Notebookcheck

Test: MSI GE75 8SG Raider (i7-8750H, RTX 2080) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/29/2019

Full GPU-styrka? MSI erbjuder också sin tunna GE75 Raider med toppskiktskortet GeForce RTX 2080 och använder inte Max-Q versionen. Vi undersöker prestandan och ser om uppgraderingen är värd pengarna.

MSI GE75 8SG Raider (GE75 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1380 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.91, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, 2 platser, upp till 32 GB
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB 
, SSD + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5"
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlurar, 3.5 mm mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 27.5 x 397 x 269
Batteri
65 Wh Litiumjon, 6 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dynaudio Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 280W PSU, MSI Software Pack, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.646 kg, Strömförsörjning: 986 g
Pris
3000 EUR
Länkar
MSI hemsida
MSI kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg412 mm 285 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 269 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg
Höger: SD-kortläsare, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1, ström
Höger: SD-kortläsare, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1, ström
Vänster: Kensington-lås, RJ45, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB-A 3.1 Gen.2, USB-C 3.1 Gen.2, 3.5 mm för hörlurar, 3.5 mm för mikrofon
Vänster: Kensington-lås, RJ45, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB-A 3.1 Gen.2, USB-C 3.1 Gen.2, 3.5 mm för hörlurar, 3.5 mm för mikrofon

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172 MB/s ∼100% +562%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=262)
91.7 MB/s ∼53% +253%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼47% +208%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼15%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
215 MB/s ∼100% +696%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=260)
109 MB/s ∼51% +304%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼40% +215%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼13%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼90% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
468 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
361
cd/m²		364
cd/m²		330
cd/m²
354
cd/m²		363
cd/m²		322
cd/m²
340
cd/m²		328
cd/m²		314
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 364 cd/m² Medel: 341.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 363 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1344:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.02 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
3%
-67%
-71%
11%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
10%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-95%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-120%
7.8 (4.4, 3.4)
2%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-20%
Response Time Black / White *
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-4%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-39%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-22%
6.2 (4.4, 1.8)
33%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-13%
PWM Frequency
26040 (17)
25510 (14)
-2%
25770 (17)
-1%
Screen
3%
-43%
-8%
-9%
17%
Brightness middle
363
288
-21%
299.1
-18%
295
-19%
262
-28%
370.4
2%
Brightness
342
287
-16%
273
-20%
291
-15%
261
-24%
348
2%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
81
-6%
96
12%
94
9%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.27
0.2
26%
0.27
-0%
0.24
11%
0.2
26%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
1344
1440
7%
1108
-18%
1229
-9%
1310
-3%
1277
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.29
2.33
-2%
5.07
-121%
3.2
-40%
3.96
-73%
1.26
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.54
5.34
-18%
10.55
-132%
6.64
-46%
7.29
-61%
3.02
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.45
2.47
-1%
3.31
-35%
2.52
-3%
2.18
11%
1.21
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.02
1.19
61%
6.8
-125%
2.16
28%
3.09
-2%
1.4
54%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.48 89%
2.2 100%
CCT
7048 92%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6872 95%
6977 93%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
57
-2%
58.5
1%
57
-2%
76
31%
59.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
88
-3%
89.9
-1%
87
-4%
100
10%
94.4
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 3%
-55% / -47%
-40% / -18%
1% / -5%
3% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9355 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

LatencyMon (WiFi på)
LatencyMon (WiFi på)
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø938 (913.12-1068.63)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼98% +17%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.28 Points ∼83%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼83% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼82% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points ∼81% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼80% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼79% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼78% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=535)
157 Points ∼74% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points ∼100% +84%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points ∼99% +82%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points ∼63% +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼62% +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼61% +13%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1132 Points ∼58% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1107 Points ∼56% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1068.63 (min: 913.12, max: 1068.63) Points ∼54%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=538)
841 Points ∼43% -21%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176.28 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1068.63 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.39 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7697 Points ∼91%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7227 Points ∼85% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (6584 - 7697, n=3)
7206 Points ∼85% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7102 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=227)
6417 Points ∼76% -17%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6161 Points ∼73% -20%
Productivity
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7759 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (6947 - 7759, n=3)
7401 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7352 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7331 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7218 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=228)
7193 Points ∼93% -7%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9111 Points ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (8917 - 9041, n=3)
8975 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8968 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8780 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=229)
8564 Points ∼89% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8277 Points ∼86% -8%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5316 - 5816, n=3)
5604 Points ∼93% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼92% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼92% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=231)
5250 Points ∼87% -10%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼85% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5574 - 5697, n=3)
5616 Points ∼95% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5574 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5338 Points ∼91% -4%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5323 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6524, n=407)
5054 Points ∼86% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4918 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (4124 - 4918, n=3)
4555 Points ∼89% -7%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4393 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=424)
4268 Points ∼84% -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3662 Points ∼72% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4918 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8493 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5574 poäng
Hjälp
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
 
AS SSD
88%
31%
11%
38%
-12%
-3%
Score Total
2340
4771
104%
2784
19%
1715
-27%
3083
32%
2109
-10%
2222 (1876 - 2405, n=5)
-5%
Score Write
870
2091
140%
1441
66%
942
8%
906
4%
799
-8%
816 (673 - 887, n=5)
-6%
Score Read
972
1721
77%
878
-10%
510
-48%
1456
50%
869
-11%
936 (814 - 1026, n=5)
-4%
Access Time Write *
0.046
0.031
33%
0.04
13%
0.045
2%
0.038
17%
0.059
-28%
0.0632 (0.044 - 0.138, n=5)
-37%
Access Time Read *
0.117
0.08
32%
0.063
46%
0.11
6%
0.077
34%
0.173
-48%
0.1438 (0.063 - 0.31, n=5)
-23%
4K-64 Write
696.68
1733.9
149%
1212.35
74%
726.69
4%
690.74
-1%
650.03
-7%
646 (514 - 711, n=5)
-7%
4K-64 Read
860.64
1576.8
83%
727.26
-15%
326.47
-62%
1238.38
44%
748.37
-13%
794 (650 - 861, n=5)
-8%
4K Write
83.03
122.46
47%
96.04
16%
122.81
48%
98.36
18%
67.12
-19%
85 (80.6 - 90.3, n=5)
2%
4K Read
22.26
53.01
138%
35.05
57%
52.43
136%
42.81
92%
25.36
14%
29.3 (22.3 - 36.4, n=5)
32%
Seq Write
906
2347.01
159%
1328.15
47%
927
2%
1172.8
29%
822.99
-9%
850 (685 - 962, n=5)
-6%
Seq Read
888
910.97
3%
1152.78
30%
1315
48%
1749.34
97%
948.8
7%
1130 (850 - 1419, n=5)
27%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1607.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 928.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 327.52 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 297.07 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 921.73 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 882.44 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 624.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 817.93 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
35224 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
33741 Points ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (3961 - 38809, n=16)
33504 Points ∼95% -1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
33396 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
29453 Points ∼84% -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
26097 Points ∼74% -23%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
25765 Points ∼73% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
24172 Points ∼69% -28%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18349 Points ∼52% -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=637)
13671 Points ∼39% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
9816 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
9780 Points ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (1134 - 10992, n=14)
9447 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8512 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7789 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7431 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7202 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=174)
5754 Points ∼59% -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
25440 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
25203 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (4045 - 27319, n=15)
23927 Points ∼94% -5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
23089 Points ∼91% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
21515 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20236 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
19236 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18520 Points ∼73% -27%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14427 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=562)
11534 Points ∼45% -54%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
158891 Points ∼100% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (72806 - 168006, n=13)
134883 Points ∼85% +7%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
126474 Points ∼80%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
118148 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
117764 Points ∼74% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
113870 Points ∼72% -10%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
95034 Points ∼60% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=542)
68419 Points ∼43% -46%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
64283 Points ∼40% -49%
3DMark 11 Performance
22658 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35054 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19661 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
9018 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (82.2 - 105, n=14)
95.4 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
94.5 fps ∼99% +3%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
92.1 fps ∼97%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
90.3 fps ∼95% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼86% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
73.1 fps ∼77% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
71.8 fps ∼75% -22%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.9 fps ∼74% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼53% -45%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
49.6 fps ∼52% -46%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
174.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (126 - 194, n=13)
169 fps ∼97% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
162 fps ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
151 (min: 123) fps ∼87% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
144.2 fps ∼83% -11%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
135.6 fps ∼78% -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
133.6 fps ∼77% -18%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
115.7 fps ∼66% -29%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
91.6 fps ∼53% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=284)
88.6 fps ∼51% -45%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
272.8 fps ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
266.8 fps ∼98% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (158 - 284, n=8)
243 fps ∼89% +6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
230 fps ∼84%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
222.4 fps ∼82% -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
204.1 fps ∼75% -11%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
154 fps ∼56% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.9 - 284, n=172)
145 fps ∼53% -37%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
387.2 fps ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
335.4 fps ∼87% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (196 - 414, n=8)
320 fps ∼83% +16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
305.4 fps ∼79% +11%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
276 fps ∼71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
255.3 fps ∼66% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 414, n=161)
207 fps ∼53% -25%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
193.9 fps ∼50% -30%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105Tooltip
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø92.5 (80-98)
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 276 230 162 92.1 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 134.8 125.5 109 103.9 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 236 174 155 145 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 102 89 75 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 126 111 106 99 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 86 75 73 65 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 144 132 117 111 fps
Darksiders III (2018) 195 129 126 121 fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 181 161 118 116 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 109 94 90 82 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 216 159 144 96 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 34 / 37 dB(A)
Hårddisk
33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
52 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Noise
7%
14%
3%
7%
4%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
28.3
6%
29
3%
30
-0%
28.3
6%
Idle Minimum *
30
29
3%
31.5
-5%
29
3%
30
-0%
33.5
-12%
Idle Average *
34
32
6%
31.6
7%
32
6%
34
-0%
33.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
37
33
11%
31.6
15%
40
-8%
36
3%
35
5%
Load Average *
52
47
10%
32.3
38%
46
12%
43
17%
38
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
49
8%
43
19%
51
4%
45
15%
50
6%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
45.5
16%
52
4%
45
17%
56.9
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 46 °C46 °C44 °C 
 46 °C46 °C41 °C 
 38 °C38 °C34 °C 
Max: 46 °C
Medel: 42.1 °C
43 °C44 °C45 °C
40 °C43 °C43 °C
30 °C33 °C31 °C
Max: 45 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.944.62534.235.93130.335.14035.9405027.840.7632734.28030.745.810029.255.612525.545.416022.754.820022.962.725022.565.231520.466.840019.163.950018.965.363017.270.380016.875.2100017.274.3125020.873.8160017.680.120001784.625001783315017.278.8400017.275.4500017.276630017.27580001775.5100001774.1125001771.11600016.973.4SPL3090.7N1.481.1median 17.2median 73.8Delta25.343.336.736.633.7312832.231.72827.625.528.525.83226.54224.643.323.345.924.953.12357.720.459.920.165.519.77219.478.819.878.521.382.92079.219.978.619.978.620.275.620.374.820.675.720.371.920.276.42063.719.86019.562.419.371.932.389.11.779.4median 20.2median 71.91.19.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE75 8SG RaiderMSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 7 / 15 / 22 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 92 / 254 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-40%
-41%
6%
-30%
-96%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
7
19
-171%
20.2
-189%
19
-171%
8
-14%
16.4
-134%
23.7 (5 - 41.3, n=13)
-239%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
-177%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
27.2
-81%
22
-47%
14
7%
21.9
-46%
30.1 (15 - 45, n=13)
-101%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
22
30
-36%
28.7
-30%
29
-32%
22
-0%
25.4
-15%
40.5 (22 - 69.4, n=13)
-84%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
-37%
Load Average *
92
104
-13%
90.8
1%
102
-11%
92
-0%
90.7
1%
113 (92 - 124, n=13)
-23%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
-13%
Load Maximum *
254
203
20%
165.4
35%
231
9%
207
19%
222.9
12%
343 (254 - 485, n=13)
-35%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
207
167
19%
152.1
27%
190
8%
154
26%
203.3
2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
7tim 48min
Battery Runtime The Witcher 3 ultra
0tim 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
4tim 41min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 53min
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 65 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 66 Wh		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh		MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 65 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-19%
-32%
-2%
-14%
-25%
7%
Reader / Idle
468
298
-36%
372
-21%
346
-26%
349 (39 - 1174, n=676)
-25%
WiFi v1.3
281
230
-18%
190
-32%
235
-16%
200
-29%
212
-25%
259 (78 - 622, n=381)
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra
50
52
4%
56.5 (50 - 66, n=6)
13%
Load
53
52
-2%
67
26%
60
13%
79 (18 - 202, n=642)
49%

För

+ utmärkt 144 Hz-skärm
+ kompakt chassi med tunn infattning
+ riktigt bra GPU-prestanda
+ tangentbord med RGB-belysning samt upplysta USB-portar
+ bra tangentbord
+ kraftfulla högtalare
+ tre lagringsplatser
+ skaplig batteritid

Emot

- svår att underhålla
- högljudda fläktar när man spelar samt brus från hårddisken
- saknar Thunderbolt 3 och G-Sync
- riktigt långsam SD-kortläsare
- processorn kunde haft bättre Turbo Boost-prestanda

Omdöme – Uppgraderingen är en bra investering

Recenseras: MSI GE75 Raider 8SG. Recensionsex från MSI Germany.
Recenseras: MSI GE75 Raider 8SG. Recensionsex från MSI Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det märks att nya MSI GE75 Raider är kompaktare än sin föregångare och den har nu en mycket kraftigare GPU. Om du är villig att betala extra för RTX 2080 kommer du inte att slösa bort dina pengar då den använder prestandan väl jämfört med de billigare varianterna med RTX 2070 eller RTX 2060. CPU-prestandan kunde definitivt ha varit en aning bättre, men det finns för tillfället inga hinder när du spelar spel.

Mindre, tunnare, snabbare – det här är en stor utmaning för en kyllösning. MSI lyckas uppnå en effektiv värmeskingring utan någon större påföljd på prestandan. Nackdelen är att fläkten låter högt. Dessutom hör man att den snabba 7200 rpm-enheten brusar vid tomgång.

En annan nackdel är ytorna, som snabbt drar åt sig smuts och fingeravtryck och som behöver göras rent ofta. En laptop för 30.000 kronor bör också ha Thunderbolt 3. Vi är inte säkra på vad vi tycker om att den saknar G-Sync. Datorn är jämförelsevis kompakt för en enhet på 17 tum, men mobilitet är definitivt inte den viktigaste egenskapen för intresserade köpare.

En uppgraderad GPU i MSI GE75 Raider är en bra investering och du kan faktiskt använda den extra prestandan trots ett tunt chassi. Det finns några brister i fråga om anslutbarhet, men vi hittar inga större problem som skulle påverka spelupplevelsen.

MSI GE75 8SG Raider - 03/25/2019 v6(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design
76 / 98 → 78%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
63 / 81 → 78%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Batteri
79%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
94%
Temperatur
84 / 95 → 88%
Ljudnivå
61 / 90 → 68%
Audio
86%
Medel
81%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Linked Articles

MSI GE75 8SG Raider (GE75 Serie)
Test
•
Test: MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Cor...
|
Test
•
MSI GE75 Raider 8SF (i7-8750H,...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GE75 8SG Raider (i7-8750H, RTX 2080) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-03-29 (Update: 2019-03-29)