Test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - En ihopvikbar telefon som andas självförtroende (Sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy Fold
Brand: Samsung

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/15/2019

5G Android Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Inget för den gnällige - Galaxy Fold är den första kommersiellt tillgängliga ihopvikbara telefonen, en enhet som Samsung har reviderat efter ett misslyckat släpp tidigare i år. Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen för att få reda på huruvida ändringarna var värt väntan och för att se vad Galaxy Fold har att erbjuda.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Minne

12288 MB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

7.3 tum 12.6:9, 2152 x 1536 pixlar 362 PPI, Kapacitiva tryckkänsliga, båda har 10 punkters multitouch, Infinity Flex Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7.3") och Super AMOLED (4.6"), Vikbar huvudskärm på 7.3 tum + Super AMOLED-skärm på 4.6 tum (21:9, 1680 x 720), glansig: ja

Hårddisk

512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 512 GB

, , 460.3 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Digital kompass, G-Sensor, Närhetssensor, DEX, OTG

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 och 1900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34, 39. LTE Cat. 18: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 39, 40, 41. 5G: N78, 3,500 MHz., LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.9 x 160.9 x 117.9

Batteri

4235 mAh Litiumjon, Två celler

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.5/f/2.4 justerbar bländare, 1.4 μm, 77°, Super Speed Dual Pixel AF, OIS. 16 MPix ultra-vidvinkel, f/2.2, 1.0 μm, 123°. 12 MPix 2x Teleobjektiv, f/2.4, 1.0 μm, 45°, PDAF, OIS.
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, 1.22 μm, 80°. 8 MPix RGB-djupkamera, f/1.9, 1.12 μm, 85°.

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Skyddsfodral av Aramidfiber, Datakabel, Nätadapter, OTG-adapter, Galaxy Buds, SIM-verktyg, Dokumentation, One UI 1.5, 24 Månader Garanti, Wireless PowerShare, 1 års Samsung Care+, SAR-värden: Kropp - 1.267 W/kg, Huvud - 0.542 W/kg., fanless

Vikt

276 g, Strömförsörjning: 58 g

Pris

2100 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Enhetsjämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86%	10/2019	Samsung Galaxy Fold 855, Adreno 640	276 g	512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7.3"	2152x1536
87%	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.5"	2688x1242
84%	01/2019	Huawei Mate 20 X Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10	232 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.2"	2244x1080
87%	07/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	198 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.7"	3040x1440
85%	03/2019	ZTE Axon 10 Pro 855, Adreno 640	178 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Huawei Mate 20 X Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Galaxy Fold ZTE Axon 10 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Fold Adreno 640, 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	662 (min: 623, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	566 (min: 514, max: 586) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=461)	230 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (min: 564, max: 663) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼93% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Adreno 640, 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	576 (min: 544, max: 601) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼87% -5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=461)	219 MBit/s ∼35% -62%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø662 (623-679)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø576 (544-601)

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Översikt

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G

Huawei P30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G

Huawei P30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G

Huawei P30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

28.6 ∆E

44.8 ∆E

36.5 ∆E

34.3 ∆E

40.5 ∆E

55.2 ∆E

42.7 ∆E

32 ∆E

30.6 ∆E

28 ∆E

53.6 ∆E

54.6 ∆E

29.4 ∆E

44.4 ∆E

26.2 ∆E

56.3 ∆E

35.1 ∆E

41.3 ∆E

55.9 ∆E

58.7 ∆E

46.3 ∆E

36.5 ∆E

23.8 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Fold: 39.53 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 58.66 ∆E

13.8 ∆E

9.9 ∆E

12.9 ∆E

18.3 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

6.7 ∆E

11.8 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

7.8 ∆E

8 ∆E

6.9 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

6.1 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

3.1 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

6.3 ∆E

5.8 ∆E

1.9 ∆E

3.7 ∆E

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Fold: 8.24 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 18.35 ∆E

Foto av vår testkarta taget vid låg ljusnivå


530 cd/m²	530 cd/m²	533 cd/m²
541 cd/m²	531 cd/m²	536 cd/m²
524 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	533 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 541 cd/m² Medel: 532.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.59 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 531 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15

	Samsung Galaxy Fold Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5	Huawei Mate 20 X OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2	ZTE Axon 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen		-31%	-8%	20%	10%	-59%
Brightness middle	531	735 38%	683 29%	790 49%	421 -21%	402 -24%
Brightness	532	735 38%	694 30%	790 48%	418 -21%	399 -25%
Brightness Distribution	97	94 -3%	96 -1%	97 0%	96 -1%	92 -5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.3	3.9 -70%	2.9 -26%	1.4 39%	1.1 52%	4.1 -78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.7	10.9 -195%	4.8 -30%	3.4 8%	2.2 41%	6.5 -76%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.5	1.4 7%	2.2 -47%	1.9 -27%	1.4 7%	3.7 -147%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.09 ^105%	2.11 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6631 ^98%	6549 ^99%	6247 ^104%	6466 ^101%	6723 ^97%	7841 ^83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Användning av den yttre skärmen utomhus i solljus

CalMAN: Gråskala - naturlig färgprofil, målfärgrymd: sRGB

CalMAN: Blandade färger - naturlig färgprofil, målfärgrymd: sRGB

CalMAN: Färgmättnad - naturlig färgprofil, målfärgrymd: sRGB

CalMAN: Färgrymd - naturlig färgprofil, målfärgrymd: sRGB

CalMAN: Gråskala - levande färgprofil, målfärgrymd: DCI P3

CalMAN: Blandade färger - levande färgprofil, målfärgrymd: DCI P3

CalMAN: Färgmättnad - levande färgprofil, målfärgrymd: DCI P3

CalMAN: Färgrymd - levande färgprofil, målfärgrymd: DCI P3

Geekbench 5
Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6448 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (3294 - 6448, n=5)	5360 Points ∼83%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	2107 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1918 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1849 - 2154, n=7)	2032 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 3222, n=30)	1539 Points ∼73% -27%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	2395 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2218 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2218 - 2395, n=7)	2302 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 4593, n=36)	2015 Points ∼84% -16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	2699 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3242 Points ∼100% +20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2531 Points ∼78% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2441 - 2852, n=8)	2616 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=47)	1995 Points ∼62% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	740 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1344 Points ∼100% +82%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	749 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (725 - 750, n=8)	742 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (155 - 1344, n=47)	575 Points ∼43% -22%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5759 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10192 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7553 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=11)	7603 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=328)	4681 Points ∼46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9852 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10489 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10765 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=13)	10960 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=387)	4727 Points ∼43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3234 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3476 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=13)	3486 Points ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=387)	1429 Points ∼32%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9655 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7772 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7704 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9664 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=17)	9650 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=399)	5379 Points ∼56% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	12276 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9867 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9557 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11857 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=17)	12152 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=566)	5844 Points ∼48% -52%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3228 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2720 Points ∼84% -16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3134 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3365, n=17)	3013 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 15735, n=76)	2691 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5884 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5565 Points ∼95% -5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5779 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=17)	5596 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 14536, n=76)	2807 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4974 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4515 Points ∼91% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4866 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=17)	4688 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 14786, n=76)	2550 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4336 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2517 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3480 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4235 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 4576, n=17)	3845 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=406)	2002 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7114 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4103 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5418 Points ∼76% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7083 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7115, n=17)	6772 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=406)	1824 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6227 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3599 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4821 Points ∼77% -23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6162 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6312, n=17)	5759 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=407)	1693 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4228 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2488 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3513 Points ∼83% -17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4120 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=16)	3824 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=435)	1910 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9489 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2536 Points ∼25% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5307 Points ∼52% -44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10279 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=16)	9490 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=435)	2432 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7434 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2525 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4766 Points ∼62% -36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7716 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=16)	7096 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=435)	2040 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4250 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3751 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3296 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4093 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4429, n=17)	3918 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4909, n=486)	1907 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6350 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3528 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5152 Points ∼81% -19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6356 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5663 - 6362, n=17)	6242 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=486)	1510 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5722 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3575 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4579 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5661 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=17)	5498 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=487)	1453 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4019 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3816 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3448 Points ∼86% -14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3919 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4540, n=16)	3864 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=527)	1770 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9918 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2347 Points ∼21% -76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6058 Points ∼54% -39%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9932 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=16)	9255 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=526)	1982 Points ∼18% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7479 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2567 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points ∼66% -31%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7407 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=16)	7039 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=529)	1708 Points ∼22% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	30743 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19993 Points ∼59% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32308 Points ∼95% +5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	23877 Points ∼70% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=16)	31794 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=687)	14357 Points ∼42% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106066 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42579 Points ∼21% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	66990 Points ∼32% -37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106799 Points ∼52% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=15)	105649 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=685)	22559 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	68675 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	34035 Points ∼35% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	54087 Points ∼56% -21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60279 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=15)	68785 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=685)	18200 Points ∼19% -73%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	115 fps ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps ∼100% +150%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	119 fps ∼41% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	97 fps ∼34% -16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	166 fps ∼58% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=18)	153 fps ∼53% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=705)	38.5 fps ∼13% -67%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps ∼92% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps ∼91% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	59 fps ∼92% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	59 fps ∼92% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=18)	63.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=714)	28.3 fps ∼44% -53%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	90 fps ∼57%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps ∼100% +74%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	78 fps ∼50% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps ∼54% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼64% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=18)	92.5 fps ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=610)	22.3 fps ∼14% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	58 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼88% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	59 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (51 - 85, n=18)	60.3 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=619)	19.6 fps ∼33% -66%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	62 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps ∼100% +61%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	53 fps ∼53% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps ∼67% +8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	70 fps ∼70% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=18)	62.1 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=475)	18.2 fps ∼18% -71%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	46 fps ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	50 fps ∼83% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps ∼62% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	57 fps ∼95% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (36 - 58, n=18)	48.3 fps ∼81% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=477)	17 fps ∼28% -63%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps ∼46%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps ∼100% +119%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	20 fps ∼43% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps ∼35% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25 fps ∼54% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (14 - 26, n=17)	21.7 fps ∼47% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=198)	10.2 fps ∼22% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	17 fps ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps ∼45% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps ∼59% 0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	17 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=18)	16.5 fps ∼57% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=197)	7.08 fps ∼24% -58%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	32 fps ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps ∼100% +81%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps ∼50% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps ∼45% -19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼66% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 38, n=17)	33.8 fps ∼58% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=202)	15 fps ∼26% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	30 fps ∼40% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps ∼61% +10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼56% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=18)	40.3 fps ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=202)	16.8 fps ∼22% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps ∼44% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps ∼68% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 42, n=18)	39.4 fps ∼63% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=400)	12.4 fps ∼20% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	32 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps ∼58% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps ∼48% -28%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼77% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (21 - 41, n=18)	32.3 fps ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=404)	11.1 fps ∼23% -65%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	367169 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	462516 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	273409 Points ∼59% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	327454 Points ∼71% -11%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	371848 Points ∼80% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=296)	143005 Points ∼31% -61%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	251927 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	253082 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	283270 Points ∼100% +12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	254602 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (239512 - 268271, n=12)	255436 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490)	87858 Points ∼31% -65%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1317 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1239 Points ∼71% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1012 Points ∼58% -23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1431 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=17)	1344 Points ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=643)	765 Points ∼44% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9510 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5070 Points ∼30% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8981 Points ∼53% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9361 Points ∼55% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=17)	9197 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=643)	2116 Points ∼12% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4945 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points ∼38% -52%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5700 Points ∼91% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4502 Points ∼72% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6253 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=17)	5010 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=643)	1558 Points ∼25% -68%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	8825 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7923 Points ∼56% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7793 Points ∼55% -12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8652 Points ∼61% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=17)	8548 Points ∼60% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=643)	3039 Points ∼21% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4835 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4104 Points ∼73% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4226 Points ∼75% -13%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5188 Points ∼93% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=17)	4768 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=643)	1526 Points ∼27% -68%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.096 Points ∼100% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=15)	58.4 Points ∼45% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1)	53.761 Points ∼42%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	52.718 Points ∼41% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)	44.352 Points ∼34% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)	42.69 Points ∼33% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115)	36.4 Points ∼28% -32%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.91 Points ∼100% +166%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	118.27 Points ∼39% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	113.68 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=15)	110 Points ∼36% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	93.241 Points ∼31% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	90.876 Points ∼30% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	84.48 Points ∼28% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=540)	42.5 Points ∼14% -63%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min ∼100% +149%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	66.3 runs/min ∼43% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=14)	62 runs/min ∼41% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	61.5 runs/min ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	57 runs/min ∼37% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=103)	40.2 runs/min ∼26% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	runs/min ∼0% -100%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	129 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	118 Points ∼65% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	115 Points ∼64% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=18)	106 Points ∼59% -18%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	98 Points ∼54% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	86 Points ∼48% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=173)	67.4 Points ∼37% -48%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points ∼100% +105%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	25640 Points ∼52% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	24128 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=18)	23212 Points ∼47% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	21208 Points ∼43% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	20653 Points ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	19135 Points ∼39% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=701)	6908 Points ∼14% -71%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=726)	10451 ms * ∼100% -422%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	2527.8 ms * ∼24% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	2145.4 ms * ∼21% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=17)	2133 ms * ∼20% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	2002.8 ms * ∼19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	1851.7 ms * ∼18% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	1823.2 ms * ∼17% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	570.9 ms * ∼5% +71%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Fold	Huawei Mate 20 X	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	ZTE Axon 10 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Note10+	OnePlus 7 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		125%	-30%	108%	131%	-2%	50%	-64%
Random Write 4KB	34.41	237.63 591%	23.79 -31%	189.53 451%	183.59 434%	24.8 -28%	99.8 (34.4 - 165, n=2) 190%	23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762) -33%
Random Read 4KB	158.38	144.44 -9%	134.96 -15%	150.36 -5%	196.22 24%	174.1 10%	162 (158 - 166, n=2) 2%	48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762) -69%
Sequential Write 256KB	394.51	182.7 -54%	246.3 -38%	503.04 28%	588.06 49%	387 -2%	390 (386 - 395, n=2) -1%	99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762) -75%
Sequential Read 256KB	1302.76	911.88 -30%	815.56 -37%	768.93 -41%	1503.7 15%	1468 13%	1395 (1303 - 1487, n=2) 7%	280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762) -79%

PUBG Mobile

; 0.14.0: Ø58.1 (30-60)

Battle Bay

; 4.6.22531: Ø59.7 (59-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


35.6 °C	36.6 °C	32.8 °C
34.1 °C	32.6 °C	31.2 °C
30.1 °C	31.4 °C	29.8 °C

Max: 36.6 °C
Medel: 32.7 °C


32.4 °C	35.1 °C	35 °C
28.7 °C	30.5 °C	32 °C
28.3 °C	28.9 °C	29.4 °C

Max: 35.1 °C
Medel: 31.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 30.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Låg belastning	0.6 / 0.85 / 1 Watt
Hög belastning	4.47 / 9.02 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-88%	-50%	-51%	-10%	-46%	-42%
Idle Minimum *	0.6	0.92 -53%	0.79 -32%	0.66 -10%	0.76 -27%	0.967 (0.6 - 1.96, n=17) -61%	0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=791) -47%
Idle Average *	0.85	2.9 -241%	1.72 -102%	1.82 -114%	1.15 -35%	1.519 (0.85 - 2.8, n=17) -79%	1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=790) -105%
Idle Maximum *	1	2.94 -194%	1.83 -83%	1.83 -83%	1.18 -18%	1.841 (1 - 2.9, n=17) -84%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=791) -103%
Load Average *	4.47	3.65 18%	5.53 -24%	6.11 -37%	3.95 12%	4.6 (3.64 - 5.8, n=17) -3%	4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=785) 9%
Load Maximum *	9.02	6.18 31%	9.85 -9%	9.81 -9%	7.49 17%	9.1 (7.49 - 11.9, n=17) -1%	5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=785) 34%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		28tim 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 10.1)		10tim 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 16min

	Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		41%	9%	8%	-1%	-8%	-5%
Reader / Idle	1724	2618 52%	1984 15%	2340 36%	1927 12%	1585 -8%	1745 1%
H.264	1027	1346 31%	986 -4%	1047 2%	1068 4%	934 -9%	802 -22%
WiFi v1.3	600	909 52%	786 31%	533 -11%	680 13%	532 -11%	768 28%
Load	316	408 29%	300 -5%	327 3%	217 -31%	305 -3%	236 -25%

För

+ innovativ design med vikbar skärm

+ WiFi 6

+ 5G

+ massor av lagring och RAM

+ snabb SoC

+ bra kameror

+ lång batteritid

Emot

- sårbar skärm

- liten skärm på utsidan

- bara en SIM-plats

- minnet går inte att utöka

Omdöme - Ömtålig och innovativ

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G (SM-F907B).

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Den är äntligen här, den första ihopvikbara telefonen som når Europa och våra kontor. Galaxy Fold är utan tvekan en innovativ produkt - med sin vikbara skärm erbjuder den ett fönster in i framtiden. Huruvida Samsungs design är ideal är dock en fråga om smak. Huawei Mate X ser bra ut, men om skärmen är lika känslig som den i Galaxy Fold måste vi ifrågasätta hur hållbar och praktisk den är.

Föga förvånande är huvudskärmen en av de största bristerna med Galaxy Fold. Den vikbara skärmen är känslig trots förstärkning, så förvänta dig inte att Galaxy Fold ska vara robust eller MIL-STD- eller IP-certifierad. Att bara trycka för hårt eller trycka på den med naglarna kan lämna djupa avtryck i skärmen, vilket kan bli ett problem för barn eller för den som har lösnaglar. Samsung täcker inte nödvändigtvis sådan skada ens med Care+, vilket är värt att tänka på innan du köper Galaxy Fold. Reparationer efter det första året ska vi nog inte ens prata om.

Ihopvikbar, utmärkta tillbehör och många superlativ. Samsung Galaxy Fold är en kraftfull bit teknik, men den kanske bara är för personer med känsliga fingrar.

Mjukvaran, som än så länge bara har anpassats till det här formatet, begränsar också nöjet man får ut av Galaxy Fold. Men eftersom Galaxy Fold är en av de första modellerna av sitt slag kan vi för tillfället ha förbiseende med de mjukvarubaserade bristerna. Totalt sett är Galaxy Fold en riktigt bra och välansluten smartphone. Så om du har pengar över och sköter om dina telefoner väl kan Samsung Galaxy Fold vara värd att överväga.

Samsung Galaxy Fold - 2019-10-0710/07/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design

79%

Tangentbord

68 / 75 → 91%

Mus

89%

Anslutningar

67 / 70 → 95%

Vikt

87%

Batteri

89%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

57 / 64 → 88%

Programprestanda

78 / 86 → 90%

Temperatur

94%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 91%

Camera

79%

Medel

81%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Linked Articles

Samsung Galaxy Fold (Galaxy Fold Serie)

Test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - En ihopvikbar telefon som andas självförtroende (Sammanfattning)

Enhetsjämförelse

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Ömtålig och innovativ

Linked Articles

Pricecompare