 sec * +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3101 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

257 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

274 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	84.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	80.5 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	78.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	75.9 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21797 KRay/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)	18514 KRay/s +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7)	17911 KRay/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	17542 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16115 KRay/s -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	16014 KRay/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11535 KRay/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9759 KRay/s -44%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107354 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	100718 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98800 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)	93043 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7)	92341 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86936 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52916 Points -39%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	43695 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4945 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)	4297 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4216 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4179 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7)	4106 MB/s -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3504 MB/s -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	3439 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3422 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)	108858 Points +4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107120 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104422 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7)	103895 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	103894 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103770 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102167 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101029 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	13062 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12969 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12783 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	12726 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)	12143 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7)	11619 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11502 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	10402 Points -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	55679 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54060 Points +27%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52544 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)	47650 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7)	44595 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	42613 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31779 Points -25%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27285 Points -36%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	179186 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	167077 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	135833 MB/s -19%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	134473 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125268 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7)	119390 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)	106724 MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106367 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1392 MB/s +16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1389 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1205 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1203 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)	1202 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (996 - 1417, n=7)	1195 MB/s -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	875 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	845 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11612 KRay/s +22%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)	10025 KRay/s +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7)	9620 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9507 KRay/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	8630 KRay/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8529 KRay/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	6663 KRay/s -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5748 KRay/s -40%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	42438 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41007 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7)	40844 MPixel/s -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40239 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)	36547 MPixel/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	34534 MPixel/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	30226 MPixel/s -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	20034 MPixel/s -53%

Systemets prestanda

Det subjektiva intrycket av prestanda är utmärkt, vilket också bekräftas av de goda resultaten i benchmark. Vi märker inga problem alls under testerna.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8636 Points +20%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8203 Points +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8186 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7573 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	7208 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	7184 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	11205 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11190 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11093 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10708 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	10593 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10306 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	10306 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10932 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10178 Points +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	10144 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9856 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	9856 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9727 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	9573 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	14291 Points +43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13270 Points +33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13098 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11407 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10003 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	10003 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	9923 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points -2%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2132 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2112 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	2112 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2108 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1903 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)	1876 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points -20%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2012 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1978 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1966 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1966 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1808 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)	1787 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points -16%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2336 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	2336 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2307 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2288 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2095 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)	2040 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2007 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1991 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1936 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)	1700 Points -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1666 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points -27%

PCMark 10 Score		7208 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64030 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63993 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63831 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7)	63039 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)	59056 MB/s -7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53861 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s -21%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	42260 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69716 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69256 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7)	66028 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)	62916 MB/s -9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62140 MB/s -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57237 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	47331 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65800 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63527 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7)	63186 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)	61374 MB/s -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60014 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	45155 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.4 ns * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	88.8 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (84.5 - 92.2, n=7)	87.9 ns * -3%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	85.2 ns *
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	76.5 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

I vårt standardiserade latenstest (surfning på Internet, 4K YouTube-video, CPU-belastning) har vår testenhet med dess BIOS-version vissa problem, så den är inte lämpad för video och ljudbehandling i realtid.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3413 μs *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2203.2 μs * +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	638.25 μs * +81%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1155.7 μs * +66%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1101.9 μs * +68%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	611 μs * +82%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringslösning

Asus använder två snabba SSD-diskar på 2 TB från Samsung (PM91A) i en RAID 0-konfiguration här. Detta möjliggör extremt höga överföringshastigheter på mer än 10 GB/s. Prestandan förblir dock inte stabil vid konstant belastning, utan sjunker istället massivt. Men det bör inte orsaka några begränsningar under vardagliga spel. Du kan hitta ytterligare SSD-jämförelser här.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5370.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10109.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1005.85 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 767.97 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.63 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 229.37 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1886.09 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2061.23 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	81.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	76.2 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.6 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	68.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.9 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	57.6 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	50.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5568 (5541.55^min - 5568.34^max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4931 (4875.77^min - 4930.83^max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4343 MB/s -22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=29)	3919 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s -30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3561 (3468.06^min - 3560.96^max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)	3528 MB/s -37%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	2931 (2925.53^min - 2931.41^max) MB/s -47%
seq write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7531 (7479^min - 7530.7^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4954 (4429.55^min - 4954.26^max) MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4819 (4728.89^min - 4819.25^max) MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s -44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2461 - 7628, n=29)	4204 MB/s -44%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3966 (3885.39^min - 3966.13^max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)	3808 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3530 (3445.02^min - 3530^max) MB/s -53%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13195 (9412.86^min - 13194.8^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12556 (4870.54^min - 12556.3^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=29)	7139 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6722 (987.46^min - 6721.79^max) MB/s -46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6693 (6460.49^min - 6692.89^max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s -49%
Average of class Gaming (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)	6357 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	5541 (2954.89^min - 5540.89^max) MB/s -56%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10261 (10045.2^min - 10261.4^max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8227 (8104.29^min - 8226.71^max) MB/s -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	5907 (5803.79^min - 5907.4^max) MB/s -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=29)	5515 MB/s -46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s -51%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5037 (5025^min - 5036.73^max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4985 (4772.28^min - 4984.61^max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)	4779 MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	79.3 (77.82^min - 79.25^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	79 (77.42^min - 79.03^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=29)	78.5 MB/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	77 (74.91^min - 76.95^max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.1 (72.94^min - 74.14^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)	67.6 MB/s -14%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	49.6 (49.23^min - 49.56^max) MB/s -37%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	258 (233.29^min - 257.8^max) MB/s +17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	244 (215.8^min - 243.91^max) MB/s +10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	241 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	221 (218.91^min - 220.66^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (134 - 295, n=29)	219 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	170.2 (168.21^min - 170.2^max) MB/s -23%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3797 (3780.09^min - 3796.62^max) MB/s +77%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (663 - 4075, n=29)	2978 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2842 (2837.59^min - 2841.89^max) MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)	2576 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2148 (1952.04^min - 2148.3^max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	971 (953.87^min - 970.88^max) MB/s -55%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	874 (867.39^min - 873.79^max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3504 (3465.89^min - 3503.69^max) MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2658 (2651.88^min - 2657.7^max) MB/s +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (422 - 3548, n=29)	2271 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)	2147 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2101 (1969.73^min - 2101.4^max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	626 (612.08^min - 626.28^max) MB/s -70%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	461 (442.02^min - 461.29^max) MB/s -78%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points +23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8492 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7498 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7400 Points -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (4850 - 9031, n=28)	7378 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)	6784 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4941 Points -34%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	4428 Points -41%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3327 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3012 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1535 - 3399, n=28)	2746 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)	2489 Points -17%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1948 Points -35%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1760 Points -42%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points +37%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 Points +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=28)	3296 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3128 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)	3089 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3013 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2137 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1857 Points -38%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9971 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	6561.69 MB/s -34%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=28)	5538 MB/s -44%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5232 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s -48%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5061.06 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	4981 MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)	4937 MB/s -50%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8590 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4336 MB/s -50%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=28)	4074 MB/s -53%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3764.99 MB/s -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s -57%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)	3647 MB/s -58%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	3480.87 MB/s -59%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3050 MB/s -64%
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=28)	73.2 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.43 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	69.89 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	69.21 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.72 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)	66.7 MB/s -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	57 MB/s -21%
4K Write
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	261.3 MB/s +28%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.73 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)	210 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	204.33 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	203.82 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=28)	202 MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	184.49 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s +46%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2751.05 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2264.38 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (918 - 2811, n=28)	2119 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1942.29 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)	1923 MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1223.07 MB/s -37%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1205 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s +84%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2942.87 MB/s +51%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=28)	2687 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)	2517 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2490.61 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1949.41 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1604.89 MB/s -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1290 MB/s -34%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)	0.05422 ms * -146%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.049 ms * -123%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * -55%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=28)	0.03364 ms * -53%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	0.032 ms * -45%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.03 ms * -36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)	0.04705 ms * -105%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * -91%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.076, n=28)	0.02943 ms * -28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.02 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W: Ø1479 (639.61-10176.63)

Grafikkort

Asus använder denGeForce RTX 3080 Ti versionen med en TGP på 150 watt, och GPU:n kan också använda ytterligare 25 watt Dynamic Boost från processorn. Den uppnår också detta värde (175 watt) i prestandaläget, så det är inte nödvändigt att använda turboläget. Det finns också en MUX som gör det möjligt att helt avaktivera den integrerade GPU:n (kräver en omstart), vilket förbättrar latenserna vid spelande men inte har någon större effekt på själva grafikprestandan

Grafikprestandan hamnar i gruppen av topprestationer och är också högre än genomsnittsvärdena för RTX 3080 Ti i vår databas. Dessutom förblir grafikprestandan helt stabil. Stresstestet 3DMark Time Spy klaras utan problem, och det finns inte heller någon prestandaförlust i vårt The Witcher 3 konstant belastningstest. Spelprestandan är lätt tillräcklig för maximala detaljer i den ursprungliga QHD-upplösningen, även i krävande spel.

Vid batteridrift får GPU:n förbruka maximalt 44 watt, vilket motsvarar en prestandaförlust på cirka 70 %. Du kan hitta ytterligare GPU-jämförelser här.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x17 R2 P48E ^-4! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	97.6 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	96.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	93.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	93.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	92.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	89.9 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	87.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	44906 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	44381 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	44134 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	43337 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	40704 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)	40173 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -11%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	34439 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	33025 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	32849 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	32505 Points
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	29508 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)	29268 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	13554 Points +6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13455 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	12791 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	12325 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)	11960 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	11598 Points -9%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	28879 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27878 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	27501 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	26982 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20846 - 28879, n=9)	26251 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1891 - 44487, n=32, last 2 years)	22325 Points -17%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=128, last 2 years)	1471 mpaths +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1384 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	1333 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (846 - 1384, n=20)	1273 mpaths -5%
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=125, last 2 years)	2042 mpaths +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	1893 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1880 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1225 - 1915, n=19)	1745 mpaths -8%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=184, last 2 years)	599 mpaths +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	526 mpaths +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	513 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	511 mpaths 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	502 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (311 - 552, n=35)	500 mpaths -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	499 mpaths -3%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	151633 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	147189 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	138625 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	138534 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	137987 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (88580 - 151633, n=41)	136691 Points -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	136135 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=230, last 2 years)	120637 Points -20%

3DMark 11 Performance		35997 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		28793 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		12904 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=176, last 2 years)	23.3 Seconds * -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13)	23.1 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	23 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	23 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	22 Seconds * +4%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	39.5 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	36 Seconds * -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13)	35 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	34 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	32 Seconds * +6%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=195, last 2 years)	317 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	301 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13)	295 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	268 Seconds * +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	263 Seconds * +13%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | GTA V | F1 22 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps +9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 (124^min) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.8 (111^min, 113^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)	116.1 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.4 (108^min, 109^P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	105.5 (91^min) fps -11%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	115.7 (46.4^min) fps +33%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 (40.7^min) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (54 - 144.1, n=16)	93.6 fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87 fps
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=103, last 2 years)	86.2 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 116, n=81, last 2 years)	62.2 fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	56 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 69.6, n=13)	55.4 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36 fps -36%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131.8 (6.21^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.7 (9.75^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.3 (5.94^min, 90.9^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.4 (6.89^min, 66.7^P1) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)	106.7 fps -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	93 (7.94^min, 71.4^P1) fps -27%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.1 (7.48^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (5.61 - 160.6, n=135, last 2 years)	101.8 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.1 (9.21^min, 71.4^P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 121.2, n=28)	98.2 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82.4 (6.53^min, 52.6^P1) fps -28%

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (78.9 - 91, n=4)	82.7 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	79.8 (65^min, 29^P1) fps +1%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=108, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.9 (69^min, 50^P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62 fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (21 - 92.2, n=81, last 2 years)	59.1 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (52.9 - 62, n=2)	57.5 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52.9 (46^min, 41^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 fps +16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	127.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122.8 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)	110.5 fps -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	106 fps -11%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 162.9, n=159, last 2 years)	96.8 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.8 - 105.8, n=34)	85.9 fps -7%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)		186.8	180.7	126.7	114.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)				118.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	211	191	180.8	169.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	173.3	156.2	118.5		92.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	165.3	143.5	116.2
Strange Brigade (2018)			236	211	157.7
F1 2021 (2021)		236	211	132.8	106.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	103	101	98	87	56
F1 22 (2022)	235	235	199.7	78.9	52.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)		135	109	107	78

Utsläpp och energihantering

Bullernivåer

Asus använder sig av ett kylsystem med ångkammare här. I strömläget Performance förblir enheten också relativt tyst, och vi kan mäta högst 46 dB(A) under stresstestet och under spelandet. Detta är naturligtvis fortfarande märkbart, men vår testenhet är ändå betydligt tystare med detta än konkurrenterna. I turboläget är spelprestandan endast obetydligt högre, men de två löpande fläktarna ger upphov till högljudda 54 dB(A). Under tomgångsdrift förblir fläktarna ofta avstängda, men vi märker nästan alltid av några tysta elektroniska ljud. Under belastning finns det också något hörbart spolviftande som kommer från GPU:n, gissar vi.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning		34.3 / 45.9 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Noise		-19%	-9%	-27%	1%	-4%
off / environment *	23.9	24.5 -3%	21.9 8%	26 -9%	22.7 5%	25 -5%
Idle Minimum *	23.9	24.5 -3%	24.53 -3%	26 -9%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Idle Average *	23.9	30 -26%	24.53 -3%	29 -21%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Idle Maximum *	23.9	32.5 -36%	24.53 -3%	40 -67%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Load Average *	34.3	43.9 -28%	46.25 -35%	47 -37%	31.9 7%	30.7 10%
Load Maximum *	45.9	54.2 -18%	54.25 -18%	54 -18%	52.5 -14%	51.3 -12%
Witcher 3 ultra *		48.8	56.86	52	52.5	51.3

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Trots de relativt tysta fläktarna ger yttemperaturerna ingen anledning till oro. Även om vi mäter mer än 50 °C (122 °F) på några isolerade ställen under belastning, förblir tangentbordet mycket svalt och det finns inga begränsningar alls under spelandet

Under stresstestet får GPU:n förmånsbehandling och körs stabilt på 150 watt så snart processorn har planat ut på cirka 36 watt. Det finns ingen prestandaförlust direkt efter stresstestet.

CPU- och GPU-mätningar under stresstestet

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


41.7 °C	45.5 °C	48.8 °C
39.7 °C	40.1 °C	45.3 °C
24.7 °C	25.1 °C	25.4 °C

Max: 48.8 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C


50.4 °C	49.3 °C	48.2 °C
40.3 °C	52.4 °C	51.1 °C
25.6 °C	27.2 °C	25.2 °C

Max: 52.4 °C
Medel: 41.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 43 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


30.3 °C	30.4 °C	30 °C
30.2 °C	30.4 °C	29.1 °C
26 °C	25.3 °C	25.6 °C

Max: 30.4 °C
Medel: 28.6 °C


34.1 °C	33.8 °C	32.2 °C
32.5 °C	33.6 °C	31.2 °C
26.7 °C	28.4 °C	28.4 °C

Max: 34.1 °C
Medel: 31.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 26.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


40.2 °C	42 °C	44.7 °C
34.5 °C	39.3 °C	42.4 °C
24.8 °C	24 °C	24.1 °C

Max: 44.7 °C
Medel: 35.1 °C


49.8 °C	48 °C	49.6 °C
40.5 °C	49.2 °C	49.3 °C
24.3 °C	28.4 °C	24 °C

Max: 49.8 °C
Medel: 40.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).

Yttemperaturer under stresstestet (överst)

Yttemperaturer under stresstestet (nedre delen)

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat		-8%	-3%	1%	7%	4%
Maximum Upper Side *	48.8	44.4 9%	40.8 16%	49 -0%	49.6 -2%	40 18%
Maximum Bottom *	52.4	60.8 -16%	52.4 -0%	52 1%	42.4 19%	39.8 24%
Idle Upper Side *	30.4	33.8 -11%	34.6 -14%	30 1%	29.2 4%	34.6 -14%
Idle Bottom *	34.1	38.8 -14%	38.4 -13%	33 3%	32 6%	38.4 -13%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Ljudanläggningen består av totalt fyra moduler som ger ett kraftfullt och rymligt ljud. Även om högtalarna inte är de mest högljudda på marknaden är kvaliteten överlag mycket bra. På grund av det höga fläktljudet under spelande rekommenderar vi dock fortfarande ett headset.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (107.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Effektförbrukning

ROG Strix Scar 17 SE är inte en särskilt effektiv bärbar dator, vilket inte är särskilt förvånande med tanke på den kraftfulla hårdvaran. Vi mäter redan upp till 27 watt vid tomgångsdrift, och när du spelar ökar värdet till cirka 230 watt. Strömförsörjningen på 330 watt är därför tillräckligt stor. Standbyförbrukningen är också ganska hög på 2,6 watt, men det beror på de ljuseffekter som är aktiverade som standard.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.58 / 2.6 Watt
Låg belastning	19.3 / 26.5 / 27.1 Watt
Hög belastning	141 / 307.9 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø225 (221-232)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø238 (220-308)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127 (115.4-183.5)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.3 (73.5-109)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.3 (141.9-156.4)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø215 (206-220)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø214 (211-217)

Batteritid

I vårt WLAN-test med 150 cd/m², vilket motsvarar 48 % av den maximala ljusstyrkan, klarar sig vår testenhet bara i cirka 4 timmar. Med tanke på de höga förbrukningsvärdena är detta inte särskilt förvånande. Några av konkurrenterna håller betydligt längre här, om du behöver överbrygga tiderna borta från eluttaget. Spelande är möjligt i ungefär en timme, men endast med en betydande prestandaförlust. Det tar cirka 100 minuter att ladda upp 90-Wh-batteriet helt och hållet, med 80 % av kapaciteten tillgänglig redan efter cirka 53 minuter.

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 107)		4tim 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 107)		3tim 40min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	559 min +124%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	537 min +115%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	412.1 min +65%
Average of class Gaming (57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)	368 min +47%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	267 min +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	250 min
Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh	117 min -53%

För

+ bra QHD-panel med 240 Hz

+ hög och stabil spelprestanda

+ omfattande belysning av höljet

+ TB4, Wi-Fi 6E och PCIe 4.0

+ relativt tysta fläktar när man spelar

Emot

- inkonsekvent SSD-prestanda

- extra kostnad för HX CPU är inte värt det

- ingen webbkamera

- elektroniska ljud

Slutsats - En fullt utrustad och snabb spellaptop

Vi testar Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 2022. Testenhet tillhandahållen av Asus Tyskland.

Den aktuella Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE levererar verkligen allt en spelares hjärta önskar. En snabb QHD-panel med 240 Hz tillsammans med GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, som också erbjuder tillräckligt med kraft för den ursprungliga upplösningen i maximala detaljer. Även om CPU-prestandan också är bra för en bärbar dator för spel, kan potentialen hos HX-processorn inte utnyttjas fullt ut. Du bör därför spara dig den extra premien för den kraftfullare processorn och bara välja en vanlig Core i9

Andra fördelar är de mycket exakta färgerna, om du till exempel måste arbeta direkt med videobearbetning, de måttliga yttemperaturerna och de relativt tysta fläktarna under spelandet. Även om det finns ett turboläge som också blir betydligt högre, har detta inte någon större inverkan på spelprestandan, så det är inte värt det enligt vår åsikt

Nya Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE erbjuder gott om prestanda och spelfunktioner, men du bör spara in på den extra kostnaden för Intel HX-processorn.

Konkurrenterna på spelmarknaden erbjuder liknande prestandaspecifikationer men också ljusare skärmar i delar och mindre flashiga höljen. Dessutom kan elektroniska ljud bli irriterande i längden.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Vår testkonfiguration av ROG Strix Scar 17 SE finns på Amazon för 3899 kr, och en mindre konfiguration med den vanliga Core i9-12900H finns också tillgänglig där för $2278.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W - 2022-11-18 11/18/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Design

81 / 98 → 82%

Tangentbord

86%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

61 / 80 → 77%

Vikt

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Batteri

59 / 95 → 62%

Skärm

91%

Spelprestanda

100%

Programprestanda

95%

Temperatur

85 / 95 → 90%

Ljudnivå

91 / 90 → 100%

Audio

74%

Medel

74%

87%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 508 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE - Fullt utrustad spellaptop med RTX 3080 Ti

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-11-21 (Update: 2022-11-29)

Recension av Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE - Fullt utrustad spellaptop med RTX 3080 Ti

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Hölje - Spellaptop med en design som sticker ut och omfattande belysning

Storleksjämförelse

Utrustning - ROG Strix Scar 17 med HDMI 2.1 och Wi-Fi 6E

Inmatningsenheter - Asus har ett bra tangentbord

Skärm - QHD med 240 Hz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Prestanda - Intel HX med bromsarna i gång

Testförhållanden

Processor - Core i9-12950HX

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstider

Lagringslösning

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Utsläpp och energihantering

Bullernivåer

Temperatur

Högtalare

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis

Effektförbrukning

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Batteritid

För

Emot

Slutsats - En fullt utrustad och snabb spellaptop

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare