Notebookcheck

Test: Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Klassisk arbetsstation med högpresterande GPU (Sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/17/2019

Är Quadro RTX 5000 för mycket? Lenovo erbjuder nya ThinkPad P53 med en avancerad Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 GPU, som vanligen är reserverad för större enheter. Kyllösningen i Lenovos arbetsstation når dock sin gräns, vilket påverkar processorns prestanda negativt.

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE (ThinkPad P53 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9850H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) - 16384 MB, Kärna: 1645 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, 431.13
Minne
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2/4 platser lediga, upp till 128 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, N156HCE-GN1, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel CM246
Hårddisk
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, , 903 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, 1 Dockningsstation, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm stereo, Kortläsare: 4-i-1 SD UHS-II, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 29.4 x 377.4 x 252.3
Batteri
90 Wh, 8000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo 2x 2 Watt, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, AC-adapter på 230 watt, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.688 kg, Strömförsörjning: 900 g
Pris
4100 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
90%11/2019Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
2.7 kg29.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
88%08/2019Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
1.7 kg18.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
87%11/2018Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200
2.6 kg29.95 mm15.6"3840x2160
86%Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000
2.8 kg31.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%06/2019MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
1.9 kg18 mm15.6"3840x2160

Storleksjämförelse

380 mm 258 mm 31.9 mm 2.8 kg377.4 mm 252.3 mm 29.4 mm 2.7 kg377.4 mm 252.3 mm 29.4 mm 2.6 kg375.9 mm 251.3 mm 29.95 mm 2.6 kg361.8 mm 245.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg357 mm 247 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg
Vänster: HDMI 2.0, 2x USB typ A 3.1 Gen 1, 4-i-1 SD-kortläsare, SmartCard-läsare
Vänster: HDMI 2.0, 2x USB typ A 3.1 Gen 1, 4-i-1 SD-kortläsare, SmartCard-läsare
Höger: 3.5 mm ljud, USB typ C 3.1 Gen 1 (Power Delivery & DisplayPort), nano-SIM tråg, Kensington-lås
Höger: 3.5 mm ljud, USB typ C 3.1 Gen 1 (Power Delivery & DisplayPort), nano-SIM tråg, Kensington-lås
Baksidan: RJ45-LAN, 2x Thunderbolt 3 (USB typ C 3.1 Gen 2 med Power Delivery & DisplayPort), SlimTip AC-adapter
Baksidan: RJ45-LAN, 2x Thunderbolt 3 (USB typ C 3.1 Gen 2 med Power Delivery & DisplayPort), SlimTip AC-adapter
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7530
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.2 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼94% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
169 MB/s ∼87% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
146 MB/s ∼76% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (17.2 - 213, n=65)
137 MB/s ∼71% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202.4 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.64 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
189.2 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.4 - 255, n=64)
171 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1485 (min: 1319, max: 1589) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
622 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Average of class Workstation
  (292 - 1557, n=53)
659 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
636 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
636 (min: 613, max: 655) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
629 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
625 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
490 (min: 376, max: 596) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1470 (min: 1418, max: 1509) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
675 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
706 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 (min: 649, max: 666) MBit/s ∼45% -55%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
650 (min: 629, max: 713) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (83 - 1642, n=53)
600 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
460
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
N156HCE-GN1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 510 cd/m² Medel: 468.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 490 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1417:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
N156HCE-EN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Precision 7530
Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Fujitsu Celsius H780
LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
-3%
18%
-32%
-8%
-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18.8, 19.6)
39.2 (21.2, 18)
-2%
34.4 (17.2, 17.2)
10%
35.2 (17.2, 18)
8%
38 (18.8, 19.2)
1%
51 (24, 27)
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
25.2 (15.2, 10)
26 (14.4, 11.6)
-3%
14 (4.4, 9.6)
44%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
-5%
26.8 (16.4, 10.4)
-6%
31 (18, 13)
-23%
PWM Frequency
26040 (77)
25250 (50)
-3%
26040 (70)
0%
198.4 (25)
-99%
20830 (60)
-20%
Screen
-34%
-15%
-31%
-36%
-23%
Brightness middle
510
304
-40%
542
6%
292.8
-43%
271
-47%
445
-13%
Brightness
468
293
-37%
528
13%
295
-37%
260
-44%
462
-1%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
84
-6%
85
-4%
86
-3%
83
-7%
Black Level *
0.36
0.26
28%
0.41
-14%
0.36
-0%
0.29
19%
0.5
-39%
Contrast
1417
1169
-18%
1322
-7%
813
-43%
934
-34%
890
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
4.5
-96%
3.5
-52%
3.48
-51%
3.9
-70%
4.75
-107%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
7.7
-40%
7.8
-42%
6.81
-24%
10.2
-85%
7.79
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.2
2.4
-100%
1.3
-8%
3.13
-161%
2.9
-142%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.2
5.2
-63%
4.8
-50%
4.1
-28%
2.6
19%
4.49
-40%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.2 100%
2.29 96%
2.49 88%
CCT
7036 92%
6789 96%
7690 85%
6740 96%
6517 100%
7374 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.4
53.8
-9%
58.8
-1%
84.4
42%
56.1
-6%
87
46%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.1
90.1
-3%
91.1
-2%
99.6
7%
85.8
-8%
100
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -28%
2% / -8%
-32% / -31%
-22% / -30%
-26% / -24%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 77 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 77 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø1114 (1097.03-1230.35)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø961 (896-1114)
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1019-1128)
Dell Precision 7530 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1123 (1110.46-1192.57)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
196.53 Points ∼100%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9850H
  (192 - 197, n=3)
194 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
193 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Core i9-8950HK
187 Points ∼95% -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Core i7-8850H
185 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (117 - 214, n=100)
160 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼100% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
1217 Points ∼79% +10%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1166 Points ∼75% +5%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Core i7-8850H
1116 Points ∼72% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-9850H
  (961 - 1272, n=3)
1114 Points ∼72% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1108.8 (min: 1097.03, max: 1230.35) Points ∼72%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
961 (min: 896, max: 1114) Points ∼62% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (260 - 1623, n=102)
766 Points ∼50% -31%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6830
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
130.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196.53 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1108.8 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198.56 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7033 Points ∼98%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
6907 Points ∼96% -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5880 Points ∼82% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5033 Points ∼70% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4348 Points ∼61% -38%
Productivity
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
7994 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7657 Points ∼96%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7377 Points ∼92% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7243 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6649 Points ∼83% -13%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼75% -22%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9603 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
9566 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
9288 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8632 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8298 Points ∼86% -14%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5754 Points ∼100%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5738 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼91% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5167 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5046 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4428 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3538.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2935.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 580.78 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 475.17 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1503.44 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1402.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.96 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (24156 - 24620, n=3)
24383 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
24156 Points ∼99%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
23739 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points ∼85% -14%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
14673 Points ∼60% -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
10407 Points ∼43% -57%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
8573 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Workstation
  (841 - 26465, n=113)
6760 Points ∼28% -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
6115 Points ∼25% -75%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
6999 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
6999 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6851 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
3732 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Workstation
  (566 - 7734, n=34)
3317 Points ∼47% -53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
2834 Points ∼40% -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
18247 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
18247 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
17619 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points ∼88% -12%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
11316 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
7558 Points ∼41% -59%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
6953 Points ∼38% -62%
Average of class Workstation
  (752 - 20913, n=106)
5585 Points ∼31% -69%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
4843 Points ∼27% -73%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
129.58 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (122 - 132, n=3)
128 fps ∼99% -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
125.44 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (37.3 - 189, n=25)
99.6 fps ∼77% -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
96.07 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
89.18 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
84.24 fps ∼65% -35%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
286.67 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (268 - 287, n=3)
275 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
271.14 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.4 - 396, n=25)
174 fps ∼61% -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.83 fps ∼45% -55%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
121.86 fps ∼43% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
103.7 fps ∼36% -64%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
94.04 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
93.44 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (92.4 - 94, n=3)
93.3 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.6 - 97.3, n=25)
49.3 fps ∼52% -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
35.27 fps ∼38% -62%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
30.26 fps ∼32% -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
27.56 fps ∼29% -71%
Medical (medical-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
79.03 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
79 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
73.2 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.8 - 81.3, n=25)
35.7 fps ∼45% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
33.45 fps ∼42% -58%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
18.47 fps ∼23% -77%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
11.93 fps ∼15% -85%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.89 fps ∼100% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (205 - 210, n=3)
207 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
204.8 fps ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.4 - 255, n=25)
126 fps ∼61% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
101.04 fps ∼49% -51%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
89.31 fps ∼43% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
72.28 fps ∼35% -65%
Energy (energy-02)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
36.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
36.15 fps ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
36.03 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.72 - 38, n=25)
14.1 fps ∼39% -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
12 fps ∼33% -67%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
5.28 fps ∼15% -85%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
3.15 fps ∼9% -91%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
212.28 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (210 - 212, n=3)
211 fps ∼99% -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.97 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.8 - 248, n=25)
126 fps ∼59% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.93 fps ∼47% -53%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
82.1 fps ∼39% -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
68.84 fps ∼32% -68%
Catia (catia-05)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (215 - 218, n=3)
216 fps ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
215.72 fps ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
212.62 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.7 - 302, n=25)
141 fps ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
121.33 fps ∼56% -44%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
104.04 fps ∼48% -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
79.44 fps ∼37% -63%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (173 - 175, n=3)
174 fps ∼100% +1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
173.01 fps ∼99% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
172.74 fps ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (20 - 182, n=25)
96.1 fps ∼55% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
83.89 fps ∼48% -51%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
71.66 fps ∼41% -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
53.08 fps ∼31% -69%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
2840 Samples/s ∼100% +44%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
2170 Samples/s ∼76% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
1972 Samples/s ∼69%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
1972 Samples/s ∼69% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
1444 Samples/s ∼51% -27%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
1280 Samples/s ∼45% -35%
Average of class Workstation
  (49 - 2840, n=88)
897 Samples/s ∼32% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
713 Samples/s ∼25% -64%
Sala GPUs-only
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
5927 Samples/s ∼100% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
4913 Samples/s ∼83%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
4913 Samples/s ∼83% 0%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
4192 Samples/s ∼71% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
2969 Samples/s ∼50% -40%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
2636 Samples/s ∼44% -46%
Average of class Workstation
  (48 - 5927, n=89)
1688 Samples/s ∼28% -66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
1260 Samples/s ∼21% -74%
3DMark 06 Standard
38739 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
54153 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
19250 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
98630 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38066 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16547 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
6879 poäng
Hjälp
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; The Witcher 3: Ø70.6 (67-74)
låg med. hög ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 177 170 150.4 77.6 68.4 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 320 235 141 71 46.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148 137 132 126 102 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 281.4 198.6 134.5 110.1 45.4 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 117 99 85 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 127 102 98 87 59 29 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 87.7 85.3 78.4 75.3 73.3 46.6 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 153.6 105.4 88.2 81.2 68.3 42.5 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 107 98 90 86 72 43 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 275 188.9 160.3 89.3 66.8 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 94.5 97.8 73.9 38.9 31.5 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 113 101 93 88 83 52 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 127 105 93 65 47 26 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 178.8 155.6 118.5 79.2 61.4 36.8 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning
29.8 / 38.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-4%
-12%
-20%
-18%
-3%
off / environment *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
29.6
-5%
30.2
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
29.6
-5%
32.8
-16%
29.5
-4%
Idle Average *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
32.2
-14%
32.8
-16%
29.5
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
28.8
-2%
30.5
-8%
37
-31%
33.6
-19%
29.5
-4%
Load Average *
29.8
36.1
-21%
34.5
-16%
40.3
-35%
40.9
-37%
34.7
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.3
49.5
-29%
33.1
14%
Load Maximum *
38.3
36.7
4%
49.5
-29%
49.4
-29%
42.7
-11%
39.4
-3%

* ... smaller is better

 41.8 °C41.6 °C41.3 °C 
 40.9 °C39.8 °C37.9 °C 
 36.3 °C37 °C34.1 °C 
Max: 41.8 °C
Medel: 39 °C
45.7 °C46.1 °C42.7 °C
41.7 °C43.7 °C45.6 °C
38.9 °C41.8 °C41.3 °C
Max: 46.1 °C
Medel: 43.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  38.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 18.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.3 °C / -16.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.426.62526.925.83126.629.34025.7255024.425.3632425.28021.725.510022.228.31252230.516022.640.520021.451.725020.254.93152056.64001961.250018.459.163017.758.780017.263.510001766.1125016.366.9160015.763.4200015.459.1250015.457.1315015.254.4400015.154500015.251.5630015.453.2800015.352.71000015.249.71250015.142.11600014.936SPL28.372.8N1.129.1median 16.3median 54.4Delta1.86.137.538.435.735.433.333.733.832.731.233.132.33431.737.23145.828.353.428.362.527.664.725.767.126.469.925.767.125.167.424.373.924.471.524.166.423.771.323.774.523.671.823.57123.56923.266.423.269.623.16823.171.22373.22365.62356.635.982.92.660.4median 23.7median 681.54hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGEDell Precision 7530
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Precision 7530 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.26 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 7.9 / 11.8 / 14.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 96 / 207.8 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-20%
-40%
3%
-22%
35%
Idle Minimum *
7.9
13.7
-73%
15.7
-99%
9.1
-15%
9.4
-19%
4.02
49%
Idle Average *
11.8
17.5
-48%
20.3
-72%
13.2
-12%
17.4
-47%
7.2
39%
Idle Maximum *
14.9
20.9
-40%
25.7
-72%
14.04
6%
19.6
-32%
11.46
23%
Load Average *
96
77.2
20%
118.9
-24%
78.8
18%
103
-7%
76.3
21%
Load Maximum *
207.8
123.7
40%
174
16%
172.5
17%
216
-4%
154
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149
131.2
12%
74
50%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.18362.387.0)
11tim 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 44.18362.387.0)
8tim 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 57min
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh
Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh
Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000, 96 Wh
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh
Average of class Workstation
 
Battery Runtime
-19%
-39%
-32%
-45%
-4%
-29%
Reader / Idle
382
577
1519
620 (63 - 2360, n=124)
H.264
590
560
-5%
733
24%
418 (123 - 1131, n=65)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
664
532
-20%
278
-58%
450
-32%
357
-46%
637
-4%
417 (106 - 974, n=76)
-37%
Load
117
79
-32%
95
-19%
65
-44%
79
-32%
91.4 (22 - 323, n=123)
-22%

För

+ kraftigt och välgjort hölje
+ riktigt bra GPU-prestanda
+ utmärkt tangentbord
+ fläktkontroll som oftast håller sig i dvala
+ ljusstark och matt 1080p-skärm
+ bra anslutbarhet
+ skapliga servicemöjligheter
+ går att konfigurera i detalj
+ utförlig garanti

Emot

- CPU-prestandan reduceras vid kombinerad stress
- variant av Quadro RTX 5000 med reducerad energiförbrukning på 80 watt (utan att detta nämns)
- dålig webbkamera
- mediokra högtalare
- ej redo för WWAN (saknar förinstallerad antenn)
Recension av Lenovo ThinkPad P53. Recensionsex från Lenovo Germany
Recension av Lenovo ThinkPad P53. Recensionsex från Lenovo Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

ThinkPad P53 är fortfarande en traditionell mobil arbetsstation som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om de senaste trenderna rörande tunnare och tunnare chassin och infattningar. Men som ett resultat är höljet riktigt robust, det finns många portar, det är lätt att uppgradera datorn och hårdvaran är riktigt kraftfull, särskilt när det kommer till grafiken.

På utsidan är det inte mycket som ändrats jämfört med förra årets ThinkPad P52, men en del saker har skett under huven. Det största försäljningsargumentet är kraftigare grafikkort (Quadro RTX 4000 & 5000), som oftast bara förekommer i arbetsstationer på 17 tum. Här får vi ge en del kritik, för det är inte uppenbart vilken version av grafikkortet man får. Varken Nvidia eller Lenovo berättar faktum att det är den långsammare versionen på 80 watt som systemet använder. Lenovo använder också den långsammare varianten av RTX 4000. Totalt sett är grafikprestandan dock ändå imponerande.

En ljusstark 1080p-skärm, utmärkta inmatningsenheter och massor av prestanda: ThinkPad P53 är en riktigt välavrundad produkt utan några egentliga svagheter. Det enda vi kan ge den kritik för är kyllösningen som kunde varit bättre optimerad för kombinerad belastning av CPU & GPU.

Kyllösningen är heller inte perfekt. Vi uppskattade den defensiva fläktkontrollen som till och med förhindrade att fläktarna snurrande efter korta perioder av belastning. Men kyllösningen kunde inte hålla jämna steg med en kombinerad belastning av CPU & GPU, vilket resulterade i sänkt processorprestanda. Även om det är bra med tysta fläktar så vill nog den som köpt toppskiktskomponenter i den här prisklassen kunna använda dem fullt ut. Vi är övertygade om att kyllösningen hade kunnat varit mer effektiv även om det hade resulterat i en högre ljudnivå. Vid det här laget kan vi bara gissa hur andra konfigurationer av P53 presterar, men vi tänker oss att modellerna med enklare grafikkort (exempelvis RTX 3000 eller T-serien) kan använda processorn bättre.

I likhet med många aktuella ThinkPad-modeller har Lenovos P53 fått en betydande uppgradering av skärmalternativen. Även om baskonfigurationen fortfarande inkluderar en IPS-panel med en ljusstyrka på 300 cd/m² så finns det också en mer ljusstark 1080p-modell att välja. Vidare erbjuder Lenovo två högupplösta skärmar (en 4K IPS och en 4K OLED), vilket borde garantera att alla användare kan hitta något som passar.

Kritiken är en aning petig, för ThinkPad P53 har inga egentliga brister och förtjänar sitt totalt sett goda omdöme.

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE - 11/14/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Design
83 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
94%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
78 / 80 → 97%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Batteri
86 / 95 → 90%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
92%
Programprestanda
92%
Temperatur
86 / 95 → 91%
Ljudnivå
97 / 90 → 100%
Audio
65%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Medel
81%
90%
Workstation - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo ThinkPad P53 - Klassisk arbetsstation med högpresterande GPU (Sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-11-17 (Update: 2019-11-18)