Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Äntligen en riktigt bra Android-surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Konkurrens för iPad Pro. Vi blev väldigt nöjda över att se Galaxy Tab S7+, för Samsung har inte släppt några surfplattor större än 11 tum på väldigt länge. Den har dessutom en förstklassig processor. Läs vidare i vår recension för att få reda på om den har några andra överraskningar.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 8 x 2.4 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
12.40 tum 16:10, 2800 x 1752 pixlar 266 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ-C , Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Rörelsesensor, Gyroskop, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 5.7 x 285 x 185
Batteri
10090 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 5 MP (Ultra-vidvinkel); Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4 högtalare justerade av AKG, Dolby Atmos, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Keyboard Cover finns som tillval, S Pen, One UI 2.5, Microsoft apps, Facebook, Spotify, Netflix, Galaxy Store, 24 Månader Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Vikt
575 g
Pris
954 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
575 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
89 %
05/2020
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
641 g5.9 mm12.90"2732x2048
88 %
08/2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.80"2560x1600
87 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640
420 g5.7 mm10.50"2560x1600

Storleksjämförelse

285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 575 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 641 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s ∼64% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
629 (284min - 753max) MBit/s ∼59%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
612 (573min - 630max) MBit/s ∼57% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s ∼100% +43%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
827 (400min - 880max) MBit/s ∼95% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
612 (243min - 690max) MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s ∼66% -6%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø628 (284-753)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø612 (243-690)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Svänga runt
Garmin Edge 500 - Svänga runt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Översikt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Cykeltur runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Cykeltur runt en sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Svänga runt
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Svänga runt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleUltra Wide-angle5X zoomLow-light photography
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: 5.05 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 9.23 ∆E
OLED-flimmer: Lägsta ljusstyrka
Lägsta ljusstyrka
OLED-flimmer: under 20% av ljusstyrkan
Under 20% av ljusstyrkan
OLED-flimmer: över 20% av ljusstyrkan
OLED-flimmer: över 20% av ljusstyrkan
450
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 451 cd/m² Medel: 446.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 441 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50
Screen
31%
-10%
-5%
Brightness middle
441
625
42%
606
37%
446
1%
Brightness
447
599
34%
579
30%
445
0%
Brightness Distribution
98
87
-11%
89
-9%
86
-12%
Black Level *
0.47
0.32
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.3
46%
2.9
-21%
2.7
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.1
2.7
34%
6
-46%
5.4
-32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
1.8
38%
4.3
-48%
2.1
28%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.05 107%
CCT
6469 100%
6765 96%
7272 89%
6468 100%
Contrast
1330
1894

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting
≤ 1.73 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % (1.73 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9604 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
Metal Score 5.1
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
10011 Points ∼98%
Average of class Tablet (9361 - 10011, n=3)
9785 Points ∼96%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3394 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4)
2438 Points ∼2%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3756 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
4712 Points ∼28% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3012 - 3458, n=5)
3207 Points ∼19% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3063 Points ∼18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points ∼17% -6%
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=24)
1995 Points ∼12% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
1117 Points ∼64% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (950 - 1006, n=5)
979 Points ∼56% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
950 Points ∼54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points ∼43% -20%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1593, n=24)
606 Points ∼35% -36%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
9279 Points ∼21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8892 Points ∼20%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
13066 Points ∼21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
11885 Points ∼19%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
4493 Points ∼61%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3865 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼23%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12457 - 13999, n=4)
12881 Points ∼84% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12466 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9615 Points ∼63% -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8636 Points ∼56% -31%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=61)
4935 Points ∼32% -60%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=4)
15760 Points ∼79% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13629 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
11644 Points ∼58% -15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
10918 Points ∼55% -20%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=97)
5356 Points ∼27% -61%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3658 Points ∼90% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3100 - 3875, n=4)
3412 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3100 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
2992 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=21)
2344 Points ∼58% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8745 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7613 - 9047, n=4)
8543 Points ∼76% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5819 Points ∼52% -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4156 Points ∼37% -52%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=21)
2065 Points ∼18% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5960 - 6977, n=4)
6364 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6226 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4809 Points ∼69% -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4036 Points ∼58% -35%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=21)
1866 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4756 Points ∼60% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4159 - 5406, n=4)
4600 Points ∼58% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4159 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3919 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=63)
1969 Points ∼25% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (9453 - 10043, n=4)
9836 Points ∼81% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
9453 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6750 Points ∼56% -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4356 Points ∼36% -54%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 12112, n=63)
2166 Points ∼18% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7369 - 8386, n=4)
7841 Points ∼81% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
7369 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5816 Points ∼60% -21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4467 Points ∼46% -39%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=63)
1856 Points ∼19% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4702 Points ∼82% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4178 - 5361, n=5)
4628 Points ∼80% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4178 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3898 Points ∼68% -7%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=69)
1848 Points ∼32% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13149 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11617 - 13779, n=5)
12716 Points ∼44% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
10119 Points ∼35% -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4405 Points ∼15% -66%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=69)
3454 Points ∼12% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8709 - 10059, n=5)
9132 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8902 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7470 Points ∼56% -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4472 Points ∼33% -50%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=69)
2332 Points ∼17% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4041 - 5035, n=4)
4386 Points ∼83% +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4096 Points ∼78% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4041 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3695 Points ∼70% -9%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=79)
1858 Points ∼35% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8548 - 9032, n=4)
8871 Points ∼77% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8548 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6128 Points ∼53% -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4425 Points ∼38% -48%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 9612, n=79)
1698 Points ∼15% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (6850 - 7678, n=4)
7213 Points ∼35% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6850 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5346 Points ∼26% -22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4334 Points ∼21% -37%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=81)
1540 Points ∼8% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4104 - 4911, n=5)
4447 Points ∼84% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4104 Points ∼78%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4056 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3678 Points ∼70% -10%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=82)
1741 Points ∼33% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12725 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11107 - 14283, n=5)
12371 Points ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9415 Points ∼56% -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4256 Points ∼26% -67%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=82)
2418 Points ∼15% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8272 - 9361, n=5)
8764 Points ∼78% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8675 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6992 Points ∼62% -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4215 Points ∼37% -51%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=83)
1907 Points ∼17% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
51436 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (42810 - 56928, n=4)
49274 Points ∼51% -4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
40299 Points ∼42% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points ∼36% -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
19565 Points ∼20% -62%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=176)
14627 Points ∼15% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
220422 Points ∼35% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
160665 Points ∼25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (128372 - 169103, n=4)
155748 Points ∼25% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points ∼17% -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64715 Points ∼10% -60%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=176)
26225 Points ∼4% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
110582 Points ∼39% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
109154 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (91762 - 117606, n=4)
104977 Points ∼37% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points ∼26% -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
42861 Points ∼15% -61%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=177)
19384 Points ∼7% -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
215 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (171 - 225, n=4)
208 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
166 fps ∼1% -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps ∼1% -37%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=198)
38.6 fps ∼0% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
116 fps ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 119, n=4)
102 fps ∼3% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
60 fps ∼2% -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps ∼2% -48%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=202)
24 fps ∼1% -79%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
125 fps ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (110 - 134, n=4)
125 fps ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
97 fps ∼11% -22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps ∼7% -49%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=132)
26.5 fps ∼3% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 82, n=4)
71 fps ∼19% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
67 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
56 fps ∼15% -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps ∼12% -34%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=138)
17.8 fps ∼5% -73%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
88 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=4)
87.3 fps ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
66 fps ∼1% -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼1% -53%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=84)
23.9 fps ∼1% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 60, n=4)
49.5 fps ∼1% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
41 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
38 fps ∼1% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps ∼1% -17%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=84)
15.4 fps ∼0% -62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (18 - 35, n=4)
24.3 fps ∼15% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
18 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
16 fps ∼10% -11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps ∼8% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=34)
10.9 fps ∼7% -39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
22 fps ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (22 - 22, n=4)
22 fps ∼9% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼7% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
15 fps ∼6% -32%
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=34)
10.4 fps ∼4% -53%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (27 - 54, n=4)
37 fps ∼18% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
27 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
24 fps ∼12% -11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼8% -37%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=34)
16 fps ∼8% -41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
57 fps ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 58, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼9% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
42 fps ∼7% -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼7% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=34)
28.4 fps ∼5% -50%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
53 fps ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 57, n=4)
52.8 fps ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
40 fps ∼9% -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps ∼9% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=60)
17.3 fps ∼4% -67%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (24 - 52, n=4)
34.3 fps ∼13% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
24 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
23 fps ∼9% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps ∼8% -12%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=60)
10.7 fps ∼4% -55%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
751846 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4)
571612 Points ∼76% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
490260 Points ∼65%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points ∼54% -17%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=18)
333737 Points ∼44% -32%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1268 - 1621, n=4)
1407 Points ∼69% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
1268 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
1249 Points ∼61% -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points ∼51% -19%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=124)
775 Points ∼38% -39%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11773 - 12048, n=4)
11899 Points ∼41% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
11773 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9372 Points ∼32% -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points ∼30% -25%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=125)
2435 Points ∼8% -79%
Memory
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5918 - 8056, n=4)
6654 Points ∼75% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5918 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5617 Points ∼63% -5%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=125)
1320 Points ∼15% -78%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8965 - 9901, n=4)
9264 Points ∼56% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8965 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
8360 Points ∼51% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points ∼50% -8%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=125)
2730 Points ∼17% -70%
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5305 - 6247, n=4)
5656 Points ∼67% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5305 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4842 Points ∼57% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=124)
1434 Points ∼17% -73%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
126.1 Points ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
72.541 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4)
72.4 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.971 Points ∼53% -8%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 167, n=21)
65.3 Points ∼52% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.115 Points ∼44% -24%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
271.89 Points ∼100% +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
127.58 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (122 - 132, n=4)
127 Points ∼47% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.05 Points ∼43% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.24 Points ∼37% -21%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=110)
63.7 Points ∼23% -50%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
140 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
126 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4)
120 Points ∼86% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points ∼74% -17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points ∼69% -23%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 195, n=45)
76.9 Points ∼55% -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
135 runs/min ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
71.3 runs/min ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min ∼49% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4)
64.2 runs/min ∼48% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min ∼47% -10%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 198, n=30)
58.9 runs/min ∼44% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
43057 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
27360 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4)
26679 Points ∼62% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points ∼57% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points ∼46% -27%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=195)
8073 Points ∼19% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=207)
8762 ms * ∼100% -350%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2344.9 ms * ∼27% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2175.7 ms * ∼25% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
1947 ms * ∼22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4)
1908 ms * ∼22% +2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
645.9 ms * ∼7% +67%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusHuawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-20%
4%
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.72 (NM Card)
3%
54.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-21%
61.8 (55.6 - 69.3, n=4)
-11%
50.4 (14 - 73.8, n=73)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.42 (NM Card)
-4%
70.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
75.8 (65.6 - 85.8, n=4)
-12%
68.4 (17.6 - 87.7, n=73)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
204.97
262.42
28%
170.16
-17%
244 (205 - 285, n=7)
19%
11.8 (0.13 - 262, n=225)
-94%
Random Read 4KB
230.14
224.61
-2%
191.65
-17%
246 (187 - 325, n=7)
7%
26.1 (1.04 - 230, n=225)
-89%
Sequential Write 256KB
731.99
398.96
-45%
522.31
-29%
847 (732 - 1321, n=7)
16%
57.2 (2.04 - 732, n=225)
-92%
Sequential Read 256KB
1674.99
1788.66
7%
1415.55
-15%
1753 (1675 - 2037, n=7)
5%
150 (6.75 - 1789, n=225)
-91%
PUBG Compare
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø59.7 (52-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.0.0: Ø40 (38-41)
; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø114 (102-120)
Hög belastning
 32.3 °C32.2 °C24.4 °C 
 24 °C24.7 °C23 °C 
 26.9 °C28.3 °C24.4 °C 
Max: 32.3 °C
Medel: 26.7 °C
23.8 °C28 °C27.1 °C
23.8 °C25.6 °C24.5 °C
23.2 °C24.5 °C24.5 °C
Max: 28 °C
Medel: 25 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  22.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.527.62521.324.43118.421.54022.525.35020.332.36315.824.18015.735.110016.741.512515.152.61601564.320010.663.125014.16631510.869.640010.971.450010.575.76308.8768001077100010.178.4125011.177.6160011.977.620001174250012.168.6315012.572.5400012.776.5500013.476.4630013.873.280001567.9100001469.11250014.169.91600014.158SPL24.487.2N0.575.8median 12.5median 71.4Delta25.932.829.726.223.123.319.421.921.12825.219.92319.135.419.946.216.556.119.662.617.560.717.562.413.96413.965.315.870.615.2711469.81470.613.972.913.470.113.865.514.3671469.414.570.314.669.614.563.414.762.915.155.6155714.862.226.5810.852.6median 14.6median 65.314.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusApple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.41 / 3.4 / 3.43 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.63 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-77%
-17%
12%
Idle Minimum *
2.41
1.22
49%
1.98
18%
1.96
19%
Idle Average *
3.4
8.68
-155%
5.66
-66%
2.8
18%
Idle Maximum *
3.43
8.75
-155%
5.69
-66%
2.82
18%
Load Average *
6.63
11.72
-77%
6.96
-5%
5.31
20%
Load Maximum *
10.29
15.25
-48%
6.98
32%
11.91
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
14tim 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
7tim 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 20min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 55min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
46%
58%
28%
Reader / Idle
898
1827
103%
1877
109%
1276
42%
H.264
620
738
19%
909
47%
872
41%
WiFi v1.3
425
905
113%
891
110%
556
31%
Load
355
167
-53%
233
-34%
340
-4%

För

+ Stor OLED-skärm med 120 Hz bilduppdatering
+ Utökningsbar lagring
+ 5G som tillval
+ Enastående system- och spelprestanda
+ USB 3.2 med DP-funktionalitet och DeX
+ Fyra högtalare med stöd för Dolby Atmos
+ S-Pen ingår

Emot

- Instabilt WiFi 6
- Mörk skärm
- Medioker batteritid

Omdöme - En kraftfull surfplatta, men inte den bästa

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ (SM-T970). Recensionsex från NBB.com
Recension av Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ (SM-T970). Recensionsex från NBB.com

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ är för tillfället den största lyxsurfplattan från Android-sidan. Den har en Super AMOLED-skärm på 12.4 tum med utmärkt färgåtergivning. Skärmen är däremot inte tillräckligt ljusstark för användning utomhus. Det är synd att Samsung inte lyckats implementera sin Dynamic AMOLED-teknik här.

WiFi-prestandan var väldigt instabil. Men vid vardagsanvändning hamnar den aldrig under den kritiska gränsen. Samsung borde dock ändå förbättra det området. Det gäller också batteritiden, som är ganska dålig även vid minimal ljusstyrka om kommunikationsmodulerna är på.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ är en kraftfull och lyxig surfplatta som passar bra både för mediakonsumtion och proffsbruk. 

I grunden är Tab S7+ en bra surfplatta. Samsung har gjort rätt på många sätt. Tab S7+ har en riktigt snabb SoC och en 120 Hz-skärm gör hela upplevelsen bättre, inte bara när man spelar. S-Pen, som ingår i förpackningen, är ett kraftfullt verktyg för att ta anteckningar, måla eller göra presentationer. Dessutom går det att få den här Android-surfplattan med ett 5G modem som tillval, vilket borde göra Tab S7+ rätt så framtidssäkrad om Samsung håller vad de lovar i fråga om uppdateringar.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - 09/30/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
86 / 98 → 88%
Tangentbord
72 / 80 → 90%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
60 / 70 → 85%
Vikt
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Batteri
80%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
62 / 78 → 79%
Programprestanda
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatur
96%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Camera
57 / 85 → 68%
Medel
81%
88%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Äntligen en riktigt bra Android-surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10- 6 (Update: 2020-10- 6)