Razer Blade 15 OLED (början av 2022) recension: En kompakt bärbar dator för spel med RTX 3070 Ti

Ompolerad. Den nuvarande versionen av Blade 15 bygger fortfarande på den kraftfulla Alder Lake- och Ampere-hårdvaran, men erbjuder också en lockande uppgradering: Razer har valt en OLED-skärm med hög kontrast (QHD) med hög uppdateringsfrekvens (240 Hz) och utmärkt färgrymdstäckning.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/10/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Razer Blade 15 (tidig 2022) har ambitioner att vara en bärbar dator för både spelare och kreativa användare. Lämplig hårdvara finns ombord: Core i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU för bärbar dator och en färgskön OLED-skärm (QHD). Liknande kompakta konkurrenter kan hittas i form av Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), denAorus 15 XE5, denHP Omen 16ochAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Information om fallet, funktioner, inmatningsenheter och högtalare finns redan till hands i vår recension av dess syskon, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Den sistnämnda är utrustad med en LED-panel (QHD) - den mest relevanta skillnaden mot den nuvarande enheten.

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1035 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Minne

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, glansig: ja, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Hårddisk

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Nätverk

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.99 x 355 x 235

Batteri

80 Wh, 5209 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.01 kg, Strömförsörjning: 790 g

Pris

3249 Euro

Länkar

Razer hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 %	12/2022	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.4 %	08/2022	Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.65 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
85.5 %	05/2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440

Storleksjämförelse

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Aorus 15 XE5 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, plats för ett kabellås

Vänster sida: Strömkontakt, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), kombinerat ljuduttag

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s ∼83% +71%
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=88, last 2 years)	109.3 MB/s ∼66% +35%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s ∼47% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s ∼36% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s ∼100% +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s ∼70% +116%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 263, n=78, last 2 years)	133.2 MB/s ∼51% +58%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s ∼32%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1528 (1341^min - 1654^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1160 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=88, last 2 years)	1158 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1470 (1448^min - 1522^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1470 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=88, last 2 years)	1187 MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1692 (1588^min - 1709^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1664 (1336^min - 1741^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1486 - 1762, n=3)	1647 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=31, last 2 years)	1551 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1612 (817^min - 1646^max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=6)	1491 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=65, last 2 years)	1455 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s ∼60% -35%

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Skärm - Den mobila Razer-datorn har en OLED-panel

OLED-displayen erbjuder samma nyckeldata som sin syster med LED-display: En upplösning på 2560 x 1440 pixlar (QHD) med en uppdateringsfrekvens på 240 Hz och en diameter på 15,6 tum.

Typiskt för OLED-skärmar får panelen poäng för underbara svartnivåer och snabba svarstider. Dessutom åtföljs detta av relativt hög maximal ljusstyrka. Detta är något som dess LED-motsvarighet inte kan hålla en flamma för.

OLED-panelens svagheter: Den har en glansig yta och flimrar vid en ljusstyrka på ≤ 70 procent med en frekvens på 500 Hz. Det tekniskt inducerade flimret är kopplat till panelens reglering av ljusstyrkan. I detta avseende, dess syskons matt, flimmerfri LED-panel har sin näsa framme.


385 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	387 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Samsung ATNA562P02-0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 99 %
Mitt på batteriet: 381 cd/m²
Kontrast: 12767:1 (Svärta: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display		-6%	-4%	-20%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	97.6	92.8 -5%	95.2 -2%	67.3 -31%	71 -27%	99.1 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.5 -1%	99.9 1%	96.7 -3%	97.9 -2%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94	83.1 -12%	84.5 -10%	68.2 -27%	73.3 -22%	86.8 -8%
Response Times		-340%	-475%	-365%	-498%	-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) -280%	14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5) -620%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -625%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -620%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	10 ?(4.6, 5.4) -400%	8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5) -330%	7 ?(3.3, 3.7) -250%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) -370%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%
PWM Frequency	500 ?(70)
Screen		-96%	-169%	-178%	-184%	-106%
Brightness middle	383	497 30%	336 -12%	326 -15%	335 -13%	286 -25%
Brightness	384	481 25%	316 -18%	303 -21%	319 -17%	271 -29%
Brightness Distribution	99	82 -17%	89 -10%	89 -10%	90 -9%	89 -10%
Black Level *	0.03	0.21 -600%	0.34 -1033%	0.33 -1000%	0.28 -833%	0.25 -733%
Contrast	12767	2367 -81%	988 -92%	988 -92%	1196 -91%	1144 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	3.53 -87%	3.36 -78%	2.73 -44%	4.38 -132%	2.74 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.76	6.15 -64%	6.67 -77%	9.54 -154%	9.48 -152%	5.21 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.53 -32%	0.74 72%	1.36 49%	1.33 50%	2.52 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.26	1.74 -38%	4.7 -273%	5.2 -313%	7 -456%	1.1 13%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.244 ^98%	2.074 ^106%	2.103 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6386 ^102%	6418 ^101%	6897 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6244 ^104%	6408 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-147% / -112%	-216% / -177%	-188% / -171%	-233% / -193%	-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen ger redan från början en imponerande färgåtergivning: Med en avvikelse på 1,9 är målet (DeltaE < 3) klart uppfyllt. Kalibrering leder inte till några förbättringar. Färgnoggrannheten är given: Färgrymderna sRGB och DCI-P3 återges helt och nästan helt med AdobeRGB-färgrymden på 94 procent. syskonets LED-panel levererar också liknande goda resultat.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

500 Hz

≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19347 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Panelen har en stor stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln och är läsbar från alla vinklar. Utomhus är detta dock svårt på grund av skärmens blanka, reflekterande yta.

Prestanda - Blade 15 är baserad på Alder Lake och Ampere

Med Blade 15 (början av 2022) har Razer en bärbar dator i sitt produktsortiment som är utformad för QHD-spel (höga till maximala inställningar), men den är också mycket bra på områden som videoredigering och rendering. Modellen som recenseras här kan fås för cirka 1 967 dollar.

Provningsvillkor

Det är möjligt att växla mellan de tre prestandalägena ("Balanced", "Silent" och "User-defined") med hjälp av kombinationen av tangenterna "Fn" + "P". Profilen "Användardefinierad" gör det möjligt att göra underinställningar för CPU ("Låg", "Medel", "Hög", "Boost") och GPU ("Låg", "Medel" och "Hög") - via den förinstallerade programvaran Razer Synapse. I batteriläge är endast profilen "Balanserad" tillgänglig.

Benchmarks utfördes med det aktiva läget "Användardefinierad" med maximala inställningar (underpresets "Boost" och "High"). För batteritestet användes profilen "Silent".

Processor

TheCore i9-12900H(Alder Lake) består av sex prestandakärnor (hyperthreading, 2,5 till 5 GHz) och åtta effektivitetskärnor (ingen hyperthreading, 1,8 till 3,8 GHz). Totalt finns det 20 logiska CPU-kärnor.

Cinebench R15-jämförelsetestet med flera trådar bearbetades vid 3,6-3,8 GHz (P-kärnor) och 2,8-2,9 GHz (E-kärnor). Vi körde testet med en enda tråd vid 1,4 till 4,5 GHz (P-kärnor) respektive 1,5 till 3,5 GHz (E-kärnor). I batteriläge är klockfrekvenserna lägre. CB15-slingtestet visar: Multi-thread-belastning konfronteras endast med hög turboklockhastighet under en kort tid. Efter 30-40 sekunder sjunker värdena till ungefär basklockhastigheten.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (Max)

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (balanserad)

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (tyst)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	83.1 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	78.1 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	74.8 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	74.7 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming	70.6 pt ∼71%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	57.9 pt ∼58%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16170 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22)	15902 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=228, last 2 years)	14887 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	10742 Points ∼66% -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22)	1838 Points ∼98% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points ∼96% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1759 Points ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=225, last 2 years)	1617 Points ∼86% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1515 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	6044 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22)	5985 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points ∼97% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years)	5605 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	4148 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22)	712 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points ∼97% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years)	623 Points ∼87% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	2711 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22)	2578 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=236, last 2 years)	2388 Points ∼85% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points ∼77% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1547 Points ∼55% -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23)	264 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=232, last 2 years)	244 Points ∼92% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points ∼87% -8%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	309 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years)	250 Seconds * ∼81% -14%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * ∼73% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22)	215 Seconds * ∼70% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * ∼63% +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * ∼59% +17%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22)	63631 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years)	60947 MIPS ∼84% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	58296 MIPS ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47298 MIPS ∼65% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22)	5869 MIPS ∼95% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS ∼95% +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	5739 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years)	5696 MIPS ∼92% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	5492 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS ∼87%

Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	12832 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23)	12461 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21058, n=227, last 2 years)	10644 Points ∼79% -13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	8261 Points ∼61% -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23)	1815 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points ∼95% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1728 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=227, last 2 years)	1627 Points ∼88% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1579 Points ∼86% -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps ∼95% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)	18.1 fps ∼91% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=232, last 2 years)	16.8 fps ∼84% -3%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.2 fps ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	12.8 fps ∼64% -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)	51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s * ∼92% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22)	43.3 s * ∼84% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * ∼82% +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * ∼80% +19%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	37.5 s * ∼73% +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.557 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Gaming (0.3793 - 4.47, n=228, last 2 years)	0.52 sec * ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * ∼85% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4647 sec * ∼83% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * ∼81% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)	0.4486 sec * ∼81% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * ∼78% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

213 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.6 pt ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88.6 pt ∼89%
Average of class Gaming	87.3 pt ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.6 pt ∼84%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	82.8 pt ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	80 pt ∼80%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	69.9 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.8 pt ∼67%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=201, last 2 years)	13605 KRay/s ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12736 KRay/s ∼83% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12680 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22)	11115 KRay/s ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=201, last 2 years)	72509 Points ∼97% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63698 Points ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61649 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22)	54800 Points ∼73% -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points ∼49% -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points ∼48% -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4107 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=201, last 2 years)	3413 MB/s ∼83% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22)	3158 MB/s ∼77% -7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3023 MB/s ∼74% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s ∼65% -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s ∼65% -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22)	103601 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102811 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=201, last 2 years)	97639 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86848 Points ∼82% -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=201, last 2 years)	10702 Points ∼100% +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points ∼89% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22)	9371 Points ∼88% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points ∼86% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points ∼86% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8872 Points ∼83% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8654 Points ∼81% -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=201, last 2 years)	39088 Points ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37197 Points ∼95% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points ∼87%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31084 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22)	28698 Points ∼73% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points ∼55% -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points ∼54% -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135380 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s ∼95% +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113172 MB/s ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=201, last 2 years)	100169 MB/s ∼74% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22)	90046 MB/s ∼67% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s ∼63% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s ∼41% -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22)	974 MB/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	860 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=222, last 2 years)	857 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	690 MB/s ∼65% -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=201, last 2 years)	7391 KRay/s ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6946 KRay/s ∼84% -4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6843 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22)	6214 KRay/s ∼75% -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s ∼96% +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s ∼96% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23)	36969 MPixel/s ∼87% +7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	35065 MPixel/s ∼82% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s ∼81% -1%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=202, last 2 years)	29365 MPixel/s ∼69% -15%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26692 MPixel/s ∼63% -23%

Systemets prestanda

Systemet fungerar smidigt och tillförlitligt och ger tillräckligt med kraft för krävande tillämpningar som rendering, videoredigering och spel. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-4800-minne och detta kompletteras av goda PC-Mark-resultat.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7695 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9151, n=187, last 2 years)	7113 Points ∼90% -3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6126 Points ∼78% -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points ∼99% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10764 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=186, last 2 years)	10312 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9544 Points ∼87% -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10352 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=186, last 2 years)	9302 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8571 Points ∼83% -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points ∼94% +10%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11099 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points ∼90% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=186, last 2 years)	10221 Points ∼84% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7627 Points ∼63% -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1947 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=91, last 2 years)	1814 Points ∼93% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1656 Points ∼85% -4%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1887 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points ∼95% +9%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=91, last 2 years)	1743 Points ∼92% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1640 Points ∼87% 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1983 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=91, last 2 years)	1944 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1692 Points ∼84% -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2022 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=91, last 2 years)	1680 Points ∼83% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1600 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points ∼78%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5101 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5789 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		7336 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22)	58799 MB/s ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50524 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=201, last 2 years)	49960 MB/s ∼79% -10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48120 MB/s ∼76% -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s ∼98% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22)	61346 MB/s ∼91% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57551 MB/s ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=201, last 2 years)	53482 MB/s ∼80% -13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48849 MB/s ∼73% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22)	58343 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58294 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=201, last 2 years)	51086 MB/s ∼77% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46056 MB/s ∼69% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.1 ns * ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * ∼91% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21)	85 ns * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=222, last 2 years)	68.8 ns * ∼69% +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Det standardiserade testet för övervakning av latens (surfning på internet, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 hög belastning) visade på avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kan dock leda till antingen förbättringar eller försämringar av prestandan.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3261 μs * ∼100% -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * ∼42% -46%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1109.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * ∼29% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * ∼29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * ∼22% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Blade har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-diskar i M.2 2280-format. Den installerade PCIe-4 SSD:n (1 TB) från Samsung ger mycket bra överföringshastigheter. Nedgångar i prestanda på grund av termisk strypning förekom inte.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	91.4 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	83.8 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	78.5 pt ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.8 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt ∼76%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.2 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming	62 pt ∼62%

DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4199 (4194.93^min - 4199.13^max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4117 (3552.16^min - 4116.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s ∼94% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼90% +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4634, n=49)	3717 MB/s ∼89% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 5676, n=187, last 2 years)	3062 MB/s ∼73% -14%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4299 (4288.86^min - 4298.95^max) MB/s ∼90% +22%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4236 (3477.46^min - 4236.46^max) MB/s ∼89% +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s ∼87% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s ∼85% +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 4516, n=49)	3566 MB/s ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼74%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 7889, n=186, last 2 years)	3263 MB/s ∼68% -8%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7020 (5888.98^min - 7020.02^max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6847 (6590.72^min - 6846.78^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼93% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7061, n=49)	6368 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 13195, n=187, last 2 years)	5306 MB/s ∼76% -20%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4999 (4982.73^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 5259, n=49)	4813 MB/s ∼89% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s ∼88% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4421 (4173.33^min - 4420.8^max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 10261, n=187, last 2 years)	3997 MB/s ∼74% -20%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.6 (67.84^min - 80.61^max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	77.9 (77.66^min - 77.9^max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.7 - 97.4, n=49)	77.8 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=187, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s ∼79% -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	333 (331.94^min - 333.25^max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s ∼79% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s ∼77% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	239 (238.19^min - 238.82^max) MB/s ∼72% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s ∼62% -3%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=186, last 2 years)	201 MB/s ∼60% -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 275, n=49)	191.3 MB/s ∼57% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4309 (4179.96^min - 4309.38^max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3566 (3562.85^min - 3566.11^max) MB/s ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s ∼66% -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=49)	2521 MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming (310 - 5829, n=186, last 2 years)	2291 MB/s ∼53% -45%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s ∼35% -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3600 (3594.9^min - 3599.81^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3435 (2876.62^min - 3435.27^max) MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s ∼75% -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4383, n=186, last 2 years)	2020 MB/s ∼56% -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=49)	1892 MB/s ∼53% -46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s ∼16% -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9117 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit jämför
HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 (min) N2820, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	46
...
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2518
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2518
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2535
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2543
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2545
i5-12600K, NVIDIA Titan RTX	2555
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2563
...
(max) TR Pro 3975WX, NVIDIA RTX A6000 (Quad NV-Link)	7053