Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 15 OLED (början av 2022) recension: En kompakt bärbar dator för spel med RTX 3070 Ti

Ompolerad. Den nuvarande versionen av Blade 15 bygger fortfarande på den kraftfulla Alder Lake- och Ampere-hårdvaran, men erbjuder också en lockande uppgradering: Razer har valt en OLED-skärm med hög kontrast (QHD) med hög uppdateringsfrekvens (240 Hz) och utmärkt färgrymdstäckning.

Razer Blade 15 (tidig 2022) har ambitioner att vara en bärbar dator för både spelare och kreativa användare. Lämplig hårdvara finns ombord: Core i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU för bärbar dator och en färgskön OLED-skärm (QHD). Liknande kompakta konkurrenter kan hittas i form av Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), denAorus 15 XE5, denHP Omen 16ochAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Information om fallet, funktioner, inmatningsenheter och högtalare finns redan till hands i vår recension av dess syskon, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Den sistnämnda är utrustad med en LED-panel (QHD) - den mest relevanta skillnaden mot den nuvarande enheten.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1035 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, glansig: ja, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.99 x 355 x 235
Batteri
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.01 kg, Strömförsörjning: 790 g
Pris
3249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.9 %
03/2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
12/2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
08/2022
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Storleksjämförelse

369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 244 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, plats för ett kabellås
Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, plats för ett kabellås
Vänster sida: Strömkontakt, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), kombinerat ljuduttag
Vänster sida: Strömkontakt, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), kombinerat ljuduttag
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s ∼83% +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.5 - 222, n=88, last 2 years)
109.3 MB/s ∼66% +35%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼47% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s ∼36% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s ∼100% +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼70% +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=78, last 2 years)
133.2 MB/s ∼51% +58%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s ∼32%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1160 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1588, n=88, last 2 years)
1158 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1470 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=88, last 2 years)
1187 MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1692 (1588min - 1709max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1486 - 1762, n=3)
1647 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (886 - 1857, n=31, last 2 years)
1551 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=6)
1491 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=65, last 2 years)
1455 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s ∼60% -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Skärm - Den mobila Razer-datorn har en OLED-panel

Pixelraster
Pixel raster

OLED-displayen erbjuder samma nyckeldata som sin syster med LED-display: En upplösning på 2560 x 1440 pixlar (QHD) med en uppdateringsfrekvens på 240 Hz och en diameter på 15,6 tum.

Typiskt för OLED-skärmar får panelen poäng för underbara svartnivåer och snabba svarstider. Dessutom åtföljs detta av relativt hög maximal ljusstyrka. Detta är något som dess LED-motsvarighet inte kan hålla en flamma för.

OLED-panelens svagheter: Den har en glansig yta och flimrar vid en ljusstyrka på ≤ 70 procent med en frekvens på 500 Hz. Det tekniskt inducerade flimret är kopplat till panelens reglering av ljusstyrkan. I detta avseende, dess syskons matt, flimmerfri LED-panel har sin näsa framme.

385
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Samsung ATNA562P02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 99 %
Mitt på batteriet: 381 cd/m²
Kontrast: 12767:1 (Svärta: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-6%
-4%
-20%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
92.8
-5%
95.2
-2%
67.3
-31%
71
-27%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.5
-1%
99.9
1%
96.7
-3%
97.9
-2%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94
83.1
-12%
84.5
-10%
68.2
-27%
73.3
-22%
86.8
-8%
Response Times
-340%
-475%
-365%
-498%
-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
-280%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-620%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-625%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-620%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
-400%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
-330%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
-250%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-370%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
-96%
-169%
-178%
-184%
-106%
Brightness middle
383
497
30%
336
-12%
326
-15%
335
-13%
286
-25%
Brightness
384
481
25%
316
-18%
303
-21%
319
-17%
271
-29%
Brightness Distribution
99
82
-17%
89
-10%
89
-10%
90
-9%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.34
-1033%
0.33
-1000%
0.28
-833%
0.25
-733%
Contrast
12767
2367
-81%
988
-92%
988
-92%
1196
-91%
1144
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
3.53
-87%
3.36
-78%
2.73
-44%
4.38
-132%
2.74
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.76
6.15
-64%
6.67
-77%
9.54
-154%
9.48
-152%
5.21
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.67
3.53
-32%
0.74
72%
1.36
49%
1.33
50%
2.52
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
1.74
-38%
4.7
-273%
5.2
-313%
7
-456%
1.1
13%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.103 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6386 102%
6418 101%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6244 104%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-147% / -112%
-216% / -177%
-188% / -171%
-233% / -193%
-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen ger redan från början en imponerande färgåtergivning: Med en avvikelse på 1,9 är målet (DeltaE < 3) klart uppfyllt. Kalibrering leder inte till några förbättringar. Färgnoggrannheten är given: Färgrymderna sRGB och DCI-P3 återges helt och nästan helt med AdobeRGB-färgrymden på 94 procent. syskonets LED-panel levererar också liknande goda resultat.

CalMAN - Färgkontrollant
CalMAN - Färgkontrollant
CalMAN - Gråa fjäll
CalMAN - Gråa fjäll
CalMAN - Färgmättnad
CalMAN - Färgmättnad
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade mot DCI P3
Blade mot DCI P3
Blade vs. sRGB
Blade vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19347 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panelen har en stor stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln och är läsbar från alla vinklar. Utomhus är detta dock svårt på grund av skärmens blanka, reflekterande yta.

Blade utomhus
Blade utomhus
Synvinkel
Synvinkel

Prestanda - Blade 15 är baserad på Alder Lake och Ampere

Med Blade 15 (början av 2022) har Razer en bärbar dator i sitt produktsortiment som är utformad för QHD-spel (höga till maximala inställningar), men den är också mycket bra på områden som videoredigering och rendering. Modellen som recenseras här kan fås för cirka 1 967 dollar.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Systeminfo

Provningsvillkor

Det är möjligt att växla mellan de tre prestandalägena ("Balanced", "Silent" och "User-defined") med hjälp av kombinationen av tangenterna "Fn" + "P". Profilen "Användardefinierad" gör det möjligt att göra underinställningar för CPU ("Låg", "Medel", "Hög", "Boost") och GPU ("Låg", "Medel" och "Hög") - via den förinstallerade programvaran Razer Synapse. I batteriläge är endast profilen "Balanserad" tillgänglig.

Benchmarks utfördes med det aktiva läget "Användardefinierad" med maximala inställningar (underpresets "Boost" och "High"). För batteritestet användes profilen "Silent".

Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse

Processor

TheCore i9-12900H(Alder Lake) består av sex prestandakärnor (hyperthreading, 2,5 till 5 GHz) och åtta effektivitetskärnor (ingen hyperthreading, 1,8 till 3,8 GHz). Totalt finns det 20 logiska CPU-kärnor.

Cinebench R15-jämförelsetestet med flera trådar bearbetades vid 3,6-3,8 GHz (P-kärnor) och 2,8-2,9 GHz (E-kärnor). Vi körde testet med en enda tråd vid 1,4 till 4,5 GHz (P-kärnor) respektive 1,5 till 3,5 GHz (E-kärnor). I batteriläge är klockfrekvenserna lägre. CB15-slingtestet visar: Multi-thread-belastning konfronteras endast med hög turboklockhastighet under en kort tid. Efter 30-40 sekunder sjunker värdena till ungefär basklockhastigheten.

Flertrådig (väggkraft)
Flertrådig (väggkraft)
Enkel tråd (väggkraft)
Enkel tråd (väggkraft)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (Max)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (Max)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (balanserad)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (balanserad)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (tyst)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (tyst)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.1 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
78.1 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
74.8 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
74.7 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
 
70.6 pt ∼71%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.9 pt ∼58%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7647 - 19648, n=22)
15902 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34521, n=228, last 2 years)
14887 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points ∼66% -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1698 - 1921, n=22)
1838 Points ∼98% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼96% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2169, n=225, last 2 years)
1617 Points ∼86% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points ∼81% -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2922 - 7471, n=22)
5985 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points ∼97% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years)
5605 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (653 - 738, n=22)
712 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼97% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years)
623 Points ∼87% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points ∼81% -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1561 - 3077, n=22)
2578 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5554, n=236, last 2 years)
2388 Points ∼85% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼77% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points ∼55% -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (243 - 277, n=23)
264 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 312, n=232, last 2 years)
244 Points ∼92% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼87% -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (93 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years)
250 Seconds * ∼81% -14%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼73% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 415, n=22)
215 Seconds * ∼70% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * ∼63% +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * ∼59% +17%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (37614 - 76677, n=22)
63631 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years)
60947 MIPS ∼84% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS ∼65% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=22)
5869 MIPS ∼95% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS ∼95% +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years)
5696 MIPS ∼92% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS ∼87%
Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=23)
12461 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 21058, n=227, last 2 years)
10644 Points ∼79% -13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points ∼61% -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1647 - 1892, n=23)
1815 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼95% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2139, n=227, last 2 years)
1627 Points ∼88% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points ∼86% -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps ∼95% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)
18.1 fps ∼91% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 34.8, n=232, last 2 years)
16.8 fps ∼84% -3%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps ∼64% -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)
51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s * ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼92% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (38 - 59.8, n=22)
43.3 s * ∼84% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * ∼82% +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * ∼80% +19%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * ∼73% +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3793 - 4.47, n=228, last 2 years)
0.52 sec * ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec * ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼85% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * ∼83% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * ∼81% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)
0.4486 sec * ∼81% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * ∼78% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2543 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
213 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.6 pt ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.6 pt ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
 
87.3 pt ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.6 pt ∼84%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.8 pt ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
80 pt ∼80%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
69.9 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.8 pt ∼67%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 52479, n=201, last 2 years)
13605 KRay/s ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s ∼83% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=22)
11115 KRay/s ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 227882, n=201, last 2 years)
72509 Points ∼97% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=22)
54800 Points ∼73% -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼49% -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points ∼48% -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 8525, n=201, last 2 years)
3413 MB/s ∼83% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=22)
3158 MB/s ∼77% -7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s ∼74% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼65% -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s ∼65% -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78668 - 111241, n=22)
103601 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 180473, n=201, last 2 years)
97639 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points ∼82% -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 29598, n=201, last 2 years)
10702 Points ∼100% +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points ∼89% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=22)
9371 Points ∼88% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points ∼86% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼86% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points ∼83% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points ∼81% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 118401, n=201, last 2 years)
39088 Points ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points ∼95% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points ∼87%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=22)
28698 Points ∼73% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼55% -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points ∼54% -38%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s ∼95% +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 236139, n=201, last 2 years)
100169 MB/s ∼74% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=22)
90046 MB/s ∼67% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s ∼63% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼41% -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=22)
974 MB/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2090, n=222, last 2 years)
857 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s ∼65% -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 28105, n=201, last 2 years)
7391 KRay/s ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s ∼84% -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=22)
6214 KRay/s ∼75% -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼96% +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s ∼96% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=23)
36969 MPixel/s ∼87% +7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s ∼82% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s ∼81% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 51096, n=202, last 2 years)
29365 MPixel/s ∼69% -15%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s ∼63% -23%

Systemets prestanda

Systemet fungerar smidigt och tillförlitligt och ger tillräckligt med kraft för krävande tillämpningar som rendering, videoredigering och spel. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-4800-minne och detta kompletteras av goda PC-Mark-resultat.

RAM-minnet körs i dubbelkanalläge.
RAM-minnet körs i dubbelkanalläge.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 9151, n=187, last 2 years)
7113 Points ∼90% -3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points ∼78% -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points ∼99% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 12639, n=186, last 2 years)
10312 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points ∼87% -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 11833, n=186, last 2 years)
9302 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points ∼83% -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points ∼94% +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points ∼90% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (5288 - 16424, n=186, last 2 years)
10221 Points ∼84% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points ∼63% -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2195, n=91, last 2 years)
1814 Points ∼93% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points ∼85% -4%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points ∼95% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=91, last 2 years)
1743 Points ∼92% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points ∼87% 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2514, n=91, last 2 years)
1944 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points ∼84% -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=91, last 2 years)
1680 Points ∼83% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points ∼78%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5789 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
7336 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=22)
58799 MB/s ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 78835, n=201, last 2 years)
49960 MB/s ∼79% -10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s ∼76% -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼98% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=22)
61346 MB/s ∼91% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 86294, n=201, last 2 years)
53482 MB/s ∼80% -13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s ∼73% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 66275, n=22)
58343 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 80441, n=201, last 2 years)
51086 MB/s ∼77% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s ∼69% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns * ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * ∼91% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (88 - 118.1, n=21)
85 ns * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 135.3, n=222, last 2 years)
68.8 ns * ∼69% +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Det standardiserade testet för övervakning av latens (surfning på internet, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 hög belastning) visade på avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kan dock leda till antingen förbättringar eller försämringar av prestandan.

Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * ∼100% -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼42% -46%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * ∼29% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs * ∼29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * ∼22% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Blade har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-diskar i M.2 2280-format. Den installerade PCIe-4 SSD:n (1 TB) från Samsung ger mycket bra överföringshastigheter. Nedgångar i prestanda på grund av termisk strypning förekom inte.

Blade har plats för två SSD-enheter.
Blade har plats för två SSD-enheter.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.4 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
78.5 pt ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.8 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.7 pt ∼76%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
72.2 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
 
62 pt ∼62%
DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s ∼94% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s ∼90% +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4634, n=49)
3717 MB/s ∼89% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (834 - 5676, n=187, last 2 years)
3062 MB/s ∼73% -14%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s ∼90% +22%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s ∼89% +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼87% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s ∼85% +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 - 4516, n=49)
3566 MB/s ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
  (399 - 7889, n=186, last 2 years)
3263 MB/s ∼68% -8%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s ∼95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s ∼93% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7061, n=49)
6368 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1620 - 13195, n=187, last 2 years)
5306 MB/s ∼76% -20%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 - 5259, n=49)
4813 MB/s ∼89% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼88% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10261, n=187, last 2 years)
3997 MB/s ∼74% -20%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.7 - 97.4, n=49)
77.8 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 - 97.4, n=187, last 2 years)
64.5 MB/s ∼79% -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s ∼79% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼77% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s ∼72% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s ∼62% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=186, last 2 years)
201 MB/s ∼60% -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 275, n=49)
191.3 MB/s ∼57% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s ∼66% -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=49)
2521 MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (310 - 5829, n=186, last 2 years)
2291 MB/s ∼53% -45%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s ∼35% -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s ∼75% -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (288 - 4383, n=186, last 2 years)
2020 MB/s ∼56% -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=49)
1892 MB/s ∼53% -46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s ∼16% -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW