Notebookcheck

Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Core i9-9900K, RTX 2080) Clevo P775TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Christian Hintze, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/14/2019

Inga halvmesyrer. Det var troligen mottot Schenker utgick ifrån när de utrustade den över 40.000 kronor dyra XMG Ultra 17 med en Nvidia RTX 2080 GPU, en Intel Core i9-9900K processor och 64 GB RAM. Läs vidare för att få reda på huruvida detta 4K-monster lever upp till förväntningarna och hur Clevo-höljet hanterar en såpass kraftfull GPU.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Processor
Intel Core i9-9900K, I sockel
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1380 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.81, kein Optimus
Minne
65536 MB 
, 2x 32GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, 2 av 4 platser upptagna
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, G-Sync, 4K / UHD, 60 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, , Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500 GB. Platser: 2 x M.2 Typ 2280 & 2 x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC898 @ Intel Kaby Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlurar + S/PDIF (Optisk), Mikrofon, Line In, Line Ut, Kortläsare: 6-i-1, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 41 x 418 x 295
Batteri
82 Wh Litiumjon, removeable
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1, Tangentbord: RGB-speltangentbord med Anti-Ghosting, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 330 W, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
4.348 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.272 kg
Pris
4,500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg425 mm 327 mm 36.3 mm 4.9 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.3 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.7 kg
Höger: Ljud In, Mikrofon, Ljud Ut, Hörlurar/Optisk, 2 x USB Typ A, Kensington-lås
Höger: Ljud In, Mikrofon, Ljud Ut, Hörlurar/Optisk, 2 x USB Typ A, Kensington-lås
Vänster: Gigabit LAN, USB Typ C/Thunderbolt 3, USB Typ C, USB Typ A, USB Typ A (med ström), SD-kortläsare
Vänster: Gigabit LAN, USB Typ C/Thunderbolt 3, USB Typ C, USB Typ A, USB Typ A (med ström), SD-kortläsare
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2 x miniDP, strömförsörjning
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2 x miniDP, strömförsörjning
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
190 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
190 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=219)
91.6 MB/s ∼48% -52%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
243 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206 MB/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s ∼84% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=217)
110 MB/s ∼45% -47%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
688 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (132 - 702, n=209)
592 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
712 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (131 - 721, n=209)
538 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
325
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 361 cd/m² Medel: 327.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 82 %
Mitt på batteriet: 343 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1106:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.03 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 6.29 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
AU Optronics B173ZAN (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
70%
-2%
65%
53%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
83%
41.2 (20.8, 20.4)
1%
8 (4, 4)
81%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 (9.6, 12)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
56%
22.4 (10, 12.4)
-4%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
48%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
46%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-10%
2%
-13%
-5%
Brightness middle
343
296
-14%
349
2%
304
-11%
314.7
-8%
Brightness
328
279
-15%
339
3%
299
-9%
312
-5%
Brightness Distribution
82
85
4%
87
6%
89
9%
90
10%
Black Level *
0.31
0.25
19%
0.41
-32%
0.27
13%
0.38
-23%
Contrast
1106
1184
7%
851
-23%
1126
2%
828
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.03
4.77
5%
4.04
20%
4.66
7%
2.56
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.91
9.08
-15%
6.01
24%
9.65
-22%
4.89
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.86
1.46
-70%
0.93
-8%
1.72
-100%
1.71
-99%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.29
5.83
7%
4.19
33%
5.53
12%
3.4
46%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.47 89%
2.44 90%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
CCT
6389 102%
8076 80%
6411 101%
8028 81%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
60
-32%
87
-1%
60
-32%
60.7
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
93
-7%
100
0%
93
-7%
94.6
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 2%
0% / 2%
26% / -1%
24% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9851 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1887 (1858.65-1934.33)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1747 (1697.29-1865)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
209 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼99%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼84% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼83% -16%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼80% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 212, n=450)
153 Points ∼73% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
1865 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points ∼62% -38%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼52% -48%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=453)
778 Points ∼40% -60%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.38 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.38 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=414)
1.685 Points ∼71% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.39 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.2 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=515)
7.34 Points ∼34% -66%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
10192 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2462 - 10192, n=230)
5825 Points ∼57% -43%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
64138 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (4590 - 64138, n=229)
20901 Points ∼33% -67%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6832 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
64138 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
10192 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
21.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
89.45 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.38 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
207 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158.61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1944 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7050 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6959 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5680 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=147)
5070 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5697 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼98% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5123 Points ∼90% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5079 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=338)
4972 Points ∼87% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5243 Points ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4692 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4622 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=356)
4244 Points ∼81% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼79% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4692 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5079 poäng
Hjälp
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus ROG G703GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-25%
-16%
-15%
-31%
Write 4K
183.2
90.38
-51%
129.6
-29%
93.6
-49%
93.88
-49%
Read 4K
52.38
39.19
-25%
53.35
2%
38.82
-26%
40.56
-23%
Write Seq
1790
1863
4%
1863
4%
2455
37%
1468
-18%
Read Seq
1743
2100
20%
1670
-4%
2107
21%
1540
-12%
Write 4K Q32T1
549.7
260.2
-53%
310
-44%
298.7
-46%
293.5
-47%
Read 4K Q32T1
647.8
297
-54%
397
-39%
338.7
-48%
346
-47%
Write Seq Q32T1
3236
1870
-42%
2739
-15%
2902
-10%
1941
-40%
Read Seq Q32T1
3538
3471
-2%
3495
-1%
3536
0%
3266
-8%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read: 1873 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1737 MB/s
512K Read: 2236 MB/s
512K Write: 2677 MB/s
4K Read: 64.05 MB/s
4K Write: 131.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 400.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 332 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5649 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5383 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (3020 - 5942, n=18)
4436 Points ∼79% -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points ∼65% -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
26223 Points ∼100% +14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
23089 Points ∼88%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20901 Points ∼80% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼69% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=477)
10723 Points ∼41% -54%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
36478 Points ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
33396 Points ∼92%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28606 Points ∼78% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼77% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼62% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=551)
12542 Points ∼34% -62%
3DMark 11 Performance
26926 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
52716 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20760 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
99.7 fps ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
94.5 fps ∼95%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼77% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼69% -27%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
61.7 fps ∼62% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=250)
46.9 fps ∼47% -50%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
169.6 fps ∼100% +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
136 (min: 104) fps ∼80% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
135.6 fps ∼80%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
130.1 fps ∼77% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=211)
80.2 fps ∼47% -41%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
144.3 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
103.9 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 159, n=157)
66.3 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
168.2 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
121.9 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.6 - 189, n=122)
74 fps ∼44% -56%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
159.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.4 - 160, n=62)
102 fps ∼64% -36%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
161.3 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 169, n=39)
101 fps ∼63% -37%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB; The Witcher 3: Ø94.3 (87-101)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø62.5 (57-68)
låg med. hög ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 335.4266.8135.694.555.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 275.8207.8168.2144.364.4fps
Doom (2016) 176.8171.2161.3159.791.8fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 33 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning
44 / 58 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Noise
-1%
-5%
6%
14%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
30
-0%
33
-10%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
Idle Average *
33
35
-6%
35
-6%
32
3%
28.8
13%
Idle Maximum *
35
41
-17%
43
-23%
34
3%
29.4
16%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
43
2%
44
-0%
35.7
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
51
7%
53
4%
46
16%
42.5
23%
Load Maximum *
58
52
10%
59
-2%
47
19%
45
22%

* ... smaller is better

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Heat
-1%
3%
-8%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
50
-11%
44
2%
49
-9%
49
-9%
Maximum Bottom *
45
50
-11%
45
-0%
58
-29%
49
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
36
30
17%
32
11%
33
8%
25.4
29%
Idle Bottom *
33
33
-0%
33
-0%
33
-0%
27.2
18%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C45 °C38 °C 
 45 °C45 °C37 °C 
 27 °C31 °C25 °C 
Max: 45 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C
45 °C41 °C44 °C
39 °C39 °C37 °C
24 °C30 °C28 °C
Max: 45 °C
Medel: 36.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  49 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 41.8 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.845.42537.738.33129.833.14034.234.9503231.16327.434.98031.636.110029.845.512524.749.616023.158.320023.863.625025.564.631522.668.140019.273.950018.675.563017.968.880017.468.710001866.5125018.863.616001864.6200017.467.4250017.567.7315017.765.6400017.662.8500017.761.2630017.461.2800017.5621000017.458.91250017.355.61600017.248.6SPL30.378.8N1.447.1median 17.9median 63.6Delta2.64.438.741.935.640.829.132.133.940.42730.625.927.427.236.228.451.42452.723.959.226.961.926.260.421.168.120.176.918.977.417.672.8187118.366.71962.117.461.917.165.817.367.617.265.817.264.417.362.417.362.917.262.417.260.417.158.61751.830.380.21.449.3median 17.6median 62.42.83.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Ultra 17 TuringSchenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 39 / 45 / 55 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 122 / 346 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
27%
19%
45%
54%
41%
Idle Minimum *
39
5
87%
33
15%
16
59%
10.4
73%
19.9 (3.8 - 113, n=639)
49%
Idle Average *
45
24
47%
42
7%
22
51%
14.6
68%
25.5 (6.8 - 119, n=639)
43%
Idle Maximum *
55
42
24%
49
11%
32
42%
16.3
70%
30.5 (8.3 - 122, n=639)
45%
Load Average *
122
112
8%
93
24%
89
27%
88.5
27%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=630)
15%
Load Maximum *
346
320
8%
293
15%
173
50%
182.4
47%
168 (21.9 - 590, n=629)
51%
Witcher 3 ultra *
259
284
-10%
156
40%
147
43%
155.4
40%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
2tim 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2tim 15min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 05min
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Asus ROG G703GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
61%
1%
56%
178%
72%
Reader / Idle
165
301
82%
171
4%
335
103%
682
313%
334 (39 - 1174, n=618)
102%
H.264
135
226
67%
245 (88 - 506, n=130)
81%
WiFi v1.3
135
238
76%
116
-14%
190
41%
387
187%
250 (78 - 622, n=299)
85%
Load
65
78
20%
73
12%
81
25%
88
35%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=584)
21%

För

+ rikligt med I/O
+ lätt att reparera och underhålla
+ goda uppgraderingsmöjligheter
+ bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord
+ övertygande 4K-skärm
+ hög prestanda
+ snabba SSD-enheter
+ rimliga yttemperaturer

Emot

- galet dyr
- styrplattan låser sig när man spelar
- skärmen har långsamma responstider
- kraftig strypning vid batteridrift
- högljudda fläktar
- hög energiförbrukning
- dålig batteritid
Recension av Schenker XMG Ultra 17. Recensionsex från Schenker Tech.
Recension av Schenker XMG Ultra 17. Recensionsex från Schenker Tech.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 är ett utmärkt val för den som letar efter ett alternativ till en desktop spel-PC. Vår recensionsenhet är fullproppad med de allra kraftigaste komponenterna som finns på marknaden samtidigt som processorsockeln möjliggör uppgraderingar av ett slag som få andra bärbara speldatorer för tillfället kan erbjuda.

Men vi hade väntat oss mer från en såpass dyr enhet. Vårt recensionsex stryps alldeles för mycket vid batteridrift även om vi förstår att få personer kommer att lämna Ultra 17 utan nätanslutning ändå med tanke på hur kort batteritid den har.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 är en värdig uppgradering från sin föregångare och har spelprestanda av högsta klass. Men i våra ögon var de högljudda fläktarna, det oerhörda priset och den kraftiga strypningen vid batteridrift en besvikelse.

Schenker måste också lösa problemen med styrplattan då den i princip inte går att använda när man spelar spel på grund av att anslutningen till den försvinner. Högtalarna gjorde oss också besvikna, precis som skärmens responstider. Vidare använder vår recensionsenhet påträngande och ofta onödigt högljudda fläktar, även om den förvisso klarar av att hålla temperaturerna på bra nivåer.

Med det sagt så erbjuder Ultra 17 utmärkt spelprestanda, många portar, enastående servicemöjligheter, ett skapligt tangentbord och en i övrigt imponerande 4K-skärm. Sammanfattningsvis gör Schenker på många sätt rätt med sin nya Ultra 17, men den missar toppbetyg på grund av några frusterande brister.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing - 03/06/2019 v6
Christian Hintze

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
75 / 81 → 93%
Vikt
46 / 10-66 → 64%
Batteri
64%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
88 / 95 → 92%
Ljudnivå
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
82%
Medel
79%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Core i9-9900K, RTX 2080) Clevo P775TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Christian Hintze, 2019-03-14 (Update: 2019-03-15)