Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - Utan tvekan den bästa Android-surfplattan på 11 tum (Sammanfattning)

Ännu bättre än Galaxy Tab S7 Plus! Vid jämförelse med sitt större syskon, Galaxy Tab S7+, verkar Galaxy Tab S7 vara en andra klassens surfplatta. Men Galaxy Tab S7 är egentligen en riktigt imponerande platta som är bättre än sitt storasyskon. Läs vidare i vår recension för att få reda på varför.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 8 x 2.4 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
11.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 274 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, native pen support, LTPS, glansig: ja, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 103 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C , Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Rörelsesensor, e-kompass, Gyroskop, Hall-sensor, OTG, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz; UMTS: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B4, B5 (850), B8 (900), LTE: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B3 (1.800), B4, B5 (850), B7 (2.600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B20 (800), B25 (1.900), B26 (850), B28 (700), B66, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.3 x 253.8 x 165.3
Batteri
8000 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 5 MPix (Ultra-vidvinkel), Camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Fyra högtalare justerade av AKG, Dolby Atmos, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbord som tillval, Modulär laddare, USB-kabel, S Pen, OneUI 2.5, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR kropp : 1.381 W/Kg, Widevine L1, fanless
Vikt
500 g, Strömförsörjning: 51 g
Pris
681 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
500 g6.3 mm11.00"2560x1600
90 %
04/2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
471 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
88 %
08/2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.80"2560x1600
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
575 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7

Storleksjämförelse

285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 575 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 6.3 mm 500 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (624min - 890max) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
629 (284min - 753max) MBit/s ∼59% -25%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s ∼57% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s ∼95% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
612 (243min - 690max) MBit/s ∼70% -10%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (624-890)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (653-709)
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Garmin Edge 500
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigation: Galaxy Tab S7

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle lensWide-angle lens5X zoomLow-light photographyUltra wide-angle lens
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
0 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: 8.16 ∆E min: 0 - max: 17.55 ∆E
548
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 569 cd/m² Medel: 534.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.44 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1679:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40
Screen
18%
-20%
-14%
Brightness middle
554
617
11%
606
9%
441
-20%
Brightness
535
585
9%
579
8%
447
-16%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
89
-2%
98
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.36
-9%
0.32
3%
Contrast
1679
1714
2%
1894
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
0.94
55%
2.9
-38%
2.4
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
1.87
74%
6
15%
4.1
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.4
12%
4.3
-169%
2.9
-81%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
2.01 109%
CCT
6623 98%
6733 97%
7272 89%
6469 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59520 Hz ≤ 21 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59520 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3591 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3466 - 3671, n=5)
3567 Points ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3466 Points ∼2% -3%
Average of class Tablet (365 - 3591, n=8)
1519 Points ∼1% -58%
Vulkan Score 5.3
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3473 - 4105, n=5)
3762 Points ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3732 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3473 Points ∼2% -7%
Average of class Tablet (79 - 3732, n=10)
1211 Points ∼1% -68%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3756 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
2932 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points ∼28% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3338 Points ∼20% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3012 - 3458, n=5)
3207 Points ∼19% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3201 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3063 Points ∼18% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points ∼17% -10%
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=24)
1995 Points ∼12% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points ∼65% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (950 - 1006, n=5)
979 Points ∼56% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
963 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
950 Points ∼54% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
906 Points ∼52% -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points ∼43% -21%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1593, n=24)
606 Points ∼35% -37%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9443 Points ∼22% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9279 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
9279 Points ∼21% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8892 Points ∼20% -4%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13186 Points ∼21% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13066 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
13066 Points ∼21% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
11885 Points ∼19% -9%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8% -64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4493 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
4493 Points ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4261 Points ∼58% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3865 Points ∼53% -14%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼23% -63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12457 - 13999, n=4)
12881 Points ∼84% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12603 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12466 Points ∼81% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10952 Points ∼72% -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8636 Points ∼56% -31%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=61)
4935 Points ∼32% -61%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=4)
15760 Points ∼79% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14982 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13629 Points ∼68% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13142 Points ∼66% -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
10918 Points ∼55% -27%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=97)
5356 Points ∼27% -64%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3830 Points ∼94% +17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3658 Points ∼90% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3100 - 3875, n=4)
3412 Points ∼84% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3285 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3100 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=21)
2344 Points ∼58% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8768 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8745 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7613 - 9047, n=4)
8543 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8173 Points ∼73% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4156 Points ∼37% -53%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=21)
2065 Points ∼18% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6578 Points ∼94% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5960 - 6977, n=4)
6364 Points ∼91% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6292 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6226 Points ∼89% -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4036 Points ∼58% -36%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=21)
1866 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
5277 Points ∼66% +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4756 Points ∼60% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4159 - 5406, n=4)
4600 Points ∼58% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4298 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4159 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=63)
1969 Points ∼25% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9893 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (9453 - 10043, n=4)
9836 Points ∼81% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
9453 Points ∼78% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9356 Points ∼77% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4356 Points ∼36% -56%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 12112, n=63)
2166 Points ∼18% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7986 Points ∼83% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7369 - 8386, n=4)
7841 Points ∼81% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7701 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
7369 Points ∼76% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4467 Points ∼46% -42%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=63)
1856 Points ∼19% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4702 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4178 - 5361, n=5)
4628 Points ∼80% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4319 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4283 Points ∼74% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4178 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=69)
1848 Points ∼32% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13779 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13149 Points ∼46% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11617 - 13779, n=5)
12716 Points ∼44% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12694 Points ∼44% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4405 Points ∼15% -68%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=69)
3454 Points ∼12% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9283 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8709 - 10059, n=5)
9132 Points ∼68% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8902 Points ∼66% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8823 Points ∼66% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4472 Points ∼33% -52%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=69)
2332 Points ∼17% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4895 Points ∼93% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4041 - 5035, n=4)
4386 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4201 Points ∼80%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4096 Points ∼78% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4041 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=79)
1858 Points ∼35% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8894 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8548 - 9032, n=4)
8871 Points ∼77% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8548 Points ∼74% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8299 Points ∼72% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4425 Points ∼38% -50%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 9612, n=79)
1698 Points ∼15% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (6850 - 7678, n=4)
7213 Points ∼35% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7157 Points ∼35% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7098 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6850 Points ∼34% -3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4334 Points ∼21% -39%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=81)
1540 Points ∼8% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4729 Points ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4482 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4104 - 4911, n=5)
4447 Points ∼84% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4104 Points ∼78% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4056 Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=82)
1741 Points ∼33% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14283 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12725 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12394 Points ∼74% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11107 - 14283, n=5)
12371 Points ∼74% -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4256 Points ∼26% -70%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=82)
2418 Points ∼15% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9238 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9123 Points ∼81% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8272 - 9361, n=5)
8764 Points ∼78% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8675 Points ∼77% -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4215 Points ∼37% -54%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=83)
1907 Points ∼17% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
51436 Points ∼53% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (42810 - 56928, n=4)
49274 Points ∼51% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
42810 Points ∼44%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points ∼42% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
32384 Points ∼33% -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
19565 Points ∼20% -54%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=176)
14627 Points ∼15% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points ∼35% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
164853 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
160665 Points ∼25% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (128372 - 169103, n=4)
155748 Points ∼25% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
150281 Points ∼24% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64715 Points ∼10% -61%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=176)
26225 Points ∼4% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points ∼39% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
109154 Points ∼38% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (91762 - 117606, n=4)
104977 Points ∼37% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
101385 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
82937 Points ∼29% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
42861 Points ∼15% -58%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=177)
19384 Points ∼7% -81%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
225 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
215 fps ∼2% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (171 - 225, n=4)
208 fps ∼2% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
203 fps ∼2% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps ∼1% -40%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=198)
38.6 fps ∼0% -83%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
119 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
116 fps ∼3% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 119, n=4)
102 fps ∼3% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
90 fps ∼3% -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps ∼2% -50%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=202)
24 fps ∼1% -80%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
134 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
125 fps ∼14% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (110 - 134, n=4)
125 fps ∼14% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
122 fps ∼13% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps ∼7% -52%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=132)
26.5 fps ∼3% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
88 fps ∼24% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
82 fps ∼22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 82, n=4)
71 fps ∼19% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
67 fps ∼18% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps ∼12% -46%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=138)
17.8 fps ∼5% -78%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
93 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
88 fps ∼2% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=4)
87.3 fps ∼2% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
86 fps ∼2% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼1% -56%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=84)
23.9 fps ∼1% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
77 fps ∼2% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
51 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 60, n=4)
49.5 fps ∼1% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
41 fps ∼1% -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps ∼1% -33%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=84)
15.4 fps ∼0% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
30 fps ∼19% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (18 - 35, n=4)
24.3 fps ∼15% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
21 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
18 fps ∼11% -14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps ∼8% -38%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=34)
10.9 fps ∼7% -48%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
22 fps ∼9% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (22 - 22, n=4)
22 fps ∼9% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
20 fps ∼8% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼7% -23%
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=34)
10.4 fps ∼4% -53%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
47 fps ∼23% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (27 - 54, n=4)
37 fps ∼18% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
33 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
27 fps ∼13% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼8% -48%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=34)
16 fps ∼8% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
58 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
57 fps ∼10% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 58, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼9% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
54 (20min) fps ∼9% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼7% -29%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=34)
28.4 fps ∼5% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
57 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
53 fps ∼12% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 57, n=4)
52.8 fps ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
50 fps ∼11% -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps ∼9% -33%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=60)
17.3 fps ∼4% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
45 fps ∼17% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (24 - 52, n=4)
34.3 fps ∼13% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
32 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
24 fps ∼9% -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps ∼8% -34%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=60)
10.7 fps ∼4% -67%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points ∼95% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
595466 Points ∼79% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
584052 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4)
571612 Points ∼76% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
490260 Points ∼65% -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points ∼54% -30%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=18)
333737 Points ∼44% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1514 Points ∼74% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
1409 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1268 - 1621, n=4)
1407 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
1268 Points ∼62% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points ∼51% -27%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=124)
775 Points ∼38% -45%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12048 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11773 - 12048, n=4)
11899 Points ∼41% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
11773 Points ∼41% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
11567 Points ∼40% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points ∼30% -27%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=125)
2435 Points ∼8% -80%
Memory
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7945 Points ∼90% +22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5918 - 8056, n=4)
6654 Points ∼75% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6501 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5918 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=125)
1320 Points ∼15% -80%
System
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10002 Points ∼61% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8965 - 9901, n=4)
9264 Points ∼56% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8994 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8965 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points ∼50% -9%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=125)
2730 Points ∼17% -70%
Overall
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6072 Points ∼72% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5305 - 6247, n=4)
5656 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
5592 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5305 Points ∼63% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points ∼56% -15%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=124)
1434 Points ∼17% -74%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.503 Points ∼100% +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
72.541 Points ∼58% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4)
72.4 Points ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
71.821 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 167, n=21)
65.3 Points ∼52% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.115 Points ∼44% -23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points ∼100% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
127.58 Points ∼46% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (122 - 132, n=4)
127 Points ∼46% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
126.98 Points ∼46%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.24 Points ∼37% -20%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=110)
63.7 Points ∼23% -50%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
126 Points ∼89% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4)
120 Points ∼85% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
116 Points ∼82%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points ∼69% -16%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 195, n=45)
76.9 Points ∼55% -34%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chome 80)
125 runs/min ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
71.3 runs/min ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
70.9 runs/min ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4)
64.2 runs/min ∼51% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min ∼51% -10%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 198, n=30)
58.9 runs/min ∼47% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
27360 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4)
26679 Points ∼63% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
26495 Points ∼63%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points ∼47% -25%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=195)
8073 Points ∼19% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=207)
8762 ms * ∼100% -361%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2344.9 ms * ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
1947 ms * ∼22% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4)
1908 ms * ∼22% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
1900.3 ms * ∼22%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646.4 ms * ∼7% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
1%
4%
-0%
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.72 (NM Card)
4%
69.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
68.8 (68.6 - 69, n=2)
0%
50.4 (14 - 73.8, n=73)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.42 (NM Card)
-4%
85.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.9 (85.9 - 86, n=2)
0%
68.4 (17.6 - 87.7, n=73)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
211.5
262.42
24%
204.97
-3%
205 (121 - 244, n=6)
-3%
11.8 (0.13 - 262, n=225)
-94%
Random Read 4KB
218.97
224.61
3%
230.14
5%
209 (133 - 231, n=6)
-5%
26.1 (1.04 - 230, n=225)
-88%
Sequential Write 256KB
680.21
398.96
-41%
731.99
8%
700 (674 - 728, n=6)
3%
57.2 (2.04 - 732, n=225)
-92%
Sequential Read 256KB
1511.54
1788.66
18%
1674.99
11%
1553 (1348 - 1659, n=6)
3%
150 (6.75 - 1789, n=225)
-90%
PUBG
010203040506070Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; HD: Ø59.7 (52-61)
; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Asphalt 9 Legends
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø57.3 (44-60)
Hög belastning
 28.1 °C27.4 °C33.4 °C 
 28.8 °C26.5 °C33.5 °C 
 27.8 °C25.4 °C32.2 °C 
Max: 33.5 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C
25.6 °C27.1 °C28.5 °C
25.3 °C27.3 °C29.8 °C
25 °C26.3 °C28.1 °C
Max: 29.8 °C
Medel: 27 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  24.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.523.22521.326.73118.426.44022.5275020.333.56315.828.48015.735.710016.746.912515.153.51601561.920010.662.125014.167.331510.872.140010.973.650010.577.46308.877.28001075.7100010.179125011.177160011.97720001174.6250012.171.6315012.574.4400012.778.5500013.476630013.879.180001576100001475.61250014.1651600014.157.3SPL24.488.4N0.584median 12.5median 74.6Delta2642.340.440.741.131.138.634.34334.751.928.946.423.840.926.249.42253.720.757.32157.218.657.117.762.517.268.31970.51771.515.27217.369.715.468.618.564.615.958.715.165.614.464.314.860.115.161.215.363.815.664.915.961.416.161.216.65760.869.667.428.378.515.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.51.65.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S7Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.16 / 4.42 / 4.43 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 8.86 / 11.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Power Consumption
-25%
-13%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.16
1.3
-12%
1.98
-71%
2.41
-108%
Idle Average *
4.42
3.5
21%
5.66
-28%
3.4
23%
Idle Maximum *
4.43
5.6
-26%
5.69
-28%
3.43
23%
Load Average *
8.86
12.5
-41%
6.96
21%
6.63
25%
Load Maximum *
11.6
19.2
-66%
6.98
40%
10.29
11%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
32tim 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 45min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 41min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
4%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1963
2001
2%
1877
-4%
898
-54%
H.264
885
936
6%
909
3%
620
-30%
WiFi v1.3
811
902
11%
891
10%
425
-48%
Load
221
197
-11%
233
5%
355
61%

För

+ Kontrastrik 120 Hz-skärm
+ Hög prestanda
+ Snabb lagring
+ Hög konstruktionskvalitet
+ Utmärkta högtalare
+ S Pen

Emot

- Startknappen sitter för djupt in i ramen
- "Endast" 6 GB RAM
- Saknar 5G-modem
- PWM
- Ingen IP-certifiering
- 45 W-laddare ingår inte i förpackningen

Verdict: Galaxy Tab S7 - Samsung gör många saker rätt, men inte allt

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7. Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7. Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 är en lockande Android-platta som kan kan stå sig mot resten av toppskiktet, om än på ett aningen ekonomiskt vis. Faktum är att den enda egentliga konkurrenten från Android-världen är Huaweis MatePad Pro, som har en del svagheter som Tab S7 inte har. Samsungs platta har en fingeravtrycksläsare, en 120 Hz-skärm och inget kamerahål som gör skärmen runt det mörkare. Vidare har Tab S7 stöd för Google Play-tjänsterna, vilket Huaweis platta inte har.

Utöver utmärkta högtalare, snabb UFS-lagring och en kraftfull Qualcomm SoC gillade vi att S Pen, med sina många funktioner, ingår. Tab S7 har riktigt hög konstruktionskvalitet. Men de matta ytorna gör den inte särskilt greppvänlig.

Galaxy Tab S7 är en utmärkt Android-surfplatta som inte behandlats så väl som den förtjänar.

Generellt sett är denna lyxiga surfplatta öppen för mer kritik än Galaxy S20-telefonerna. Som exempel har den inte lyxfunktioner som IP-certifiering, NFC-chip eller trådlös laddning. Med tanke på enhetens höga utgångspris är det märkligt att förpackningen inte innehåller en snabbladdare på 45 W. Det är också svårt att förstå varför Tab S7 bara har 6 GB RAM när det fanns en 8 GB-version av Tab S6 och Note 20 Ultra faktiskt kommer med hela 16 GB RAM. Vidare är det märkligt att mobilnätsversionen av Tab S7 bara kommer med ett 4G-modem.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - 10/15/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
88 / 98 → 89%
Tangentbord
72 / 80 → 89%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
66 / 70 → 94%
Vikt
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
63 / 78 → 80%
Programprestanda
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 98%
Camera
57 / 85 → 68%
Medel
82%
90%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - Utan tvekan den bästa Android-surfplattan på 11 tum (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10-20 (Update: 2020-10-20)