Razer Blade 15 OLED (början av 2022) recension: En kompakt bärbar dator för spel med RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 15 (tidig 2022) har ambitioner att vara en bärbar dator för både spelare och kreativa användare. Lämplig hårdvara finns ombord: Core i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU för bärbar dator och en färgskön OLED-skärm (QHD). Liknande kompakta konkurrenter kan hittas i form av Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), denAorus 15 XE5, denHP Omen 16ochAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.
Information om fallet, funktioner, inmatningsenheter och högtalare finns redan till hands i vår recension av dess syskon, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Den sistnämnda är utrustad med en LED-panel (QHD) - den mest relevanta skillnaden mot den nuvarande enheten.
Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.8 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % | 12/2022 | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.4 % | 08/2022 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 21.65 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85.5 % | 05/2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 263, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=88, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=88, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1486 - 1762, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=31, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=65, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |

Skärm - Den mobila Razer-datorn har en OLED-panel
OLED-displayen erbjuder samma nyckeldata som sin syster med LED-display: En upplösning på 2560 x 1440 pixlar (QHD) med en uppdateringsfrekvens på 240 Hz och en diameter på 15,6 tum.
Typiskt för OLED-skärmar får panelen poäng för underbara svartnivåer och snabba svarstider. Dessutom åtföljs detta av relativt hög maximal ljusstyrka. Detta är något som dess LED-motsvarighet inte kan hålla en flamma för.
OLED-panelens svagheter: Den har en glansig yta och flimrar vid en ljusstyrka på ≤ 70 procent med en frekvens på 500 Hz. Det tekniskt inducerade flimret är kopplat till panelens reglering av ljusstyrkan. I detta avseende, dess syskons matt, flimmerfri LED-panel har sin näsa framme.
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 99 %
Mitt på batteriet: 381 cd/m²
Kontrast: 12767:1 (Svärta: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -4% | -20% | -17% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 92.8 -5% | 95.2 -2% | 67.3 -31% | 71 -27% | 99.1 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 1% | 96.7 -3% | 97.9 -2% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94 | 83.1 -12% | 84.5 -10% | 68.2 -27% | 73.3 -22% | 86.8 -8% |
Response Times | -340% | -475% | -365% | -498% | -550% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 7.6 ? -280% | 14.4 ? -620% | 11.6 ? -480% | 14.5 ? -625% | 14.4 ? -620% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 10 ? -400% | 8.6 ? -330% | 7 ? -250% | 9.4 ? -370% | 11.6 ? -480% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | |||||
Screen | -96% | -169% | -178% | -184% | -106% | |
Brightness middle | 383 | 497 30% | 336 -12% | 326 -15% | 335 -13% | 286 -25% |
Brightness | 384 | 481 25% | 316 -18% | 303 -21% | 319 -17% | 271 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 82 -17% | 89 -10% | 89 -10% | 90 -9% | 89 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.21 -600% | 0.34 -1033% | 0.33 -1000% | 0.28 -833% | 0.25 -733% |
Contrast | 12767 | 2367 -81% | 988 -92% | 988 -92% | 1196 -91% | 1144 -91% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 3.53 -87% | 3.36 -78% | 2.73 -44% | 4.38 -132% | 2.74 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.76 | 6.15 -64% | 6.67 -77% | 9.54 -154% | 9.48 -152% | 5.21 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.67 | 3.53 -32% | 0.74 72% | 1.36 49% | 1.33 50% | 2.52 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 1.74 -38% | 4.7 -273% | 5.2 -313% | 7 -456% | 1.1 13% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.244 98% | 2.074 106% | 2.103 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6386 102% | 6418 101% | 6897 94% | 6911 94% | 6244 104% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -147% /
-112% | -216% /
-177% | -188% /
-171% | -233% /
-193% | -219% /
-147% |
* ... smaller is better
Skärmen ger redan från början en imponerande färgåtergivning: Med en avvikelse på 1,9 är målet (DeltaE < 3) klart uppfyllt. Kalibrering leder inte till några förbättringar. Färgnoggrannheten är given: Färgrymderna sRGB och DCI-P3 återges helt och nästan helt med AdobeRGB-färgrymden på 94 procent. syskonets LED-panel levererar också liknande goda resultat.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19347 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Prestanda - Blade 15 är baserad på Alder Lake och Ampere
Med Blade 15 (början av 2022) har Razer en bärbar dator i sitt produktsortiment som är utformad för QHD-spel (höga till maximala inställningar), men den är också mycket bra på områden som videoredigering och rendering. Modellen som recenseras här kan fås för cirka 1 967 dollar.
Provningsvillkor
Det är möjligt att växla mellan de tre prestandalägena ("Balanced", "Silent" och "User-defined") med hjälp av kombinationen av tangenterna "Fn" + "P". Profilen "Användardefinierad" gör det möjligt att göra underinställningar för CPU ("Låg", "Medel", "Hög", "Boost") och GPU ("Låg", "Medel" och "Hög") - via den förinstallerade programvaran Razer Synapse. I batteriläge är endast profilen "Balanserad" tillgänglig.
Benchmarks utfördes med det aktiva läget "Användardefinierad" med maximala inställningar (underpresets "Boost" och "High"). För batteritestet användes profilen "Silent".
Processor
TheCore i9-12900H(Alder Lake) består av sex prestandakärnor (hyperthreading, 2,5 till 5 GHz) och åtta effektivitetskärnor (ingen hyperthreading, 1,8 till 3,8 GHz). Totalt finns det 20 logiska CPU-kärnor.
Cinebench R15-jämförelsetestet med flera trådar bearbetades vid 3,6-3,8 GHz (P-kärnor) och 2,8-2,9 GHz (E-kärnor). Vi körde testet med en enda tråd vid 1,4 till 4,5 GHz (P-kärnor) respektive 1,5 till 3,5 GHz (E-kärnor). I batteriläge är klockfrekvenserna lägre. CB15-slingtestet visar: Multi-thread-belastning konfronteras endast med hög turboklockhastighet under en kort tid. Efter 30-40 sekunder sjunker värdena till ungefär basklockhastigheten.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21058, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3793 - 4.47, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Systemets prestanda
Systemet fungerar smidigt och tillförlitligt och ger tillräckligt med kraft för krävande tillämpningar som rendering, videoredigering och spel. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-4800-minne och detta kompletteras av goda PC-Mark-resultat.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9151, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5101 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5789 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7336 poäng | |
Hjälp |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC-latenstider
Det standardiserade testet för övervakning av latens (surfning på internet, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 hög belastning) visade på avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kan dock leda till antingen förbättringar eller försämringar av prestandan.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
* ... smaller is better
Masslagring
AS SSD | |
Score Total | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |